Sonographic differentiation of complicated from uncomplicated appendicitis

Tanja Rawolle, Marc Reismann, Maximiliane I Minderjahn, Christian Bassir, Kathrin Hauptmann, Karin Rothe, Josephine Reismann, Tanja Rawolle, Marc Reismann, Maximiliane I Minderjahn, Christian Bassir, Kathrin Hauptmann, Karin Rothe, Josephine Reismann

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to differentiate acute uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis, by investigating the correlation between sonographic findings and histological results in different types of paediatric appendicitis.

Methods: This is a retrospective study of 1017 paediatric patients (age < 18 years) who underwent ultrasound by paediatric radiologists before appendicectomy at our institution between 2006 and 2016. Histologically, uncomplicated appendicitis was primarily associated with transmural infiltration of neutrophil granulocytes, while complicated appendicitis was characterised by transmural myonecrosis. Logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the association between sonographic and histological findings.

Results: Out of 566 (56%) male and 451 (44%) female patients with a mean age of 10.7 years, uncomplicated appendicitis was histologically diagnosed in 446 (44%) children and complicated appendicitis was diagnosed in 348 (34%) cases. The following ultrasound findings were significantly associated with complicated appendicitis in multivariate regression: an increased appendiceal diameter (OR = 1.3, p < .001), periappendiceal fat inflammation (OR = 1.5, p = 0.02), the presence of an appendicolith (OR = 1.7, p = 0.01) and a suspected perforation (OR = 6.0, p < .001) by the pediatric radiologist. For complicated appendicitis, an appendiceal diameter of more than 6 mm had the highest sensitivity (98%), while a sonographically suspected perforation showed the highest specificity (94%).

Conclusion: Abdominal sonography by paediatric radiologists can differentiate between uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis in paediatric patients by using an increased appendiceal diameter, periappendiceal fat inflammation, the presence of an appendicolith and a suspected perforation as discriminatory markers.

Advances in knowledge: This paper demonstrates expanded information on ultrasound, which is not only an essential tool for diagnosing appendicitis, but also a key method for distinguishing between different forms of appendicitis when performed by paediatric radiologists. Compared with previous studies, the crucial distinction features in our analysis are 1) the definition of gangrene and not primarily perforation as an acute complicated appendicitis enabling early decision-making by sonography and 2) a large number of patients in a particularly affected age group.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Patient flow diagram.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Negative: a: normal sonography of appendix; b: normal histopathological conditions with normal wall structure and no signs of inflammation. Phlegmonous (= acute uncomplicated appendicitis): c: appendix with marked echogenic reaction; d: diffuse granulocytic infiltration of the wall into the subserous fatty tissue and the mesenteriolum. Gangrenous (= acute complicated appendicitis): e: wall oedema, beginning fragmentation of the wall structure; f: microabscesses in the wall and circumscribed almost complete wall necrosis. Severe fibrinous-purulent serositis. Fibrinous-purulent inflammation of adjacent fatty tissue.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner