Identification of macrophage activation-related biomarkers in obese type 2 diabetes that may be indicative of enhanced respiratory risk in COVID-19

Abu Saleh Md Moin, Thozhukat Sathyapalan, Ilhame Diboun, Stephen L Atkin, Alexandra E Butler, Abu Saleh Md Moin, Thozhukat Sathyapalan, Ilhame Diboun, Stephen L Atkin, Alexandra E Butler

Abstract

Hyperactivation of the immune system through obesity and diabetes may enhance infection severity complicated by Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS). The objective was to determine the circulatory biomarkers for macrophage activation at baseline and after serum glucose normalization in obese type 2 diabetes (OT2D) subjects. A case-controlled interventional pilot study in OT2D (n = 23) and control subjects (n = 23). OT2D subjects underwent hyperinsulinemic clamp to normalize serum glucose. Plasma macrophage-related proteins were determined using Slow Off-rate Modified Aptamer-scan plasma protein measurement at baseline (control and OT2D subjects) and after 1-h of insulin clamp (OT2D subjects only). Basal M1 macrophage activation was characterized by elevated levels of M1 macrophage-specific surface proteins, CD80 and CD38, and cytokines or chemokines (CXCL1, CXCL5, RANTES) released by activated M1 macrophages. Two potent M1 macrophage activation markers, CXCL9 and CXCL10, were decreased in OT2D. Activated M2 macrophages were characterized by elevated levels of plasma CD163, TFGβ-1, MMP7 and MMP9 in OT2D. Conventional mediators of both M1 and M2 macrophage activation markers (IFN-γ, IL-4, IL-13) were not altered. No changes were observed in plasma levels of M1/M2 macrophage activation markers in OT2D in response to acute normalization of glycemia. In the basal state, macrophage activation markers are elevated, and these reflect the expression of circulatory cytokines, chemokines, growth factors and matrix metalloproteinases in obese individuals with type 2 diabetes, that were not changed by glucose normalisation. These differences could potentially predispose diabetic individuals to increased infection severity complicated by ARDS. Clinical trial reg. no: NCT03102801; registration date April 6, 2017.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Circulatory levels of M1 macrophage activation markers in the steady state of obese type 2 diabetes (OT2D). Plasma LBP (A), TLR4 (B), CD80 (C) and CD38 (D) levels in control subjects (black circles) and obese subjects with T2D (blue circles). Basal level of plasma LBP was higher (85,311 ± 1453 vs 91,747 ± 3048 RFU of LBP, OT2D vs control, p < 0.05) but TLR4 was unchanged in OT2D (235 ± 11 vs 254 ± 13 RFU of TLR4, OT2D vs control, p = ns). Basal levels of plasma M1 macrophage surface markers CD38 and CD80 were also higher in OT2D (714 ± 24 vs 626 ± 21 RFU of CD80, OT2D vs control, p < 0.01; 441 ± 15 vs 408 ± 7 RFU of CD38, OT2D vs control, p < 0.05). Acute normalization of glycemia had no effect on levels of LBP, CD80 or CD38 in T2D subjects (A-D). Data were presented as mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Circulatory levels of cytokines and chemokines released from activated M1 macrophages in the steady state of obese type 2 diabetes (OT2D). Plasma CXCL1 (A), CXCL5 (B), CCL5 (RANTES) (C), CXCL9 (D) and CXCL10 (E) levels in control subjects (black circles) and obese subjects with T2D (blue circles). Basal level of plasma CXCL1, CXCL5 and RANTES was higher in OT2D compared to control (2487 ± 177 vs 2060 ± 67 RFU of CXCL1, OT2D vs control, p < 0.05; 543 ± 17 vs 500 ± 10 RFU of CXCL5, OT2D vs control, p < 0.05; 36,961 ± 5692 vs 18,162 ± 2393 RFU of RANTES, OT2D vs control, p < 0.01). Basal levels of plasma CXCL9 and CXCL10 were lower in T2D compared to control (455 ± 26 vs 722 ± 113 RFU of CXCL9, and 1825 ± 122 vs 2706 ± 352 RFU of CXCL10, OT2D vs control, p < 0.05). Acute normalization of glycemia had no effect on levels of CXCL1. CXCL5, RANTES, CXCL9 and CXCL10 in T2D subjects (A-E). Data were presented as mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Circulatory levels of activated M2 macrophage markers in the steady state of obese type 2 diabetes (OT2D). Plasma TGF-β1 (A), CD163 (B), MMP7 (C) and MMP9 (D) levels in control subjects (black circles) and obese subjects with T2D (blue circles). Basal levels of plasma TGF-β1, CD163, MMP7 and MMP9 were higher in OT2D compared to control (1123 ± 72 vs 933 ± 27 RFU of TGF-β1, OT2D vs control, p < 0.01; 2748 ± 256 vs 2297 ± 124 RFU of CD163, OT2D vs control, p < 0.05). Two matrix metalloproteinases MMP7 and MMP9 were also increased in OT2D (1242 ± 93 vs 1005 ± 42 RFU of MMP7, OT2D vs control, p < 0.05 and 30,193 ± 3746 vs 19,532 ± 1562 RFU of MMP9, OT2D vs control, p < 0.01). Acute normalization of glycemia had no effect on levels of LBP, CD80 or CD38 in T2D subjects (A-D). Data were presented as mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05, **, p < 0.01.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Circulatory levels of adipose tissue macrophage (ATM) markers in the steady state of obese type 2 diabetes (OT2D). Plasma level of MCP-1 (A), MIF (B) and netrin-1 (C) in control subjects (black circles) and obese subjects with T2D (blue circles). Basal level of plasma MCP-1 did not alter in OT2D compared to control (698 ± 49 vs 760 ± 73 RFU of MCP-1, OT2D vs control, p = ns). Basal level of plasma MIF and netrin-1was increased in OT2D (1387 ± 223 vs 1007 ± 29 RFU of MIF-1 and 558 ± 30 vs 478 ± 19 RFU of netrin-1, OT2D vs control, p < 0.05). Acute normalization of glycemia had no effect on levels of LBP, CD80 or CD38 in T2D subjects (A-C). Data were presented as mean ± SEM. *, p < 0.05.

References

    1. Moss M, Guidot DM, Steinberg KP, Duhon GF, Treece P, Wolken R, et al. Diabetic patients have a decreased incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit. Care Med. 2000;28(7):2187–2192. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200007000-00001.
    1. Koh GC, Vlaar AP, Hofstra JJ, de Jong HK, van Nierop S, Peacock SJ, et al. In the critically ill patient, diabetes predicts mortality independent of statin therapy but is not associated with acute lung injury: a cohort study. Crit. Care Med. 2012;40(6):1835–1843. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31824e1696.
    1. Richardson S, Hirsch JS, Narasimhan M, Crawford JM, McGinn T, Davidson KW, et al. Presenting Characteristics, Comorbidities, and Outcomes Among 5700 Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19 in the New York City Area. Jama. 2020.
    1. Huang I, Lim MA, Pranata R. Diabetes mellitus is associated with increased mortality and severity of disease in COVID-19 pneumonia—A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. 2020;14(4):395–403. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2020.04.018.
    1. Gong MN, Bajwa EK, Thompson BT, Christiani DC. Body mass index is associated with the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome. Thorax. 2010;65(1):44–50. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.117572.
    1. Misharin AV, Scott Budinger GR, Perlman H. The lung macrophage: a Jack of all trades. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 184. United States2011. p. 497–8.
    1. Green GM, Kass EH. The role of the alveolar macrophage in the clearance of bacteria from the lung. J. Exp. Med. 1964;119:167–176. doi: 10.1084/jem.119.1.167.
    1. Porcheray F, Viaud S, Rimaniol AC, Leone C, Samah B, Dereuddre-Bosquet N, et al. Macrophage activation switching: an asset for the resolution of inflammation. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2005;142(3):481–489.
    1. Murray PJ, Allen JE, Biswas SK, Fisher EA, Gilroy DW, Goerdt S, et al. Macrophage activation and polarization: nomenclature and experimental guidelines. Immunity. 2014;41(1):14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.008.
    1. Sica A, Mantovani A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: in vivo veritas. J. Clin. Invest. 2012;122(3):787–795. doi: 10.1172/JCI59643.
    1. Martinez FO, Sica A, Mantovani A, Locati M. Macrophage activation and polarization. Front Biosci. 2008;13:453–461. doi: 10.2741/2692.
    1. Martinez FO, Gordon S. The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Rep. 2014;6:13. doi: 10.12703/P6-13.
    1. Dewhurst JA, Lea S, Hardaker E, Dungwa JV, Ravi AK, Singh D. Characterisation of lung macrophage subpopulations in COPD patients and controls. Sci. Rep. 2017;7(1):7143. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07101-2.
    1. Mitsi E, Kamng'ona R, Rylance J, Solorzano C, Jesus Reine J, Mwandumba HC, et al. Human alveolar macrophages predominately express combined classical M1 and M2 surface markers in steady state. Respir Res. 2018;19:66. doi: 10.1186/s12931-018-0777-0.
    1. Rosseau S, Hammerl P, Maus U, Walmrath HD, Schutte H, Grimminger F, et al. Phenotypic characterization of alveolar monocyte recruitment in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2000;279(1):L25–35. doi: 10.1152/ajplung.2000.279.1.L25.
    1. Ferracini M, Martins JO, Campos MR, Anger DB, Jancar S. Impaired phagocytosis by alveolar macrophages from diabetic rats is related to the deficient coupling of LTs to the Fc gamma R signaling cascade. Mol. Immunol. 2010;47(11–12):1974–1980. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2010.04.018.
    1. Vance J, Santos A, Sadofsky L, Morice A, Cervantes J. Effect of high glucose on human alveolar macrophage phenotype and phagocytosis of mycobacteria. Lung. 2019;197(1):89–94. doi: 10.1007/s00408-018-0181-z.
    1. Moin ASM, Sathyapalan T, Atkin SL, Butler AE. Pro-fibrotic M2 macrophage markers may increase the risk for COVID19 in type 2 diabetes with obesity. Metabol. Clin. Exp. 2020;112:154–374. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2020.154374.
    1. Ceriello A, Monnier L, Owens D. Glycaemic variability in diabetes: clinical and therapeutic implications. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2019;7(3):221–230. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30136-0.
    1. Lakhani JD, Pandya H, Jain A, Ghadiya S. Continuous Blood Glucose Monitoring to Determine the Glycemic Variability in Patients Having SARS CoV-2 Infection with ARDS and Its Bearing on the Severity of the Disease. Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research. 2020:51–6.
    1. Al-Qaissi A, Papageorgiou M, Deshmukh H, Madden LA, Rigby A, Kilpatrick ES, et al. Effects of acute insulin-induced hypoglycaemia on endothelial microparticles in adults with and without type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019;21(3):533–540. doi: 10.1111/dom.13548.
    1. Kahal H, Halama A, Aburima A, Bhagwat AM, Butler AE, Graumann J, et al. Effect of induced hypoglycemia on inflammation and oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes and control subjects. Sci. Rep. 2020;10(1):4750. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61531-z.
    1. Kraemer S, Vaught JD, Bock C, Gold L, Katilius E, Keeney TR, et al. From SOMAmer-based biomarker discovery to diagnostic and clinical applications: a SOMAmer-based, streamlined multiplex proteomic assay. PLoS ONE. 2011;6(10):e26332. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026332.
    1. Birkett MA, Day SJ. Internal pilot studies for estimating sample size. Stat. Med. 1994;13(23–24):2455–2463. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780132309.
    1. Zanoni I, Ostuni R, Marek LR, Barresi S, Barbalat R, Barton GM, et al. CD14 controls the LPS-induced endocytosis of Toll-like receptor 4. Cell. 2011;147(4):868–880. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.09.051.
    1. Tarique AA, Logan J, Thomas E, Holt PG, Sly PD, Fantino E. Phenotypic, functional, and plasticity features of classical and alternatively activated human macrophages. Am. J. Respir Cell Mol. Biol. 2015;53(5):676–688. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2015-0012OC.
    1. Cani PD, Amar J, Iglesias MA, Poggi M, Knauf C, Bastelica D, et al. Metabolic endotoxemia initiates obesity and insulin resistance. Diabetes. 2007;56(7):1761–1772. doi: 10.2337/db06-1491.
    1. Sun L, Yu Z, Ye X, Zou S, Li H, Yu D, et al. A marker of endotoxemia is associated with obesity and related metabolic disorders in apparently healthy Chinese. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(9):1925–1932. doi: 10.2337/dc10-0340.
    1. Gonzalez-Quintela A, Alonso M, Campos J, Vizcaino L, Loidi L, Gude F. Determinants of serum concentrations of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein (LBP) in the adult population: the role of obesity. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(1):e54600. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054600.
    1. Regueiro V, Campos MA, Morey P, Sauleda J, Agustí AG, Garmendia J, et al. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein and CD14 are increased in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of smokers. Eur. Respir J. 2009;33(2):273–281. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00087708.
    1. Schäfer C, Parlesak A, Schütt C, Bode JC, Bode C. Concentrations of lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, bactericidal/permeability-increasing protein, soluble CD14 and plasma lipids in relation to endotoxaemia in patients with alcoholic liver disease. Alcohol Alcohol. 2002;37(1):81–86. doi: 10.1093/alcalc/37.1.81.
    1. Gutsmann T, Müller M, Carroll SF, MacKenzie RC, Wiese A, Seydel U. Dual role of lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-binding protein in neutralization of LPS and enhancement of LPS-induced activation of mononuclear cells. Infect Immun. 2001;69(11):6942–6950. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.11.6942-6950.2001.
    1. Kopp F, Kupsch S, Schromm AB. Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein is bound and internalized by host cells and colocalizes with LPS in the cytoplasm: Implications for a role of LBP in intracellular LPS-signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2016;1863(4):660–672. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2016.01.015.
    1. Amici SA, Young NA, Narvaez-Miranda J, Jablonski KA, Arcos J, Rosas L, et al. CD38 Is robustly induced in human macrophages and monocytes in inflammatory conditions. Front Immunol. 2018;9:1593. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01593.
    1. Balbo P, Silvestri M, Rossi GA, Crimi E, Burastero SE. Differential role of CD80 and CD86 on alveolar macrophages in the presentation of allergen to T lymphocytes in asthma. Clin. Exp. Allergy. 2001;31(4):625–636. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2001.01068.x.
    1. Mantovani A, Sica A, Sozzani S, Allavena P, Vecchi A, Locati M. The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol. 2004;25(12):677–686. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015.
    1. Shaykhiev R, Krause A, Salit J, Strulovici-Barel Y, Harvey BG, O'Connor TP, et al. Smoking-dependent reprogramming of alveolar macrophage polarization: implication for pathogenesis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J. Immunol. 2009;183(4):2867–2883. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900473.
    1. Lang S, Li L, Wang X, Sun J, Xue X, Xiao Y, et al. CXCL10/IP-10 Neutralization can ameliorate lipopolysaccharide-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome in rats. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(1):0169100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169100.
    1. Prencipe G, Caiello I, Pascarella A, Grom AA, Bracaglia C, Chatel L, et al. Neutralization of IFN-γ reverts clinical and laboratory features in a mouse model of macrophage activation syndrome. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018;141(4):1439–1449. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.07.021.
    1. Van den Heuvel MM, Tensen CP, van As JH, Van den Berg TK, Fluitsma DM, Dijkstra CD, et al. Regulation of CD 163 on human macrophages: cross-linking of CD163 induces signaling and activation. J. Leukoc Biol. 1999;66(5):858–866. doi: 10.1002/jlb.66.5.858.
    1. Zanni MV, Burdo TH, Makimura H, Williams KC, Grinspoon SK. Relationship between monocyte/macrophage activation marker soluble CD163 and insulin resistance in obese and normal-weight subjects. Clin. Endocrinol (Oxf). 2012;77(3):385–390. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2265.2011.04284.x.
    1. Snelgrove RJ, Goulding J, Didierlaurent AM, Lyonga D, Vekaria S, Edwards L, et al. A critical function for CD200 in lung immune homeostasis and the severity of influenza infection. Nat. Immunol. 2008;9(9):1074–1083. doi: 10.1038/ni.1637.
    1. Relloso M, Puig-Kröger A, Pello OM, Rodríguez-Fernández JL, de la Rosa G, Longo N, et al. DC-SIGN (CD209) expression is IL-4 dependent and is negatively regulated by IFN, TGF-beta, and anti-inflammatory agents. J. Immunol. 2002;168(6):2634–2643. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.168.6.2634.
    1. Lurier EB, Dalton D, Dampier W, Raman P, Nassiri S, Ferraro NM, et al. Transcriptome analysis of IL-10-stimulated (M2c) macrophages by next-generation sequencing. Immunobiology. 2017;222(7):847–856. doi: 10.1016/j.imbio.2017.02.006.
    1. Hussell T, Bell TJ. Alveolar macrophages: plasticity in a tissue-specific context. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2014;14(2):81–93. doi: 10.1038/nri3600.
    1. Gottschall PE, Deb S. Regulation of matrix metalloproteinase expressions in astrocytes, microglia and neurons. NeuroImmunoModulation. 1996;3(2–3):69–75. doi: 10.1159/000097229.
    1. Broekelmann TJ, Limper AH, Colby TV, McDonald JA. Transforming growth factor beta 1 is present at sites of extracellular matrix gene expression in human pulmonary fibrosis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 1991;88(15):6642–6646. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.15.6642.
    1. Yu Q, Stamenkovic I. Cell surface-localized matrix metalloproteinase-9 proteolytically activates TGF-beta and promotes tumor invasion and angiogenesis. Genes Dev. 2000;14(2):163–176.
    1. Rosas IO, Richards TJ, Konishi K, Zhang Y, Gibson K, Lokshin AE, et al. MMP1 and MMP7 as potential peripheral blood biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. PLoS Med. 2008;5(4):e93. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050093.
    1. Pradhan AD, Everett BM, Cook NR, Rifai N, Ridker PM. Effects of initiating insulin and metformin on glycemic control and inflammatory biomarkers among patients with type 2 diabetes: the LANCET randomized trial. JAMA. 2009;302(11):1186–1194. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1347.
    1. Hintz KA, Rassias AJ, Wardwell K, Moss ML, Morganelli PM, Pioli PA, et al. Endotoxin induces rapid metalloproteinase-mediated shedding followed by up-regulation of the monocyte hemoglobin scavenger receptor CD163. J. Leukoc Biol. 2002;72(4):711–717.
    1. Fabriek BO, Møller HJ, Vloet RP, van Winsen LM, Hanemaaijer R, Teunissen CE, et al. Proteolytic shedding of the macrophage scavenger receptor CD163 in multiple sclerosis. J. Neuroimmunol. 2007;187(1–2):179–186. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2007.04.016.
    1. Etzerodt A, Rasmussen MR, Svendsen P, Chalaris A, Schwarz J, Galea I, et al. Structural basis for inflammation-driven shedding of CD163 ectodomain and tumor necrosis factor-α in macrophages. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289(2):778–788. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.520213.
    1. Amour A, Slocombe PM, Webster A, Butler M, Knight CG, Smith BJ, et al. TNF-alpha converting enzyme (TACE) is inhibited by TIMP-3. FEBS Lett. 1998;435(1):39–44. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(98)01031-X.
    1. Moore CS, Crocker SJ. An alternate perspective on the roles of TIMPs and MMPs in pathology. Am. J. Pathol. 2012;180(1):12–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.09.008.
    1. Nielsen MC, Andersen MN, Rittig N, Rødgaard-Hansen S, Grønbaek H, Moestrup SK, et al. The macrophage-related biomarkers sCD163 and sCD206 are released by different shedding mechanisms. J. Leukoc Biol. 2019;106(5):1129–1138. doi: 10.1002/JLB.3A1218-500R.
    1. Italiani P, Boraschi D. From Monocytes to M1/M2 Macrophages: Phenotypical vs. Funct. Differ. Front Immunol. 2014;5:514.
    1. Malavasi F, Deaglio S, Funaro A, Ferrero E, Horenstein AL, Ortolan E, et al. Evolution and function of the ADP ribosyl cyclase/CD38 gene family in physiology and pathology. Phys. Rev. 2008;88(3):841–886.
    1. Silverstein RL, Febbraio M. CD36, a scavenger receptor involved in immunity, metabolism, angiogenesis, and behavior. Sci Signal. 2009;2(72):re3. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.272re3.
    1. Etzerodt A, Moestrup SK. CD163 and inflammation: biological, diagnostic, and therapeutic aspects. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2013;18(17):2352–2363. doi: 10.1089/ars.2012.4834.
    1. Yang S, Van den Bossche J, Ramalho T. Macrophage metabolism at the crossroad of metabolic diseases and cancer. Immunometabolism. 2020;2(3):e200022.
    1. Kratz M, Coats BR, Hisert KB, Hagman D, Mutskov V, Peris E, et al. Metabolic dysfunction drives a mechanistically distinct proinflammatory phenotype in adipose tissue macrophages. Cell Metab. 2014;20(4):614–625. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.08.010.
    1. Thapa B, Lee K. Metabolic influence on macrophage polarization and pathogenesis. BMB Rep. 2019;52(6):360–372. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2019.52.6.140.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner