Delaying skeletal-related events in a randomized phase 3 study of denosumab versus zoledronic acid in patients with advanced cancer: an analysis of data from patients with solid tumors

David Henry, Saroj Vadhan-Raj, Vera Hirsh, Roger von Moos, Vania Hungria, Luis Costa, Penella J Woll, Giorgio Scagliotti, Geoffrey Smith, Amy Feng, Susie Jun, Roger Dansey, Howard Yeh, David Henry, Saroj Vadhan-Raj, Vera Hirsh, Roger von Moos, Vania Hungria, Luis Costa, Penella J Woll, Giorgio Scagliotti, Geoffrey Smith, Amy Feng, Susie Jun, Roger Dansey, Howard Yeh

Abstract

Purpose: Bone complications of metastatic disease, including skeletal-related events (SREs), impair patients' functioning and quality of life. In a randomized, phase 3 trial of 1,776 patients with metastases from solid tumors (except breast or prostate) or multiple myeloma, denosumab was non-inferior to zoledronic acid (ZA) in delaying or preventing SREs. This ad hoc analysis reports outcomes in the subgroup of 1,597 patients with solid tumors, excluding patients with multiple myeloma.

Methods: Patients received monthly subcutaneous denosumab 120 mg or intravenous ZA 4 mg, adjusted for creatinine clearance, with calcium and vitamin D supplementation recommended. Endpoints included times to first on-study SRE, first-and-subsequent SREs, and pain worsening.

Results: Denosumab significantly delayed time to first on-study SRE compared with ZA (HR, 0.81; 95 % CI, 0.68-0.96) and time to first-and-subsequent SREs (RR, 0.85; 95 % CI, 0.72-1.00). Denosumab also significantly delayed time to development of moderate or severe pain (HR, 0.81; 95 % CI, 0.66-1.00), pain worsening (HR, 0.83; 95 % CI, 0.71-0.97), and worsening pain interference in patients with no/mild baseline pain (HR, 0.77; 95 % CI, 0.61-0.96). Adverse event rates were 96 % in both groups. Grade 3 or 4 hypocalcemia, mostly without clinical sequelae, was more frequent in denosumab-treated patients (denosumab 4 %, ZA 2 %). Osteonecrosis of the jaw occurred infrequently (denosumab 0.8 %, ZA 1.1 %).

Conclusions: Denosumab was more effective in delaying or preventing SREs in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors and also prevented pain progression compared to ZA in this ad hoc analysis.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00330759.

References

    1. Cancer. 2007 Oct 15;110(8):1860-7
    1. Ann Oncol. 2006 Jun;17(6):986-9
    1. Lancet. 2011 Mar 5;377(9768):813-22
    1. Ann Oncol. 2007 May;18(5):950-8
    1. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005 Jan 5;97(1):59-69
    1. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2006 Dec;25(4):541-9
    1. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Dec;124(3):745-53
    1. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Oct 15;12(20 Pt 2):6243s-6249s
    1. Cancer. 2004 Jun 15;100(12):2613-21
    1. Drugs. 2011 May 28;71(8):1059-69
    1. J Surg Oncol. 2012 Feb;105(2):135-41
    1. Semin Oncol. 2010 Oct;37 Suppl 2:S15-29
    1. Lancet. 1999 May 15;353(9165):1695-700
    1. N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 15;350(16):1655-64
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Dec 10;28(35):5132-9
    1. J Urol. 2010 Jul;184(1):162-7
    1. Clin Cancer Res. 2006 Oct 15;12(20 Pt 2):6236s-6242s
    1. Eur J Cancer. 2012 Nov;48(16):3082-92
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 20;29(9):1125-32
    1. Mol Cancer Ther. 2007 Oct;6(10):2609-17
    1. Cancer. 2003 Oct 15;98(8):1735-44

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner