International ASAS consensus statement for the use of anti-tumour necrosis factor agents in patients with ankylosing spondylitis

J Braun, T Pham, J Sieper, J Davis, Sj van der Linden, M Dougados, D van der Heijde, ASAS Working Group, J Braun, T Pham, J Sieper, J Davis, Sj van der Linden, M Dougados, D van der Heijde, ASAS Working Group

Abstract

Objective: To obtain an international consensus about the use of anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF alpha) for treating patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS).

Methods: These recommendations were developed by a review of published reports in combination with expert opinion, including a Delphi exercise, and a consensus meeting of the ASsessments in AS (ASAS) Working Group.

Results: The final consensus comprises the following requirements: (1) For the initiation of anti-TNF alpha therapy: (a) a diagnosis of definitive AS; (b) presence of active disease for at least four weeks as defined by both a sustained Bath AS Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) of at least 4 and an expert opinion based on clinical features, acute phase reactants, and imaging modalities; (c) presence of refractory disease defined by failure of at least two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during a single three month period, failure of intra-articular steroids if indicated, and failure of sulfasalazine in patients with peripheral arthritis; (d) application and implementation of the usual precautions and contraindications for biological therapy. (2) For the monitoring of anti-TNF alpha therapy: both the BASDAI and the ASAS core set for clinical practice should be followed regularly. (3) For the discontinuation of anti-TNF alpha therapy: in non-responders, consideration should be made after 6-12 weeks' treatment. Response is defined as improvement of (a) at least 50% or 2 units (on a 0-10 scale) of the BASDAI, (b) expert opinion that treatment should be continued.

Conclusion: This consensus statement on anti-TNF alpha treatment in AS may be used for guidance in clinical decision making and as the basis for the development of guidelines. Evaluation of the healthcare consequences of this consensus is subject to further research by the ASAS group.

References

    1. Lancet. 2002 Apr 6;359(9313):1187-93
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 May;61(5):429-37
    1. N Engl J Med. 2002 May 2;346(18):1349-56
    1. J Rheumatol. 2002 May;29(5):959-65
    1. Arthritis Res. 2002;4(5):307-21
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Nov;61 Suppl 2:ii2-7
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Dec;61 Suppl 3:iii9-23
    1. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2002 Sep;16(4):573-604
    1. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 Nov;41(11):1280-5
    1. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002 Nov-Dec;20(6 Suppl 28):S16-22
    1. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2002 Nov-Dec;20(6 Suppl 28):S152-7
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Jan;62(1):74-6
    1. N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 13;348(7):601-8
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Apr;48(4):1126-36
    1. J Rheumatol. 2003 Jun;30(6):1356-63
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 2003 Jun;48(6):1667-75
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Sep;62(9):812-6
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1984 Mar;27(3):241-9
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1984 Apr;27(4):361-8
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1991 Oct;34(10):1218-27
    1. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 1993 Apr;22(5):319-34
    1. J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2281-5
    1. J Rheumatol. 1994 Dec;21(12):2286-91
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1995 Apr;38(4):499-505
    1. J Rheumatol. 1997 Nov;24(11):2225-9
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 1998 Jan;41(1):58-67
    1. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 1998 Nov;24(4):737-51, viii
    1. J Rheumatol. 1999 Apr;26(4):951-4
    1. Arthritis Care Res. 1999 Aug;12(4):247-55
    1. J Rheumatol. 2000 Mar;27(3):613-22
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2000 Jun;59(6):428-33
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 2000 Jun;43(6):1346-52
    1. Lancet. 2000 Jul 29;356(9227):385-90
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Mar;60(3):199-206
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001 Apr;60(4):353-8
    1. J Rheumatol. 2001 Jul;28(7):1605-14
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Aug;44(8):1876-86
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Sep;44(9):2112-7
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 2001 Dec;44(12):2936-7
    1. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2002 Jan;41(1):114-6
    1. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002 Mar;61(3):207-12
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Mar;46(3):755-65
    1. Arthritis Rheum. 2002 Mar;46(3):840-1, author reply 841-3

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner