Validation of the VEINES-QOL quality of life instrument in venous leg ulcers: repeatability and validity study embedded in a randomised clinical trial

J Martin Bland, Jo C Dumville, Rebecca L Ashby, Rhian Gabe, Nikki Stubbs, Una Adderley, Arthur R Kang'ombe, Nicky A Cullum, J Martin Bland, Jo C Dumville, Rebecca L Ashby, Rhian Gabe, Nikki Stubbs, Una Adderley, Arthur R Kang'ombe, Nicky A Cullum

Abstract

Background: VEINES-QOL/Sym is a disease-specific quality of life instrument for use in venous diseases of the leg. Its relative scoring system precludes comparisons between studies. There were very few venous leg ulcer patients in the validation samples. We report a validation study for venous leg ulcers and develop a scoring system which enables comparison between studies.

Methods: Four hundred fifty-one participants in the VenUS IV trial of the management of venous leg ulcers were asked to complete a VEINES-QOL questionnaire at recruitment, along with SF-12, pain, and other aspects of quality of life. VEINES-QOL was repeated after two weeks and after 4 months. Healing of ulcers was confirmed by blind assessment of digital photographs. Three scoring systems for VEINES-QOL were compared.

Results: No floor or ceiling effects were observed for VEINES-QOL items, item-item correlations were weak to moderate, item-score correlations were moderate. Internal reliability was good. The VEINES-Sym subscale was confirmed by factor analysis. Test-retest reliability was satisfactory for the scale scores; individual items showed moderate to good agreement. Relationships with SF-12, pain, and the quality items confirmed construct validity. Participants whose ulcers had healed showed greater mean increase in scores than did those yet to heal, though they continued to report leg problems. An intrinsic scoring method appeared superior to the original relative method.

Conclusions: VEINES-QOL was suitable for use in the study of venous leg ulcers. The intrinsic scoring method should be adopted, to facilitate comparisons between studies.

Trial registration: VenUS IV is registered with the ISRCTN register, number ISRCTN49373072 .

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Distribution of each VEINES-QOL question at baseline
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Scree plot for a principal component analysis using the baseline data, showing a line through the points on the right
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Distribution of total score at three times using different scoring methods
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Distribution of symptom score at three times using different scoring methods
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Distribution of residual VEINES-QOL and symptom score at 4 months after regression on score at baseline using different scoring methods

References

    1. Guyatt GH, Bombardier C, Tugwell PX. Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. Can Med Assoc J. 1986;134:889–895.
    1. Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care. 1989;27:S217–S232. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00018.
    1. Valencia IC, Falabella A, Kirsner RS, Eaglstein WH. Chronic venous insufficiency and venous leg ulceration. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;44:401–21. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2001.111633.
    1. Gloviczki P, Gloviczki ML. Evidence on efficacy of treatments of venous ulcers and on prevention of ulcer recurrence. Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2009;21:259–68. doi: 10.1177/1531003510373660.
    1. Simon DA, Dix FP, McCollum CN. Management of venous leg ulcers. BMJ. 2004;328:1358–62. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7452.1358.
    1. Abbade LP, Lastoria S. Venous ulcer: epidemiology, physiopathology, diagnosis and treatment. Int J Dermatol. 2005;44:449–56. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2004.02456.x.
    1. Barwell JR, Davies CE, Deacon J, Harvey K, Minor J, Sassano A, Taylor M, Usher J, Wakely C, Earnshaw JJ, Heather BP, Mitchell DC, Whyman MR, Poskitt KR. Comparison of surgery and compression with compression alone in chronic venous ulceration (ESCHAR study): randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2004;363:1854–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16353-8.
    1. Iglesias C, Nelson EA, Cullum NA, Torgerson DJ. VenUS I: a randomised controlled trial of two types of bandage for treating venous leg ulcers. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(29):1–105. doi: 10.3310/hta8290.
    1. Nelzen O, Bergqvist D, Lindhagen A. Venous and non-venous leg ulcers: clinical history and appearance in a population study. Br J Surg. 1994;81:182–7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800810206.
    1. Margolis DJ, Bilker W, Santanna J, Baumgarten M. Venous leg ulcer: incidence and prevalence in the elderly. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46:381–6. doi: 10.1067/mjd.2002.121739.
    1. Herber OR, Schnepp W, Rieger MA. A systematic review on the impact of leg ulceration on patients’ quality of life. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:44. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-44.
    1. Lamping DL, Schroter S, Kurz X, Kahn SR, Abenhaim L. Evaluating outcomes in chronic venous disorders of the leg: Development of a scientifically rigorous, patient-reported measure of symptoms and quality of life. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:410–19. doi: 10.1067/mva.2003.152.
    1. Kahn SR, Lamping DL, Ducruet T, Arsenault L, Miron MJ, Roussin A, Desmarais S, Joyal F, Kassis J, Solymoss S, Desjardins L, Johri M, Shrier I, VETO Study investigators VEINES-QOL/Sym questionnaire was a reliable and valid disease specific quality of life measure for deep venous thrombosis. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1049–1056.
    1. Lamping DL, Schroter S. VEINES-QOL/VEINES-SYM Scoring Manual. London: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine; 2007.
    1. Ware JE, Kosinski M. SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales: a Manual for Users of Version 1. 2. Lincoln RI: QualityMetric Inc.; 2001.
    1. Ashby RL, Gabe R, Ali S, Saramago P, Chuang L-H, Adderley U, Bland JM, Cullum NA, Dumville JC, Iglesias CP, Soares MO, Stubbs NC, Torgerson DJ. VenUS IV (Venous leg Ulcer Study IV): Compression hosiery versus compression bandaging in the treatment of venous leg ulcers: a randomised controlled trial, mixed treatment comparison and decision analytic model. Health Technol Assess. 2014;18:57. doi: 10.3310/hta18570.
    1. Ashby RL, Gabe R, Ali S, Adderley U, Bland JM, Cullum NA, Dumville JC, Iglesias CP, Kang’ombe AR, Soares MO, Stubbs NC, Torgerson DJ. VenUS IV (Venous leg Ulcer Study IV): A randomised controlled trial of compression hosiery versus compression bandaging in the treatment of venous leg ulcers (ISRCTN49373072) Lancet. 2014;383:871–79. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62368-5.
    1. Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics Notes: Cronbach’s alpha. BMJ. 1997;314:572. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7098.1874.
    1. Enden L, Garratt AM, Kløw N-E, Sandset PM. Assessing burden of illness following acute deep vein thrombosis: data quality, reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of VEINES-QOL/Sym, a disease-specific questionnaire. Scand J Caring Sci. 2009;23:369–374. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2008.00618.x.
    1. Kutlum A, Yilmaz E, Çeçen D, Eser E, Özbakkaloglu A. The Turkish validity and reliability of the venous insufficiency epidemiological and economic study-quality of life/symptoms scales. Angiology. 2011;62:329–337. doi: 10.1177/0003319710394159.
    1. Tuygun AK, Ketenci B, Gunay R, Goror A, Guney MR, Bicer M, Tuygun A, Ozay B, Cimen S, Demirtas M, Yekeler I. Validity and reliability of VEINES-QOL/Sym questionnaire in chronic venous disorders. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;53:355–361.
    1. Prior JA, Jordan KP, Kadam UT. Variations in patient-reported physical health between cardiac and musculoskeletal diseases: systematic review and meta-analysis of population-based studies. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015;13:71. doi: 10.1186/s12955-015-0265-x.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner