Effects of vasopressinergic receptor agonists on sublingual microcirculation in norepinephrine-dependent septic shock

Andrea Morelli, Abele Donati, Christian Ertmer, Sebastian Rehberg, Tim Kampmeier, Alessandra Orecchioni, Alessandro Di Russo, Annalia D'Egidio, Giovanni Landoni, Maria Rita Lombrano, Laura Botticelli, Agnese Valentini, Alberto Zangrillo, Paolo Pietropaoli, Martin Westphal, Andrea Morelli, Abele Donati, Christian Ertmer, Sebastian Rehberg, Tim Kampmeier, Alessandra Orecchioni, Alessandro Di Russo, Annalia D'Egidio, Giovanni Landoni, Maria Rita Lombrano, Laura Botticelli, Agnese Valentini, Alberto Zangrillo, Paolo Pietropaoli, Martin Westphal

Abstract

Introduction: The present study was designed to determine the effects of continuously infused norepinephrine (NE) plus (1) terlipressin (TP) or (2) arginine vasopressin (AVP) or (3) placebo on sublingual microcirculation in septic shock patients. The primary study end point was a difference of ≥ 20% in the microvascular flow index of small vessels among groups.

Methods: The design of the study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial. NE was titrated to maintain mean arterial pressure (MAP) between 65 and 75 mmHg after establishment of normovolemia in 60 septic shock patients. Thereafter patients (n = 20 per group) were randomized to receive continuous infusions of either TP (1 μg/kg/hour), AVP (0.04 U/minute) or placebo (isotonic saline). In all groups, open-label NE was adjusted to maintain MAP within threshold values if needed. The sublingual microcirculatory blood flow of small vessels was assessed by sidestream dark-field imaging. All measurements, including data from right heart catheterization and norepinephrine requirements, were obtained at baseline and 6 hours after randomization.

Results: TP and AVP decreased NE requirements at the end of the 6-hour study period. The data are medians (25th and 75th interquartile ranges (IQRs)): 0.57 μg/kg/minute (0.29 to 1.04) vs. 0.16 μg/kg/minute (0.03 to 0.37) for TP and 0.40 μg/kg/minute (0.20 to 1.05) vs. 0.23 μg/kg/minute (0.03 to 0.77) for AVP, with statistical significance of P < 0.05 vs. baseline and vs. placebo. There were no differences in sublingual microcirculatory variables, systemic hemodynamics, oxygen transport and acid-base homeostasis among the three study groups during the entire observation period. The proportions of perfused vessels increased in relation to baseline within all study groups, and there were no significant differences between groups. The specific data were as follows (median (IQR)): 9.7% (2.6 to 19.8) for TP, 8.9% (0.0 to 17.8) for AVP, and 6.9% (3.5 to 10.1) for placebo (P < 0.05 vs. baseline for each comparison), as well as perfused vessel density 18.6% (8.6 to 36.9) for TP, 20.2% (-3.0 to 37.2) for AVP, and 11.4% (-3.0 to 19.4) for placebo (P < 0.05 vs. baseline for each comparison).

Conclusions: The present study suggests that to achieve a MAP of 65 to 75 mmHg in septic patients treated with NE, the addition of continuously infused low-dose TP or AVP does not affect sublingual microcirculatory blood flow. In addition, our results suggest that microcirculatory flow abnormalities are mainly related to other factors (for example, volume status, timing, hemodynamics and progression of the disease) rather than to the vasopressor per se.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrial.gov NCT00995839.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Absolute changes in microcirculatory variables. AVP, arginine vasopressin; BL, baseline; DBS, De Backer Score; HI, heterogenity index; MFI, microvascular flow index of small vessels (Ø < 20 μm); NE, norepinephrine; CTRL, control; PPV, proportion of perfused vessels; PVD, perfused vessel density; TP, terlipressin; VD, vessel density. Solid lines, median; dashed lines, mean; boxes, 25th and 75th percentiles; whisker caps, 10th and 90th percentiles. aP < 0.05, aaP < 0.01, aaaP < 0.001 vs. BL; bP < 0.05 vs. CTRL.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Norepinephrine requirements. The upper panel shows norepinephrine (NE) infusion rates in the terlipressin (TP), arginine vasopressin (AVP) and control (CTRL) groups at baseline (BL) and at 6 hours. The lower panel shows relative NE changes (dNE) after 6 hours compared to baseline in each study group. Solid lines, median; dashed lines, mean; boxes, 25th and 75th percentiles; whisker caps, 10th and 90th percentiles. aaP < 0.01, aaaP < 0.001 vs. BL; bP < 0.05, bbbP < 0.001 vs. controls.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative changes in microcirculatory variables. Data represent relative changes from baseline (BL) at 6 hours. AVP, arginine vasopressin; dDBS, relative changes in De Backer Score; dHI, relative changes in heterogeneity index; dMFI, relative changes in microvascular flow index of small vessels (Ø < 20 μm); dPPV, relative changes in proportion of perfused vessels; dPVD, relative changes in perfused vessel density; dVD, relative changes in vessel density; CTRL, control; TP, terlipressin. Solid lines, median; dashed lines, mean; boxes, 25th and 75th percentiles; whisker caps, 10th and 90th percentiles.

References

    1. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R, Calandra T, Dhainaut JF, Gerlach H, Harvey M, Marini JJ, Marshall J, Ranieri M, Ramsay G, Sevransky J, Thompson BT, Townsend S, Vender JS, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL. International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee; American Association of Critical Care Nurses; American College of Chest Physicians; American College of Emergency Physicians; Canadian Critical Care Society; European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases; European Society of Intensive Care Medicine; European Respiratory Society; International Sepsis Forum; Japanese Association for Acute Medicine; Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine; Society of Critical Care Medicine; Society of Hospital Medicine; Surgical Infection Society; World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008. Crit Care Med. 2008;36:296–327. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000298158.12101.41.
    1. Trzeciak S, Cinel I, Phillip Dellinger R, Shapiro NI, Arnold RC, Parrillo JE, Hollenberg SM. Microcirculatory Alterations in Resuscitation and Shock (MARS) Investigators. Resuscitating the microcirculation in sepsis: the central role of nitric oxide, emerging concepts for novel therapies, and challenges for clinical trials. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:399–413. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2008.00109.x.
    1. Trzeciak S, Dellinger RP, Parrillo JE, Guglielmi M, Bajaj J, Abate NL, Arnold RC, Colilla S, Zanotti S, Hollenberg SM. Microcirculatory Alterations in Resuscitation and Shock Investigators. Early microcirculatory perfusion derangements in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: relationship to hemodynamics, oxygen transport, and survival. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:88–98. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.08.021.
    1. De Backer D, Ortiz JA, Salgado D. Coupling microcirculation to systemic hemodynamics. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2010;16:250–254. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3283383621.
    1. Sakr Y, Dubois MJ, De Backer D, Creteur J, Vincent JL. Persistent microcirculatory alterations are associated with organ failure and death in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:403–408. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000198107.61493.5A.
    1. Dubin A, Pozo MO, Casabella CA, Pálizas F Jr, Murias G, Moseinco MC, Kanoore Edul VS, Pálizas F, Estenssoro E, Ince C. Increasing arterial blood pressure with norepinephrine does not improve microcirculatory blood flow: a prospective study. Crit Care. 2009;13:R92. doi: 10.1186/cc7922.
    1. Jhanji S, Stirling S, Patel N, Hinds CJ, Pearse RM. The effect of increasing doses of norepinephrine on tissue oxygenation and microvascular flow in patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2009;37:1961–1966. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181a00a1c.
    1. De Backer D, Hollenberg S, Boerma C, Goedhart P, Büchele G, Ospina-Tascon G, Dobbe I, Ince C. How to evaluate the microcirculation? Report of a round table conference. Crit Care. 2007;11:R101–R111. doi: 10.1186/cc6118.
    1. Kaiser L. Adjusting for baseline: change or percentage change. Stat Med. 1989;8:1183–1190. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780081002.
    1. Morelli A, Donati A, Ertmer C, Rehberg S, Lange M, Orecchioni A, Cecchini V, Landoni G, Pelaia P, Pietropaoli P, Van Aken H, Teboul JL, Ince C, Westphal M. Levosimendan for resuscitating the microcirculation in patients with septic shock: a randomized controlled study. Crit Care. 2010;14:R232. doi: 10.1186/cc9387.
    1. Boerma EC, Ince C. The role of vasoactive agents in the resuscitation of microvascular perfusion and tissue oxygenation in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:2004–2018. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1970-x.
    1. Buwalda M, Ince C. Opening the microcirculation: can vasodilators be useful in sepsis? Intensive Care Med. 2002;28:1208–1217. doi: 10.1007/s00134-002-1407-2.
    1. Petersen MB. The effect of vasopressin and related compounds at V1a and V2 receptors in animal models relevant to human disease. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006;99:96–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_299.x.
    1. Barrett LK, Singer M, Clapp LH. Vasopressin: mechanisms of action on the vasculature in health and in septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:33–40. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Lange M, Ertmer C, Westphal M. Vasopressin vs terlipressin in the treatment of cardiovascular failure in sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34:821–832. doi: 10.1007/s00134-007-0946-y.
    1. Russell JA, Walley KR, Singer J, Gordon AC, Hébert PC, Cooper DJ, Holmes CL, Mehta S, Granton JT, Storms MM, Cook DJ, Presneill JJ, Ayers D. VASST Investigators. Vasopressin versus norepinephrine infusion in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:877–887. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa067373.
    1. Rehberg S, Ertmer C, Köhler G, Spiegel HU, Morelli A, Lange M, Moll K, Schlack K, Van Aken H, Su F, Vincent JL, Westphal M. Role of arginine vasopressin and terlipressin as firstline vasopressor agents in fulminant ovine septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:1286–1296. doi: 10.1007/s00134-009-1470-z.
    1. Traber DL. Selective V1a receptor agonists in experimental septic shock [abstract] Crit Care. 2007;11(Suppl 4):P51. doi: 10.1186/cc6030.
    1. Morelli A, Ertmer C, Rehberg S, Lange M, Orecchioni A, Cecchini V, Bachetoni A, D'Alessandro M, Van Aken H, Pietropaoli P, Westphal M. Continuous terlipressin versus vasopressin infusion in septic shock (TERLIVAP): a randomized, controlled pilot study. Crit Care. 2009;13:R130. doi: 10.1186/cc7990.
    1. Rehberg S, Ertmer C, Lange M, Morelli A, Whorton E, Dünser M, Strohhäcker AK, Lipke E, Kampmeier TG, Van Aken H, Traber DL, Westphal M. Role of selective V2-receptor-antagonism in septic shock: a randomized, controlled, experimental study. Crit Care. 2010;14:R200. doi: 10.1186/cc9320.
    1. Rehberg S, Ertmer C, Vincent JL, Morelli A, Schneider M, Lange M, Van Aken H, Traber DL, Westphal M. Role of selective V1a receptor agonism in ovine septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2011;39:119–125. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181fa3898.
    1. Kampmeier TG, Westphal M, Rehberg S, Morelli A, Lange M, Van Aken H, Ertmer C. Effects of early versus delayed terlipressin infusion on hemodynamics and catecholamine requirements in ovine septic shock. Critical Care. 2011;15:P93. doi: 10.1186/cc9513.
    1. Morelli A, Donati A, Ertmer C, Rehberg S, Orecchioni A, Di Russo A, Pelaia P, Pietropaoli P, Westphal M. Short-term effects of terlipressin bolus infusion on sublingual microcirculatory blood flow during septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37:963–969. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2148-x.
    1. Boerma EC, Koopmans M, Konijn A, Kaiferova K, Bakker AJ, van Roon EN, Buter H, Bruins N, Egbers PH, Gerritsen RT, Koetsier PM, Kingma WP, Kuiper MA, Ince C. Effects of nitroglycerin on sublingual microcirculatory blood flow in patients with severe sepsis/septic shock after a strict resuscitation protocol: a double-blind randomized placebo controlled trial. Crit Care Med. 2010;38:93–100. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b02fc1.
    1. Ospina-Tascon G, Neves AP, Occhipinti G, Donadello K, Büchele G, Simion D, Chierego ML, Silva TO, Fonseca A, Vincent JL, De Backer D. Effects of fluids on microvascular perfusion in patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:949–955. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-1843-3.
    1. Dubin A, Pozo MO, Casabella CA, Murias G, Pálizas F Jr, Moseinco MC, Kanoore Edul VS, Pálizas F, Estenssoro E, Ince C. Comparison of 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 and saline solution for resuscitation of the microcirculation during the early goal-directed therapy of septic patients. J Crit Care. 2010;25:659–659. e1-e8.
    1. De Backer D, Ospina-Tascon G, Salgado D, Favory R, Creteur J, Vincent JL. Monitoring the microcirculation in the critically ill patient: current methods and future approaches. Intensive Care Med. 2010;36:1813–1825. doi: 10.1007/s00134-010-2005-3.
    1. Boerma EC, van der Voort PH, Spronk PE, Ince C. Relationship between sublingual and intestinal microcirculatory perfusion in patients with abdominal sepsis. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1055–1060. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259527.89927.F9.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner