Passive Sensor Data for Characterizing States of Increased Risk for Eating Disorder Behaviors in the Digital Phenotyping Arm of the Binge Eating Genetics Initiative: Protocol for an Observational Study

Robyn E Kilshaw, Colin Adamo, Jonathan E Butner, Pascal R Deboeck, Qinxin Shi, Cynthia M Bulik, Rachael E Flatt, Laura M Thornton, Stuart Argue, Jenna Tregarthen, Brian R W Baucom, Robyn E Kilshaw, Colin Adamo, Jonathan E Butner, Pascal R Deboeck, Qinxin Shi, Cynthia M Bulik, Rachael E Flatt, Laura M Thornton, Stuart Argue, Jenna Tregarthen, Brian R W Baucom

Abstract

Background: Data that can be easily, efficiently, and safely collected via cell phones and other digital devices have great potential for clinical application. Here, we focus on how these data could be used to refine and augment intervention strategies for binge eating disorder (BED) and bulimia nervosa (BN), conditions that lack highly efficacious, enduring, and accessible treatments. These data are easy to collect digitally but are highly complex and present unique methodological challenges that invite innovative solutions.

Objective: We describe the digital phenotyping component of the Binge Eating Genetics Initiative, which uses personal digital device data to capture dynamic patterns of risk for binge and purge episodes. Characteristic data signatures will ultimately be used to develop personalized models of eating disorder pathologies and just-in-time interventions to reduce risk for related behaviors. Here, we focus on the methods used to prepare the data for analysis and discuss how these approaches can be generalized beyond the current application.

Methods: The University of North Carolina Biomedical Institutional Review Board approved all study procedures. Participants who met diagnostic criteria for BED or BN provided real time assessments of eating behaviors and feelings through the Recovery Record app delivered on iPhones and the Apple Watches. Continuous passive measures of physiological activation (heart rate) and physical activity (step count) were collected from Apple Watches over 30 days. Data were cleaned to account for user and device recording errors, including duplicate entries and unreliable heart rate and step values. Across participants, the proportion of data points removed during cleaning ranged from <0.1% to 2.4%, depending on the data source. To prepare the data for multivariate time series analysis, we used a novel data handling approach to address variable measurement frequency across data sources and devices. This involved mapping heart rate, step count, feeling ratings, and eating disorder behaviors onto simultaneous minute-level time series that will enable the characterization of individual- and group-level regulatory dynamics preceding and following binge and purge episodes.

Results: Data collection and cleaning are complete. Between August 2017 and May 2021, 1019 participants provided an average of 25 days of data yielding 3,419,937 heart rate values, 1,635,993 step counts, 8274 binge or purge events, and 85,200 feeling observations. Analysis will begin in spring 2022.

Conclusions: We provide a detailed description of the methods used to collect, clean, and prepare personal digital device data from one component of a large, longitudinal eating disorder study. The results will identify digital signatures of increased risk for binge and purge events, which may ultimately be used to create digital interventions for BED and BN. Our goal is to contribute to increased transparency in the handling and analysis of personal digital device data.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04162574; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04162574.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/38294.

Keywords: digital phenotyping; eating disorders; methodology; personal digital devices.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: Author CMB is a grant recipient and Scientific Advisory Board member of Shire Pharmaceuticals (now Takeda); a grant recipient from the Lundbeck Foundation; an author and royalty recipient from Pearson; and a member of the Clinical Advisory Board of Equip Health Inc. Authors JT and SA are owners, shareholders, and employees of Recovery Record, Inc. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

©Robyn E Kilshaw, Colin Adamo, Jonathan E Butner, Pascal R Deboeck, Qinxin Shi, Cynthia M Bulik, Rachael E Flatt, Laura M Thornton, Stuart Argue, Jenna Tregarthen, Brian R W Baucom. Originally published in JMIR Research Protocols (https://www.researchprotocols.org), 02.06.2022.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of all data cleaning and preparation steps.

References

    1. Bulik CM, Butner JE, Tregarthen J, Thornton LM, Flatt RE, Smith T, Carroll IM, Baucom BR, Deboeck PR. The Binge Eating Genetics Initiative (BEGIN): study protocol. BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):307. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02698-7. 10.1186/s12888-020-02698-7
    1. O'Dea S. Smartphone penetration worldwide 2020. Statista. [2022-03-22].
    1. Anderson M. Mobile technology and home broadband 2019. Pew Research Center. [2021-10-20].
    1. Perrin A. Mobile technology and home broadband 2021. Pew Research Center. [2022-02-26].
    1. Torous J, Chan SR, Yee-Marie Tan Shih, Behrens J, Mathew I, Conrad EJ, Hinton L, Yellowlees P, Keshavan M. Patient Smartphone Ownership and Interest in Mobile Apps to Monitor Symptoms of Mental Health Conditions: A Survey in Four Geographically Distinct Psychiatric Clinics. JMIR Ment Health. 2014;1(1):e5. doi: 10.2196/mental.4004. v1i1e5
    1. Klasnja P, Consolvo S, McDonald DW, Landay JA, Pratt W. Using mobile and personal sensing technologies to support health behavior change in everyday life: Lessons learned. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2009 Nov 14;2009:338–42.
    1. Mohr DC, Zhang M, Schueller SM. Personal Sensing: Understanding Mental Health Using Ubiquitous Sensors and Machine Learning. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2017 May 08;13:23–47. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-044949.
    1. Eagle N, Pentland AS. Reality mining: sensing complex social systems. Pers Ubiquit Comput. 2005 Nov 3;10(4):255–268. doi: 10.1007/s00779-005-0046-3.
    1. Li I, Dey A, Forlizzi J. A stage-based model of personal informatics systems. Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; Apr 10-15, 2010; Atlanta, GA. 2010.
    1. Torous John, Kiang Mathew V, Lorme Jeanette, Onnela Jukka-Pekka. New Tools for New Research in Psychiatry: A Scalable and Customizable Platform to Empower Data Driven Smartphone Research. JMIR Ment Health. 2016 May 05;3(2):e16. doi: 10.2196/mental.5165. v3i2e16
    1. Jacobson NC, Summers B, Wilhelm S. Digital Biomarkers of Social Anxiety Severity: Digital Phenotyping Using Passive Smartphone Sensors. J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 29;22(5):e16875. doi: 10.2196/16875. v22i5e16875
    1. Saeb S, Zhang M, Karr Christopher J, Schueller Stephen M, Corden Marya E, Kording Konrad P, Mohr David C. Mobile Phone Sensor Correlates of Depressive Symptom Severity in Daily-Life Behavior: An Exploratory Study. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jul 15;17(7):e175. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4273. v17i7e175
    1. Barnett I, Torous J, Staples P, Sandoval L, Keshavan M, Onnela J. Relapse prediction in schizophrenia through digital phenotyping: a pilot study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2018 Jul;43(8):1660–1666. doi: 10.1038/s41386-018-0030-z. 10.1038/s41386-018-0030-z
    1. Ben-Zeev D, Wang R, Abdullah S, Brian R, Scherer EA, Mistler LA, Hauser M, Kane JM, Campbell A, Choudhury T. Mobile Behavioral Sensing for Outpatients and Inpatients With Schizophrenia. Psychiatr Serv. 2016 May 01;67(5):558–561. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201500130.
    1. Torous J, Larsen ME, Depp C, Cosco TD, Barnett I, Nock MK, Firth J. Smartphones, Sensors, and Machine Learning to Advance Real-Time Prediction and Interventions for Suicide Prevention: a Review of Current Progress and Next Steps. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2018 Jun 28;20(7):51. doi: 10.1007/s11920-018-0914-y.10.1007/s11920-018-0914-y
    1. Onnela J. Opportunities and challenges in the collection and analysis of digital phenotyping data. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2021 Jan 17;46(1):45–54. doi: 10.1038/s41386-020-0771-3. 10.1038/s41386-020-0771-3
    1. Linardon J. Rates of abstinence following psychological or behavioral treatments for binge-eating disorder: Meta-analysis. Int J Eat Disord. 2018 Aug;51(8):785–797. doi: 10.1002/eat.22897.
    1. Peat CM, Berkman ND, Lohr KN, Brownley KA, Bann CM, Cullen K, Quattlebaum MJ, Bulik CM. Comparative Effectiveness of Treatments for Binge-Eating Disorder: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. Eur Eat Disord Rev. 2017 Sep 03;25(5):317–328. doi: 10.1002/erv.2517.
    1. Smink F, van Hoeken Daphne, Hoek H. Epidemiology, course, and outcome of eating disorders. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2013 Nov;26(6):543–548. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e328365a24f.
    1. Cacioppo JT, Tassinary LG, Berntson G, editors. Handbook of psychophysiology. 3rd edition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007. pp. 182–197.
    1. Guertin TL. Eating behavior of bulimics, self-identified binge eaters, and non-eating-disordered individuals: what differentiates these populations? Clin Psychol Rev. 1999 Jan;19(1):1–23. doi: 10.1016/s0272-7358(98)00017-8.S0272735898000178
    1. Schreiber-Gregory DN, Lavender JM, Engel SG, Wonderlich SA, Crosby RD, Peterson CB, Simonich H, Crow S, Durkin N, Mitchell JE. Examining duration of binge eating episodes in binge eating disorder. Int J Eat Disord. 2013 Dec;46(8):810–4. doi: 10.1002/eat.22164.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner