Halo size under distance and near conditions in refractive multifocal intraocular lenses
S Pieh, B Lackner, G Hanselmayer, R Zöhrer, M Sticker, H Weghaupt, A Fercher, C Skorpik, S Pieh, B Lackner, G Hanselmayer, R Zöhrer, M Sticker, H Weghaupt, A Fercher, C Skorpik
Abstract
Aims: To calculate the diameter of halos perceived by patients with multifocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) and to stimulate halos in patients with refractive multifocal IOLs in a clinical experiment.
Methods: Calculations were done to show the diameter of halos in the case of the bifocal intraocular lens. 24 patients with a refractive multifocal IOLs and five patients with a monofocal IOL were asked about their subjective observation of halos and were included in a clinical experiment using a computer program (Glare & Halo, FW Fitzke and C Lohmann, Tomey AG) which simulates a light source of 0.15 square degrees (sq deg) in order to stimulate and measure halos. Halo testing took place monoculary, under mesopic conditions through the distance and the near focus of the multifocal lens and through the focus of the monofocal lens.
Results: The halo diameter depends on the pupil diameter, the refractive power of the cornea, and distance focus of the multifocal IOL as well as the additional lens power for the near focus. 23 out of 24 patients with a refractive multifocal IOL described halos at night when looking at a bright light source. Only one patient was disturbed by the appearance of halos. Under test conditions, halos were detected in all patients with a refractive multifocal IOL. The halo area testing through the distance focus was 1.05 sq deg +/- 0.41, through the near focus 1.07 sq deg +/- 0.49 and in the monofocal lens 0.26 sq deg +/- 0.13.
Conclusions: Under high contrast conditions halos can be stimulated in all patients with multifocal intraocular lenses. The halo size using the distance or the near focus is identical.
Figures
References
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 Jul;16(4):413-22
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 1999 Mar;25(3):399-404
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 Nov;16(6):697-702
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 1990 Nov;16(6):703-6
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 1991 Sep;17(5):577-82
- Ophthalmology. 1992 Nov;99(11):1658-63; discussion 1663-4
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 Jan;19(1):22-5
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 Jan;19(1):26-31
- Ophthalmology. 1993 Jan;100(1):91-7
- Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1993 Jan;202(1):49-51
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 Mar;19(2):254-7
- Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1993 Apr;202(4):309-14
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 Jul;19(4):505-12
- Ophthalmologe. 1993 Aug;90(4):343-7
- Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1993 Sep;203(3):189-94
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 1993 Nov;19(6):685-9
- Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1994 Jan;204(1):14-9
- Br J Ophthalmol. 1994 Apr;78(4):249-51
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 1994 Mar;20(2):124-8
- Ophthalmologe. 1994 Aug;91(4):465-8
- Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1994 Nov;205(5):289-97
- Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1995 Nov;207(5):283-6
- Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1996 Feb;208(2):87-92
- Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1996 Aug-Sep;209(2-3):125-31
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996 Nov;22(9):1222-5
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 1996;22 Suppl 2:1313-7
- Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 1997 Jan;210(1):38-42
- Ophthalmology. 1997 Sep;104(9):1380-6
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 May;24(5):659-62
- J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998 May;24(5):663-5
- Arch Ophthalmol. 1999 Jan;117(1):17-23
- Ophthalmology. 1990 Jul;97(7):922-6
Source: PubMed