After the diabetes care trial ends, now what? A 1-year follow-up of the RxING study

Yazid N Al Hamarneh, Luc Sauriol, Ross T Tsuyuki, Yazid N Al Hamarneh, Luc Sauriol, Ross T Tsuyuki

Abstract

Introduction: There is strong evidence that pharmacist care improves patients' glycaemic control. However, the sustainability and durability of such interventions beyond the research period is not known. RxING was the first trial of pharmacist prescribing in diabetes and it showed an improvement in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) of 1.8% over 6 months.

Objective: 1° objective: To evaluate glycaemic control in the RxING study patients 12 months after the end of the formal study follow-up. 2° objective: To assess the patients' risk of cardiovascular events in the next 10 years.

Methods: We contacted the participating pharmacists to check if the patients who participated in the RxING study are still taking insulin, the dose of insulin they are taking, and their HbA1c. There were no mandated follow-up visits with the pharmacist after the study completion.

Results: A total of 100 patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes were enrolled in the original RxING study; 93 of them completed the study, while 83 participated in the 12-month follow-up. Seventy-five patients were still taking insulin, with the average dose increasing from 31.1 units (SD 18.4) at study completion to 37.4 units (SD 30.8) (95% CI -13.3 to 0.88, p=0.085). HbA1c was reduced from 9.1% (SD 1) at baseline to 7.3% (SD 0.9) at study completion (95% CI 1.4 to 2, p <0.001), and increased to 8.1% (SD 1.3) 12 months later (95% CI -1.1 to -0.5, p <0.001 vs study completion).

Conclusions: Twelve months after completing the intervention, approximately half of the glycaemic control gains were lost. This highlights the importance of structured follow-up with the pharmacist in this patient population.

Trial registration number: clinicaltrials.gov; Identifier: NCT01335763.

Keywords: PUBLIC HEALTH.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient's enrolment and follow-up flow chart.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) change with the intervention and 12 months postcompletion * Dotted line indicates the completion of the intervention period.

References

    1. O'Donovan D, Byrne S, Sahm L. The role of pharmacists in control and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus; a review of the literature. J Diabetol 2011;1:5–21.
    1. Wubben DP, Vivian EM. Effects of pharmacist outpatient interventions on adults with diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Pharmacotherapy 2008;28:421–36. 10.1592/phco.28.4.421
    1. Armour CL, Taylor SJ, Houriham F et al. . Implementation and evaluation of Australian pharmacists’ diabetes care services. J Am Pharm Assoc 2004;44:455–66. 10.1331/1544345041475625
    1. Fornos JA, Andres NF, Andres JC et al. . A pharmacotherapy follow-up program in patients with type-2 diabetes in community pharmacies in Spain. Pharm World Sci 2006;28:65–72. 10.1007/s11096-006-9003-0
    1. Krass I, Armour CL, Mitchell B et al. . The pharmacy diabetes care program: assessment of a community pharmacy diabetes service model in Australia. Diabet Med 2007;24:677–83. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02143.x
    1. Al Hamarneh YN, Charrois T, Lewanczuk R et al. . Pharmacist intervention for glycaemic control in the community (The RxING study). BMJ Open 2013;3:e003154 10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003154
    1. Stevens RJ, Kothari V, Adler AI et al. . The UKPDS risk engine: a model for the risk of coronary heart disease in Type II diabetes (UKPDS 56). Clin Sci 2001;101:671–9. 10.1042/CS20000335
    1. Lebovitz HE. Insulin secretagogues: old and new. Diabetes Rev 1999;7:139–53.
    1. Alberta Health. Why create an EHR 2015[] (accessed 3 May 2015)

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner