Trastuzumab deruxtecan in HER2-positive breast cancer with brain metastases: a single-arm, phase 2 trial

Rupert Bartsch, Anna Sophie Berghoff, Julia Furtner, Maximilian Marhold, Elisabeth Sophie Bergen, Sophie Roider-Schur, Angelika Martina Starzer, Heidrun Forstner, Beate Rottenmanner, Karin Dieckmann, Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath, Helmuth Haslacher, Georg Widhalm, Aysegül Ilhan-Mutlu, Christoph Minichsdorfer, Thorsten Fuereder, Thomas Szekeres, Leopold Oehler, Birgit Gruenberger, Christian F Singer, Ansgar Weltermann, Rainer Puhr, Matthias Preusser, Rupert Bartsch, Anna Sophie Berghoff, Julia Furtner, Maximilian Marhold, Elisabeth Sophie Bergen, Sophie Roider-Schur, Angelika Martina Starzer, Heidrun Forstner, Beate Rottenmanner, Karin Dieckmann, Zsuzsanna Bago-Horvath, Helmuth Haslacher, Georg Widhalm, Aysegül Ilhan-Mutlu, Christoph Minichsdorfer, Thorsten Fuereder, Thomas Szekeres, Leopold Oehler, Birgit Gruenberger, Christian F Singer, Ansgar Weltermann, Rainer Puhr, Matthias Preusser

Abstract

Trastuzumab deruxtecan is an antibody-drug conjugate with high extracranial activity in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer. We conducted the prospective, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 TUXEDO-1 trial. We enrolled patients aged ≥18 years with HER2-positive breast cancer and newly diagnosed untreated brain metastases or brain metastases progressing after previous local therapy, previous exposure to trastuzumab and pertuzumab and no indication for immediate local therapy. Patients received trastuzumab deruxtecan intravenously at the standard dose of 5.4 mg per kg bodyweight once every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was intracranial response rate measured according to the response assessment in neuro-oncology brain metastases criteria. A Simon two-stage design was used to compare a null hypothesis of <26% response rate against an alternative of 61%. Fifteen patients were enrolled in the intention-to-treat population of patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Two patients (13.3%) had a complete intracranial response, nine (60%) had a partial intracranial response and three (20%) had stable disease as the best intracranial response, with a best overall intracranial response rate of 73.3% (95% confidential interval 48.1-89.1%), thus meeting the predefined primary outcome. No new safety signals were observed and global quality-of-life and cognitive functioning were maintained over the treatment duration. In the TUXEDO-1 trial (NCT04752059, EudraCT 2020-000981-41), trastuzumab deruxtecan showed a high intracranial response rate in patients with active brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer and should be considered as a treatment option in this setting.

Conflict of interest statement

R.B. has received honoraria for advisory role from Astra Zeneca, Daiichi, Eisai, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, Puma, Roche, Seagen, lecture honoraria from Astra Zeneca, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre-Fabre, Roche, Seagen and research support from Daiichi, MSD, Novartis and Roche. A.S.B. has research support from Daiichi Sankyo and Roche, honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation for Roche Bristol-Meyers Squibb, Merck, Daiichi Sankyo as well as travel support from Roche, Amgen, Daiichi Sankyo and AbbVie. A.M.S. has received honoraria for lectures from Astra Zeneca and travel support from PharmaMar. Z.B.H. has received honoraria for advisory board from MSD, Roche, congress funding from Daichii Sankyo and lecture honoraria from MSD and Daichii Sankyo. H.H. reports grants from Glock Health Science and Research, BlueSky Immunotherapies and the Austrian Ministry of Education Science and Research. A.I.M. reports honoraria for participation in advisory boards organized by MSD, Servier and BMS, lecture honoraria from Eli Lilly, Servier, BMS and MSD, consulting for Astellas and MSD and travel support from BMS, Roche, Eli Lilly and Daiichi Sankyo. C.M. received honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, MSD, Amgen and travel grants from MSD and Merck Darmstadt. T.F. reports honoraria or being an advisor for MSD, Merck, BMS, Böhringer Ingelheim, Roche, Pfizer, Sanofi, Amgen, Janssen, Takeda and research grants from MSD and Merck. M.P. has received honoraria for lectures, consultation or advisory board participation from the following for-profit companies: Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Gerson Lehrman Group (GLG), CMC Contrast, GlaxoSmithKline, Mundipharma, Roche, BMJ Journals, MedMedia, Astra Zeneca, AbbVie, Lilly, Medahead, Daiichi Sankyo, Sanofi, Merck Sharp & Dome and Tocagen. The following for-profit companies have supported clinical trials and contracted research conducted by M.P. with payments made to his institution: Böhringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Sharp & Dome, Novocure, GlaxoSmithKline and AbbVie. The remaining authors declare no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT flow diagram of the TUXEDO-1 trial. BM, brain metastases.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Waterfall plot of responses in patients evaluable for response by RANO-BM criteria in the TUXEDO-1 trial. Blue bars illustrate the radiographic change of maximum brain metastasis size after start of trastuzumab deruxtecan therapy compared to the baseline measurement. Red dotted lines denote thresholds for response and progression by RANO-BM criteria.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan–Meier plot showing progression-free survival times (months) in the TUXEDO-1 trial.
Extended Data Fig. 1. Health-related quality-of-life.
Extended Data Fig. 1. Health-related quality-of-life.
Health-related quality-of-life. Data are presented as mean values +/- SEM. At each cycle data are based on (n/N) participants where n denotes the number of participants completing a section of the questionnaire at a specific cycle and N the total number of participants reaching that cycle.
Extended Data Fig. 2. Neuron specific enolase…
Extended Data Fig. 2. Neuron specific enolase levels.
Neuron specific enolase levels (ng/ml) in patients with and without response to trastuzumab deruxtecan.

References

    1. Weil RJ, Palmieri DC, Bronder JL, Stark AM, Steeg PS. Breast cancer metastasis to the central nervous system. Am. J. Pathol. 2005;167:913–920. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)61180-7.
    1. Sanna G, et al. Brain metastases in patients with advanced breast cancer. Anticancer Res. 2007;27:2865–2869.
    1. Lin NU, Winer EP. Brain metastases: the HER2 paradigm. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:1648–1655. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2478.
    1. Ufen MP, et al. Metastatic breast cancer: are we treating the same patients as in the past? Ann. Oncol. 2014;25:95–100. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt429.
    1. Soffietti R, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of brain metastases from solid tumors: guidelines from the European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) Neuro. Oncol. 2017;19:162–174. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now241.
    1. Arvold ND, et al. Updates in the management of brain metastases. Neuro. Oncol. 2016;18:1043–1065. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now127.
    1. Bartsch R, et al. Impact of anti-HER2 therapy on overall survival in HER2-overexpressing breast cancer patients with brain metastases. Br. J. Cancer. 2012;106:25–31. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.531.
    1. Brastianos, H. C., Cahill, D. P. & Brastianos, P. K. Systemic therapy of brain metastases. Curr. Neurol. Neurosci. Rep. 15, 518 (2015).
    1. Percy DB, et al. In vivo characterization of changing blood-tumor barrier permeability in a mouse model of breast cancer metastasis: a complementary magnetic resonance imaging approach. Invest. Radiol. 2011;46:718–725. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318226c427.
    1. Kurihara, H. et al. 64Cu-DOTA-trastuzumab PET imaging and HER2 specificity of brain metastases in HER2-positive breast cancer patients. EJNMMI Res. 5, 8 (2015).
    1. Bartsch R, et al. Activity of T-DM1 in Her2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. Clin. Exp. Metastasis. 2015;32:729–737. doi: 10.1007/s10585-015-9740-3.
    1. Jacot W, et al. Efficacy and safety of trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer with brain metastases. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2016;157:307–318. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3828-6.
    1. Center For Drug Evaluation and Research, Application Number 761139Orig1s000, Product Quality Review(s). Food and Drug Administration. (2022).
    1. Ogitani Y, et al. DS-8201a, a novel HER2-targeting ADC with a novel DNA topoisomerase I inhibitor, demonstrates a promising antitumor efficacy with differentiation from T-DM1. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;22:5097–5108. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2822.
    1. Modi S, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in previously treated HER2-positive breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:610–621. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1914510.
    1. Cortés J, et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine for breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022;386:1143–1154. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2115022.
    1. Hurvitz, S. et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd; Ds-82101a) vs. trastuzumab emtansine (T-SM1) in patients (pts) with HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (mBC): subgroup analyses from the randomized phase 3 study DESTINY-Breast03. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7–10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res.82, Abstract GS3-01 (2022).
    1. Lin NU, et al. Multicenter phase II study of lapatinib in patients with brain metastases from HER2-positive breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009;15:1452–1459. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-1080.
    1. Bachelot T, et al. Lapatinib plus capecitabine in patients with previously untreated brain metastases from HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (LANDSCAPE): a single-group phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:64–71. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70432-1.
    1. Freedman RA, et al. TBCRC 022: a phase II trial of neratinib and capecitabine for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer and brain metastases. J. Clin. Oncol. 2019;37:1081–1089. doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01511.
    1. Murthy RK, et al. Tucatinib, trastuzumab, and capecitabine for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:597–609. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1914609.
    1. Gennari A, et al. ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2021;32:1475–1495. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.019.
    1. Le Rhun E, et al. EANO-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients with brain metastasis from solid tumours. Ann. Oncol. 2021;32:1332–1347. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.07.016.
    1. Vogelbaum MA, et al. Treatment for brain metastases: ASCO-SNO-ASTRO Guideline. J. Clin. Oncol. 2022;40:492–516. doi: 10.1200/JCO.21.02314.
    1. Saleem A, et al. Lapatinib access into normal brain and brain metastases in patients with Her-2 overexpressing breast cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2015;5:30–39. doi: 10.1186/s13550-015-0103-5.
    1. Pivot X, et al. CEREBEL (EGF111438): a phase III, randomized, open-label study of lapatinib plus capecitabine versus trastuzumab plus capecitabine in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive metastatic breast cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2015;33:1564–1573. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.57.1794.
    1. Rosner D, Nemoto T, Lane WW. Chemotherapy induces regression of brain metastases in breast carcinoma. Cancer. 1986;58:832–839. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19860815)58:4<832::AID-CNCR2820580404>;2-W.
    1. Van Swearingen AED, et al. LCCC 1025: a phase II study of everolimus, trastuzumab, and vinorelbine to treat progressive HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2018;171:637–648. doi: 10.1007/s10549-018-4852-5.
    1. Lin NU, et al. Pertuzumab plus high-dose trastuzumab in patients with progressive brain metastases and HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: primary analysis of a phase II study. J. Clin. Oncol. 2021;39:2667–2675. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.02822.
    1. Askoxylakis, V. et al. Preclinical efficacy of ado-trastuzumab emtansine in the brain microenvironment. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 108, djv313 (2015).
    1. Montemurro F, et al. Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and brain metastases: exploratory final analysis of cohort 1 from KAMILLA, a single-arm phase IIIb clinical trial ☆. Ann. Oncol. 2020;31:1350–1358. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.020.
    1. Pérez-García, J. M. et al. Trastuzumab deruxtecan in patients with central nervous system involvement from HER2-positive breast cancer: The DEBBRAH trial. Neuro. Oncol. noac144 (2022).
    1. Sheheryar K, et al. Preclinical and clinical efficacy of trastuzumab deruxtecan in breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7–10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res.82, Abstract PD4-05 (2022).
    1. Corti, C. et al. Targeting brain metastases in breast cancer. Cancer Treat. Rev. 103, 3119 (2022).
    1. Lin NU, et al. Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:e270–e278. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70057-4.
    1. Eisenhauer EA, et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur. J. Cancer. 2009;45:228–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
    1. Massaron S, et al. Neuron-specific enolase evaluation in patients with neuroblastoma. Tumour Biol. 1998;19:261–268. doi: 10.1159/000030016.
    1. Vos MJ, et al. Serum levels of S-100B protein and neuron-specific enolase in glioma patients: a pilot study. Anticancer Res. 2004;24:2511–2514.
    1. Martens P, Raabe A, Johnsson P. Serum S-100 and neuron-specific enolase for prediction of regaining consciousness after global cerebral ischemia. Stroke. 1998;29:2363–2366. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.29.11.2363.
    1. Simon R. Optimal two-stage designs for phase II clinical trials. Control. Clin. Trials. 1989;10:1–10. doi: 10.1016/0197-2456(89)90015-9.
    1. Bender R, Lange S. Adjusting for multiple testing—when and how? J. Clin. Epidemiol. 2001;54:343–349. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00314-0.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner