Determinants of left ventricular ejection fraction and a novel method to improve its assessment of myocardial contractility

Manuel Ignacio Monge García, Zhongping Jian, Jos J Settels, Charles Hunley, Maurizio Cecconi, Feras Hatib, Michael R Pinsky, Manuel Ignacio Monge García, Zhongping Jian, Jos J Settels, Charles Hunley, Maurizio Cecconi, Feras Hatib, Michael R Pinsky

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of different cardiovascular factors on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and test a novel LVEF calculation considering these factors.

Results: 10 pigs were studied. The experimental protocol consisted of sequentially changing afterload, preload and contractility. LV pressure-volume (PV) loops and peripheral arterial pressure were obtained before and after each intervention. LVEF was calculated as stroke volume (SV)/end-diastolic volume (EDV). We studied global cardiac function variables: LV end-systolic elastance (Ees), effective arterial elastance (Ea), end-diastolic volume and heart rate. Diastolic function was evaluated by means of the ventricular relaxation time (τ) and ventricular stiffness constant (β) obtained from the end-diastolic PV relationship. Ventriculo-arterial coupling (VAC), an index of cardiovascular performance, was calculated as Ea/Ees. LV mechanical efficiency (LVeff) was calculated as the ratio of stroke work to LV pressure-volume area. A linear mixed model was used to determine the impact of cardiac factors (Ees, Ea, EDV and heart rate), VAC and LVeff on LVEF during all experimental conditions. LVEF was mainly related to Ees and Ea. There was a strong relationship between LVEF and both VAC and LVeff (r2 = 0.69 and r2 = 0.94, respectively). The relationship between LVEF and Ees was good (r2 = 0.43). Adjusting LVEF to afterload ([Formula: see text]) performed better for estimating Ees (r2 = 0.75) and improved the tracking of LV contractility changes, even when a peripheral Ea was used as surrogate (Ea = radial MAP/SV; r2 = 0.73).

Conclusions: LVEF was mainly affected by contractility and afterload changes and was strongly related to VAC and LVeff. An adjustment to LVEF that considers the impact of afterload provided a better assessment of LV contractility.

Keywords: Afterload; Arterial elastance; Contractility; Diastolic function; Ejection fraction; Preload; Systolic function; Ventricular efficiency; Ventriculo-arterial coupling.

Conflict of interest statement

MIMG is a consultant to Edwards Lifesciences and received honoraria and/or travel expenses from Deltex Medical. M.R. Pinsky is a consultant to Edwards LifeSciences, LiDCO Ltd., and Cheetah. MC has received honoraria and/or travel expenses from Edwards Lifesciences, LiDCO, Cheetah, Bmeye, Masimo and Deltex Medical. CH is a consultant to Edwards Lifesciences. ZJ, JJS and FH are Edwards Lifesciences employees.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Relationship between ventriculo-arterial coupling, left ventricular mechanical efficiency and left ventricular ejection fraction. Left: linear regression analysis between ventriculo-arterial coupling (VAC), calculated as the ratio between effective arterial elastance (Ea) and left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Right: linear regression analysis between left ventricular mechanical efficiency, calculated as the ratio between stroke work (SW) and the left ventricular pressure–volume area (PVA), and left ventricular ejection fraction. Colors inside circles represent different experimental interventions: red, afterload; green: preload; blue: contractility
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Relationship between left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees) and standard left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) calculation, Ea-adjusted LVEF and peripheral Ea-adjusted LVEF. Linear regression analysis for left ventricular end-systolic elastance (Ees) and standard LVEF, LVEF corrected to effective arterial elastance (Ea = left ventricular end-systolic pressure/left ventricular stroke volume) and peripheral Ea-adjusted LVEF (Eaperiph = radial mean arterial pressure/stroke volume). Colors inside circles represent different interventions: red, afterload; green: preload; blue: contractility
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Concordance analysis for percentage changes in different approaches for estimating left ventricular contractility and end-systolic elastance (Ees) during different experimental stages. Four-quadrant plots showing the relationship between percentage changes in left ventricular (LV) end-systolic elastance (Ees) and different approaches studied: standard LVEF calculation, LVEF adjusted to effective arterial elastance (Ea = left ventricular end-systolic pressure/stroke volume) and peripheral Ea-adjusted LVEF (Eaperiph = radial mean arterial pressure/stroke volume). Excellent trending capability was assumed when ≥ 90% of the data lie in the right-upper and the left-lower quadrants. Open circles with bars represent the mean percentage change on each stage. Dashed green lines represent the line of equality

References

    1. Weir RA, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ. Epidemiology of heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction: prevalence, clinical characteristics, and prognostic importance. Am J Cardiol. 2006;97(10A):13F–25F. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.03.005.
    1. Curtis JP, Sokol SI, Wang Y, Rathore SS, Ko DT, Jadbabaie F, et al. The association of left ventricular ejection fraction, mortality, and cause of death in stable outpatients with heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42(4):736–742. doi: 10.1016/S0735-1097(03)00789-7.
    1. Cikes M, Solomon SD. Beyond ejection fraction: an integrative approach for assessment of cardiac structure and function in heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(21):1642–1650. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv510.
    1. Kim EK, Cho J, Kim JY, Chang SA, Park SJ, Choi JO, et al. Early decline in left ventricular ejection fraction can predict trastuzumab-related cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer: a study using 13 years of registry data. Cancer Res Treat. 2019;51(2):727–736. doi: 10.4143/crt.2018.262.
    1. Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, Bordachar P, Boriani G, Breithardt OA, et al. 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) Eur Heart J. 2013;34(29):2281–2329. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht150.
    1. Robotham JL, Takata M, Berman M, Harasawa Y. Ejection fraction revisited. Anesthesiology. 1991;74(1):172–183. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199101000-00026.
    1. Konstam MA, Abboud FM. Ejection fraction: misunderstood and overrated (changing the paradigm in categorizing heart failure) Circulation. 2017;135(8):717–719. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025795.
    1. Boissier F, Razazi K, Seemann A, Bedet A, Thille AW, de Prost N, et al. Left ventricular systolic dysfunction during septic shock: the role of loading conditions. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(5):633–642. doi: 10.1007/s00134-017-4698-z.
    1. Repesse X, Charron C, Vieillard-Baron A. Evaluation of left ventricular systolic function revisited in septic shock. Crit Care. 2013;17(4):164. doi: 10.1186/cc12755.
    1. Vieillard-Baron A, Caille V, Charron C, Belliard G, Page B, Jardin F. Actual incidence of global left ventricular hypokinesia in adult septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(6):1701–1706. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318174db05.
    1. Monge Garcia MI, Jian Z, Settels JJ, Hunley C, Cecconi M, Hatib F, et al. Performance comparison of ventricular and arterial dP/dtmax for assessing left ventricular systolic function during different experimental loading and contractile conditions. Crit Care. 2018;22(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2260-1.
    1. Monge Garcia MI, Jian Z, Settels JJ, Hatib F, Cecconi M, Pinsky MR. Reliability of effective arterial elastance using peripheral arterial pressure as surrogate for left ventricular end-systolic pressure. J Clin Monit Comput. 2018 doi: 10.1007/s10877-018-0236-y.
    1. Kass DA, Yamazaki T, Burkhoff D, Maughan WL, Sagawa K. Determination of left ventricular end-systolic pressure-volume relationships by the conductance (volume) catheter technique. Circulation. 1986;73(3):586–595. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.73.3.586.
    1. Baan J, van der Velde ET, de Bruin HG, Smeenk GJ, Koops J, van Dijk AD, et al. Continuous measurement of left ventricular volume in animals and humans by conductance catheter. Circulation. 1984;70(5):812–823. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.70.5.812.
    1. Suga H, Sagawa K, Shoukas AA. Load independence of the instantaneous pressure-volume ratio of the canine left ventricle and effects of epinephrine and heart rate on the ratio. Circ Res. 1973;32(3):314–322. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.32.3.314.
    1. Sunagawa K, Sagawa K, Maughan WL. Ventricular interaction with the loading system. Ann Biomed Eng. 1984;12(2):163–189. doi: 10.1007/BF02584229.
    1. Sunagawa K, Maughan WL, Burkhoff D, Sagawa K. Left ventricular interaction with arterial load studied in isolated canine ventricle. Am J Physiol. 1983;245(5 Pt 1):H773–H780.
    1. Burkhoff D, Sagawa K. Ventricular efficiency predicted by an analytical model. Am J Physiol. 1986;250(6 Pt 2):R1021–R1027.
    1. Mirsky I. Assessment of diastolic function: suggested methods and future considerations. Circulation. 1984;69(4):836–841. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.69.4.836.
    1. Burkhoff D, Mirsky I, Suga H. Assessment of systolic and diastolic ventricular properties via pressure-volume analysis: a guide for clinical, translational, and basic researchers. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2005;289(2):H501–H512. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00138.2005.
    1. Fitzmaurice GM, Laird NM, Ware JH. Modeling the covariance. Applied longitudinal analyss. 2. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley; 2011. pp. 165–188.
    1. Brown H, Prescott R. Repeated measures data. Applied mixed models in medicine. 2. Chichester: Wiley; 2006. pp. 215–270.
    1. Krayenbuhl HP, Bussmann WD, Turina M, Luthy E. Is the ejection fraction an index of myocardial contractility? Cardiologia. 1968;53(1):1–10. doi: 10.1159/000166167.
    1. Kass DA, Maughan WL, Guo ZM, Kono A, Sunagawa K, Sagawa K. Comparative influence of load versus inotropic states on indexes of ventricular contractility: experimental and theoretical analysis based on pressure-volume relationships. Circulation. 1987;76(6):1422–1436. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.76.6.1422.
    1. Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, Beale R, Bakker J, Hofer C, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(12):1795–1815. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z.
    1. Parker MM, Shelhamer JH, Bacharach SL, Green MV, Natanson C, Frederick TM, et al. Profound but reversible myocardial depression in patients with septic shock. Ann Intern Med. 1984;100(4):483–490. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-100-4-483.
    1. Guarracino F, Ferro B, Morelli A, Bertini P, Baldassarri R, Pinsky MR. Ventriculoarterial decoupling in human septic shock. Crit Care. 2014;18(2):R80. doi: 10.1186/cc13842.
    1. Barraud D, Faivre V, Damy T, Welschbillig S, Gayat E, Heymes C, et al. Levosimendan restores both systolic and diastolic cardiac performance in lipopolysaccharide-treated rabbits: comparison with dobutamine and milrinone. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(5):1376–1382. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000261889.18102.84.
    1. Vieillard-Baron A. Septic cardiomyopathy. Ann Intensive Care. 2011;1(1):6. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-1-6.
    1. Huang SJ, Nalos M, McLean AS. Is early ventricular dysfunction or dilatation associated with lower mortality rate in adult severe sepsis and septic shock? A meta-analysis. Crit Care. 2013;17(3):R96. doi: 10.1186/cc12741.
    1. Landesberg G, Gilon D, Meroz Y, Georgieva M, Levin PD, Goodman S, et al. Diastolic dysfunction and mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock. Eur Heart J. 2012;33(7):895–903. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehr351.
    1. Sanfilippo F, Corredor C, Arcadipane A, Landesberg G, Vieillard-Baron A, Cecconi M, et al. Tissue Doppler assessment of diastolic function and relationship with mortality in critically ill septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth. 2017;119(4):583–594. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex254.
    1. Sanfilippo F, Corredor C, Fletcher N, Landesberg G, Benedetto U, Foex P, et al. Diastolic dysfunction and mortality in septic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2015;41(6):1004–1013. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-3748-7.
    1. Nixon JV, Murray RG, Leonard PD, Mitchell JH, Blomqvist CG. Effect of large variations in preload on left ventricular performance characteristics in normal subjects. Circulation. 1982;65(4):698–703. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.65.4.698.
    1. Quinones MA, Gaasch WH, Alexander JK. Influence of acute changes in preload, afterload, contractile state and heart rate on ejection and isovolumic indices of myocardial contractility in man. Circulation. 1976;53(2):293–302. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.53.2.293.
    1. Tsakiris AG, Rusell A, Vanderberg MB, Banchero N, Sturm RE, Wood EH. Variations of left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, volume, and ejection fraction with changes in outflow resistance in anesthetized intact dogs. Circ Res. 1968;23:213–222. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.23.2.213.
    1. Sunagawa K, Maughan WL, Sagawa K. Optimal arterial resistance for the maximal stroke work studied in isolated canine left ventricle. Circ Res. 1985;56(4):586–595. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.56.4.586.
    1. Paonessa JR, Brennan T, Pimentel M, Steinhaus D, Feng M, Celi LA. Hyperdynamic left ventricular ejection fraction in the intensive care unit. Crit Care. 2015;19:288. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1012-8.
    1. Weng L, Liu YT, Du B, Zhou JF, Guo XX, Peng JM, et al. The prognostic value of left ventricular systolic function measured by tissue Doppler imaging in septic shock. Crit Care. 2012;16(3):R71. doi: 10.1186/cc11328.
    1. Kass DA. Clinical evaluation of left heart function by conductance catheter technique. Eur Heart J. 1992;13 Suppl E:57–64. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/13.suppl_E.57.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner