Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (tAVNS) Delivered During Upper Limb Interactive Robotic Training Demonstrates Novel Antagonist Control for Reaching Movements Following Stroke
Johanna L Chang, Ashley N Coggins, Maira Saul, Alexandra Paget-Blanc, Malgorzata Straka, Jason Wright, Timir Datta-Chaudhuri, Stavros Zanos, Bruce T Volpe, Johanna L Chang, Ashley N Coggins, Maira Saul, Alexandra Paget-Blanc, Malgorzata Straka, Jason Wright, Timir Datta-Chaudhuri, Stavros Zanos, Bruce T Volpe
Abstract
Implanted vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) delivered concurrently with upper limb rehabilitation has been shown to improve arm function after stroke. Transcutaneous auricular VNS (taVNS) offers a non-invasive alternative to implanted VNS and may provide similar therapeutic benefit. There is much discussion about the optimal approach for combining VNS and physical therapy, as such we sought to determine whether taVNS administered during robotic training, specifically delivered during the premotor planning stage for arm extension movements, would confer additional motor improvement in patients with chronic stroke. Thirty-six patients with chronic, moderate-severe upper limb hemiparesis (>6 months; mean Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer score = 25 ± 2, range 13-48), were randomized to receive 9 sessions (1 h in length, 3x/week for 3 weeks) of active (N = 18) or sham (N = 18) taVNS (500 ms bursts, frequency 30 Hz, pulse width 0.3 ms, max intensity 5 mA, ∼250 stimulated movements per session) delivered during robotic training. taVNS was triggered by the onset of a visual cue prior to center-out arm extension movements. Clinical assessments and surface electromyography (sEMG) measures of the biceps and triceps brachii were collected during separate test sessions. Significant motor improvements were measured for both the active and sham taVNS groups, and these improvements were robust at 3 month follow-up. Compared to the sham group, the active taVNS group showed a significant reduction in spasticity of the wrist and hand at discharge (Modified Tardieu Scale; taVNS = -8.94% vs. sham = + 2.97%, p < 0.05). The EMG results also demonstrated significantly increased variance for the bicep peak sEMG amplitude during extension for the active taVNS group compared to the sham group at discharge (active = 26.29% MVC ± 3.89, sham = 10.63% MVC ± 3.10, mean absolute change admission to discharge, p < 0.01), and at 3-month follow-up, the bicep peak sEMG amplitude was significantly reduced in the active taVNS group (P < 0.05). Thus, robot training improved the motor capacity of both groups, and taVNS, decreased spasticity. taVNS administered during premotor planning of movement may play a role in improving coordinated activation of the agonist-antagonist upper arm muscle groups by mitigating spasticity and increasing motor control following stroke. Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier (NCT03592745).
Keywords: hemiparesis; rehabilitation; robotic therapy; stroke; transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS); vagus nerve stimulation (VNS).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Copyright © 2021 Chang, Coggins, Saul, Paget-Blanc, Straka, Wright, Datta-Chaudhuri, Zanos and Volpe.
Figures
References
- American Heart Association [AHA] (2021). Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics- 2021 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics Update Fact Sheet. Dallas: American Heart Association.
- Badran B. W., Dowdle L. T., Mithoefer O. J., LaBate N. T., Coatsworth J., Brown J. C., et al. (2018). Neurophysiologic effects of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) via electrical stimulation of the tragus: a concurrent taVNS/fMRI study and review. Brain Stimul. 11 492–500. 10.1016/j.brs.2017.12.009
- Brashear A., Gordon M. F., Elovic E., Kassicieh V. D., Marciniak C., Do M., et al. (2002). Intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin for the treatment of wrist and finger spasticity after a stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 347 395–400. 10.1056/nejmoa011892
- Brunoni A. R., Schestatsky P., Lotufo P. A., Benseñor I. M., Fregni F. (2014). Comparison of blinding effectiveness between sham tDCS and placebo sertraline in a 6-week major depression randomized clinical trial. Clin. Neurophysiol. 125 298–305. 10.1016/j.clinph.2013.07.020
- Burke D. (1988). Spasticity as an adaptation to pyramidal tract injury. Adv. Neurol. 47 401–423.
- Capone F., Assenza G., Di Pino G., Musumeci G., Ranieri F., Florio L., et al. (2015). The effect of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation on cortical excitability. J. Neural. Transm. (Vienna) 122 679–685. 10.1007/s00702-014-1299-7
- Capone F., Miccinilli S., Pellegrino G., Zollo L., Simonetti D., Bressi F., et al. (2017). Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined with Robotic Rehabilitation Improves Upper Limb Function after Stroke. Neural Plast. 2017:7876507. 10.1155/2017/7876507
- Chalard A., Belle M., Montané E., Marque P., Amarantini D., Gasq D. (2020). Impact of the EMG normalization method on muscle activation and the antagonist-agonist co-contraction index during active elbow extension: practical implications for post-stroke subjects. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 51:102403. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2020.102403
- Chang J. L., Lin R. Y., Saul M., Koch P. J., Krebs H. I., Volpe B. T. (2017). Intensive seated robotic training of the ankle in patients with chronic stroke differentially improves gait. NeuroRehabilitation 41 61–68. 10.3233/NRE-171457
- Colgate J. E. (1988). Robust control of dynamically interacting systems. Int. J. Control 48 5–88.
- Colzato L., Beste C. (2020). A literature review on the neurophysiological underpinnings and cognitive effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation: challenges and future directions. J. Neurophysiol. 123 1739–1755. 10.1152/jn.00057.2020
- Cramer S. C., Nelles G., Benson R. R., Kaplan J. D., Parker R. A., Kwong K. K., et al. (1997). functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 28 2518–2527. 10.1161/01.str.28.12.2518
- Dawson J., Liu C. Y., Francisco G. E., Cramer S. C., Wolf S. L., Dixit A., et al. (2021). Vagus nerve stimulation paired with rehabilitation for upper limb motor function after ischaemic stroke (VNS-REHAB): a randomised, blinded, pivotal, device trial. Lancet 397 1545–1553. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00475-X
- Dawson J., Pierce D., Dixit A., Kimberley T. J., Robertson M., Tarver B., et al. (2016). Safety, feasibility and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation paired with upper limb rehabilitation following ischaemic stroke. Stroke 47 143–150. 10.1177/2396987319855306
- De Ridder D., Vanneste S., Engineer N. D., Kilgard M. P. (2014). Safety and efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones for the treatment of tinnitus: a case series. Neuromodulation 17 170–179. 10.1111/ner.12127
- Dipietro L., Krebs H. I., Fasoli S. E., Volpe B. T., Stein J., Bever C., et al. (2007). Changing motor synergies in chronic stroke. J. Neurophysiol. 98 757–768. 10.1152/jn.01295.2006
- Edwards D. J., Cortes M., Rykman-Peltz A., Chang J., Elder J., Thickbroom G., et al. (2019). Clinical improvement with intensive robot-assisted arm training in chronic stroke is unchanged by supplementary tDCS. Restor. Neurol. Neurosci. 37 167–180. 10.3233/RNN-180869
- Ellis M. D., Schut I., Dewald J. P. A. (2017). Flexion synergy overshadows flexor spasticity during reaching in chronic moderate to severe hemiparetic stroke. Clin. Neurophysiol. 128 1308–1314. 10.1016/j.clinph.2017.04.028
- Engineer N. D., Riley J. R., Seale J. D., Vrana W. A., Shetake J. A., Sudanagunta S. P., et al. (2011). Reversing pathological neural activity using targeted plasticity. Nature 470 101–104. 10.1038/nature09656
- Fernández-Peña E., Lucertini F., Ditroilo M. (2009). A maximal isokinetic pedalling exercise for EMG normalization in cycling. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 19 e162–70. 10.1016/j.jelekin.2007.11.013
- Gandiga P. C., Hummel F. C., Cohen L. G. (2006). Transcranial DC stimulation (tDCS): a tool for double-blind sham-controlled clinical studies in brain stimulation. Clin. Neurophysiol. 117 845–850. 10.1016/j.clinph.2005.12.003
- Gladstone D. J., Danells C. J., Black S. E. (2002). The Fugl-Meyer Assessment of motor recovery after stroke: a critical review of its measurement properties. Neurorehabil. Neural. Repair. 16 232–240. 10.1177/154596802401105171
- Haugh A. B., Pandyan A. D., Johnson G. R. (2006). A systematic review of the Tardieu Scale for the measurement of spasticity. Disabil. Rehabil. 28 899–907.
- Hays S. A. (2016). Enhancing rehabilitative therapies with vagus nerve stimulation. Neurotherapeutics 13 382–394. 10.1007/s13311-015-0417-z
- Hodics T. M., Nakatsuka K., Upreti B., Arun A., Smith P. S., Pezzullo J. C. (2012). Wolf Motor Function Test for Characterizing Moderate to Severe Hemiparesis in Stroke Patients. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 93 1963–1967. 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.05.002
- Hogan N. (1985). “Control strategies for complex movements derived from physical systems theory,” in Complex Systems - Operational Approaches in Neurobiology, Physics, and Computers, ed. Haken H. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag; ), 156–168. 10.1007/978-3-642-70795-7_11
- Hogan N. (1988). On the Stability of Manipulators Performing Contact Tasks. IEEE J. Robot. Autom. 4 677–686.
- Hsieh Y., Wu C., Lin K., Chang Y., Chen C., Liu J. (2009). Responsiveness and validity of three outcome measures of motor function after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 40 1386–1391. 10.1161/strokeaha.108.530584
- Khodaparast N., Hays S. A., Sloan A. M., Fayyaz T., Hulsey D. R., Rennaker R. L. I. I., et al. (2014). Vagus nerve stimulation delivered during motor rehabilitation improves recovery in a rat model of stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural. Repair 28 698–706. 10.1177/1545968314521006
- Kim H., Her J., Ko J., Park D. S., Woo J. H., You Y., et al. (2012). Reliability, concurrent validity, and responsiveness of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment (FMA) for hemiplegic patients. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 24 893–899. 10.1589/jpts.24.893
- Kimberley T. J., Pierce D., Prudente C. N., Francisco G. E., Yozbatiran N., Smith P., et al. (2018). Vagus nerve stimulation paired with upper limb rehabilitation after chronic stroke: a blinded randomized pilot study. Stroke 49 2789–2792. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022279
- Kraus T., Hösl K., Kiess O., Schanze A., Kornhuber J., Forster C. (2007). BOLD fMRI deactivation of limbic and temporal brain structures and mood enhancing effect by transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation. J. Neural. Transm. (Vienna) 114 1485–1493. 10.1007/s00702-007-0755-z
- Lance J. W. (1980). The control of muscle tone, reflexes, and movement: Robert Wartenberg Lecture. Neurology 30 1303–1313. 10.1212/wnl.30.12.1303
- Levin A. F., Solomon J. M., Shah J., Blanchette A. K., Feldman A. G. (2018). Activation of elbow extensors during passive stretch of flexors in patients with post-stroke spasticity. Clin. Neurophysiol. 129 2065–2074. 10.1016/j.clinph.2018.07.007
- Lo A. C., Guarino P. D., Richards L. G., Haselkorn J. K., Wittenberg G. F., Federman D. G., et al. (2010). Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 362 1772–1783.
- McMorland A. J., Runnalls K. D., Byblow W. D. (2015). A neuroanatomical framework for upper limb synergies after stroke. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:82. 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00082
- Mehrholz J., Wagner K., Meissner D., Grundmann K., Zange C., Koch R., et al. (2005). Reliability of the Modified Tardieu Scale and the Modified Ashworth Scale in adult patients with severe brain injury: a comparison study. Clin. Rehabil. 19 751–759. 10.1191/0269215505cr889oa
- Page S. J., Fulk G. D., Boyne P. (2012). Clinically important differences for the upper-extremity fugl-meyer scale in people with minimal to moderate impairment due to chronic stroke. Phys. Ther. 92 791–798.
- Paget-Blanc A., Chang J. L., Saul M., Lin R., Ahmed Z., Volpe B. T. (2019). Non-invasive treatment of patients with upper extremity spasticity following stroke using paired trans-spinal and peripheral direct current stimulation. Bioelectron. Med. 5:11. 10.1186/s42234-019-0028-9
- Paternostro-Sluga T., Grim-Stieger M., Posch M., Schuhfried O., Vacariu G., Mittermaier C., et al. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Medical Research Council (MRC) scale and a modified scale for testing muscle strength in patients with radial palsy. J. Rehabil. Med. 40 665–671. 10.2340/16501977-0235
- Paulis W. D., Horemans H. L., Brouwer B. S., Stam H. J. (2011). Excellent test-retest and inter-rater reliability for Tardieu Scale measurements with inertial sensors in elbow flexors of stroke patients. Gait Posture 33 185–189. 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.10.094
- Porter B. A., Khodaparast N., Fayyaz T., Cheung R. J., Ahmed S. S., Vrana W. A., et al. (2011). Repeatedly pairing vagus nerve stimulation with a movement reorganizes primary motor cortex. Cereb. Cortex 22 2365–2374. 10.1093/cercor/bhr316
- Pundik S., Falchook A. D., McCabe J., Litinas K., Daly J. J. (2014). Functional brain correlates of upper limb spasticity and its mitigation following rehabilitation in chronic stroke survivors. Stroke Res. Treat. 2014:306325. 10.1155/2014/306325
- Singh P., Joshua A. M., Ganeshan S., Suresh S. (2011). Intra-rater reliability of the modified Tardieu scale to quantify spasticity in elbow flexors and ankle plantar flexors in adult stroke subjects. Ann. Indian Acad. Neurol. 14 23–26. 10.4103/0972-2327.78045
- Toluee Achacheluee S., Rahnama L., Karimi N., Abdollahi I., Jaberzadeh Sh., Arslan S. A. (2016). Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the fugl-meyer assessment of the upper extremity and 9-hole pegboard test in individuals with subacute stroke. Phys. Treat. 5 225–230.
- Volpe B. T., Huerta P. T., Zipse J. L., Rykman A., Edwards D., Dipietro L., et al. (2009). Robotic devices as therapeutic and diagnostic tools for stroke recovery. Arch. Neurol. 66 1086–1090.
- Winstein C. J., Stein J., Arena R., Bates B., Cherney L. R., Cramer S. C., et al. (2016). Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 47 e98–e169.
- Wolf S. L., Catlin P. A., Ellis M., Archer A. L., Morgan B., Piacentino A. (2001). Assessing wolf motor function test as outcome measure for research in patients after stroke. Stroke 32 1635–1639. 10.1161/01.str.32.7.1635
- Zackowski K. M., Dromerick A. W., Sahrmann S. A., Thach W. T., Bastian A. J. (2004). How do strength, sensation, spasticity and joint individuation relate to the reaching deficits of people with chronic hemiparesis? Brain 127 1035–1046. 10.1093/brain/awh116
Source: PubMed