First-in-Human Experience and Acute Procedural Outcomes Using a Novel Pulsed Field Ablation System: The PULSED AF Pilot Trial

Atul Verma, Lucas Boersma, David E Haines, Andrea Natale, Francis E Marchlinski, Prashanthan Sanders, Hugh Calkins, Douglas L Packer, John Hummel, Birce Onal, Sofi Rosen, Karl-Heinz Kuck, Gerhard Hindricks, Bradley Wilsmore, Atul Verma, Lucas Boersma, David E Haines, Andrea Natale, Francis E Marchlinski, Prashanthan Sanders, Hugh Calkins, Douglas L Packer, John Hummel, Birce Onal, Sofi Rosen, Karl-Heinz Kuck, Gerhard Hindricks, Bradley Wilsmore

Abstract

Background: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel form of ablation using electrical fields to ablate cardiac tissue. There are only limited data assessing the feasibility and safety of this type of ablation in humans.

Methods: PULSED AF (Pulsed Field Ablation to Irreversibly Electroporate Tissue and Treat AF; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; unique identifier: NCT04198701) is a nonrandomized, prospective, multicenter, global, premarket clinical study. The first-in-human pilot phase evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation using a novel PFA system delivering bipolar, biphasic electrical fields through a circular multielectrode array catheter (PulseSelect; Medtronic, Inc). Thirty-eight patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation were treated in 6 centers in Australia, Canada, the United States, and the Netherlands. The primary outcomes were ability to achieve acute pulmonary vein isolation intraprocedurally and safety at 30 days.

Results: Acute electrical isolation was achieved in 100% of pulmonary veins (n=152) in the 38 patients. Skin-to-skin procedure time was 160±91 minutes, left atrial dwell time was 82±35 minutes, and fluoroscopy time was 28±9 minutes. No serious adverse events related to the PFA system occurred in the 30-day follow-up including phrenic nerve injury, esophageal injury, stroke, or death.

Conclusions: In this first-in-human clinical study, 100% pulmonary vein isolation was achieved using only PFA with no PFA system-related serious adverse events. Graphic Abstract: A graphic abstract is available for this article.

Keywords: atrial fibrillation; catheter ablation; electroporation; follow-up studies.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Pulsed field ablation delivered to a 9-gold circular electrode array (electrode length, 3 mm; 20° forward tilted array with diameter of 25 mm; 9F shaft) in a biphasic, bipolar configuration generates an electric field confined to the area immediately surrounding the array.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Isolation of pulmonary veins with pulsed field ablation. Pulmonary vein potentials recorded from bipolar electrograms from the nine-gold electrode array are shown immediately before and after PFA delivery in the left inferior (A), left superior (B), right inferior (C), and the right superior (D) pulmonary veins demonstrating efficient electrical PV isolation.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Evidence of pulmonary vein block recorded from bipolar electrograms from the 9-gold electrode array. In (A), we see exit block demonstrated by pacing within the left superior pulmonary vein with no conduction to the rest of the atrium (green coronary sinus signals). In (B), after one pulsed field application, we see delay in the pulmonary vein potential compared with preablation (white arrow). In (C), we see further delay in the pulmonary vein potential after one more application of pulsed field ablation (white arrow) and then pulmonary vein block (asterix).
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Postablation voltage maps of patients treated with pulsed field ablation. A demonstrates how the catheter electrode array position was tracked on a subset of cases using an electroanatomical mapping system. The catheter positionings were overlaid on the preablation voltage map (A, left) and on the postablation voltage map (A, right). At least 4 catheter positions were required around each pulmonary vein (PV) to achieve full ostial and antral PV isolation, as demonstrated in another patient (B).

References

    1. Krijthe BP, Kunst A, Benjamin EJ, Lip GY, Franco OH, Hofman A, Witteman JC, Stricker BH, Heeringa J. Projections on the number of individuals with atrial fibrillation in the European Union, from 2000 to 2060. Eur Heart J. 2013;34:2746–2751. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht280
    1. Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ, Gillum RF, Kim YH, McAnulty JH, Jr, Zheng ZJ, et al. . Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a Global Burden of Disease 2010 Study. Circulation. 2014;129:837–847. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119
    1. Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim YH, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, Akar JG, Badhwar V, Brugada J, Camm J, et al. . 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14:e275–e444. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.05.012
    1. Muthalaly RG, John RM, Schaeffer B, Tanigawa S, Nakamura T, Kapur S, Zei PC, Epstein LM, Tedrow UB, Michaud GF, et al. . Temporal trends in safety and complication rates of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;29:854–860. doi: 10.1111/jce.13484
    1. Kotnik T, Rems L, Tarek M, Miklavčič D. Membrane electroporation and electropermeabilization: mechanisms and models. Annu Rev Biophys. 2019;48:63–91. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biophys-052118-115451
    1. Jiang C, Davalos RV, Bischof JC. A review of basic to clinical studies of irreversible electroporation therapy. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2015;62:4–20. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2014.2367543
    1. Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, Castella M, Diener HC, Heidbuchel H, Hendriks J, et al. ; ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur Heart J. 2016;37:2893–2962. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw210
    1. January CT, Wann LS, Calkins H, Chen LY, Cigarroa JE, Cleveland JC, Jr., Ellinor PT, Ezekowitz MD, Field ME, Furie KL, et al. . 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS focused update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS guideline for the management of patients with atrial fibrillation: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on clinical practice guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16:e66–e93
    1. Sugrue A, Vaidya V, Witt C, DeSimone CV, Yasin O, Maor E, Killu AM, Kapa S, McLeod CJ, Miklavčič D, et al. . Irreversible electroporation for catheter-based cardiac ablation: a systematic review of the preclinical experience. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2019;55:251–265. doi: 10.1007/s10840-019-00574-3
    1. Stewart MT, Haines DE, Miklavčič D, Kos B, Kirchhof N, Barka N, Mattison L, Martien M, Onal B, Howard B, et al. . Safety and chronic lesion characterization of pulsed field ablation in a Porcine model. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021;32:958–969. doi: 10.1111/jce.14980
    1. Stewart MT, Haines DE, Verma A, Kirchhof N, Barka N, Grassl E, Howard B. Intracardiac pulsed field ablation: proof of feasibility in a chronic porcine model. Heart Rhythm. 2019;16:754–764. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.10.030
    1. Neven K, van Es R, van Driel V, van Wessel H, Fidder H, Vink A, Doevendans P, Wittkampf F. Acute and long-term effects of full-power electroporation ablation directly on the porcine esophagus. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017;10:e004672. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.116.004672
    1. Koruth JS, Kuroki K, Kawamura I, Brose R, Viswanathan R, Buck ED, Donskoy E, Neuzil P, Dukkipati SR, Reddy VY. Pulsed field ablation versus radiofrequency ablation: esophageal injury in a novel porcine model. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13:e008303. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.008303
    1. Koruth JS, Kuroki K, Kawamura I, Stoffregen WC, Dukkipati SR, Neuzil P, Reddy VY. Focal pulsed field ablation for pulmonary vein isolation and linear atrial lesions: a preclinical assessment of safety and durability. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13:e008716. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008716
    1. Yavin H, Brem E, Zilberman I, Shapira-Daniels A, Datta K, Govari A, Altmann A, Anic A, Wazni O, Anter E. Circular multielectrode pulsed field ablation catheter lasso pulsed field ablation: lesion characteristics, durability, and effect on neighboring structures. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021;14:e009229. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009229
    1. van Driel VJ, Neven K, van Wessel H, Vink A, Doevendans PA, Wittkampf FH. Low vulnerability of the right phrenic nerve to electroporation ablation. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12:1838–1844. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.05.012
    1. Howard B, Haines DE, Verma A, Packer D, Kirchhof N, Barka N, Onal B, Fraasch S, Miklavčič D, Stewart MT. Reduction in pulmonary vein stenosis and collateral damage with pulsed field ablation compared with radiofrequency ablation in a canine model. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2020;13:e008337. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008337
    1. van Driel VJ, Neven KG, van Wessel H, du Pré BC, Vink A, Doevendans PA, Wittkampf FH. Pulmonary vein stenosis after catheter ablation: electroporation versus radiofrequency. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7:734–738. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.113.001111

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner