Phase IIb, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial of GC4419 Versus Placebo to Reduce Severe Oral Mucositis Due to Concurrent Radiotherapy and Cisplatin For Head and Neck Cancer

Carryn M Anderson, Christopher M Lee, Deborah P Saunders, Amarinthia Curtis, Neal Dunlap, Chaitali Nangia, Arielle S Lee, Sharon M Gordon, Philip Kovoor, Roberto Arevalo-Araujo, Voichita Bar-Ad, Abhinand Peddada, Kyle Colvett, Douglas Miller, Anshu K Jain, James Wheeler, Dukagjin Blakaj, Marcelo Bonomi, Sanjiv S Agarwala, Madhur Garg, Francis Worden, Jon Holmlund, Jeffrey M Brill, Matt Downs, Stephen T Sonis, Sanford Katz, John M Buatti, Carryn M Anderson, Christopher M Lee, Deborah P Saunders, Amarinthia Curtis, Neal Dunlap, Chaitali Nangia, Arielle S Lee, Sharon M Gordon, Philip Kovoor, Roberto Arevalo-Araujo, Voichita Bar-Ad, Abhinand Peddada, Kyle Colvett, Douglas Miller, Anshu K Jain, James Wheeler, Dukagjin Blakaj, Marcelo Bonomi, Sanjiv S Agarwala, Madhur Garg, Francis Worden, Jon Holmlund, Jeffrey M Brill, Matt Downs, Stephen T Sonis, Sanford Katz, John M Buatti

Abstract

Purpose: Oral mucositis (OM) remains a common, debilitating toxicity of radiation therapy (RT) for head and neck cancer. The goal of this phase IIb, multi-institutional, randomized, double-blind trial was to compare the efficacy and safety of GC4419, a superoxide dismutase mimetic, with placebo to reduce the duration, incidence, and severity of severe OM (SOM).

Patients and methods: A total of 223 patients (from 44 institutions) with locally advanced oral cavity or oropharynx cancer planned to be treated with definitive or postoperative intensity-modulated RT (IMRT; 60 to 72 Gy [≥ 50 Gy to two or more oral sites]) plus cisplatin (weekly or every 3 weeks) were randomly assigned to receive 30 mg (n = 73) or 90 mg (n = 76) of GC4419 or to receive placebo (n = 74) by 60-minute intravenous administration before each IMRT fraction. WHO grade of OM was assessed biweekly during IMRT and then weekly for up to 8 weeks after IMRT. The primary endpoint was duration of SOM tested for each active dose level versus placebo (intent-to-treat population, two-sided α of .05). The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03, was used for adverse event grading.

Results: Baseline patient and tumor characteristics as well as treatment delivery were balanced. With 90 mg GC4419 versus placebo, SOM duration was significantly reduced (P = .024; median, 1.5 v 19 days). SOM incidence (43% v 65%; P = .009) and severity (grade 4 incidence, 16% v 30%; P = .045) also were improved. Intermediate improvements were seen with the 30-mg dose. Safety was comparable across arms, with no significant GC4419-specific toxicity nor increase of known toxicities of IMRT plus cisplatin. The 2-year follow-up for tumor outcomes is ongoing.

Conclusion: GC4419 at a dose of 90 mg produced a significant, clinically meaningful reduction of SOM duration, incidence, and severity with acceptable safety. A phase III trial (ROMAN; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03689712) has begun.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
CONSORT diagram: patient random assignment. ITT, intent to treat.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
Cumulative severe oral mucositis (WHO grade 3 or 4) incidence (%) at progressive intensity-modulated radiation therapy delivery landmarks (Gray cutoffs).
FIG 3.
FIG 3.
Swimmer plot of severe oral mucositis scores for the subsets of patients in (left) the placebo arm (n = 45) or (right) the 90-mg arm (n = 35) who had at least one WHO oral mucositis score of grade 3 or 4. Each horizontal lane represents the experience of an individual patient. Time on radiation therapy or after radiation therapy is indicated at the top, for which the vertical line denotes the end of intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Yellow, WHO grade 3; red, WHO grade 4; purple, WHO grade 0 to 2. WHO scoring was done twice per week during radiation therapy, then once per week after radiation therapy in patients who returned for follow-up for up to 8 weeks or until the WHO score was 0 or 1.
FIG A1.
FIG A1.
Numbers of patients with grade 4 oral mucositis of progressively greater length, 90 mg v placebo.

References

    1. Henke M, Alfonsi M, Foa P, et al. Palifermin decreases severe oral mucositis of patients undergoing postoperative radiochemotherapy for head and neck cancer: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2815–2820.
    1. Le QT, Kim HE, Schneider CJ, et al. Palifermin reduces severe mucositis in definitive chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced head and neck cancer: A randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:2808–2814.
    1. Levy A, Blanchard P, Bellefqih S, et al. Concurrent use of cisplatin or cetuximab with definitive radiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Strahlenther Onkol. 2014;190:823–831.
    1. Elting LS, Keefe DM, Sonis ST, et al. Patient-reported measurements of oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients treated with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: Demonstration of increased frequency, severity, resistance to palliation, and impact on quality of life. Cancer. 2008;113:2704–2713.
    1. Traynor AM, Richards GM, Hartig GK, et al. Comprehensive IMRT plus weekly cisplatin for advanced head and neck cancer: The University of Wisconsin experience. Head Neck. 2010;32:599–606.
    1. Park HSM, Rutter CE, Lester-Coll NH, et al. Facility case volume and outcomes for intensity modulated radiation therapy in head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016;96:E325.
    1. Russo G, Haddad R, Posner M, et al. Radiation treatment breaks and ulcerative mucositis in head and neck cancer. Oncologist. 2008;13:886–898.
    1. Vera-Llonch M, Oster G, Hagiwara M, et al. Oral mucositis in patients undergoing radiation treatment for head and neck carcinoma. Cancer. 2006;106:329–336.
    1. Elting LS, Cooksley CD, Chambers MS, et al. Risk, outcomes, and costs of radiation-induced oral mucositis among patients with head-and-neck malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007;68:1110–1120.
    1. Nonzee NJ, Dandade NA, Patel U, et al. Evaluating the supportive care costs of severe radiochemotherapy-induced mucositis and pharyngitis: Results from a Northwestern University Costs of Cancer Program pilot study with head and neck and non–small-cell lung cancer patients who received care at a county hospital, a Veterans Administration hospital, or a comprehensive cancer care center. Cancer. 2008;113:1446–1452.
    1. Allison RR, Ambrad AA, Arshoun Y, et al. Multi-institutional, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess the efficacy of a mucoadhesive hydrogel (MuGard) in mitigating oral mucositis symptoms in patients being treated with chemoradiation therapy for cancers of the head and neck. Cancer. 2014;120:1433–1440.
    1. Barber C, Powell R, Ellis A, et al. Comparing pain control and ability to eat and drink with standard therapy vs Gelclair: A preliminary, double centre, randomised controlled trial on patients with radiotherapy-induced oral mucositis. Support Care Cancer. 2007;15:427–440.
    1. Lalla RV, Bowen J, Barasch A, et al. MASCC/ISOO clinical practice guidelines for the management of mucositis secondary to cancer therapy. Cancer. 2014;120:1453–1461.
    1. Lambrecht M, Mercier C, Geussens Y, et al. The effect of a supersaturated calcium phosphate mouth rinse on the development of oral mucositis in head and neck cancer patients treated with (chemo)radiation: A single-center, randomized, prospective study of a calcium phosphate mouth rinse + standard of care versus standard of care. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21:2663–2670.
    1. Leenstra JL, Miller RC, Qin R, et al. Doxepin rinse versus placebo in the treatment of acute oral mucositis pain in patients receiving head and neck radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy: A phase III, randomized, double-blind trial (NCCTG-N09C6 [Alliance]) J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:1571–1577.
    1. Rao NG, Trotti A, Kim J, et al. Phase II multicenter trial of Caphosol for the reduction of mucositis in patients receiving radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Oral Oncol. 2014;50:765–769.
    1. Sarvizadeh M, Hemati S, Meidani M, et al. Morphine mouthwash for the management of oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer. Adv Biomed Res. 2015;4:44.
    1. Wong KH, Kuciejewska A, Sharabiani MTA, et al. A randomised controlled trial of Caphosol mouthwash in management of radiation-induced mucositis in head and neck cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2017;122:207–211.
    1. Sio TT, Le-Rademacher JG, Leenstra JL, et al. Effect of doxepin mouthwash or diphenhydramine-lidocaine-antacid mouthwash vs placebo on radiotherapy-related oral mucositis pain: The Alliance A221304 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;321:1481–1490.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration Palifermin (Kepivance) prescribing information.
    1. Spielberger R, Stiff P, Bensinger W, et al. Palifermin for oral mucositis after intensive therapy for hematologic cancers. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2590–2598.
    1. Sonis ST. The pathobiology of mucositis. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004;4:277–284.
    1. Riley DP, Schall OF. Structure-activity studies and the design of synthetic superoxide dismutase (SOD) mimetics as therapeutics, in van Eldik R, Bowman-James K (eds): Advances in Inorganic Chemistry. XXXX, Academic Press, 2006, pp 233-263.
    1. Anderson CM, Sonis ST, Lee CM, et al. Phase 1b/2a trial of the superoxide dismutase mimetic GC4419 to reduce chemoradiotherapy-induced oral mucositis in patients with oral cavity or oropharyngeal carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;100:427–435.
    1. van Elteren P. On the combination of independent two-sample tests of Wilcoxon. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute. 1960;37:351–361.
    1. US Food and Drug Administration: Nitrolingual: nitroglycerin spray, metered.
    1. Buettner GR, Ng CF, Wang M, et al. A new paradigm: Manganese superoxide dismutase influences the production of H2O2 in cells and thereby their biological state. Free Radic Biol Med. 2006;41:1338–1350.
    1. Story MD, Sishc BJ, Polsdofer EM, et al. The radioprotector GC4419 ameliorates radiation induced lung fibrosis while enhancing the response of non–small-cell lung cancer tumors to high dose per fraction radiation exposures. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2018;102:S187.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner