Efficacy and Safety of Ensovibep for Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19 : A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Ensovibep (MP0420) is a designed ankyrin repeat protein, a novel class of engineered proteins, under investigation as a treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Objective: To investigate if ensovibep, in addition to remdesivir and other standard care, improves clinical outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19 compared with standard care alone.

Design: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, clinical trial. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04501978).

Setting: Multinational, multicenter trial.

Participants: Adults hospitalized with COVID-19.

Intervention: Intravenous ensovibep, 600 mg, or placebo.

Measurements: Ensovibep was assessed for early futility on the basis of pulmonary ordinal scores at day 5. The primary outcome was time to sustained recovery through day 90, defined as 14 consecutive days at home or place of usual residence after hospital discharge. A composite safety outcome that included death, serious adverse events, end-organ disease, and serious infections was assessed through day 90.

Results: An independent data and safety monitoring board recommended that enrollment be halted for early futility after 485 patients were randomly assigned and received an infusion of ensovibep (n = 247) or placebo (n = 238). The odds ratio (OR) for a more favorable pulmonary outcome in the ensovibep (vs. placebo) group at day 5 was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.67 to 1.30; P = 0.68; OR > 1 would favor ensovibep). The 90-day cumulative incidence of sustained recovery was 82% for ensovibep and 80% for placebo (subhazard ratio [sHR], 1.06 [CI, 0.88 to 1.28]; sHR > 1 would favor ensovibep). The primary composite safety outcome at day 90 occurred in 78 ensovibep participants (32%) and 70 placebo participants (29%) (HR, 1.07 [CI, 0.77 to 1.47]; HR < 1 would favor ensovibep).

Limitation: The trial was prematurely stopped because of futility, limiting power for the primary outcome.

Conclusion: Compared with placebo, ensovibep did not improve clinical outcomes for hospitalized participants with COVID-19 receiving standard care, including remdesivir; no safety concerns were identified.

Primary funding source: National Institutes of Health.

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M22-1503.

Figures

Visual Abstract.. Ensovibep for Adults Hospitalized With COVID-19.

Novel therapies for SARS-CoV-2 infection have been a focus of research and enquiry, and many promising compounds tested in phase 1 and 2 trials have emerged. In this multinational clinical trial, one such compound—a designed ankyrin repeat protein, ensovibep—was compared with standard of care to determine whether it improved outcomes among patients hospitalized with COVID-19. After randomly assigning 485 patients, the trial was stopped for early futility because the odds of a more favorable pulmonary outcome were no different in those randomized to treatment versus control. This study highlights that effective antiviral therapies for patients hospitalized with COVID-19 remain an unmet need. Even though this trial was negative, important lessons regarding how to conduct such trials and test promising compounds can be gleaned from this study.

Figure 1.. Study flow diagram.

mITT = modified intention-to-treat.

Figure 2.. Distribution of patients on the pulmonary ordinal scale on day 5, 14, and 28.

ECMO = extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; OR = odds ratio.

Figure 3.. Time to sustained recovery and death through day 90 for ensovibep vs. placebo.

The rate ratios were calculated with Fine–Gray models to account for the competing risk for death and stratified according to study pharmacy. Left. Sustained recovery. Right. Death.