Implementation of depression screening in antenatal clinics through tablet computers: results of a feasibility study

José S Marcano-Belisario, Ajay K Gupta, John O'Donoghue, Paul Ramchandani, Cecily Morrison, Josip Car, José S Marcano-Belisario, Ajay K Gupta, John O'Donoghue, Paul Ramchandani, Cecily Morrison, Josip Car

Abstract

Background: Mobile devices may facilitate depression screening in the waiting area of antenatal clinics. This can present implementation challenges, of which we focused on survey layout and technology deployment.

Methods: We assessed the feasibility of using tablet computers to administer a socio-demographic survey, the Whooley questions and the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) to 530 pregnant women attending National Health Service (NHS) antenatal clinics across England. We randomised participants to one of two layout versions of these surveys: (i) a scrolling layout where each survey was presented on a single screen; or (ii) a paging layout where only one question appeared on the screen at any given time.

Results: Overall, 85.10% of eligible pregnant women agreed to take part. Of these, 90.95% completed the study procedures. Approximately 23% of participants answered Yes to at least one Whooley question, and approximately 13% of them scored 10 points of more on the EPDS. We observed no association between survey layout and the responses given to the Whooley questions, the median EPDS scores, the number of participants at increased risk of self-harm, and the number of participants asking for technical assistance. However, we observed a difference in the number of participants at each EPDS scoring interval (p = 0.008), which provide an indication of a woman's risk of depression. A scrolling layout resulted in faster completion times (median = 4 min 46 s) than a paging layout (median = 5 min 33 s) (p = 0.024). However, the clinical significance of this difference (47.5 s) is yet to be determined.

Conclusions: Tablet computers can be used for depression screening in the waiting area of antenatal clinics. This requires the careful consideration of clinical workflows, and technology-related issues such as connectivity and security. An association between survey layout and EPDS scoring intervals needs to be explored further to determine if it corresponds to a survey layout effect. Future research needs to evaluate the effect of this type of antenatal depression screening on clinical outcomes and clinic workflows.

Trial registration: This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov under the identifier NCT02516982 on 20 July 2015.

Keywords: Antenatal depression; Apple ® iPad®; Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS); Mental health; Mobile health (mHealth); Patient self-report; Population screening; Survey layout; Tablet computers; Whooley questions.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Scrolling layout - Screenshot
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Paging layout - Screenshot

References

    1. BinDhim NF, Shaman AM, Trevena L, Basyouni MH, Pont LG, Alhawassi TM. Depression screening via a smartphone app: cross-country user characteristics and feasibility. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2015; doi: 10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002840.
    1. BinDhim NF, Alanazi EM, Aljadhey H, Basyouni MH, Kowalski SR, Pont LG, Shaman AM, Trevena L, Alhawassi TM. Does a Mobile Phone Depression-Screening App Motivate Mobile Phone Users With High Depressive Symptoms to Seek a Health Care Professional’s Help? J Med Internet Res 2016; doi: 10.2196/jmir.5726.
    1. Birney AJ, Gunn R, Russell JK, Ary DV. MoodHacker Mobile Web App With Email for Adults to Self-Manage Mild-to-Moderate Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2016; doi:10.2196/mhealth.4231.
    1. Faurholt-Jepsen M, Frost M, Vinberg M, Christensen EM, Bardram JE, Kessing LV. Smartphone data as objective measures of bipolar disorder symptoms. Psychiatry Res 2014; doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2014.03.009.
    1. Tabb KM, Choi S, Pineros-Leano M, Meline B, McDonald HG, Kester R, Huang H. Perinatal depression screening in a Women, Infants, and Children (WIC) program: perception of feasibility and acceptability among a multidisciplinary staff. Gene Hosp Psychiatry 2015; doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2015.03.008.
    1. Marcano-Belisario JS, Jamsek J, Huckvale K, O’Donoghue J, Morrison CP, Car J. Comparison of self-administered survey questionnaire responses collected using mobile apps versus other methods. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015; doi:10.1002/14651858.MR000042.pub2.
    1. Gavin NI, Gaynes BN, Lohr KN, Maltzer-Brody S, Gartlehner G, Swinson T. Perinatal depression: a systematic review of prevalence and incidence. Obstet Gynecol. 2005;106(5 Pt 1):1071–83. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000183597.31630.db.
    1. Bennett HA, Einarson A, Taddio A, Koren G, Einarson TR. Prevalence of depression during pregnancy: systematic review. Obstet Gynecol. 2004;103(4):698–709. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000116689.75396.5f.
    1. Stewart DE. Clinical practice: Depression during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 2011; doi:10.1056/NEJMcp1102730.
    1. Heron J, O’Connor TG, Evans J, et al. The course of anxiety and depression through pregnancy and the postpartum in a community sample. J Affect Disord 2004; doi:10.1016/j.jad.2003.08.004
    1. Kinsella MT, Monk C. Impact of Maternal Stress, Depression & Anxiety on Fetal Neurobehavioral Development. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2009;doi:10.1097/GRF.0b013e3181b52df1.
    1. Pearson RM, Evans J, Kounali D, et al. Maternal Depression During Pregnancy and the Postnatal Period: Risks and Possible Mechanisms for Offspring Depression at Age 18 Years. JAMA Psychiatry 2013; doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.2163.
    1. Braithwaite EC, Murphy SE, Ramchandani PG. Effects of prenatal depressive symptoms on maternal and infant cortisol reactivity. Arch Womens Ment Health 2016;doi:10.1007/s00737-016-0611-y.
    1. Bauer A, Parsonage M, Knapp M, Iemmi V, Adelaja B. The costs of perinatal mental health problems. London: Centre for Mental Health and London School of Economics; 2014.
    1. Woolhouse H, Gartland D, Mensah F, Brown SJ. Maternal depression from early pregnancy to 4 years postpartum in a prospective pregnancy cohort study: implications for primary health care. BJOG 2015; doi:10.1111/1471-0528.12837.
    1. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. Antenatal and postnatal mental health: clinical management and service guidance—updated edition. NICE guideline (CG192). Leicester London: British Psychological Society and The Royal College of Psychiatrists; 2014.
    1. Sherwin HN, McKeown M, Evans MF, Battacharyya OK. The waiting room “wait”: from annoyance to opportunity. Can Fam Physician. 2013;59(5):479–81.
    1. Mavletova A, Couper M. Mobile web survey design: scrolling versus paging, SMS versus e-mail invitations. J Surv Stat Methodol. 2014;2:498–518. doi: 10.1093/jssam/smu015.
    1. Wells T, Bailey JT, Link MW. Comparison of smartphone and online computer survey administration. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2014;32:238–55. doi: 10.1177/0894439313505829.
    1. Keusch F. The Influence of Answer Box Format on Response Behaviour on List-Style Open-Ended Questions. J Surv Stat Methodol 2014; doi:10.1093/jssam/smu007.
    1. Pineros-Leano M, Tabb KM, Sears H, Meline B, Huang H. Clinic staff attitudes towards the use of mHealth technology to conduct perinatal depression screenings: a qualitative study. Fam Pract 2015; doi:10.1093/fampra/cmu083.
    1. Marcano-Belisario JS, Gupta AK, O’Donoghue J, Morrison C, Car J. Tablet computers for implementing NICE antenatal mental health guidelines: protocol of a feasibility study. BMJ Open 2016; doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009930.
    1. Snap® Surveys Limited. Powerful and flexible software. [Online] Available at: . Accessed 12 Sept 2016.
    1. Snap® Surveys Limited. Snap Mobile. [Online] Available at: . Accessed 12 Sept 2016.
    1. Snap® Surveys Limited. Snap WebHost – Online and Mobile Survey Management. [Online] Available at: . Accessed 12 Sept 2016.
    1. Whooley MA, Avins AL, Miranda J, Browner WS. Case-finding instruments for depression – two questions are as good as many. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:439–45. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00076.x.
    1. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression – development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. 1987;150:782–6. doi: 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782.
    1. Allbaugh LJ, Marcus SM, Ford EC, Flynn HA. Development of a screening and recruitment registry to facilitate perinatal depression research in obstetrics settings in the USA. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2015; doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2014.09.015.
    1. Stata. Stata Statistical Software [Program]. Version 13, 2013
    1. Core Team R. A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2016.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner