mHealth Messaging to Motivate Quitline Use and Quitting: Protocol for a Community-Based Randomized Controlled Trial in Rural Vietnam

Celine Larkin, Jessica Wijesundara, Hoa L Nguyen, Duc Anh Ha, Anh Vuong, Cuong Kieu Nguyen, Daniel Amante, Chau Quy Ngo, Phuong Thu Phan, Quyen Thi Le Pham, Binh Ngoc Nguyen, Anh Thi Phuong Nguyen, Phuong Thi Thu Nguyen, Sharina Person, Jeroan J Allison, Thomas K Houston, Rajani Sadasivam, Celine Larkin, Jessica Wijesundara, Hoa L Nguyen, Duc Anh Ha, Anh Vuong, Cuong Kieu Nguyen, Daniel Amante, Chau Quy Ngo, Phuong Thu Phan, Quyen Thi Le Pham, Binh Ngoc Nguyen, Anh Thi Phuong Nguyen, Phuong Thi Thu Nguyen, Sharina Person, Jeroan J Allison, Thomas K Houston, Rajani Sadasivam

Abstract

Background: Tobacco kills more than 8 million people each year, mostly in low- and middle-income countries. In Vietnam, 1 in every 2 male adults smokes tobacco. Vietnam has set up telephone Quitline counseling that is available to all smokers, but it is underused. We previously developed an automated and effective motivational text messaging system to support smoking cessation among US smokers.

Objective: The aim of this study is to adapt the aforementioned system for rural Vietnamese smokers to promote cessation of tobacco use, both directly and by increasing the use of telephone Quitline counseling services and nicotine replacement therapy. Moreover, we seek to enhance research and health service capacity in Vietnam.

Methods: We are testing the effectiveness of our culturally adapted motivational text messaging system by using a community-based randomized controlled trial design (N=600). Participants were randomly allocated to the intervention (regular motivational and assessment text messages) or control condition (assessment text messages only) for a period of 6 months. Trial recruitment took place in four communes in the Hung Yen province in the Red River Delta region of Vietnam. Recruitment events were advertised to the local community, facilitated by community health workers, and occurred in the commune health center. We are assessing the impact of the texting system on 6-month self-reported and biochemically verified smoking cessation, as well as smoking self-efficacy, uptake of the Quitline, and use of nicotine replacement therapy. In addition to conducting the trial, the research team also provided ongoing training and consultation with the Quitline during the study period.

Results: Site preparation, staff training, intervention adaptation, participant recruitment, and baseline data collection were completed. The study was funded in August 2017; it was reviewed and approved by the University of Massachusetts Medical School Institutional Review Board in 2017. Recruitment began in November 2018. A total of 750 participants were recruited from four communes, and 700 (93.3%) participants completed follow-up by March 2021. An analysis of the trial results is in progress; results are expected to be published in late 2022.

Conclusions: This study examines the effectiveness of mobile health interventions for smoking in rural areas in low- and middle-income countries, which can be implemented nationwide if proven effective. In addition, it also facilitates significant collaboration and capacity building among a variety of international partners, including researchers, policy makers, Quitline counselors, and community health workers.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03567993; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03567993.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/30947.

Keywords: Vietnam; global health; mHealth; randomized controlled trial; smoking cessation; tobacco cessation.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Celine Larkin, Jessica Wijesundara, Hoa L Nguyen, Duc Anh Ha, Anh Vuong, Cuong Kieu Nguyen, Daniel Amante, Chau Quy Ngo, Phuong Thu Phan, Quyen Thi Le Pham, Binh Ngoc Nguyen, Anh Thi Phuong Nguyen, Phuong Thi Thu Nguyen, Sharina Person, Jeroan J Allison, Thomas K Houston, Rajani Sadasivam. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 07.10.2021.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study scheme. *The intervention group received one-way motivational text messages (seven in the first week, two per week in weeks 2-26) to promote cessation and provide encouragement to access Quitline and free nicotine replacement therapy. They also received weekly two-way assessment text messages asking how many times they had smoked tobacco in the past 24 hours and whether they would like to receive a call from the Quitline, which is then provided. **The control group received twice-monthly two-way assessment text messages asking how many times they have smoked tobacco in the past 24 hours. SEQ-12: 12-item Smoking Self-Efficacy Questionnaire.

References

    1. OECD/WHO . Health at a Glance: Asia/Pacific 2020. Paris: OECD; 2020. Tobacco. .
    1. Patnode C, Henderson J, Coppola E, Melnikow J, Durbin S, Thomas R. Interventions for tobacco cessation in adults, including pregnant persons: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2021 Jan 19;325(3):280–298. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23541.2775286
    1. 2008 PHS Guideline Update Panel‚ Liaisons‚ Staff Treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update U.S. Public Health Service Clinical Practice Guideline executive summary. Respir Care. 2008 Sep;53(9):1217–22.
    1. Van Minh Hoang, Giang K, Ngoc N, Hai P, Huyen D, Khue L, Lam N, Nga P, Quan Nguyen The, Xuyen Nguyen Thi. Prevalence of tobacco smoking in Vietnam: findings from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey 2015. Int J Public Health. 2017 Feb;62(Suppl 1):121–129. doi: 10.1007/s00038-017-0955-8.10.1007/s00038-017-0955-8
    1. Vietnam Ministry of Health. Hanoi Medical University. General Statistics Office. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. World Health Organization . Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) Viet Nam. Hanoi: Ministry of Health; 2010. .
    1. Houston T, Sadasivam R, Allison J, Ash A, Ray M, English T, Hogan T, Ford D. Evaluating the QUIT-PRIMO clinical practice ePortal to increase smoker engagement with online cessation interventions: a national hybrid type 2 implementation study. Implement Sci. 2015 Nov 02;10:154. doi: 10.1186/s13012-015-0336-8. 10.1186/s13012-015-0336-8
    1. Coley HL, Sadasivam RS, Williams JH, Volkman JE, Schoenberger Y, Kohler CL, Sobko H, Ray MN, Allison JJ, Ford DE, Gilbert GH, Houston TK. Crowdsourced Peer- Versus Expert-Written Smoking-Cessation Messages. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2013 Nov;45(5):543–550. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2013.07.004.
    1. Borland R, Segan C. The potential of quitlines to increase smoking cessation. Drug and Alcohol Review. 2006 Jan 1;25(1):73–78. doi: 10.1080/09595230500459537.
    1. Momin B, Neri A, McCausland K, Duke J, Hansen H, Kahende J, Zhang L, Stewart S. Traditional and innovative promotional strategies of tobacco cessation services: a review of the literature. J Community Health. 2014 Aug;39(4):800–9. doi: 10.1007/s10900-014-9825-y.
    1. Clinical Practice Guideline Treating Tobacco Use Dependence 2008 Update Panel‚ Liaisons‚ Staff A clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence: 2008 update. A U.S. Public Health Service report. Am J Prev Med. 2008 Aug;35(2):158–76. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.04.009. S0749-3797(08)00332-2
    1. Cohen S, Lichtenstein E. Partner behaviors that support quitting smoking. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1990;58(3):304–309. doi: 10.1037/0022-006x.58.3.304.
    1. Cox LS, Tiffany ST, Christen AG. Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings. Nicotine Tob Res. 2001 Feb;3(1):7–16. doi: 10.1080/14622200020032051.
    1. Tiffany ST, Drobes DJ. The development and initial validation of a questionnaire on smoking urges. Addiction. 1991 Nov;86(11):1467–1476. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01732.x.
    1. Etter J, Bergman M, Humair J, Perneger T. Development and validation of a scale measuring self? Efficacy of current and former smokers. Addiction Jun. 2000;95(6):901–13. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.9569017.x.
    1. Jatlow P, Toll BA, Leary V, Krishnan-Sarin S, O’Malley SS. Comparison of expired carbon monoxide and plasma cotinine as markers of cigarette abstinence. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 2008 Dec;98(3):203–209. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.05.013.
    1. Austin P, Manca A, Zwarenstein M, Juurlink D, Stanbrook M. A substantial and confusing variation exists in handling of baseline covariates in randomized controlled trials: a review of trials published in leading medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Feb;63(2):142–53. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.002.S0895-4356(09)00174-7
    1. Senn S. Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials. Statist. Med. 1994 Sep 15;13(17):1715–1726. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780131703.
    1. Cupertino AP, Cartujano-Barrera F, Ramírez M, Rodríguez-Bolaños R, Thrasher JF, Pérez-Rubio G, Falfán-Valencia R, Ellerbeck EF, Reynales-Shigematsu LM. A Mobile Smoking Cessation Intervention for Mexico (Vive sin Tabaco... ¡Decídete!): Single-Arm Pilot Study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Apr 25;7(4):e12482. doi: 10.2196/12482.
    1. Chen J, Ho E, Jiang Y, Whittaker R, Yang T, Bullen C. Mobile social network–based smoking cessation intervention for Chinese male smokers: pilot randomized controlled trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Oct 23;8(10):e17522. doi: 10.2196/17522.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner