Patterned feeding experience for preterm infants: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Rita H Pickler, Paul A Wetzel, Jareen Meinzen-Derr, Heather L Tubbs-Cooley, Margo Moore, Rita H Pickler, Paul A Wetzel, Jareen Meinzen-Derr, Heather L Tubbs-Cooley, Margo Moore

Abstract

Background: Neurobehavioral disabilities occur in 5-15% of preterm infants with an estimated 50-70% of very low birth weight preterm infants experiencing later dysfunction, including cognitive, behavioral, and social delays that often persist into adulthood. Factors implicated in poor neurobehavioral and developmental outcomes are hospitalization in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and inconsistent caregiving patterns. Although much underlying brain damage occurs in utero or shortly after birth, neuroprotective strategies can stop lesions from progressing, particularly when these strategies are used during the most sensitive periods of neural plasticity occurring months before term age. The purpose of this randomized trial is to test the effect of a patterned feeding experience on preterm infants' neurobehavioral organization and development, cognitive function, and clinical outcomes.

Methods: This trial uses an experimental, longitudinal, 2-group design with 120 preterm infants. Infants are enrolled within the first week of life and randomized to an experimental group receiving a patterned feeding experience from the first gavage feeding through discharge or to a control group receiving usual feeding care experience. The intervention involves a continuity of tactile experiences associated with feeding to train and build neuronal networks supportive of normal infant feeding experience. Primary outcomes are neurobehavioral organization as measured by Neurobehavioral Assessment of the Preterm Infant at 3 time points: the transition to oral feedings, NICU discharge, and 2 months corrected age. Secondary aims are cognitive function measured using the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition at 6 months corrected age, neurobehavioral development (sucking organization, feeding performance, and heart rate variability), and clinical outcomes (length of NICU stay and time to full oral feeding). The potential effects of demographic and biobehavioral factors (perinatal events and conditions of maternal or fetal/newborn origin and immunologic and genetic biomarkers) on the outcome variables will also be considered.

Discussion: Theoretically, the intervention provided at a critical time in neurologic system development and associated with a recurring event (feeding) should enhance neural connections that may be important for later development, particularly language and other cognitive and neurobehavioral organization skills.

Trial registration: NCT01577615 11 April 2012.

References

    1. Mwaniki MK, Atieno M, Lawn JE, Newton CR. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes after intrauterine and neonatal insults: a systematic review. Lancet. 2012;379(9814):445–52. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61577-8.
    1. Taylor HG, Margevicius S, Schluchter M, Andreias L, Hack M. Persisting behavior problems in extremely low birth weight adolescents. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2015;36(3):178–87. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000139.
    1. Hack M, Cartar L, Schluchter M, Klein N, Forrest CB. Self-perceived health, functioning and well-being of very low birth weight infants at age 20 years. J Pediatr. 2007;151(6):635–41. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.04.063.
    1. Petrou S, Henderson J, Bracewell M, Hockley C, Wolke D, Marlow N. Pushing the boundaries of viability: the economic impact of extreme preterm birth. Early Hum Dev. 2006;82:77–84. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2006.01.002.
    1. Perry BD, Pollard RA, Blakley TL, Baker WL, Vigilante D. Childhood trauma, the neurobiology of adaptation, and “use-dependent” development of the brain: how “states” become “traits.”. Infant Ment Health J. 1995;16(4):271–91. doi: 10.1002/1097-0355(199524)16:4<271::AID-IMHJ2280160404>;2-B.
    1. Gray L, Philbin K. Effects of the neonatal intensive unit on auditory attention and distraction. Clin Perinatol. 2004;31:243–60. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2004.04.013.
    1. Graven S. Early neurosensory visual development of the fetus and newborn. Clin Perinatol. 2004;31:199–216. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2004.04.010.
    1. Bada HS, Korones SB, Perry EH, Arheart KL, Pourcyrous M, Runyan JW, III, et al. Frequent handling in the neonatal intensive care unit and intraventricular hemorrhage. J Pediatr. 1990;117:126–31. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3476(05)72460-4.
    1. Als H, Duffy FH, McAnulty GB, Rivkin MJ, Vajapeyam S, Mulkern RV, et al. Early experience alters brain function and structure. Pediatr. 2004;113:846–57. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.4.846.
    1. Volpe JJ. Brain injury in premature infants: a complex amalgam of destructive and developmental disturbances. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:110–24. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70294-1.
    1. Hussey-Gardner B, Famuyide M. Developmental interventions in the NICU: what are the developmental benefits? NeoReviews. 2009;10:e113–20. doi: 10.1542/neo.10-3-e113.
    1. Pickler RH, McGrath JM, Reyna BA, McCain N, Lewis M, Cone S, et al. A model of neurodevelopmental risk and protection for preterm infants. J Perinat Neonatal Nurs. 2010;24:356–65. doi: 10.1097/JPN.0b013e3181fb1e70.
    1. Luciana M. Cognitive development in children born preterm: implications for theories of brain plasticity following early injury. Dev Psychopathol. 2003;15:1017–47. doi: 10.1017/S095457940300049X.
    1. Brown LF, Pickler RH. A guided feeding intervention for mothers of preterm infants: Two case studies. J Spec Pediatr Nurs. 2013;18:98–108. doi: 10.1111/jspn.12020.
    1. Markham JA, Greenough WT. Experience-driven brain plasticity: beyond the synapse. Neuron Glia Biol. 2004;1(4):351–63. doi: 10.1017/S1740925X05000219.
    1. Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:200–7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583.
    1. Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Trials. 2010;11:32. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-11-32.
    1. Pickler RH, Best AM, Reyna BA, Wetzel PA, Gutcher GR. Prediction of feeding performance in preterm infants. Newborn Infant Nurs Rev. 2005;5(3):116–23. doi: 10.1053/j.nainr.2005.04.001.
    1. Pickler RH, Reyna BA. A descriptive study of bottle-feeding opportunities in preterm infants. Adv Neonatal Care. 2003;3(3):139–46. doi: 10.1016/S1536-0903(03)00074-2.
    1. Medoff-Cooper B, Shultz J, Kaplan J. Sucking behavior of preterm neonates as a predictor of developmental outcomes. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2009;30:16–22. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e318196b0a8.
    1. Pickler RH, Best AM, Reyna BA, Gutcher G, Wetzel PA. Predictors of nutritive sucking in preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2006;26(11):693–9. doi: 10.1038/sj.jp.7211590.
    1. Constantinou JC, Fleisher BE, Korner AF, Stevenson DK. Prediction from the neurobehavioral assessment of the preterm infant to the Bayley II at two years of age. J Investig Med. 1997;45:117A.
    1. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of infant and toddler development. 3. Harcourt Assessment: San Antonio, TX; 2006.
    1. Murata Y, Itakura A, Matsuzawa K, Okumura A, Wakai K, Mizutani S. Possible antenatal and perinatal related factors in development of cystic periventricular leucomalacia. Brain Dev. 2005;27(1):17–21. doi: 10.1016/j.braindev.2004.02.011.
    1. Versland LB, Sommerfelt K, Elgen I. Maternal signs of chorioamnionitis: Persistent cognitive impairment in low-birthweight children. Acta Paediatr. 2006;95:231–5. doi: 10.1080/08035250500352151.
    1. Škrablin S, Maurac I, Banović V, Bošnjak-Nadj K. Perinatal factors associated with the neurologic impairment of children born preterm I. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;102(1):12–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.02.008.
    1. Wilson-Costello D. Risk factors for neurologic impairment among very low birth weight infants. Semin Pediatr Neurol. 2001;8(2):120–6. doi: 10.1053/spen.2001.25228.
    1. Korner AF, Stevenson DK, Kraemer HC, Spiker D, Scott DT, Constantinou J, et al. Prediction of the development of low birth weight preterm infants by a new neonatal medical index. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1993;14(2):106–11. doi: 10.1097/00004703-199304000-00005.
    1. Gaynor JW, Gerdes M, Zackai EH, Bernbaum J, Wernovsky G, Clancy RR, et al. J Apolipoprotein E genotype and neurodevelopmental sequelae of infant cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126(6):1736–45. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5223(03)01188-7.
    1. Medoff-Cooper B, Ratcliffe SJ. Development of preterm infants: feeding behaviors and brazelton neonatal behavioral assessment scale at 40 and 44 weeks’ postconceptional age. ANS Adv Nurs Sci. 2005;28(4):356–63. doi: 10.1097/00012272-200510000-00007.
    1. Pickler RH, Best A, Crosson D. The effect of feeding experience on clinical outcomes in preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2009;29(2):124–9. doi: 10.1038/jp.2008.140.
    1. Simpson C, Schanler RJ, Lau C. Early introduction of oral feeding in preterm infants. Pediatr. 2002;110(3):517–22. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.3.517.
    1. Lau C, Alagugurusamy R, Schanler RJ, Smith EO, Shulman RJ. Characterization of the developmental stages of sucking in preterm infants during bottle feeding. Acta Paediatr. 2000;89:846–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2000.tb00393.x.
    1. Lau C, Schanler RJ. Oral feeding in premature infants: advantage of a self-paced milk flow. Acta Paediatr. 2000;89(4):453–9. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2000.tb00083.x.
    1. Baldzer K, Dykes FD, Jones SA, Brogan M, Carrigan TA, Giddens DP. Heart rate variability analysis in full-term infants: spectral indices for study of neonatal cardiorespiratory control. Pediatr Res. 1989;26(3):188–95. doi: 10.1203/00006450-198909000-00004.
    1. Prietsch V, Knoepke U, Obladen M. Continuous monitoring of heart rate variability in preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 1994;37:117–31. doi: 10.1016/0378-3782(94)90153-8.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner