Effectiveness of self-applied acupressure for cervical pain of benign origin (EDIDO-CUH): a randomized controlled clinical trial

Calvo Trujillo Susana, Toribio Martín Luisa Maria, Domenech Senra Pilar, Mingo Moreno Teresa María, Marín Solano Pilar, Martín González Valentín, group EDIDO-CUH, Alicia Martín López, Aurora García Lerín, Olga García Vallejo, María Teresa Mingo Moreno, Juan Carlos Muñoz García, Carmen Villar Velasco, Rocío López Recio, Pilar Marín Solano, Olga Nieto García, Julia Dorado Quesada, Inés Manzanas Ruiz, Elena López Nogales, Arancha Cubero Muñoz, Jesús Bravo Rodriguez, Rocío Mateo Ciria, Sct Mª Trinidad García Alegre, Mª Angeles Blanco, Irina López Larrayoz, Pedro Pablo Sánchez de la Calle, Calvo Trujillo Susana, Toribio Martín Luisa Maria, Domenech Senra Pilar, Mingo Moreno Teresa María, Marín Solano Pilar, Martín González Valentín, group EDIDO-CUH, Alicia Martín López, Aurora García Lerín, Olga García Vallejo, María Teresa Mingo Moreno, Juan Carlos Muñoz García, Carmen Villar Velasco, Rocío López Recio, Pilar Marín Solano, Olga Nieto García, Julia Dorado Quesada, Inés Manzanas Ruiz, Elena López Nogales, Arancha Cubero Muñoz, Jesús Bravo Rodriguez, Rocío Mateo Ciria, Sct Mª Trinidad García Alegre, Mª Angeles Blanco, Irina López Larrayoz, Pedro Pablo Sánchez de la Calle

Abstract

Background: Cervical pain is a problem with a high prevalence of ~13% of the population, and is more common in women (16.5%). The most affected age group is 65-74 years. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness of self-applied acupressure for decreasing benign-origin cervical pain, under the supervision of a health professional and in combination with usual treatment, as well as to examine its impact on the patient's self-perceived health condition and their opinion of the technique.

Methods: Pragmatic, multicenter, controlled clinical trial randomized by healthcare center. A total of 160 patients with benign-origin cervical pain between 18 and 65 years of age who attended primary care were included from 12 healthcare centers in the autonomous community of Madrid by consecutive sampling, and randomly assigned to a control or intervention group. The main outcome variable was pain intensity measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and secondary variables were self-perceived quality of life (EuroQol-5D utility index) and functional ability (neck disability index). An explanative model of generalized estimating equations was built taking into account the lack of independence among observations. The analysis was performed over 6 months.

Results: In total, 150 patients completed the study. Mean age was 45 years (SD: 10.7), 86.7% were women, 86.2% were currently employed, and 57.9% did not perform any physical exercise. Average days experiencing pain was 32.9 (SD: 2.8) and 80% were undergoing previous pharmacological treatment. The quality of life utility index after 3 months was 1.6 points (95% CI: 0.54-2.71) higher in the intervention group. The pain score on the VAS was 0.16 points (95% CI: 0.80-0.48) lower in the intervention group. The health professional explained 10.4% of the reduction in pain observed on the VAS throughout the medical visits.

Conclusion: Acupressure applied in addition to usual practice appeared to improve cervical pain in the long term. The effectiveness of this technique was partially explained by the health professional that trained the participants on technique application.

Trial registration number:: NCT01855893.

Keywords: acupressure; musculoskeletal disorders; orthopaedics & trauma; pain management.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flowchart of patients and losses to follow-up between baseline visit (V1) and subsequent visits at 3 days (V2), 7 days (V3), 30 days (V4), and 90 days (V5).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Evolution of pain in both groups measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS) at baseline visit (V1) and follow-up visits at 3 days (V2), 7 days (V3), 30 days (V4), and 90 days (V5).

References

    1. Webb R, Brammah T, Lunt M, et al.. Prevalence and predictors of intense, chronic, and disabling neck and back pain in the UK general population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2003; 28(11): 1195–1202.
    1. Calvo J, Collantes E.Protocolo diagnóstico de la cervicalgia inflamatoria. Medicine 2013; 11(31): 1949–1953.
    1. Encuesta Nacional de salud 1011-12. Principales resultados. Disponible,
    1. WHO traditional medicine strategy: 2014-2023.
    1. Haines T, Gross A, Burnie SJ, et al.. Patient education for neck pain with or without radiculopathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; 8: CD005106.
    1. Revel M, Minguet M, Gregory P, et al.. Changes in cervicocephalic kinesthesia after a proprioceptive rehabilitation program in patients with neck pain: a randomised controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 895–899.
    1. Trinh KV, Graham N, Gross AR, et al.. Acupuncture for neck disorders. In: The Cochrane Library: Issue 2, 2007. Chichester: John Wiley& Sons. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; 11: CD004870.
    1. Vas J, Perea-Milla E, Mendez C, et al.. Efficacy and safety of acupuncture for chronic uncomplicated neck pain: a randomised controlled study. Pain 2006; 126: 245–255.
    1. Witt CM, Jena S, Brinkhaus B, et al.. Acupuncture for patients with chronic neck pain. Pain 2006; 125: 98–106.
    1. Vernon H, Humphreys K, Hagino C.Chronic mechanical neck pain in adults treated by manual therapy: a systematic review of change scores in randomized clinical trials. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007; 30(3): 215–227.
    1. Hoving JL, de Vet HC, Koes BW, et al.. Manual therapy, physical therapy, or continued care by the general practitioner for patients with neck pain: long-term results from a pragmatic randomized clinical trial. Clin J Pain 2006; 22: 370–377.
    1. Marti-nez-Segura R, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Ruiz-Saez M, et al.. Immediate effects on neck pain and active range of motion after a single cervical high-velocity low-amplitude manipulation in subjects presenting with mechanical neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2006; 29(7): 511–517.
    1. Kroeling P, Gross A, Goldsmith CH.Electrotherapy for neck disorders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 4: CD004251.
    1. Ministerio de Sanidad Politica Social e Igualdad. Informe sobre Terapias Naturales, 2011,
    1. Carragee EJ, Hurwitz EL, van der Velde G, et al.. Treatment of neck pain: noninvasive interventions results of the bone and joint decade 2000–2010 task force on neck pain and its associated disorders. Spine 2008; 33(4S): S123–S152.
    1. Kurland HD.Treatment of headache pain with auto -acupressure. Dis Nerv Syst 1976; 37(3): 127–129.
    1. Nguyen HP, Le DL, Tran QM, et al.. A therapy advice system based on chrono-massage and acupressión using the method of ZiWuLiuZhu. Medinfo 1995; 8(2): 998.
    1. Calvo S, et al.. Patients and professionals with musculoskeletal pain. Is acupressure a technique to improve? Oral Communication presented to the XXIII Congress of the Madrid Society for Family and Community Medicine (SoMaMfyc), April, 2014, 5: 7–8. Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid.
    1. Mingxiao Y, Yue Feng HP, Shufang De, Minyu W, et al.. Effectiveness of Chinese massage therapy (Tui Na) for chronic low back pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2014; 15: 418.
    1. Perera R, Heneghan C, Yudkin P.Graphical method for depicting randomized trials of complex interventions. BMJ 2007; 334: 127–129.
    1. Herdman M, Badia X, Berra S.El EuroQol-5D: una alternativa sencilla para la medición de la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en atención primaria. Rev Aten Primaria 2001; 28: 425–430.
    1. Fairbank JC, Cooper J, Davies JBJP, et al.. The Owestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotheraphy 1980; 66: 271–273.
    1. León Vázquez F, González AB, Álvarez ACG, et al.. Incapacidad Temporal. Manual Para El Manejo En Atención Primaria Gráficas Loureiro. Somamfyc Y AMAT 2008; 5: 75.
    1. Hamer RM, Simpson PM.Last observation carried forward versus mixed models in the analysis of psychiatric clinical trials. Am J Psychiatry 2009; 166(6): 639–641.
    1. Stenberg G, Lundquist A, Fjellman-Wiklund AC, et al.. Patterns of reported problems in women and men with back and neck pain: similarities and differences. J Rehabil Med 2014; 46(7): 668–675.
    1. Jeitler M, Brunnhuber S, Meier L, et al.. Effectiveness of Jyoti meditation for patients with chronic neck pain and psychological distress—a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Pain 2015; 16(1): 77–86.
    1. Kasumovic M, Gorcevic E, Gorcevic S, et al.. Cervical syndrome: the effectiveness of physical therapy interventions. Med Arth 2013; 67: 414–417.
    1. Rezai M, Cote P, Cassidy JD, et al.. The association between prevalent neck pain and health-related quality of life: a cross-sectional analysis. Eur Spine J 2009; 18(3): 371–381.
    1. Chou R, Deyo R, Friedly J, et al.. Noninvasive treatments for low back pain. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2016,
    1. Southerst D, Nordin MC, Cote P, et al.. Is exercise effective for the management of neck pain and associated disorders or whiplash-associated disorders? A systematic review by the Ontario Protocol for Traffic Injury Management (OPTIMa) Collaboration. Spine J 2016; 16: 1503–1523.
    1. Antúnez Sánchez LG, De la casa Almeida M, Roldan JR, et al.. Eficacia ante el dolor y la discapacidad cervical de un programa de fisioterapia individual frente a uno colectivo en la cervicalgia mecánica aguda y subaguda. Aten Primaria 2016; 49: 417–425.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner