An open-label randomized multi-Centre study to evaluate anterior controllable Antedisplacement and fusion versus posterior Laminoplasty in patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: study design and analysis plan (STAR)

Yu Chen, Jingchuan Sun, Dan Han, Xiaoqiu Yuan, Yuan Wang, Yongfei Guo, Xihua Zhong, Jiangang Shi, Yu Chen, Jingchuan Sun, Dan Han, Xiaoqiu Yuan, Yuan Wang, Yongfei Guo, Xihua Zhong, Jiangang Shi

Abstract

Background: In treating patients with cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (COPLL), a novel surgery technique - anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion (ACAF) suggested promising clinical benefits in recent exploratory studies.

Methods: This is a multicentre, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, active controlled trial that will compare the clinical benefits of ACAF versus conventional posterior laminoplasty (LAMP) in severe COPLL patients. A total of 164 patients will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either ACAF or LAMP group. The primary efficacy measure is cervical- Japanese Orthopaedic Association (C-JOA) recovery rate at 12 months post operation, which is to be derived by Hirabayashi's method from JOA data (range, 0 [worst] to 17 [normal condition]). Other important secondary efficacy endpoints include visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score (range, 0 [no pain] to 10 [most severe]), 10-item neck disability index (NDI, a total range of 0 to 50 points, the highest index the worst) and 6-level Nurick disability grade (range, 0 [mild] to 5 [severe]). Safety endpoints including adverse events, perioperative complications, and adverse events of special interest will also be assessed in this study. Full analysis set for baseline and efficacy data analyses according to the intention-to-treat principle will be established as the primary analysis population. Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) will be used to analyze the C-JOA recovery rate, with random stratification factors (if appropriate) and the treatment group as fixed factors, and the baseline level of C-JOA score as covariate.

Discussion: This study is designed to demonstrate the clinical benefits of ACAF as compared to conventional LAMP in COPLL patients. It will provide clinical evidence that the novel surgery technique - ACAF might be more favorable in treating patients with severe cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. (Words: 290).

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04968028 .

Keywords: Anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion; Cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament; Clinical outcome; Posterior laminoplasty; Randomized controlled trial.

Conflict of interest statement

None.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study flow chart. Abbreviations: ACAF, anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion; C-JOA, cervical Japanese Orthopaedic Association; LAMP, posterior laminoplasty; NDI, neck disability index; VAS, visual analogue scale
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic diagram of ACAF technique with steps A through E: (A) Expose and confirm surgical levels; (B) Remove discs, decompress at the levels cephalic and caudal to OPLL and remove the anterior portion of the middle vertebral bodies with OPLL; (C) Place interbody cages and create a groove on the left side, and fix anterior plate; (D) Create a groove on the right side, and isolate the vertebrae with OPLL and (E) Evaluate the vertebrae with OPLL. Sagittal (left) and transverse (right) sectional images of the cervical spine. Abbreviations: ACAF, anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion; OPLL, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

References

    1. Barrett S. Boody, Mayan Lendner, Alexander R Vaccaro. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine: a review. Int Orthop. 2019;43(4):797–805. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4106-5.
    1. Matsunaga S, Sakou T. OPLL: disease entity, incidence, literature search and prognosis. Tokyo: Springer; 2006. pp. 11–17.
    1. Zhen C, Sun Y. Research progress on epidemiology of ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament of cervical spine. Chin J Spine Spinal Cord. 2017;27(5):460–464.
    1. Singh NA, Shetty AP, Jakkepally S, Kumarasamy D, Kanna RM, Rajasekaran S. Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament in Cervical Spine and Its Association With Ossified Lesions in the Whole Spine: A Cross-Sectional Study of 2500 CT Scans. Global Spine J. 2021;2192568221993440.
    1. Bakhsh W, Saleh A, Yokogawa N, Gruber J, Rubery PT, Mesfin A. Cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a computed tomography-based epidemiological study of 2917 patients. Global Spine J. 2019;9(8):820–825. doi: 10.1177/2192568219833658.
    1. Nam DC, Lee HJ, Lee CJ, Hwang SC. Molecular pathophysiology of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) Biomol Ther (Seoul) 2019;27(4):342–348. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2019.043.
    1. Pham MH, Attenello FJ, Lucas J, He S, Stapleton CJ, Hsieh PC. Conservative management of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. A review. Neurosurg Focus. 2011;30(3):E2. doi: 10.3171/2011.1.focus10273.
    1. Matsunaga S, Sakou T. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament of the cervical spine: etiology and natural history. Spine. 2012;37(5):E309–E314. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318241ad33.
    1. Zhang J, Liang Q, Qin D, Song J, An Q, Wang X, Zhao Z. The anterior versus posterior approach for the treatment of ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Spinal Cord Med. 2019;6:1–10.
    1. Aljuboori Z, Boakye M. The natural history of cervical Spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a review article. Cureus. 2019;11(7):e5074. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5074.
    1. Head J, Rymarczuk G, Stricsek G, Velagapudi L, Maulucci C, Hoelscher C, Harrop J. Ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: surgical approaches and associated complications. Neurospine. 2019;16(3):517–529. doi: 10.14245/ns.1938222.111.
    1. Kwok SSS, Cheung JPY. Surgical decision-making for ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament versus other types of degenerative cervical myelopathy: anterior versus posterior approaches. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020;21(1):823. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03830-0.
    1. Sun J, Shi J, Xu X, Yang Y, Wang Y, Kong Q, Yang H, Guo Y, Han D, Jiang J, Shi G, Yuan W, Jia L. Anterior controllable antidisplacement and fusion surgery for the treatment of multilevel severe ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with myelopathy: preliminary clinical results of a novel technique. Eur Spine J. 2018;27(6):1469–1478. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5437-4.
    1. Chen Y, Jingchuan S, Xiaoqiu Y, Guo Y, Yang H, Deyu C, Jiangang S. Comparison of anterior controllable Antedisplacement and fusion with posterior Laminoplasty in the treatment of multilevel cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a prospective, randomized, and control study with at least 1-year follow up. Spine. 2020;45(16):1091–1101. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000003462.
    1. Shi J. Principle and application of cervical spine anterior controllable antedisplacement and fusion. Beijing: Science Press; 2020.
    1. Lee D-H, Park S, Hong CG. A novel anterior decompression technique for kyphosis line (K-line) ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL): vertebral body sliding osteotomy. J Spine Surg. 2020;6(1):196–204. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.12.05.
    1. Altman DG, Bland JM. Treatment allocation by minimisation. BMJ. 2005;330(7495):843. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7495.843.
    1. Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975;31(1):103–115. doi: 10.2307/2529712.
    1. Chinese Journal of Surgery The experts consensus on the surgical treatment and perioperative management of cervical spondylosis. Chin J Surg. 2018;56(12):881–884. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2018.12.001.
    1. Hirabayashi K, Miyakawa J, Satomi K, et al. Operative results and postoperative progression of ossification among patients with ossification of cervical posterior longitudinal ligament. Spine. 1981;6(4):354–364. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198107000-00005.
    1. Gillian A, Hawker SM, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale (CPGS), Short Form-36 Bodily Pain Scale (SF-36 BPS), and Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP) Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2011;63(Suppl 11):S240–S252.
    1. Vernon H, Mior S. The neck disability index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manip Physiol Ther. 1991;14(7):409–415.
    1. Nurick S. The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis. Brain. 1972;95(1):87–100. doi: 10.1093/brain/95.1.87.
    1. National Cancer Institute (USA). Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0 [, March 15, 2021, date last accessed].
    1. R Core Team (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. [URL , March 15th, 2021, date last accessed.]
    1. Newcombe RG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med. 1998;17(8):873–890. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19980430)17:8<873::AID-SIM779>;2-I.
    1. Cui L, Hung HM, Wang SJ. Modification of sample size in group sequential clinical trials. Biometrics. 1999;55(3):853–857. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.1999.00853.x.
    1. Haybittle JL. Repeated assessment of results in clinical trials of cancer treatment. Br J Radiol. 1971;44(526):793–797. doi: 10.1259/0007-1285-44-526-793.
    1. Peto R, Pike MC, Armitage P, Breslow NE, Cox DR, Howard SV, Mantel N, McPherson K, Peto J, Smith PG. Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient: I. Introduction and design. Br J Cancer. 1976;34(6):585–612. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1976.220.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner