Effects of Testing and Disclosing Ancestry-Specific Genetic Risk for Kidney Failure on Patients and Health Care Professionals: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Girish N Nadkarni, Kezhen Fei, Michelle A Ramos, Diane Hauser, Emilia Bagiella, Stephen B Ellis, Saskia Sanderson, Stuart A Scott, Tatiana Sabin, Ebony Madden, Richard Cooper, Martin Pollak, Neil Calman, Erwin P Bottinger, Carol R Horowitz, Girish N Nadkarni, Kezhen Fei, Michelle A Ramos, Diane Hauser, Emilia Bagiella, Stephen B Ellis, Saskia Sanderson, Stuart A Scott, Tatiana Sabin, Ebony Madden, Richard Cooper, Martin Pollak, Neil Calman, Erwin P Bottinger, Carol R Horowitz

Abstract

Importance: Risk variants in the apolipoprotein L1 (APOL1 [OMIM 603743]) gene on chromosome 22 are common in individuals of West African ancestry and confer increased risk of kidney failure for people with African ancestry and hypertension. Whether disclosing APOL1 genetic testing results to patients of African ancestry and their clinicians affects blood pressure, kidney disease screening, or patient behaviors is unknown.

Objective: To determine the effects of testing and disclosing APOL1 genetic results to patients of African ancestry with hypertension and their clinicians.

Design, setting, and participants: This pragmatic randomized clinical trial randomly assigned 2050 adults of African ancestry with hypertension and without existing chronic kidney disease in 2 US health care systems from November 1, 2014, through November 28, 2016; the final date of follow-up was January 16, 2018. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo immediate (intervention) or delayed (waiting list control group) APOL1 testing in a 7:1 ratio. Statistical analysis was performed from May 1, 2018, to July 31, 2020.

Interventions: Patients randomly assigned to the intervention group received APOL1 genetic testing results from trained staff; their clinicians received results through clinical decision support in electronic health records. Waiting list control patients received the results after their 12-month follow-up visit.

Main outcomes and measures: Coprimary outcomes were the change in 3-month systolic blood pressure and 12-month urine kidney disease screening comparing intervention patients with high-risk APOL1 genotypes and those with low-risk APOL1 genotypes. Secondary outcomes compared these outcomes between intervention group patients with high-risk APOL1 genotypes and controls. Exploratory analyses included psychobehavioral factors.

Results: Among 2050 randomly assigned patients (1360 women [66%]; mean [SD] age, 53 [10] years), the baseline mean (SD) systolic blood pressure was significantly higher in patients with high-risk APOL1 genotypes vs those with low-risk APOL1 genotypes and controls (137 [21] vs 134 [19] vs 133 [19] mm Hg; P = .003 for high-risk vs low-risk APOL1 genotypes; P = .001 for high-risk APOL1 genotypes vs controls). At 3 months, the mean (SD) change in systolic blood pressure was significantly greater in patients with high-risk APOL1 genotypes vs those with low-risk APOL1 genotypes (6 [18] vs 3 [18] mm Hg; P = .004) and controls (6 [18] vs 3 [19] mm Hg; P = .01). At 12 months, there was a 12% increase in urine kidney disease testing among patients with high-risk APOL1 genotypes (from 39 of 234 [17%] to 68 of 234 [29%]) vs a 6% increase among those with low-risk APOL1 genotypes (from 278 of 1561 [18%] to 377 of 1561 [24%]; P = .10) and a 7% increase among controls (from 33 of 255 [13%] to 50 of 255 [20%]; P = .01). In response to testing, patients with high-risk APOL1 genotypes reported more changes in lifestyle (a subjective measure that included better dietary and exercise habits; 129 of 218 [59%] vs 547 of 1468 [37%]; P < .001) and increased blood pressure medication use (21 of 218 [10%] vs 68 of 1468 [5%]; P = .005) vs those with low-risk APOL1 genotypes; 1631 of 1686 (97%) declared they would get tested again.

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, disclosing APOL1 genetic testing results to patients of African ancestry with hypertension and their clinicians was associated with a greater reduction in systolic blood pressure, increased kidney disease screening, and positive self-reported behavior changes in those with high-risk genotypes.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02234063.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Nadkarni reported receiving personal fees from Renalytix, being a cofounder and having equity in Renalytix, and being a member of the scientific advisory board of Renalyti and a cofounder of Pensieve Health. Mss Ramos and Hauser and Dr Horowitz reported receiving grants from the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI)/National Institutes of Health (NIH) during the conduct of the study. Dr Bagiella reported receiving grants from the NIH during the conduct of the study. Dr Scott reported being a paid consultant of Sema4. Dr Pollak reported receiving grants and personal fees from Vertex and having equity in Apolo1Bio outside the submitted work; in addition, Dr Pollak had a patent for US20200399702A1 issued. No other disclosures were reported.

Figures

Figure.. Enrollment and Randomization of Study Participants
Figure.. Enrollment and Randomization of Study Participants

References

    1. Albertus P, Morgenstern H, Robinson B, Saran R. Risk of ESRD in the United States. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68(6):862-872. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2016.05.030
    1. McClellan W, Tuttle E, Issa A. Racial differences in the incidence of hypertensive end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are not entirely explained by differences in the prevalence of hypertension. Am J Kidney Dis. 1988;12(4):285-290. doi:10.1016/S0272-6386(88)80221-X
    1. Myers OB, Pankratz VS, Norris KC, Vassalotti JA, Unruh ML, Argyropoulos C. Surveillance of CKD epidemiology in the US—a joint analysis of NHANES and KEEP. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):15900. doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34233-w
    1. Genovese G, Friedman DJ, Ross MD, et al. . Association of trypanolytic ApoL1 variants with kidney disease in African Americans. Science. 2010;329(5993):841-845. doi:10.1126/science.1193032
    1. Parsa A, Kao WHL, Xie D, et al. ; AASK Study Investigators; CRIC Study Investigators . APOL1 risk variants, race, and progression of chronic kidney disease. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(23):2183-2196. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1310345
    1. Foster MC, Coresh J, Fornage M, et al. . APOL1 variants associate with increased risk of CKD among African Americans. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;24(9):1484-1491. doi:10.1681/ASN.2013010113
    1. Zhang J, Fedick A, Wasserman S, et al. . Analytical validation of a personalized medicine APOL1 genotyping assay for nondiabetic chronic kidney disease risk assessment. J Mol Diagn. 2016;18(2):260-266. doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2015.11.003
    1. Rosset S, Tzur S, Behar DM, Wasser WG, Skorecki K. The population genetics of chronic kidney disease: insights from the MYH9-APOL1 locus. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2011;7(6):313-326. doi:10.1038/nrneph.2011.52
    1. Freedman BI, Murea M. Target organ damage in African American hypertension: role of APOL1. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2012;14(1):21-28. doi:10.1007/s11906-011-0237-4
    1. Cooper RS, Nadkarni GN, Ogedegbe G. Race, ancestry, and reporting in medical journals. JAMA. 2018;320(15):1531-1532. doi:10.1001/jama.2018.10960
    1. Nadkarni GN, Horowitz CR. Genomics in CKD: is this the path forward? Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2016;23(2):120-124. doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2016.01.017
    1. Franceschini N, Frick A, Kopp JB. Genetic testing in clinical settings. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018;72(4):569-581. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.02.351
    1. Rasmussen-Torvik LJ, Stallings SC, Gordon AS, et al. . Design and anticipated outcomes of the eMERGE-PGx project: a multicenter pilot for preemptive pharmacogenomics in electronic health record systems. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2014;96(4):482-489. doi:10.1038/clpt.2014.137
    1. Judd E, Calhoun DA. Management of hypertension in CKD: beyond the guidelines. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2015;22(2):116-122. doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2014.12.001
    1. Gu A, Yu Y, Desai Raj P, Argulian E. Racial and ethnic differences in antihypertensive medication use and blood pressure control among US adults with hypertension. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10(1):e003166. doi:10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.116.003166
    1. Nadkarni GN, Gottesman O, Linneman JG, et al. . Development and validation of an electronic phenotyping algorithm for chronic kidney disease. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2014;2014:907-916.
    1. Ku E, Lipkowitz MS, Appel LJ, et al. . Strict blood pressure control associates with decreased mortality risk by APOL1 genotype. Kidney Int. 2017;91(2):443-450. doi:10.1016/j.kint.2016.09.033
    1. Kharbanda EO, Asche SE, Sinaiko AR, et al. . Clinical decision support for recognition and management of hypertension: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2018;141(2):e20172954. doi:10.1542/peds.2017-2954
    1. Samal L, Lipsitz SR, Hicks LS. Impact of electronic health records on racial and ethnic disparities in blood pressure control at US primary care visits. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(1):75-76. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.604
    1. Gordon EJ, Amόrtegui D, Blancas I, Wicklund C, Friedewald J, Sharp RR. African American living donors’ attitudes about APOL1 genetic testing: a mixed methods study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018;72(6):819-833. doi:10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.07.017
    1. Freedman BI, Moxey-Mims M. The APOL1 Long-Term Kidney Transplantation Outcomes Network—APOLLO. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;13(6):940-942. doi:10.2215/CJN.01510218
    1. Horowitz CR, Abul-Husn NS, Ellis S, et al. . Determining the effects and challenges of incorporating genetic testing into primary care management of hypertensive patients with African ancestry. Contemp Clin Trials. 2016;47:101-108. doi:10.1016/j.cct.2015.12.020
    1. Equator Network. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Accessed December 13, 2021.
    1. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, et al. ; Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research . Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals: Part 1: blood pressure measurement in humans: a statement for professionals from the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension. 2005;45(1):142-161. doi:10.1161/01.HYP.0000150859.47929.8e
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The SHARE approach. Accessed December 3, 2018.
    1. Gottesman O, Scott SA, Ellis SB, et al. . The CLIPMERGE PGx program: clinical implementation of personalized medicine through electronic health records and genomics-pharmacogenomics. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2013;94(2):214-217. doi:10.1038/clpt.2013.72
    1. Horowitz CR, Ferryman K, Negron R, et al. . Race, genomics and chronic disease: what patients with African ancestry have to say. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2017;28(1):248-260. doi:10.1353/hpu.2017.0020
    1. Horowitz CR, Sabin T, Ramos M, et al. Successful recruitment and retention of diverse participants in a genomics clinical trial: a good invitation to a great party. Genet Med. 2019;21(10):2364-2370. doi:10.1038/s41436-019-0498-x
    1. McClellan WM, Langston RD, Presley R. Medicare patients with cardiovascular disease have a high prevalence of chronic kidney disease and a high rate of progression to end-stage renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(7):1912-1919. doi:10.1097/01.ASN.0000129982.10611.4C
    1. McClellan W, Warnock DG, McClure L, et al. . Racial differences in the prevalence of chronic kidney disease among participants in the Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) cohort study. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(6):1710-1715. doi:10.1681/ASN.2005111200
    1. Matsushita K, van der Velde M, Astor BC, et al. ; Chronic Kidney Disease Prognosis Consortium . Association of estimated glomerular filtration rate and albuminuria with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in general population cohorts: a collaborative meta-analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9731):2073-2081. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60674-5
    1. Malhotra R, Nguyen HA, Benavente O, et al. . Association between more intensive vs less intensive blood pressure lowering and risk of mortality in chronic kidney disease stages 3 to 5: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2017;177(10):1498-1505. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.4377
    1. Nadkarni GN, Galarneau G, Ellis SB, et al. . Apolipoprotein L1 variants and blood pressure traits in African Americans. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;69(12):1564-1574. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.01.040
    1. Hollands GJ, French DP, Griffin SJ, et al. . The impact of communicating genetic risks of disease on risk-reducing health behaviour: systematic review with meta-analysis. BMJ. 2016;352:i1102. doi:10.1136/bmj.i1102
    1. Bloss CS, Schork NJ, Topol EJ. Effect of direct-to-consumer genomewide profiling to assess disease risk. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(6):524-534. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1011893
    1. Larson EA, Wilke RA. Integration of genomics in primary care. Am J Med. 2015;128(11):1251.e1-1251.e5. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2015.05.011
    1. Hoskovec JM, Bennett RL, Carey ME, et al. . Projecting the supply and demand for certified genetic counselors: a workforce study. J Genet Couns. 2018;27(1):16-20. doi:10.1007/s10897-017-0158-8
    1. Kaplan B, Caddle-Steele C, Chisholm G, et al. . A culture of understanding: reflections and suggestions from a genomics research community board. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2017;11(2):161-165. doi:10.1353/cpr.2017.0020
    1. Hauser D, Obeng AO, Fei K, Ramos MA, Horowitz CR. Views of primary care providers on testing patients for genetic risks for common chronic diseases. Health Aff (Millwood). 2018;37(5):793-800. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1548
    1. Kannel WB. Elevated systolic blood pressure as a cardiovascular risk factor. Am J Cardiol. 2000;85(2):251-255. doi:10.1016/S0002-9149(99)00635-9
    1. Popejoy AB, Fullerton SM. Genomics is failing on diversity. Nature. 2016;538(7624):161-164. doi:10.1038/538161a

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner