Positioning work related stress - GPs' reasoning about using the WSQ combined with feedback at consultation

Anna-Maria Hultén, Synneve Dahlin-Ivanoff, Kristina Holmgren, Anna-Maria Hultén, Synneve Dahlin-Ivanoff, Kristina Holmgren

Abstract

Background: General practitioners (GPs) regularly handle cases related to stress and work capacity, but often find this work difficult. However, using an assessment tool in a structured way can increase GPs' awareness of the risk for sick leave and need of referrals to preventive measures. Today there is no established methodical practice for this in primary health care. The aim of this study was to explore GPs' reasoning about using the Work Stress Questionnaire combined with feedback at consultation as an early intervention to reduce sick leave.

Methods: A focus group study was performed with 23 GPs at six primary health care centres. The discussions were analysed based on a method by Krueger.

Results: Three themes emerged. Positioning work-related stress describes the need to make fundamental standpoints on stress and how it should be handled, to make sense of their work concerning work-related stress. Making use of resources focuses on GPs performing to the best of their ability using assigned resources to treat patients with stress-related ill health, even if the resources were perceived as insufficient. Practising daily work focuses on the GPs' regular and preferred way of working set against the degree of intrusion and benefits. The two related themes making use of resources and practising daily work were mirrored through the third theme, positioning work-related stress, to form an understanding of how GPs should work with patients perceiving work-related stress.

Conclusions: The GPs own competence and tools, those of other professionals and the time allocated were seen as important when treating patients perceiving ill health due to work-related stress. When resources were insufficient though, the GPs questioned their responsibility for these patients. The results also indicate that the GPs viewed their ordinary consultative way of working as sufficient to identify these patients. The intervention was therefore not seen as useful for early treatment of patients at risk of sick leave due to work-related stress. However, prevention is an important part of the PHC's responsibility, and strategies concerning stress-related ill health therefore need to be more thoroughly formulated and incorporated.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02480855 . Registered 20 May 2015.

Keywords: Early intervention; Focus group study; Implementation; Occupational stress; Primary care; Working age.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The three themes and eight categories describing the reasoning about using the intervention
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Interrelating aspects affecting the brief intervention in the context of the primary health care

References

    1. Eurofound and International Labour Organization. Working conditions in a global perspective. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, and International Labour Organization. 2019. . Accessed 3 Jul 2020.
    1. Arbetsmiljöverket [Swedish Work Environment Authority]. Arbetsorsakade besvär 2018 [Work-related disorders 2018] (Rapport 2018:3) Arbetsmiljöverket. 2018. . Accessed 2 Jul 2020.
    1. Kronenberg C, Boehnke JR. How did the 2008–11 financial crisis affect work-related common mental distress? Evidence from 393 workplaces in Great Britain. Econ Hum Biol. 2019;33:193–200.
    1. Ojala S, Pyöriä P. Precarious work and the risk of receiving a disability pension. Scand J Public Health. 2019;47(3):293–300.
    1. Van Amelsvoort LG, Jansen NW, Kant I. Addressing long-term sickness absence: moving beyond disease, illness and work-related factors for effective prevention. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017;43(1):1–4.
    1. Shaw WS, Van Der Windt DA, Main CJ, et al. Early patient screening and intervention to address individual-level occupational factors (“blue flags”) in back disability. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(1):64–80.
    1. Kant I, Jansen NW, Van Amelsvoort LG, et al. Structured early consultation with the occupational physician reduces sickness absence among office workers at high risk for long-term sickness absence: a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(1):79–86.
    1. DeVries MW, Wilkerson B. Stress, work and mental health: a global perspective. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2003;15(1):44–53.
    1. Lykkegaard J, Rosendal M, Brask K, et al. Prevalence of persons contacting general practice for psychological stress in Denmark. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018;36(3):272–280.
    1. Wiegner L, Hange D, Björkelund C, et al. Prevalence of perceived stress and associations to symptoms of exhaustion, depression and anxiety in a working age population seeking primary care – an observational study. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(1):38.
    1. Lofgren A, Hagberg J, Arrelov B, et al. Frequency and nature of problems associated with sickness certification tasks: a cross-sectional questionnaire study of 5455 physicians. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2007;25(3):178–185.
    1. Nilsen S, Malterud K, Werner EL, et al. GPs' negotiation strategies regarding sick leave for subjective health complaints. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2015;33(1):40–46.
    1. Kiessling A, Arrelöv B. Sickness certification as a complex professional and collaborative activity – a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:702.
    1. Sturesson M, Edlund C, Fjellman-Wiklund A, et al. Work ability as obscure, complex and unique: views of Swedish occupational therapists and physicians. Work. 2013;45(1):117–128.
    1. Nilsing E, Soderberg E, Bertero C, et al. Primary healthcare professionals' experiences of the sick leave process: a focus group study in Sweden. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(3):450–461.
    1. Carlsson L, Lännerström L, Wallman T, et al. General practitioners' perceptions of working with the certification of sickness absences following changes in the Swedish social security system: a qualitative focus-group study. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(1):21.
    1. Østersa N, Gulbrandsen P, Benth JŜ, et al. Implementing structured functional assessments in general practice for persons with long-term sick leave: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMC Fam Pract. 2009;10:31.
    1. Verger P, Menard C, Richard JB, et al. Collaboration between general practitioners and occupational physicians: a comparison of the results of two national surveys in France. J Occup Environ Med. 2014;56(2):209–213.
    1. Boersma K, Linton SJ. Screening to identify patients at risk: profiles of psychological risk factors for early intervention. Clin J Pain. 2005;21(1):38–43.
    1. Holmgren K, Hensing G, Dahlin-Ivanoff S. Development of a questionnaire assessing work-related stress in women – identifying individuals who risk being put on sick leave. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31(4):284–292.
    1. Holmgren K, Fjällström-Lundgren M, Hensing G. Early identification of work-related stress predicted sickness absence in employed women with musculoskeletal or mental disorders: a prospective, longitudinal study in a primary health care setting. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(5):418–426.
    1. Holmgren K, Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Björkelund C, et al. The prevalence of work-related stress, and its association with self-perceived health and sick-leave, in a population of employed Swedish women. BMC Public Health. 2009;9:73.
    1. Frantz A, Holmgren K. The work stress questionnaire (WSQ) – reliability and face validity among male workers. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1580.
    1. Nergårdh A. God och nära vård – en primärvårdsreform [good quality, local health care – a primary care reform] (SOU 2018:39). Statens offentliga utredningar 2018. . Accessed 5 Sept 2019.
    1. World Health Organization. Declaration of Astana. World Health Organization. 2018. . Accessed 1 Aug 2019.
    1. Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol Health Illn. 1994;16(1):103–121.
    1. Dahlin Ivanoff S, Hultberg J. Understanding the multiple realities of everyday life: basic assumptions in focus-group methodology. Scand J Occup Ther. 2006;13(2):125–132.
    1. Holmgren K, Sandheimer C, Mardby AC, et al. Early identification in primary health care of people at risk for sick leave due to work-related stress – study protocol of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) BMC Public Health. 2016;16(1):1193.
    1. Holmgren K, Hensing G, Bültmann U, et al. Does early identification of work-related stress, combined with feedback at GP-consultation, prevent sick leave in the following 12 months? A randomized controlled trial in primary health care. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):1110.
    1. Bjerkeli PJ, Skoglund I, Holmgren K. Does early identification of high work related stress affect pharmacological treatment of primary care patients? Analysis of Swedish pharmacy dispensing data in a randomised control study. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):70.
    1. Sandheimer C, Hedenrud T, Hensing G, et al. Effects of a work stress intervention on healthcare use and treatment compared to treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial in Swedish primary healthcare. BMC Fam Pract. 2020;21(1):133.
    1. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009.
    1. Parker L, Bero L, Gillies D, et al. Mental health messages in prominent mental health apps. Ann Fam Med. 2018;16(4):338–342.
    1. Conrad P. The shifting engines of medicalization. J Health Soc Behav. 2005;46(1):3–14.
    1. Moloney ME. “Sometimes, it's easier to write the prescription”: physician and patient accounts of the reluctant medicalisation of sleeplessness. Sociol Health Illn. 2017;39(3):333–348.
    1. Thangadurai P, Jacob KS. Medicalizing distress, ignoring public health strategies. Indian J Psychol Med. 2014;36(4):351–354.
    1. Kivimäki M, Pentti J, Ferrie JE, et al. Work stress and risk of death in men and women with and without cardiometabolic disease: a multicohort study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6(9):705–713.
    1. Ljungquist T, Alexanderson K, Kjeldgård L, et al. Occupational health physicians have better work conditions for handling sickness certification compared with general practitioners: results from a nationwide survey in Sweden. Scand J Public Health. 2015;43(1):35–43.
    1. Pettersson A, Björkelund C, Petersson E. To score or not to score: a qualitative study on GPs views on the use of instruments for depression. Fam Pract. 2014;31(2):215–221.
    1. Frank E, Rothenberg R, Lewis C, et al. Correlates of physicians' prevention-related practices: findings from the women Physicians' health study. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(4):359–367.
    1. De Marchis E, Knox M, Hessler D, et al. Physician burnout and higher clinic capacity to address patients’ social needs. J Am Board Fam Med. 2019;32(1):69–78.
    1. Pedersen AF, Ingeman ML, Vedsted P. Empathy, burn-out and the use of gut feeling: a cross-sectional survey of Danish general practitioners. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e020007.
    1. Williams ES, Manwell LB, Konrad TR, et al. The relationship of organizational culture, stress, satisfaction, and burnout with physician-reported error and suboptimal patient care: results from the MEMO study. Health Care Manag Rev. 2007;32(3):203–212.
    1. Riley R, Spiers J, Chew-Graham CA, et al. “Treading water but drowning slowly”: What are GPs' experiences of living and working with mental illness and distress in England? A qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(5):e018620.
    1. Jeffrey D. Empathy, sympathy and compassion in healthcare: is there a problem? Is there a difference? Does it matter? J R Soc Med. 2016;109(12):446–52.
    1. Heneghan C, Glasziou P, Thompson M, et al. Diagnosis in general practice: diagnostic strategies used in primary care. BMJ (Online) 2009;338(7701):1003–1005.
    1. Landström B, Rudebeck CE, Mattsson B. Working behaviour of competent general practitioners: personal styles and deliberate strategies. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2006;24(2):122–128.
    1. Michiels-Corsten M, Donner-Banzhoff N. Beyond accuracy: hidden motives in diagnostic testing. Fam Pract. 2018;35(2):222–227.
    1. de Kock CA, Lucassen PLBJ, Bor H, et al. Training GPs to improve their management of work-related problems: results of a cluster randomized controlled trial. Eur J Gen Pract. 2018;24(1):258–265.
    1. Davidsen AS, Reventlow S. Narratives about patients with psychological problems illustrate different professional roles among general practitioners. J Health Psychol. 2011;16(6):959–968.
    1. Harkness AMB, Long BC, Bermbach N, et al. Talking about work stress: discourse analysis and implications for stress interventions. Work Stress. 2005;19(2):121–136.
    1. Huynh HP, Sweeny K, Miller T. Transformational leadership in primary care: clinicians’ patterned approaches to care predict patient satisfaction and health expectations. J Health Psychol. 2018;23(5):743–753.
    1. Ben-Avi N, Toker S, Heller D. “If stress is good for me, it's probably good for you too”: stress mindset and judgment of others' strain. J Exp Soc Psychol. 2018;74:98–110.
    1. Carlfjord S, Festin K. Association between organizational climate and perceptions and use of an innovation in Swedish primary health care: a prospective study of an implementation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(1):364.

Source: PubMed

Sponsorer og samarbejdspartnere

Medicinske tilstande

Narkotikainterventioner

3
Abonner