First in-human trial and prospective case series of an articulated laparoscopic camera system in minimally invasive surgery in gynecology: an IDEAL stage 1 and 2a study

Tong Yow Ng, Siew Fei Ngu, Tat Yan Deyoung Kam, Sai Yan Ng, Ping Lai Benny Lo, Tong Yow Ng, Siew Fei Ngu, Tat Yan Deyoung Kam, Sai Yan Ng, Ping Lai Benny Lo

Abstract

Objectives: Precision Robotics' Sirius Robotic Flexible Endoscopic System is a new, fully integrated, compact three-dimensional laparoscopic camera system with a disposable single-use flexible tip that can change its viewing direction. This IDEAL Stage 1 and 2a study assessed its safety, reliability and potential efficacy particularly for single incision laparoscopic surgery and vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery.

Design: Prospective single-institution, single-surgeon study.

Setting: The study was conducted in a multispecialty hospital.

Participants: Women aged 18-70 years scheduled for gynecological laparoscopic surgery were invited to participate. An information sheet and consent was available for the women and an informed consent was obtained. Thirteen participants completed this study.

Interventions: The laparoscopic procedures were done in the usual manner. The only difference was the Sirius System was used in place of the conventional laparoscope. All other procedures and instruments remained the same.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcome was the proportion of women who successfully completed the intended procedure using the Sirius System without conversion to another camera system, camera users and surgeon's view and experience, and iterations and modifications to the system. Secondary outcomes were the incidence of intraoperative and postoperative complications during the first 6 weeks following surgery, and duration of surgery.

Results: 85% (11/13) of women had their procedure completed successfully using the Sirius System. Two women required immediate conversion to the conventional laparoscope due to technical issues. There were no intraoperative complications. Users agreed that the improved field of view was beneficial for laparoscopic surgery. Iterative improvements were made in the imaging quality, user interface and manufacturing quality.

Conclusions: Sirius System has early indications for safety and efficacy for intermediate and major minimally invasive laparoscopic procedures in gynecology. Further studies are needed to confirm it can replace a conventional laparoscope in the surgical workflow.

Trial registration number: NCT05048407.

Keywords: development study; device evaluation; minimally invasive surgical procedures; natural orifice endoscopic surgery; obstetrics and gynecology devices.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: TYN is Clinical Advisor to Precision Robotics (Hong Kong) Limited, SYN is employee of Precision Robotics (Hong Kong) Limited, PLBL is employee of Precision Robotics (Hong Kong) Limited.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The Sirius Robotic Flexible Endoscopic System.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Label indicator to ensure connector is fully inserted into the video processor.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Dynamic model—included a three-dimensional model as part of the graphical user interface, providing real-time information of the articulated tip position for the user.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Single camera fix—enable image setting—this is to provide additional image setting functions for the surgeon to choose to reduce the redness of the image and improve image quality.

References

    1. Concin N, Matias-Guiu X, Vergote I, et al. . ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines for the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2021;31:12–39. 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002230
    1. Janda M, Gebski V, Brand A, et al. . Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer (lacE): a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11:772–80. 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70145-5
    1. Obermair A, Janda M, Baker J, et al. . Improved surgical safety after laparoscopic compared to open surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:1147–53. 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.055
    1. Kondalsamy-Chennakesavan S, Janda M, Gebski V, et al. . Risk factors to predict the incidence of surgical adverse events following open or laparoscopic surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:2155–62. 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.03.013
    1. Janda M, Gebski V, Davies LC, et al. . Effect of total laparoscopic hysterectomy vs total abdominal hysterectomy on disease-free survival among women with stage I endometrial cancer: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017;317:1224–33. 10.1001/jama.2017.2068
    1. Schmitt A, Crochet P, Knight S, et al. . Single-Port laparoscopy vs conventional laparoscopy in benign adnexal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2017;24:1083–95. 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.07.001
    1. Baekelandt J. Total vaginal notes hysterectomy: a new approach to hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2015;22:1088–94. 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.05.015
    1. Chern BSM, Lakhotia S, Khoo CK, et al. . Single incision laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: evolution, current trends, and future perspectives. Gynecology and Minimally Invasive Therapy 2012;1:9–18. 10.1016/j.gmit.2012.08.005
    1. . ENDOEYE FLEX 3D LTF-190-10-3D - Olympus Medical Systems, 2021. Available: [Accessed 5 Dec 2021].
    1. Precision Robotics (HK) Ltd . Sirius laparoscope system, 2021. Available: [Accessed 5 Dec 2021].
    1. Berthet-Rayne P, Yang GZ. Vision based shape reconstruction of tendon driven snake-like surgical robots. 10th Hamlyn Symposium on Medical Robotics, 2017.
    1. Berthet-Rayne P, Gras G, Leibrandt K, et al. . The i2Snake Robotic Platform for Endoscopic Surgery. Ann Biomed Eng 2018;46:1663–75. 10.1007/s10439-018-2066-y
    1. Shang J. An articulated universal joint based flexible access robot for minimally invasive surgery. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Shanghai, 2011:1147–52.
    1. Shang J, Payne CJ, Clark J, et al. . Design of a multitasking robotic platform with flexible arms and articulated head for minimally invasive surgery. Rep U S 2012;2012:1988–93. 10.1109/IROS.2012.6385567
    1. McCulloch P, Altman DG, Campbell WB, et al. . No surgical innovation without evaluation: the ideal recommendations. Lancet 2009;374:1105–12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61116-8
    1. Pennell CP, Hirst AD, Campbell WB, et al. . Practical guide to the idea, development and exploration stages of the ideal framework and recommendations. Br J Surg 2016;103:607–15. 10.1002/bjs.10115
    1. Hirst A, Philippou Y, Blazeby J, et al. . No surgical innovation without evaluation: evolution and further development of the ideal framework and recommendations. Ann Surg 2019;269:211–20. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002794
    1. Bilbro NA, Hirst A, Paez A, et al. . The ideal reporting guidelines: a Delphi consensus statement stage specific recommendations for reporting the evaluation of surgical innovation. Ann Surg 2021;273:82–5. 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004180
    1. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P-A. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004;240:205–13. 10.1097/
    1. Wang Y, Deng L, Tang S, et al. . vNOTES hysterectomy with sentinel lymph node mapping for endometrial cancer: description of technique and perioperative outcomes. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021;28:1254–61. 10.1016/j.jmig.2021.01.022

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner