A qualitative study of patients' views on quality of primary care consultations in Hong Kong and comparison with the UK CARE Measure

Colman S C Fung, Stewart W Mercer, Colman S C Fung, Stewart W Mercer

Abstract

Background: Patients' priorities and views on quality care are well-documented in Western countries but there is a dearth of research in this area in the East. The aim of the present study was to explore Chinese patients' views on quality of primary care consultations in Hong Kong and to compare these with the items in the CARE measure (a process measure of consultation quality widely used in the UK) in order to assess the potential utility of the CARE measure in a Chinese population.

Methods: Individual semi-structured interviews were conducted on 21 adult patients from 3 different primary care clinics (a public primary healthcare clinic, a University health centre, and a private family physician's clinic). Topics discussed included expectations, experiences, and views about quality of medical consultations. Interviews were typed verbatim, and a thematic approach was taken to identify key issues. These identified issues were then compared with the ten CARE measure items, using a CARE framework: Connecting (Care Measure items 1-3), Assessing (item 4), Responding (items 5,6), and Empowering (items 7-10).

Results: Patients judged doctors in terms of both the process of the consultation and the perceived outcomes. Themes identified that related to the interpersonal process of the consultation fitted well under the CARE framework; Connecting and communicating (18/21 patients), Assessing holistically (10/21 patients), Responding (18/21 patients) and Empowering (19/21 patients). Patients from the public clinic, who were generally of lower socio-economic status, were least likely to expect holistic care or empowerment. Two-thirds of patients also judged doctors on whether they performed an adequate physical examination, and three-quarters on the later outcomes of consultation (in terms of relief or cure and/or side-effects of prescribed drugs).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that Chinese patients in Hong Kong value engaged, empathic primary care doctors and judge the quality of consultations largely on these human skills and the attitudes and values that underpin them, as well as on the perceived outcomes of treatment. The match between themes relating to consultation process and the CARE Measure items suggests utility of this measure in this population, but further quantitative validation is required.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The CARE Measure.

References

    1. Stewart M, Brown JB, Weston WW, McWhinney IR, McWilliam CL, Freeman TR. Patient-centered medicine Transforming the clinical method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995.
    1. Wensing M, Jung HP, Mainz J, Olesen F, Grol R. A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: description of the research domain. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:1573–1588. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00222-6.
    1. Freeman J. Towards a definition of holism. Br J Gen Pract. 2005:154–155.
    1. Cheraghi-Sohi S, Hole AR, Mead N, McDonald R, Whalley D, Bower P, Roland M. What patients want from primary care consultations: a discrete choice experiment to identify patients' priorities. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6:107–115. doi: 10.1370/afm.816.
    1. Campbell SM, Roland MO, Buetow S. Defining quality of care. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1611–1625. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(00)00057-5.
    1. Haslam N. Humanizing medical practice: the role of empathy. MJA. 2007;187:381–2.
    1. Norfolk T, Birdi K, Walsh D. The role of empathy in establishing rapport in the consultation: a new model. Medical Education. 2007;41:690–697. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02789.x.
    1. Mercer SW, Reilly D, Watt GCM. The importance of empathy in the enablement of patients attending the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52:901–905.
    1. Price S, Mercer SW, McPherson H. Practitioner empathy, patient enablement, and health outcomes: a prospective study of acupuncture patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63:239–245. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.006.
    1. Bikker AP, Mercer SW, Reilly D. A pilot prospective study on the consultation and relational empathy, patient enablement, and health changes over 12 months, in patients going to the Glasgow Homoeopathic Hospital. J Alt Comp Med. 2005;11:591–600. doi: 10.1089/acm.2005.11.591.
    1. Neumann M, Wirtz M, Bollschweiler E, Mercer SW, Warm M, Wolf J, Pfaff H. Determinants and patient-reported long-term outcomes of physician empathy in oncology: a structural equation modeling approach. Patient Education & Counseling. 2007;69:63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.07.003.
    1. Cromarty I. What do patients think about during their consultations? A qualitative study. Br J Gen Pract. 1996;46:525–528.
    1. Bergeson SC, Dean JD. A systems approach to patient-centered care. JAMA. 2006;296:2848–2851. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.23.2848.
    1. Tan YSL, Goh LG, Whitley R. Patient centredness: what determines the doctor's clinical behaviour?
    1. The first Conference on People and Patient Centered Care: 14 December 2007; Hong Kong. School of Public Health, the Chinese University of Hong Kong; 2007. eNews.
    1. Lau DH. Patient improvement- a patient-centred approach to improve care. HKMJ. 2002;8:372–374.
    1. Rao KD, Peters DH, Bandeen-roche K. Towards patient-centered health services in India- a scale to measure patient perceptions of quality. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006;18:414–421. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzl049.
    1. World Health Organization . Primary Health Care Review Project. Region Specific Report. Western Pacific Region. Manila; 2002.
    1. Food and Health Bureau. Hong Kong Special Administrative Region Government Your Health Your Life Healthcare Reform Consultation Document. 2008.
    1. Mercer SW, Reynolds W. Empathy and quality of care. Br J Gen Pract. 2002;52 Suppl:S9–S12.
    1. Mercer SW, Watt GCM, Maxwell M, Heaney DH. The development and preliminary validation of the consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure: an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract. 2004;21:699–705. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh621.
    1. Mercer SW, McConnachie A, Maxwell M, Heaney D, Watt GCM. Relevance and practical use of the Consultation and Relational Empathy (CARE) Measure in general practice. Fam Pract. 2005;22:328–334. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh730.
    1. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess RG, editor. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. pp. 173–94.
    1. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis. London: SAGE; 1994.
    1. Glaser BG, Strauss AL. The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson; 1968.
    1. Garson A, Yong CM, Yock CA, McClellan MB. International differences in patient and physician perceptions of "high quality" healthcare: a model from pediatric cardiology. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97:1073–1075. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.10.051.
    1. Howie JGR, Heaney D, Maxwell M. Quality, core values and the general practice consultation: issues of definition, measurement and delivery. Family Practice. 2004;21:458–468. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmh419.
    1. Tarrant C, Windridge K, Boulton M, Baker R, Freeman G. Qualitative study of the meaning of personal care in general practice. BMJ. 2003;326:1–8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7402.1310.
    1. Mercer SW, Cawston PG, Bikker AP. Quality in general practice consultations; a qualitative study of the views of patients living in an area of high socio-economic deprivation in Scotland. BMC Family Practice. 2007;8:22. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-8-22.
    1. McKinstry B. Do patients wish to be involved in decision making in the consultation? A cross sectional survey with video vignettes. BMJ. 2000;321:867–871. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7265.867.
    1. Bastiaens H, Van Royen P, Paulik DR, Raposa V, Baker R. Older people's preferences for involvement in their own care: a qualitative study in primary health care in eleven European countries. Pat Ed Couns. 2007;68:33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2007.03.025.
    1. Mead N, Bower P, Roland M. Factors associated with enablement in general practice: cross-sectional study using routinely-collected data. Br J Gen Pract. 2008;58:346–352. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X280218.
    1. Mercer SW, Watt GMC. The inverse care law: clinical primary care encounters in deprived and affluent areas of Scotland. Ann Fam Med. 2007;5:503–510. doi: 10.1370/afm.778.
    1. Becker G, Newsom E. Socioeconomic status and dissatisfaction with health care among chronically ill African Americans. Am J Public Health. 2003;93:742–748. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.5.742.
    1. Lo AY, Hedley AJ, Pei GK, Ong S, Ho LM, Fielding R, Cheng KK, Daniel L. Doctor-Shopping in Hong Kong: Implications for Quality of Care. Int J Qual Health Care. 1994;6:371–381.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner