Screening for pulmonary tuberculosis in HIV-infected individuals: AIDS Clinical Trials Group Protocol A5253

S Swindells, L Komarow, S Tripathy, K P Cain, R R MacGregor, J M Achkar, A Gupta, V G Veloso, A Asmelash, A E Omoz-Oarhe, S Gengiah, U Lalloo, R Allen, C Shiboski, J Andersen, S S Qasba, D K Katzenstein, AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5253 Study Team, S Swindells, L Komarow, S Tripathy, K P Cain, R R MacGregor, J M Achkar, A Gupta, V G Veloso, A Asmelash, A E Omoz-Oarhe, S Gengiah, U Lalloo, R Allen, C Shiboski, J Andersen, S S Qasba, D K Katzenstein, AIDS Clinical Trials Group 5253 Study Team

Abstract

Background: Improved tuberculosis (TB) screening is urgently needed for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected patients.

Methods: An observational, multi-country, cross-sectional study of HIV-infected patients to compare a standardized diagnostic evaluation (SDE) for TB with standard of care (SOC). SOC evaluations included TB symptom review (current cough, fever, night sweats and/or weight loss), sputum Ziehl-Neelsen staining and chest radiography. SDE screening added extended clinical signs and symptoms and fluorescent microscopy (FM). All participants underwent all evaluations. Mycobacterium tuberculosis on sputum culture was the primary outcome.

Results: A total of 801 participants were enrolled from Botswana, Malawi, South Africa, Zimbabwe, India, Peru and Brazil. The median age was 33 years; 37% were male, and median CD4 count was 275 cells/mm(3). Thirty-one participants (4%) had a positive culture on Löwenstein-Jensen media and 54 (8%) on MGIT. All but one positive culture came from sub-Saharan Africa, where the prevalence of TB was 54/445 (12%). SOC screening had 54% sensitivity (95%CI 40-67) and 76% specificity (95%CI 72-80). Positive and negative predictive values were respectively 24% and 92%. No elements of the SDE improved the predictive values of SOC.

Conclusions: Symptom-based screening with smear microscopy was insufficiently sensitive. More sensitive diagnostic testing is required for HIV-infected patients.

Figures

Figure
Figure
*Reasons for screen failures were: 9 were assigned 2 screening numbers; 3 failed appointments; 1 was taking prohibited medication; 1 negative HIV test; 1 unable to produce sputum; 2 screened after accrual was complete

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner