Conversion from chronic to episodic migraine in patients treated with galcanezumab in real life in Italy: the 12-month observational, longitudinal, cohort multicenter GARLIT experience

Claudia Altamura, Nicoletta Brunelli, Marilena Marcosano, Cinzia Aurilia, Gabriella Egeo, Carlo Lovati, Valentina Favoni, Armando Perrotta, Ilaria Maestrini, Francesca Schiano Di Cola, Florindo d'Onofrio, Cinzia Finocchi, Davide Bertuzzo, Francesco Bono, Angelo Ranieri, Maria Albanese, Roberta Messina, Alberto Doretti, Vittorio Di Piero, Sabina Cevoli, Piero Barbanti, Fabrizio Vernieri, GARLIT Study Group, Carmelina Maria Costa, Luisa Fofi, Renata Rao, Luigi d'Onofrio, Daniele Spitalieri, Marco Aguggia, Fabio Bombardieri, Bruno Colombo, Massimo Filippi, Stefano Messina, Gianluca Demirtzidis, Claudia Altamura, Nicoletta Brunelli, Marilena Marcosano, Cinzia Aurilia, Gabriella Egeo, Carlo Lovati, Valentina Favoni, Armando Perrotta, Ilaria Maestrini, Francesca Schiano Di Cola, Florindo d'Onofrio, Cinzia Finocchi, Davide Bertuzzo, Francesco Bono, Angelo Ranieri, Maria Albanese, Roberta Messina, Alberto Doretti, Vittorio Di Piero, Sabina Cevoli, Piero Barbanti, Fabrizio Vernieri, GARLIT Study Group, Carmelina Maria Costa, Luisa Fofi, Renata Rao, Luigi d'Onofrio, Daniele Spitalieri, Marco Aguggia, Fabio Bombardieri, Bruno Colombo, Massimo Filippi, Stefano Messina, Gianluca Demirtzidis

Abstract

Objective: To investigate in real-life the conversion from chronic migraine (CM) to episodic migraine (EM), specifically to EM with High-Frequency (HFEM: 8-14 monthly migraine days, MMDs), Medium-Frequency (MFEM, 4-7 MMDs), and Low-Frequency EM (LFEM, 0-3 MMDs), and its persistence during 1 year of treatment with galcanezumab.

Methods: Consecutive CM patients treated with galcanezumab completing 1 year of observation were enrolled. We collected data on MMDs, pain intensity (Numeric Rating Scale, NRS score), and monthly acute medication intake (MAMI) from baseline (V1) to the 12-month visit (V12).

Results: Of the 155 enrolled patients, 116 (around 75%) reverted to EM at every visit and 81 (52.3%) for the entire 1-year treatment. Patients with older onset age (p = 0.010) and fewer baseline MMDs (p = 0.005) reverted more frequently to EM. At V12, 83 participants (53.5%) presented MFEM or LFEM. Patients reverted to MFEM or LFEM for 7 months (25th 1, 75th 11). The medication overuse discontinuation rate at V12 was 82.8% and occurred for 11 months (25th 8, 75th 12). From baseline to V12, the MAMI decreased by 17 symptomatic drugs (p < 0.000001) while the NRS score reduced by almost 2 points (p < 0.000001). A consistent transition to EM for the entire treatment year was observed in 81 (52.3%) patients.

Discussion: The 1-year GARLIT experience suggests that more than half of CM patients treated with galcanezumab persistently reverted to EM in real life.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04803513.

Keywords: Calcitonin gene-related peptide; Chronic migraine; Conversion; Migraine treatment; Monoclonal antibodies; Real world.

Conflict of interest statement

Maria Albanese received honoraria or travel grants from Novartis, Teva, Merck Serono; Claudia Altamura received travel grants and honoraria from Novartis, Eli Lilly, Lusofarmaco, Laborest, Allergan, Almirall; Cinzia Aurilia received travel grants and honoraria from FB-Health, Lusofarmaco, Almirall, Eli-Lilly Novartis and Teva; Piero Barbanti received travel grants, honoraria for advisory boards, speaker panels or clinical investigation studies from Alder, Allergan, Angelini, Bayer, ElectroCore, Eli-Lilly, GSK, Lusofarmaco, MSD, Novartis, Stx-Med, Teva, Visufarma, Zambon; Francesco Bono received honoraria as a speaker or for participating in advisory boards from Teva, Novartis, Ipsen; Sabina Cevoli received travel grants, honoraria for advisory boards, speaker panels or clinical investigation studies from Novartis, Teva, Lilly, Allergan, Ibsa, Amgen and Lundbeck; Vittorio Di Piero received grants and honoraria by Bayer, Biogen, Lilly, TEVA and Novartis; Florindo d’Onofrio received grants and honoraria from Lilly, Teva, Novartis, Neopharmed; Alberto Doretti received grants and honoraria from Novartis, Eli Lilly; Gabriella Egeo received travel grants and honoraria from Eli-Lilly, Novartis, New Penta and Ecupharma; Valentina Favoni received honoraria as speaker or for participating in advisory boards from Ely-Lilly, Novartis and Teva; Cinzia Finocchi received grants and honoraria from Novartis, Eli Lilly, AIM group; Carlo Lovati received grants from Novartis and Lilly. Florindo d’Onofrio received grants and honoraria from Lilly, Teva, Novartis, Neopharmed; Ilaria Maestrini received honoraria from Eli Lilly. Roberta Messina received honoraria as speaker from Novartis, Eli Lilly, and Teva. Armando Perrotta travel grants, honoraria for advisory boards, speaker panels, or clinical investigation studies from Allergan, Eli-Lilly, Novartis, and Teva; Angelo Ranieri received speaker honoraria from Teva, Lilly; Fabrizio Vernieri received travel grants, honoraria for advisory boards, speaker panels, or clinical investigation studies from Allergan, Amgen, Angelini, Eli-Lilly, Lundbeck, Novartis, and Teva; Nicoletta Brunelli, Marilena Marcosano and Francesca Schiano Di Cola, Davide Bertuzzo have nothing to disclose.

© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study population and design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Percentage of patients reverting to EM (A) and to HFEM, MFEM, and LFEM (B) from V1 to V12
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Percentage of patients with medication overuse (MO) from V1 to V12
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean changes in the MAMI (panel A) and NRS score (panel B) from baseline to V12. SE standard error
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Ratio between the mean MAMI and MMDs from baseline to V12. A ratio of 1 corresponds to the intake of one acute medication for each migraine day

References

    1. Stovner LJ, Nichols E, Steiner TJ, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of migraine and tension-type headache, 1990–2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2018;17:954–976. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(18)30322-3.
    1. Steiner TJ, Stovner LJ, Jensen R, Uluduz D, Katsarava Z, Lifting the Burden: the Global Campaign against Headache Migraine remains second among the world's causes of disability, and first among young women: findings from GBD2019. J Headache Pain. 2020;21(1):137. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01208-0.
    1. Ashina M, Katsarava Z, Do TP, et al. Migraine: epidemiology and systems of care. Lancet. 2021;397:1485–1495. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32160-7.
    1. Buse DC, Fanning KM, Reed ML, et al. Life with migraine: effects on relationships, career, and finances from the chronic migraine epidemiology and outcomes (CaMEO) study. Headache. 2019;59:1286–1299. doi: 10.1111/head.13613.
    1. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS) The international classification of headache disordersition, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia. 2018;38:1–211. doi: 10.1177/0333102417738202.
    1. Altamura C, Corbelli I, de Tommaso M, et al. Pathophysiological bases of comorbidity in migraine. Front Hum Neurosci. 2021;15:640574. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.640574.
    1. Ferrari MD, Goadsby PJ, Burstein R, et al. Migraine. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2022;8:2. doi: 10.1038/s41572-021-00328-4.
    1. Schwedt TJ, Hentz JG, Sahai-Srivastava S, et al. Headache characteristics and burden from chronic migraine with medication overuse headache: cross-sectional observations from the Medication Overuse Treatment Strategy trial. Headache J Head Face Pain. 2021;61:351–362. doi: 10.1111/head.14056.
    1. Edvinsson L, Haanes KA, Warfvinge K, DiN K. CGRP as the target of new migraine therapies: successful translation from bench to clinic. Nat Rev Neurol. 2018;14:338–350. doi: 10.1038/s41582-018-0003-1.
    1. Evers S, Áfra J, Frese A, et al. EFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine: revised report of an EFNS task force. Eur J Neurol. 2009;16:968–981. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02748.x.
    1. Hepp Z, Dodick DW, Varon SF, et al. Persistence and switching patterns of oral migraine prophylactic medications among patients with chronic migraine: a retrospective claims analysis. Cephalalgia. 2017;37:470–485. doi: 10.1177/0333102416678382.
    1. Soni P, Chawla E. Efficacy and safety of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies for treatment of chronic migraine: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2021;209:106893. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.106893.
    1. Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Cevoli S, et al. Long-term (48 weeks) effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of erenumab in the prevention of high-frequency episodic and chronic migraine in a real world: Results of the EARLY 2 study. Headache J Head Face Pain. 2021;61:1351–1363. doi: 10.1111/head.14194.
    1. Caronna E, Gallardo VJ, Alpuente A, et al. Anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in chronic migraine with medication overuse: real-life effectiveness and predictors of response at 6 months. J Headache Pain. 2021;22:120. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01328-1.
    1. Belvís R, Irimia P, Pozo-Rosich P, et al. MAB-MIG: registry of the spanish neurological society of erenumab for migraine prevention. J Headache Pain. 2021;22:74. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01267-x.
    1. Pensato U, Baraldi C, Favoni V, et al. Real-life assessment of erenumab in refractory chronic migraine with medication overuse headache. Neurol Sci. 2022;43:1273–1280. doi: 10.1007/s10072-021-05426-5.
    1. Ornello R, Casalena A, Frattale I, et al. Conversion from chronic to episodic migraine in patients treated with erenumab: real-life data from an Italian region. J Headache Pain. 2020;21:102. doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01171-w.
    1. Lipton RB, Cohen JM, Bibeau K, et al. Reversion from chronic migraine to episodic migraine in patients treated with fremanezumab: post hoc analysis from HALO CM study. Headache. 2020;60:2444–2453. doi: 10.1111/head.13997.
    1. Serrano D, Lipton RB, Scher AI, et al. Fluctuations in episodic and chronic migraine status over the course of 1 year: implications for diagnosis, treatment and clinical trial design. J Headache Pain. 2017;18:101. doi: 10.1186/s10194-017-0787-1.
    1. May A, Schulte LH. Chronic migraine: Risk factors, mechanisms and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12:455–464. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.93.
    1. Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, Wang S, et al. Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology. 2018;91:E2211–E2221. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000006640.
    1. Sacco S, Bendtsen L, Ashina M, et al. European headache federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies acting on the calcitonin gene related peptide or its receptor for migraine prevention. J Headache Pain. 2019;20:6. doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0955-y.
    1. Vernieri F, Altamura C, Brunelli N, et al. Galcanezumab for the prevention of high frequency episodic and chronic migraine in real life in Italy: a multicenter prospective cohort study (the GARLIT study) J Headache Pain. 2021;22:35. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01247-1.
    1. Andreou AP, Edvinsson L. Mechanisms of migraine as a chronic evolutive condition. J Headache Pain. 2019;20:117. doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-1066-0.
    1. Vernieri F, Altamura C, Brunelli N, et al. Rapid response to galcanezumab and predictive factors in chronic migraine patients: a 3-month observational, longitudinal, cohort, multicenter, Italian real-life study. Eur J Neurol. 2022;29:1198–1208. doi: 10.1111/ene.15197.
    1. Lipton RB, Tepper SJ, Silberstein SD, et al. Reversion from chronic migraine to episodic migraine following treatment with erenumab: results of a post-hoc analysis of a randomized, 12-week, double-blind study and a 52-week, open-label extension. Cephalalgia. 2021;41:6–16. doi: 10.1177/0333102420973994.
    1. Zecca C, Cargnin S, Schankin C, et al. Clinic and genetic predictors in response to erenumab. Eur J Neurol. 2022;29:1209–1217. doi: 10.1111/ene.15236.
    1. Gerring ZF, McRae AF, Montgomery GW, Nyholt DR. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling in whole blood reveals epigenetic signatures associated with migraine. BMC Genom. 2018;19:69. doi: 10.1186/s12864-018-4450-2.
    1. Charles JA, Peterlin BL, Rapoport AM, et al. Favorable outcome of early treatment of new onset child and adolescent migraine-implications for disease modification. J Headache Pain. 2009;10:227–233. doi: 10.1007/s10194-009-0133-3.
    1. Ishii R, Schwedt TJ, Dumkrieger G, et al. Chronic versus episodic migraine: the 15-day threshold does not adequately reflect substantial differences in disability across the full spectrum of headache frequency. Headache J Head Face Pain. 2021;61:992–1003. doi: 10.1111/HEAD.14154.
    1. Ziegeler C, Mehnert J, Asmussen K, May A. Central effects of erenumab in migraine patients: an event-related functional imaging study. Neurology. 2020;95:e2794–e2802. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000010740.
    1. Thiele A, Klehr L, Strauß S, et al. Preventive treatment with CGRP monoclonal antibodies restores brain stem habituation deficits and excitability to painful stimuli in migraine: results from a prospective case-control study. J Headache Pain. 2021;22:149. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01364-x.
    1. Yin JH, Lin YK, Yang CP, et al. Prevalence and association of lifestyle and medical-, psychiatric-, and pain-related comorbidities in patients with migraine: A cross-sectional study. Headache. 2021;61:715–726. doi: 10.1111/head.14106.
    1. Vernieri F, Brunelli N, Messina R, et al. Discontinuing monoclonal antibodies targeting CGRP pathway after one-year treatment: an observational longitudinal cohort study. J Headache Pain. 2021;22:154. doi: 10.1186/s10194-021-01363-y.
    1. Ashina M, Goadsby PJ, Reuter U, et al. Long-term safety and tolerability of erenumab: Three-plus year results from a five-year open-label extension study in episodic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2019;39:1455–1464. doi: 10.1177/0333102419854082.
    1. Mahon R, Lang A, Vo P, et al. Cost-effectiveness of erenumab for the preventive treatment of migraine in patients with prior treatment failures in Sweden. Pharmacoeconomics. 2021;39:357–372. doi: 10.1007/S40273-020-00996-2.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner