Neuromodulation through brain stimulation-assisted cognitive training in patients with post-COVID-19 cognitive impairment (Neuromod-COV): study protocol for a PROBE phase IIb trial

Friederike Thams, Daria Antonenko, Robert Fleischmann, Marcus Meinzer, Ulrike Grittner, Sein Schmidt, Eva-Lotta Brakemeier, Anke Steinmetz, Agnes Flöel, Friederike Thams, Daria Antonenko, Robert Fleischmann, Marcus Meinzer, Ulrike Grittner, Sein Schmidt, Eva-Lotta Brakemeier, Anke Steinmetz, Agnes Flöel

Abstract

Introduction: A substantial number of patients diagnosed with COVID-19 experience long-term persistent symptoms. First evidence suggests that long-term symptoms develop largely independently of disease severity and include, among others, cognitive impairment. For these symptoms, there are currently no validated therapeutic approaches available. Cognitive training interventions are a promising approach to counteract cognitive impairment. Combining training with concurrent transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may further increase and sustain behavioural training effects. Here, we aim to examine the effects of cognitive training alone or in combination with tDCS on cognitive performance, quality of life and mental health in patients with post-COVID-19 subjective or objective cognitive impairments.

Methods and analysis: This study protocol describes a prospective randomised open endpoint-blinded trial. Patients with post-COVID-19 cognitive impairment will either participate in a 3-week cognitive training or in a defined muscle relaxation training (open-label interventions). Irrespective of their primary intervention, half of the cognitive training group will additionally receive anodal tDCS, all other patients will receive sham tDCS (double-blinded, secondary intervention). The primary outcome will be improvement of working memory performance, operationalised by an n-back task, at the postintervention assessment. Secondary outcomes will include performance on trained and untrained tasks and measures of health-related quality of life at postassessment and follow-up assessments (1 month after the end of the trainings).

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee of the University Medicine Greifswald (number: BB 066/21). Results will be available through publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations at national and international conferences.

Trial registration number: NCT04944147.

Keywords: COVID-19; clinical trials; neurology.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Neuromod-COV study flow chart. PMR, progressive muscle relaxation; tDCS, transcranial direct current stimulation.

References

    1. Leite VF, Rampim DB, Jorge VC, et al. . Persistent symptoms and disability after COVID-19 hospitalization: data from a comprehensive telerehabilitation program. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2021;102:1308–16. 10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.001
    1. Garrigues E, Janvier P, Kherabi Y, et al. . Post-discharge persistent symptoms and health-related quality of life after hospitalization for COVID-19. J Infect 2020;81:e4–6. 10.1016/j.jinf.2020.08.029
    1. Halpin SJ, McIvor C, Whyatt G, et al. . Postdischarge symptoms and rehabilitation needs in survivors of COVID-19 infection: a cross-sectional evaluation. J Med Virol 2021;93:1013–22. 10.1002/jmv.26368
    1. Huang C, Huang L, Wang Y, et al. . 6-month consequences of COVID-19 in patients discharged from Hospital: a cohort study. Lancet 2021;397:220–32. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32656-8
    1. Mandal S, Barnett J, Brill SE, et al. . 'Long-COVID': a cross-sectional study of persisting symptoms, biomarker and imaging abnormalities following hospitalisation for COVID-19. Thorax 2021;76:396–8. 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2020-215818
    1. Townsend L, Dyer AH, Jones K, et al. . Persistent fatigue following SARS-CoV-2 infection is common and independent of severity of initial infection. PLoS One 2020;15:e0240784. 10.1371/journal.pone.0240784
    1. Almeria M, Cejudo JC, Sotoca J, et al. . Cognitive profile following COVID-19 infection: clinical predictors leading to neuropsychological impairment. Brain Behav Immun Health 2020;9:100163. 10.1016/j.bbih.2020.100163
    1. Hampshire A, Trender W, Chamberlain SR, et al. . Cognitive deficits in people who have recovered from COVID-19. EClinicalMedicine 2021;39:101044. 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101044
    1. Miners S, Kehoe PG, Love S. Cognitive impact of COVID-19: looking beyond the short term. Alzheimers Res Ther 2020;12:170. 10.1186/s13195-020-00744-w
    1. Heneka MT, Golenbock D, Latz E, et al. . Immediate and long-term consequences of COVID-19 infections for the development of neurological disease. Alzheimers Res Ther 2020;12:69. 10.1186/s13195-020-00640-3
    1. Ritchie K, Chan D, Watermeyer T. The cognitive consequences of the COVID-19 epidemic: collateral damage? Brain Commun 2020;2:fcaa069-fcaa69. 10.1093/braincomms/fcaa069
    1. Barker-Davies RM, O'Sullivan O, Senaratne KPP, et al. . The Stanford Hall consensus statement for post-COVID-19 rehabilitation. Br J Sports Med 2020;54:949–59. 10.1136/bjsports-2020-102596
    1. Sheehy LM. Considerations for Postacute rehabilitation for survivors of COVID-19. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2020;6:e19462. 10.2196/19462
    1. Chung CS, Pollock A, Campbell T. Cognitive rehabilitation for executive dysfunction in adults with stroke or other adult non-progressive acquired brain damage. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013;2013:Cd008391.
    1. Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2011;377:1693–702. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60325-5
    1. Bahar-Fuchs A, Martyr A, Goh AM, et al. . Cognitive training for people with mild to moderate dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019;3:Cd013069. 10.1002/14651858.CD013069.pub2
    1. Leung IHK, Walton CC, Hallock H, et al. . Cognitive training in Parkinson disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology 2015;85:1843–51. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002145
    1. Constantinidis C, Klingberg T. The neuroscience of working memory capacity and training. Nat Rev Neurosci 2016;17:438–49. 10.1038/nrn.2016.43
    1. Butler M, McCreedy E, Nelson VA, et al. . Does cognitive training prevent cognitive decline?: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med 2018;168:63–8. 10.7326/M17-1531
    1. Park DC, Bischof GN. The aging mind: neuroplasticity in response to cognitive training. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 2013;15:109–19.
    1. Elmasry J, Loo C, Martin D. A systematic review of transcranial electrical stimulation combined with cognitive training. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2015;33:263–78. 10.3233/RNN-140473
    1. Passow S, Thurm F, Li S-C. Activating developmental reserve capacity via cognitive training or non-invasive brain stimulation: potentials for promoting fronto-parietal and Hippocampal-Striatal network functions in old age. Front Aging Neurosci 2017;9:33. 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00033
    1. Perceval G, Flöel A, Meinzer M. Can transcranial direct current stimulation counteract age-associated functional impairment? Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2016;65:157–72. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.03.028
    1. Polanía R, Nitsche MA, Ruff CC. Studying and modifying brain function with non-invasive brain stimulation. Nat Neurosci 2018;21:174–87. 10.1038/s41593-017-0054-4
    1. Stagg CJ, Nitsche MA. Physiological basis of transcranial direct current stimulation. Neuroscientist 2011;17:37–53. 10.1177/1073858410386614
    1. Jones KT, Stephens JA, Alam M, et al. . Longitudinal neurostimulation in older adults improves working memory. PLoS One 2015;10:e0121904. 10.1371/journal.pone.0121904
    1. Stephens JA, Berryhill ME. Older adults improve on everyday tasks after working memory training and neurostimulation. Brain Stimul 2016;9:553–9. 10.1016/j.brs.2016.04.001
    1. Ruf SP, Fallgatter AJ, Plewnia C. Augmentation of working memory training by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Sci Rep 2017;7:876. 10.1038/s41598-017-01055-1
    1. Thams F, Kuzmina A, Backhaus M, et al. . Cognitive training and brain stimulation in prodromal Alzheimer's disease (AD-Stim)-study protocol for a double-blind randomized controlled phase IIb (monocenter) trial. Alzheimers Res Ther 2020;12:142. 10.1186/s13195-020-00692-5
    1. Antonenko D, Thams F, Uhrich J, et al. . Effects of a Multi-Session Cognitive Training Combined With Brain Stimulation (TrainStim-Cog) on Age-Associated Cognitive Decline - Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Phase IIb (Monocenter) Trial. Front Aging Neurosci 2019;11:200. 10.3389/fnagi.2019.00200
    1. Hansson L, Hedner T, Dahlöf B. Prospective randomized open blinded end-point (probe) study. A novel design for intervention trials. Blood Press 1992;1:113–9. 10.3109/08037059209077502
    1. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) . COVID-19 rapid guideline: managing the long-term effects of COVID-19, 2020. Available: [Accessed 22 Jun 2021].
    1. Jacobson E. Progressive muscle relaxation. J Abnorm Psychol 1938;75:18.
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. . SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200–7. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
    1. Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Gøtzsche PC, et al. . SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ 2013;346:e7586. 10.1136/bmj.e7586
    1. Jessen F, Amariglio RE, van Boxtel M, et al. . A conceptual framework for research on subjective cognitive decline in preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimers Dement 2014;10:844–52. 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.01.001
    1. Smart CM, Karr JE, Areshenkoff CN, et al. . Non-Pharmacologic interventions for older adults with subjective cognitive decline: systematic review, meta-analysis, and preliminary recommendations. Neuropsychol Rev 2017;27:245–57. 10.1007/s11065-017-9342-8
    1. Antal A, Alekseichuk I, Bikson M, et al. . Low intensity transcranial electric stimulation: safety, ethical, legal regulatory and application guidelines. Clin Neurophysiol 2017;128:1774–809. 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.06.001
    1. Dahlin E, Nyberg L, Bäckman L, et al. . Plasticity of executive functioning in young and older adults: immediate training gains, transfer, and long-term maintenance. Psychol Aging 2008;23:720–30. 10.1037/a0014296
    1. Manzoni GM, Pagnini F, Castelnuovo G, et al. . Relaxation training for anxiety: a ten-years systematic review with meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2008;8:1–12. 10.1186/1471-244X-8-41
    1. Kuo H-I, Bikson M, Datta A, et al. . Comparing cortical plasticity induced by conventional and high-definition 4 × 1 ring tDCS: a neurophysiological study. Brain Stimul 2013;6:644–8. 10.1016/j.brs.2012.09.010
    1. Villamar MF, Volz MS, Bikson M, et al. . Technique and considerations in the use of 4x1 ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS). JoVE 2013;77. 10.3791/50309
    1. Gandiga PC, Hummel FC, Cohen LG. Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin Neurophysiol 2006;117:845–50. 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003
    1. Hartley T, Maguire EA, Spiers HJ, et al. . The well-worn route and the path less traveled: distinct neural bases of route following and wayfinding in humans. Neuron 2003;37:877–88. 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00095-3
    1. Hautus MJ. Corrections for extreme proportions and their biasing effects on estimated values ofd′. Behav Res Meth Instrum Comput 1995;27:46–51. 10.3758/BF03203619
    1. Cella D, Choi SW, Condon DM, et al. . PROMIS® Adult Health Profiles: Efficient Short-Form Measures of Seven Health Domains. Value Health 2019;22:537–44. 10.1016/j.jval.2019.02.004
    1. Klok FA, Boon GJAM, Barco S, et al. . The Post-COVID-19 functional status scale: a tool to measure functional status over time after COVID-19. Eur Respir J 2020;56. 10.1183/13993003.01494-2020. [Epub ahead of print: 02 Jul 2020].
    1. Margraf J, Cwik JC, Pflug V, et al. . Strukturierte klinische interviews Zur Erfassung psychischer Störungen über die Lebensspanne. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie 2017;46:176–86. 10.1026/1616-3443/a000430
    1. Carretti B, Borella E, Zavagnin M, et al. . Gains in language comprehension relating to working memory training in healthy older adults. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2013;28:539–46. 10.1002/gps.3859
    1. Cantarella A, Borella E, Carretti B, et al. . Benefits in tasks related to everyday life competences after a working memory training in older adults. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2017;32:86–93. 10.1002/gps.4448
    1. Xin Z, Lai Z-R, Li F, et al. . Near- and far‐transfer effects of working memory updating training in elderly adults. Appl Cogn Psychol 2014;28:403–8. 10.1002/acp.3011
    1. Borm GF, Fransen J, Lemmens WAJG. A simple sample size formula for analysis of covariance in randomized clinical trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60:1234–8. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.02.006
    1. Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. . The Montreal cognitive assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc 2005;53:695–9. 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
    1. Lezak MD, Howieson DB, Loring DW. Neuropsychological assessment. USA: Oxford University Press, 2004.
    1. Shin M-S, Park S-Y, Park S-R, et al. . Clinical and empirical applications of the Rey-Osterrieth complex figure test. Nat Protoc 2006;1:892–9. 10.1038/nprot.2006.115
    1. Wechsler D. Wechsler adult intelligence scale. 22. Fourth ed (WAIS–IV). San Antonio, TX: NCS Pearson, 2008.
    1. Stroop JR. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 1935;18:643–62. 10.1037/h0054651
    1. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, et al. . A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1092–7. 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092
    1. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med 2001;16:606–13. 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x
    1. Cloitre M, Shevlin M, Brewin CR, et al. . The International trauma questionnaire: development of a self-report measure of ICD-11 PTSD and complex PTSD. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2018;138:536–46. 10.1111/acps.12956
    1. Jorm AF, Jacomb PA. The informant questionnaire on cognitive decline in the elderly (IQCODE): socio-demographic correlates, reliability, validity and some norms. Psychol Med 1989;19:1015–22. 10.1017/S0033291700005742
    1. Grabe HJ, Schulz A, Schmidt CO, et al. . [A brief instrument for the assessment of childhood abuse and neglect: the childhood trauma screener (CTS)]. Psychiatr Prax 2012;39:109–15. 10.1055/s-0031-1298984
    1. De Vries J, Michielsen H, Van Heck GL, et al. . Measuring fatigue in sarcoidosis: the fatigue assessment scale (FAS). Br J Health Psychol 2004;9:279–91. 10.1348/1359107041557048
    1. Kazis LE, Miller DR, Skinner KM, et al. . Applications of methodologies of the Veterans health study in the Va healthcare system: conclusions and summary. J Ambul Care Manage 2006;29:182–8. 10.1097/00004479-200604000-00011
    1. Buysse DJ, Reynolds CF, Monk TH, et al. . The Pittsburgh sleep quality index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989;28:193–213. 10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4
    1. Johns MW. A new method for measuring daytime sleepiness: the Epworth sleepiness scale. Sleep 1991;14:540–5. 10.1093/sleep/14.6.540
    1. Horne JA, Ostberg O. A self-assessment questionnaire to determine morningness-eveningness in human circadian rhythms. Int J Chronobiol 1976;4:97–110.
    1. Brunoni AR, Ferrucci R, Bortolomasi M, et al. . Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in unipolar vs. bipolar depressive disorder. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry 2011;35:96–101. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.09.010
    1. Poreisz C, Boros K, Antal A, et al. . Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients. Brain Res Bull 2007;72:208–14. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.004
    1. Martin AK, Kessler K, Cooke S, et al. . The right temporoparietal junction is causally associated with embodied perspective-taking. J Neurosci 2020;40:3089–95. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2637-19.2020
    1. Martin AK, Huang J, Hunold A, et al. . Dissociable roles within the social brain for Self-Other processing: a HD-tDCS study. Cereb Cortex 2019;29:3642–54. 10.1093/cercor/bhy238
    1. Perceval G, Martin AK, Copland DA, et al. . High-definition tDCS of the temporo-parietal cortex enhances access to newly learned words. Sci Rep 2017;7:1–9. 10.1038/s41598-017-17279-0
    1. ICH E6 (R2) good clinical practice. Available: [Accessed Jun 2021].

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner