Single-Stage Combined Embolization and Resection for Spetzler-Martin Grade III/IV/V Arteriovenous Malformations: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review

Yu Chen, Ruinan Li, Li Ma, Yang Zhao, Tengfei Yu, Hao Wang, Xun Ye, Rong Wang, Xiaolin Chen, Yuanli Zhao, Yu Chen, Ruinan Li, Li Ma, Yang Zhao, Tengfei Yu, Hao Wang, Xun Ye, Rong Wang, Xiaolin Chen, Yuanli Zhao

Abstract

Background and Purpose: This study sought to identify the efficacy and intraoperative operational details of single-stage combined embolization and microsurgery strategy for Spetzler-Martin (SM) grade III/IV/V arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Methods: The authors retrospectively reviewed consecutive SM grade III/IV/V AVMs who underwent hybrid procedures and surgical resection alone procedures from January 2016 to February 2018. Outcomes [modified Rankin Scale (mRS)] were compared between hybrid group and surgical resection alone group in ruptured or unruptured subgroup. Factors associated with long-term disability were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: A total of 100 AVM patients (47 corrected using hybrid procedures whereas 53 by surgical resection alone) were evaluated. After a mean follow-up of 2.3 ± 0.6 years, we found no difference in long-term prognosis and incidences of disability rates between these two strategies. However, the hybrid strategy offers significant advantage in accelerating the resection process [ruptured (P = 0.000); unruptured (P = 0.002)]. In the analysis of risk factors, excessive embolization (Grade C, 60-100%) was significantly associated with long-term disability in the hybrid cohorts (P = 0.041; odds ratio, 24.000; 95% CI, 1.140-505.194), and involvement of deep perforating arteries was the significant predictor of long-term disability in the surgical resection alone cohort (P = 0.025; odds ratio, 15.389; 95% CI, 1.412-167.66). In the subgroup analysis of the hybrid cohort, moderate embolization (Grade B, 30-60%) was recommended because of the low risk ratio of major intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.033). Conclusions: Single-stage combined embolization and resection is an efficient strategy for the treatment of SM grade III/IV/V AVMs. Although the long-term outcomes were similar to surgical resection alone, the hybrid strategy had obvious advantages of shorter resection. In the hybrid technique, moderate embolization was recommended, and excessive embolization might be detrimental to the subsequent microsurgical resection. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT04136860.

Keywords: arteriovenous malformation; embolization; embolization degree; hybrid angio-surgical suite; microsurgical resection; outcomes.

Copyright © 2020 Chen, Li, Ma, Zhao, Yu, Wang, Ye, Wang, Chen and Zhao.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The changes of long-term outcomes in the surgical resection alone cohort and the single-stage hybrid cohort.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Illustration case. A 25-year-old female presented with loss of consciousness accompanied by physical convulsions 10 days before admission. (A–D) The preoperative imaging examination suggested an unruptured AVM in the left parietal occipital lobe (SM grade IV). The maximum diameter was 7.1 cm. The nidus was supplied by the ipsilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) and posterior cerebral artery (PCA). The nidus was compact. She received a single-stage combined embolization and resection 4 days after admission. (E,F) The intraoperative embolization was mainly performed on the nidus supplied by the ipsilateral PCA, and the overall embolization degree was Grade B (30–60%). (G) After craniotomy, the main feeding artery was controlled and blocked with aneurysm clips (main feeding artery: yellow arrow). The embolized vessels and lesions appear black (embolized lesions: green arrow), which make the lesion boundary easy to be identified. (H) Intraoperative DSA and postoperative CT showed completely obliteration of the lesion. In order to preserve important neurological functions, a small number of embolized lesions adjacent to the eloquent area were maintained during resection (maintained embolized lesion: red arrow). Immediate DSA after the microsurgical resection procedure demonstrated complete obliteration of the lesion. The intraoperative blood loss was 200 ml and the resection duration was 2.9 h. After 2.4 years' follow-up, she experienced no neurofunctional deficit and mRS score of 0.

References

    1. Klopfenstein JD, Spetzler RF. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: when is surgery indicated? Acta Neurochir (Wien). (2005) 147:693–5. 10.1007/s00701-005-0545-z
    1. Spetzler RF, Martin NA. A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. (1986) 65:476–83. 10.3171/jns.1986.65.4.0476
    1. Derdeyn CP, Zipfel GJ, Albuquerque FC, Cooke DL, Feldmann E, Sheehan JP, et al. . Management of brain arteriovenous malformations: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. (2017) 48:e200–e224. 10.1161/STR.0000000000000134
    1. Bervini D, Morgan MK, Ritson EA, Heller G. Surgery for unruptured arteriovenous malformations of the brain is better than conservative management for selected cases: a prospective cohort study. J Neurosurg. (2014) 121:878–90. 10.3171/2014.7.JNS132691
    1. Steiger HJ, Fischer I, Rohn B, Turowski B, Etminan N, Hanggi D. Microsurgical resection of Spetzler-Martin grades 1 and 2 unruptured brain arteriovenous malformations results in lower long-term morbidity and loss of quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) than conservative management–results of a single group series. Acta Neurochir (Wien). (2015) 157:1279–87. 10.1007/s00701-015-2474-9
    1. Barrow DL, Boyer KL, Joseph GJ. Intraoperative angiography in the management of neurovascular disorders. Neurosurgery. (1992) 30:153–9. 10.1097/00006123-199202000-00001
    1. Fandino J, Taussky P, Marbacher S, Muroi C, Diepers M, Fathi AR, et al. . The concept of a hybrid operating room: applications in cerebrovascular surgery. Acta Neurochir Suppl. (2013) 115:113–7. 10.1007/978-3-7091-1192-5_24
    1. Gruter BE, Mendelowitsch I, Diepers M, Remonda L, Fandino J, Marbacher S. Combined endovascular and microsurgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations in the hybrid operating room. World Neurosurg. (2018) 117:e204–e14. 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.241
    1. Kocer N, Kandemirli SG, Dashti R, Kizilkilic O, Hanimoglu H, Sanus GZ, et al. Single-stage planning for total cure of grade III-V brain arteriovenous malformations by embolization alone or in combination with microsurgical resection. Neuroradiology. (2018) 61:195–205. 10.1007/s00234-018-2140-z
    1. Kotowski M, Sarrafzadeh A, Schatlo B, Boex C, Narata AP, Pereira VM, et al. . Intraoperative angiography reloaded: a new hybrid operating theater for combined endovascular and surgical treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations: a pilot study on 25 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien). (2013) 155:2071–8. 10.1007/s00701-013-1873-z
    1. Kulcsar Z, Machi P, Schaller K, Lovblad KO, Bijlenga P. Trans-venous embolization of a basal ganglia ruptured arteriovenous malformation with open surgical arterial control: A hybrid technique. J Neuroradiol. (2018) 45:202–5. 10.1016/j.neurad.2017.12.021
    1. Murayama Y, Arakawa H, Ishibashi T, Kawamura D, Ebara M, Irie K, et al. . Combined surgical and endovascular treatment of complex cerebrovascular diseases in the hybrid operating room. J Neurointerv Surg. (2013) 5:489–93. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010382
    1. Tian J, Lin Z, Zhang J, Yang Q, Huang J, Zhang H, et al. . [Combined surgical and endovascular treatments of complex cerebral arteriovenous malformation in hybrid operating room]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. (2014) 94:3763–6. 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2014.47.017
    1. Wang M, Qiu H, Cao Y, Wang S, Zhao J. One-staged in situ embolization combined with surgical resection for eloquence protection of AVM: technical note. Neurosurg Rev. (2019) 42:783–90. 10.1007/s10143-019-01137-w
    1. Jiao Y, Wu J, Chen X, Li Z, Ma J, Cao Y, et al. . Spetzler-Martin grade IV and V arteriovenous malformations: treatment outcomes and risk factors for negative outcomes after surgical resection. J Clin Neurosci. (2019) 61:166–73. 10.1016/j.jocn.2018.10.101
    1. Braksick SA, Fugate JE. Management of brain arteriovenous malformations. Curr Treat Options Neurol. (2015) 17:358. 10.1007/s11940-015-0358-1
    1. Ren Z, Wang S, Xu K, Mokin M, Zhao Y, Cao Y, et al. . The working road map in a neurosurgical Hybrid Angio-Surgical suite—development and practice of a neurosurgical Hybrid Angio-Surgical suite. Chin Neurosurg J. (2018) 4:7. 10.1186/s41016-017-0108-1
    1. Morgan MK, Wiedmann MKH, Assaad NNA, Parr MJA, Heller GZ. Deliberate employment of postoperative hypotension for brain arteriovenous malformation surgery and the incidence of delayed postoperative hemorrhage: a prospective cohort study. J Neurosurg. (2017) 127:1025–40. 10.3171/2016.9.JNS161333
    1. Vitaz TW, Gaskill-Shipley M, Tomsick T, Tew JM, Jr. Utility, safety, and accuracy of intraoperative angiography in the surgical treatment of aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (1999) 20:1457–61.
    1. Orlov K, Panarin V, Krivoshapkin A, Kislitsin D, Berestov V, Shayakhmetov T, et al. . Assessment of periprocedural hemodynamic changes in arteriovenous malformation vessels by endovascular dual-sensor guidewire. Interv Neuroradiol. (2015) 21:101–7. 10.1177/INR-2014-10096
    1. Batjer HH, Devous MD Sr, Meyer YJ, Purdy PD, Samson DS. Cerebrovascular hemodynamics in arteriovenous malformation complicated by normal perfusion pressure breakthrough. Neurosurgery. (1988) 22:503–9. 10.1227/00006123-198803000-00009
    1. Henkes H, Gotwald TF, Brew S, Kaemmerer F, Miloslavski E, Kuehne D. Pressure measurements in arterial feeders of brain arteriovenous malformations before and after endovascular embolization. Neuroradiology. (2004) 46:673–7. 10.1007/s00234-004-1229-8
    1. Handa T, Negoro M, Miyachi S, Sugita K. Evaluation of pressure changes in feeding arteries during embolization of intracerebral arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. (1993) 79:383–9. 10.3171/jns.1993.79.3.0383
    1. Ivanov AA, Alaraj A, Charbel FT, Aletich V, Amin-Hanjani S. Recurrence of cerebral arteriovenous malformations following resection in adults: does preoperative embolization increase the risk? Neurosurgery. (2016) 78:562–71. 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001191
    1. Reig AS, Rajaram R, Simon S, Mericle RA. Complete angiographic obliteration of intracranial AVMs with endovascular embolization: incomplete embolic nidal opacification is associated with AVM recurrence. J Neurointerv Surg. (2010) 2:202–7. 10.1136/jnis.2009.001636
    1. Spiotta AM, James RF, Lowe SR, Vargas J, Turk AS, Chaudry MI, et al. . Balloon-augmented Onyx embolization of cerebral arteriovenous malformations using a dual-lumen balloon: a multicenter experience. J Neurointerv Surg. (2015) 7:721–7. 10.1136/neurintsurg-2014-011285

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner