CT-defined visceral adipose tissue thresholds for identifying metabolic complications: a cross-sectional study in the United Arab Emirates

Sunmi Yoo, Myung-Whun Sung, Hongdae Kim, Sunmi Yoo, Myung-Whun Sung, Hongdae Kim

Abstract

Objectives: Visceral adipose tissue (VAT) is closely related to obesity complications. We aimed to determine the optimal sex-specific and age-specific VAT thresholds for predicting metabolic complications among individuals living in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Setting: We reviewed medical records of adults who visited a hospital in the UAE.

Participants: A total of 369 subjects were included in the final analysis after application of inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Primary outcome measures: The prevalence of metabolic syndrome (MES).

Results: MES measures excluding waist circumference were present in 73.4% of women and 78.5% of men. VAT areas adjusted for age were significantly greater in the MES group compared with the non-MES group regardless of sex (p<0.05 for all relations); however, subcutaneous adipose tissue areas adjusted for age were not significantly different. Areas under the curve used to predict MES were statistically significant for VAT and visceral to subcutaneous fat ratios among both men and women. Identified cut-off values of VAT to predict MES were 132.0 cm2 in both sexes for individuals under the age of 50 years. For those over 50 years of age, VAT thresholds were greater in women compared with men (173 cm2 vs 124.3 cm2, respectively).

Conclusions: Optimal VAT cut-offs to predict MES were 132 cm2 for individuals under 50 years old living in the UAE. These measures are potential target visceral fat values that could be used to reduce obesity-related morbidity in populations with pre-existing metabolic complications.

Keywords: abdominal fat; ethnic groups; intra-abdominal fat; metabolic syndrome.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Data collection and management.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Quartiles of visceral adipose tissue (VAT), subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) and visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratios (VSRs) according to age group and sex (empty columns, women; hatched columns, men). (A) VAT. (B) SAT. (C) VSR.

References

    1. Ibrahim MM. Subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue: structural and functional differences. Obes Rev 2010;11:11–18. 10.1111/j.1467-789X.2009.00623.x
    1. Britton KA, Fox CS. Ectopic fat depots and cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2011;124:e837–41. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.077602
    1. Smith U. Abdominal obesity: a marker of ectopic fat accumulation. J Clin Invest 2015;125:1790–2. 10.1172/JCI81507
    1. Freedland ES. Role of a critical visceral adipose tissue threshold (CVATT) in metabolic syndrome: implications for controlling dietary carbohydrates: a review. Nutr Metab 2004;1:12. 10.1186/1743-7075-1-12
    1. Katzmarzyk PT, Heymsfield SB, Bouchard C. Clinical utility of visceral adipose tissue for the identification of cardiometabolic risk in white and African American adults. Am J Clin Nutr 2013;97:480–6. 10.3945/ajcn.112.047787
    1. Lear SA, Humphries KH, Kohli S, et al. . Visceral adipose tissue accumulation differs according to ethnic background: results of the multicultural community health assessment trial (M-CHAT). Am J Clin Nutr 2007;86:353–9. 10.1093/ajcn/86.2.353
    1. Onat A, Uğur M, Can G, et al. . Visceral adipose tissue and body fat mass: predictive values for and role of gender in cardiometabolic risk among turks. Nutrition 2010;26:382–9. 10.1016/j.nut.2009.05.019
    1. Matsushita Y, Nakagawa T, Yamamoto S, et al. . Visceral fat area cutoff for the detection of multiple risk factors of metabolic syndrome in Japanese: the Hitachi health study. Obesity 2012;20:1744–9. 10.1038/oby.2011.285
    1. Lee A, Kim YJ, Oh S-W, et al. . Cut-Off values for visceral fat area identifying Korean adults at risk for metabolic syndrome. Korean J Fam Med 2018;39:239–46. 10.4082/kjfm.17.0099
    1. Newton RL, Bouchard C, Bray G, et al. . Abdominal adiposity depots are correlates of adverse cardiometabolic risk factors in Caucasian and African-American adults. Nutr Diabetes 2011;1:e2. 10.1038/nutd.2010.2
    1. NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC) Worldwide trends in body-mass index, underweight, overweight, and obesity from 1975 to 2016: a pooled analysis of 2416 population-based measurement studies in 128·9 million children, adolescents, and adults. Lancet 2017;390:2627–42. 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)32129-3
    1. International Diabetes Federation IDF diabetes atlas. 8th edn Brussels, Belgium, 2017.
    1. Blair I, Sharif AA. Population structure and the burden of disease in the United Arab Emirates. J Epidemiol Glob Health 2012;2:61–71. 10.1016/j.jegh.2012.04.002
    1. Smith SR, Lovejoy JC, Greenway F, et al. . Contributions of total body fat, abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue compartments, and visceral adipose tissue to the metabolic complications of obesity. Metabolism 2001;50:425–35. 10.1053/meta.2001.21693
    1. International Diabetes Federation The IDF consensus worldwide definition of the metabolic syndrome. Brussels, Belgium, 2017.
    1. Oka R, Kobayashi J, Yagi K, et al. . Reassessment of the cutoff values of waist circumference and visceral fat area for identifying Japanese subjects at risk for the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2008;79:474–81. 10.1016/j.diabres.2007.10.016
    1. Al-Sarraj T, Saadi H, Volek JS, et al. . Metabolic syndrome prevalence, dietary intake, and cardiovascular risk profile among overweight and obese adults 18-50 years old from the United Arab Emirates. Metab Syndr Relat Disord 2010;8:39–46. 10.1089/met.2009.0035
    1. Al Dhaheri AS, Mohamad MN, Jarrar AH, et al. . A cross-sectional study of the prevalence of metabolic syndrome among young female Emirati adults. PLoS One 2016;11:e0159378. 10.1371/journal.pone.0159378
    1. Shulman GI. Ectopic fat in insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, and cardiometabolic disease. N Engl J Med 2014;371:1131–41. 10.1056/NEJMra1011035
    1. Oh YH, Moon JH, Kim HJ, et al. . Visceral-to-subcutaneous fat ratio as a predictor of the multiple metabolic risk factors for subjects with normal waist circumference in Korea. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes 2017;10:505–11. 10.2147/DMSO.S150914
    1. Kim S, Cho B, Lee H, et al. . Distribution of abdominal visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue and metabolic syndrome in a Korean population. Diabetes Care 2011;34:504–6. 10.2337/dc10-1364
    1. Fukuda T, Bouchi R, Takeuchi T, et al. . Ratio of visceral-to-subcutaneous fat area predicts cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Diabetes Investig 2018;9:396–402. 10.1111/jdi.12713
    1. Grundy SM. Adipose tissue and metabolic syndrome: too much, too little or neither. Eur J Clin Invest 2015;45:1209–17. 10.1111/eci.12519
    1. Peters SAE, Bots SH, Woodward M. Sex differences in the association between measures of general and central adiposity and the risk of myocardial infarction: results from the UK Biobank. J Am Heart Assoc 2018;7:e008507. 10.1161/JAHA.117.008507
    1. Valencak TG, Osterrieder A, Schulz TJ. Sex matters: the effects of biological sex on adipose tissue biology and energy metabolism. Redox Biol 2017;12:806–13. 10.1016/j.redox.2017.04.012

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner