Bioequivalence of a Newly Developed Dabigatran Etexilate Tablet Versus the Commercial Capsule and Impact of Rabeprazole-Induced Elevated Gastric pH on Exposure in Healthy Subjects

Akiko Harada, Ippei Ikushima, Miwa Haranaka, Aki Yanagihara, Daisuke Nakayama, Akiko Harada, Ippei Ikushima, Miwa Haranaka, Aki Yanagihara, Daisuke Nakayama

Abstract

Background and objective: Dabigatran etexilate (DE) is an anticoagulant with proven efficacy and tolerability for stroke prevention in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. For the commercial capsule, a complex formulation is used to maintain the acidic microenvironment required for maximal absorption. Consequently, its efficacy and safety are similar with or without concomitant intake of proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs). A simplified DE tablet formulation was developed and tested in two studies. One investigated bioequivalence (BE) of the novel DE tablet versus the commercial DE capsule. The other investigated DE bioavailability (BA) under pretreatment with the PPI rabeprazole and assessed the effect of elevated pH on exposure to dabigatran.

Methods: BE of the novel DE tablet versus the DE capsule was assessed in a randomized two-treatment, four-period, two-sequence crossover study (NCT03070171). The effect of rabeprazole on the BA of the DE tablet was assessed in an open-label, single-arm study (NCT03143166). Both studies were conducted at sites in Japan. Participants were healthy male volunteers, aged ≥ 20-40 years. In the BE study, participants received the DE tablet or capsule (single oral dose, 110 mg); primary endpoints were area under the concentration-time curve from baseline to the last quantifiable data point (AUC0-tz) and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of unconjugated dabigatran. In the relative BA study, participants received the DE tablet (single oral dose, 110 mg) with or without rabeprazole pretreatment (once daily for 5 days, 20 mg); primary endpoints were AUC0-tz and Cmax of total dabigatran.

Results: In total, 160 participants were randomized in the BE study; 36 participants were enrolled in the BA study. The 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean (gMean) ratios for AUC0-tz (101.4-116.0%) and Cmax (101.8-116.6%) of unconjugated dabigatran were within pre-defined acceptance criteria for BE. In the relative BA study, the gMeans of AUC0-tz (667 to 192 ng h/mL) and Cmax (83.1 to 21.8 ng/mL) were decreased by approximately 70% when the tablet was administered under rabeprazole pretreatment. The reduction in BA was observed at a mean gastric pH of 5.3. Treatment was well tolerated; no deaths, serious adverse events (AEs) or significant AEs were reported in either study.

Conclusion: The DE tablet demonstrated BE to the capsule; however, at high gastric pH, BA of the tablet was reduced by approximately 70%, which may lead to reduced efficacy. Data indicate the importance of examining not only BE under standard conditions, but relative BA at elevated gastric pH. Such investigations may avoid the reduced BA at elevated pH that is quite common in the target population (the elderly and/or patients treated with gastric-acid modifying co-medications), and therefore reduce treatment failure with DE. Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier numbers: NCT03070171, and NCT03143166.

Conflict of interest statement

Akiko Harada: employee of Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd. Ippei Ikushima: no conflicts of interest to disclose. Miwa Haranaka: no conflicts of interest to disclose. Aki Yanagihara: employee of Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd. Daisuke Nakayama: employee of Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
BE of the DE tablet versus capsule: randomization sequence and study design. There was a washout period of at least 4 days between treatment administrations. BE bioequivalence, DE dabigatran etexilate, R reference treatment: dabigatran etexilate commercial capsule formulation, T test treatment: dabigatran etexilate tablet formulation, N number of subjects
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
BA of the DE tablet alone and under rabeprazole pretreatment: study design. BA bioavailability, DE dabigatran etexilate, EOT end of trial, N number of subjects. 1DE tablet was given 4 h after rabeprazole administration
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean (± SD) plasma concentration–time profiles of unconjugated dabigatran after a single 110-mg dose of DE tablet or capsule formulations. DE dabigatran etexilate, N number of subjects, SD standard deviation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean (± SD) plasma concentration–time profiles of total dabigatran after a single 110-mg dose of DE alone or under 20-mg rabeprazole pretreatment. DE dabigatran etexilate, N number of subjects, SD standard deviation

References

    1. Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S, Eikelboom J, Oldgren J, Parekh A, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2009;361:1139–1151. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0905561.
    1. Hori M, Connolly SJ, Zhu J, Liu LS, Lau CP, Pais P, et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin: effects on ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes and bleeding in Asians and non-Asians with atrial fibrillation. Stroke. 2013;44:1891–1896. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.000990.
    1. Hori M, Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Reilly PA, Yusuf S, Wallentin L, et al. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran vs. warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation—sub-analysis in Japanese population in RE-LY trial. Circ J. 2011;75:800–805. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-11-0191.
    1. Inoue H, Uchiyama S, Atarashi H, Okumura K, Koretsune Y, Yasaka M, et al. Effectiveness and safety of long-term dabigatran among patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: J-dabigatran surveillance. J Cardiol. 2019;74:156–163. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2018.12.013.
    1. JCS Joint Working Group Guidelines for pharmacotherapy of atrial fibrillation (JCS 2013) Circ J. 2014;78:1997–2021. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-66-0092.
    1. Wann LS, Curtis AB, Ellenbogen KA, Estes NA, 3rd, Ezekowitz MD, Jackman WM, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update on the management of patients with atrial fibrillation (update on dabigatran): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2011;123:1144–1150. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31820f14c0.
    1. Evaluation and Licensing Division, Pharmaceutical and Food Safety Bureau. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Report on the deliberation results for Pradaxa 75 and 100 mg capsules. . Accessed 17 Oct 2019.
    1. Morris H. Administering drugs to patients with swallowing difficulties. Nurs Times. 2005;101:28–30.
    1. Notenboom K, Beers E, van Riet-Nales DA, Egberts TC, Leufkens HG, Jansen PA, et al. Practical problems with medication use that older people experience: a qualitative study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014;62:2339–2344. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13126.
    1. Inoue H, Fujiki A, Origasa H, Ogawa S, Okumura K, Kubota I, et al. Prevalence of atrial fibrillation in the general population of Japan: an analysis based on periodic health examination. Int J Cardiol. 2009;137:102–107. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2008.06.029.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Pradaxa® Assessment Report. . Accessed 17 Oct 2019.
    1. Weitz JI, Earl KM, Leblanc K, Semchuk W, Jamali F. Establishing therapeutic equivalence of complex pharmaceuticals: the case of dabigatran. Can J Cardiol. 2018;34:1116–1119. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.05.023.
    1. Eikelboom JW, Wallentin L, Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz M, Healey JS, Oldgren J, et al. Risk of bleeding with 2 doses of dabigatran compared with warfarin in older and younger patients with atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the randomized evaluation of long-term anticoagulant therapy (RE-LY) trial. Circulation. 2011;123:2363–2372. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.004747.
    1. National Institute of Health Sciences. Guideline for bioequivalence studies of generic products. Available at: . Accessed 17 Oct 2019.
    1. Blech S, Ebner T, Ludwig-Schwellinger E, Stangier J, Roth W. The metabolism and disposition of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor, dabigatran, in humans. Drug Metab Dispos. 2008;36:386–399. doi: 10.1124/dmd.107.019083.
    1. Musib L, Choo E, Deng Y, Eppler S, Rooney I, Chan IT, et al. Absolute bioavailability and effect of formulation change, food, or elevated pH with rabeprazole on cobimetinib absorption in healthy subjects. Mol Pharm. 2013;10:4046–4054. doi: 10.1021/mp400383x.
    1. Malhi V, Colburn D, Williams SJ, Hop CE, Dresser MJ, Chandra P, et al. A clinical drug-drug interaction study to evaluate the effect of a proton-pump inhibitor, a combined P-glycoprotein/cytochrome 450 enzyme (CYP)3A4 inhibitor, and a CYP2C9 inhibitor on the pharmacokinetics of vismodegib. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2016;78:41–49. doi: 10.1007/s00280-016-3020-z.
    1. Ware JA, Dalziel G, Jin JY, Pellett JD, Smelick GS, West DA, et al. Impact of food and the proton pump inhibitor rabeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of GDC-0941 in healthy volunteers: bench to bedside investigation of pH-dependent solubility. Mol Pharm. 2013;10:4074–4081. doi: 10.1021/mp4005595.
    1. National Institute of Health Sciences. Guideline for bioequivalence studies of generic products Q & A. . Accessed 17 Oct 2019.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the investigation of bioequivalence. . Accessed 17 Oct 2019.
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Bioavailability and Bioequivalence Studies Submitted in NDAs or INDs — General Considerations. 2014. . Accessed 17 Oct 2019.
    1. European Medicines Agency. Dabigatran etexilate hard capsule 75 mg, 110 mg and 150 mg product-specific bioequivalence guidance. . Accessed 17 Oct 2019.
    1. Stangier J, Stahle H, Rathgen K, Fuhr R. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the direct oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran in healthy elderly subjects. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2008;47:47–59. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200847010-00005.
    1. Liesenfeld KH, Lehr T, Dansirikul C, Reilly PA, Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of the oral thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation from the RE-LY trial. J Thromb Haemost. 2011;9:2168–2175. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2011.04498.x.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner