Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of Swedish snus for smoking reduction and cessation

Gordana Joksić, Vera Spasojević-Tišma, Ruza Antić, Robert Nilsson, Lars E Rutqvist, Gordana Joksić, Vera Spasojević-Tišma, Ruza Antić, Robert Nilsson, Lars E Rutqvist

Abstract

Background: Epidemiological studies suggest that smokeless tobacco in the form of Swedish snus has been used by many smokers in Scandinavia to quit smoking, but the efficacy of snus has so far not been evaluated in controlled clinical trials.

Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, clinical trial aimed at assessing the efficacy of snus to help adult cigarette smokers in Serbia to substantially reduce, and, eventually, completely stop smoking. The study enrolled 319 healthy smokers aged 20-65 years at two occupational health centers in Belgrade, Serbia. Most of them (81%) expressed an interest to quit rather than just reduce their smoking. Study products were used ad libitum throughout the 48-week study period. The main study objective during the first 24 weeks was smoking reduction. The primary end-point was defined as a biologically verified reduction of ≥ 50% in the average number of smoked cigarettes per day during week 21-24 compared to baseline. During week 25-48 participants were actively instructed to stop smoking completely. Outcome measures of biologically verified, complete smoking cessation included 1-week point prevalence rates at clinical visits after 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks, as well as 4-, 12- and 24-week continued cessation rates at the week 36 and 48 visits.

Results: At the week 24 visit, the proportion of participants who achieved the protocol definition of a ≥ 50% smoking reduction was similar in the two treatment groups. However, the proportion that reported more extreme reductions (≥ 75%) was statistically significantly higher in the snus group than in the placebo group (p < 0.01). The results for biologically verified complete cessation suggested that participants in the snus group were more likely to quit smoking completely than the controls; the odds ratio (snus versus placebo) for the protocol estimates of cessation varied between 1.9 to 3.4, but these ratios were of borderline significance with p-values ranging from 0.04-0.10. Snus was well tolerated and only 2/158 (1.3%) participants in the snus group discontinued treatment due to an adverse event (in both cases unrelated to snus).

Conclusions: Swedish snus could promote smoking cessation among smokers in Serbia, that is, in a cultural setting without traditional use of oral, smokeless tobacco.

Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT00601042.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study product usage. Proportion of participants reporting daily use (at least one sachet per day) of study product, and their mean daily consumption, by treatment allocation and week of follow up.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cigarette consumption. Self-reported mean number of cigarettes smoked per day during the preceding week by treatment allocation and week of follow up.

References

    1. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic, 2008: the MPOWER package. Geneva, World Health Organization; 2008.
    1. Institute of Public Health of Serbia "Dr Milan Jovanović Batut". Health of Population of Serbia: analytical study 1997-2007. Belgrade. 2009.
    1. Mackay J, Eriksen M, Shafey O. The Tobacco Atlas. American Cancer Society. 2006.
    1. Foulds J, Ramström L, Burke M, Fagerström K. The effects of smokeless tobacco (snus) on smoking and public health in Sweden. Tobacco Control. 2003;12:349–359. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.4.349.
    1. Royal College of Physicians. Protecting Smokers, Saving Lives, Publications Unit of the Royal College of Physicians, London; 2002.
    1. Lee PN, Hamling J. Systematic review of the relation between smokeless tobacco and cancer in Europe and North America. BMC Med. 2009;29:36.
    1. Lee PN. Summary of the epidemiological evidence relating snus to health. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011;59:197–214. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2010.12.002.
    1. Moore D, Aveyard P, Connock M, Wang D, Fry-Smith A, Barton P. Effectiveness and safety of nicotine replacement therapy assisted reduction to stop smoking: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2009;338:b1024. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b1024.
    1. Rodu B, Cole P. Lung cancer mortality: comparing Sweden with other countries in the European Union. Scand J Public Health. 2010;38:332–3. doi: 10.1177/1403494810364203.
    1. Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Public Health Report 2005 (In Swedish) Socialstyrelsen, Stockholm. 2006.
    1. Lund K, Scheffels J, McNeill A. The association between use of snus and quit rates for smoking: results from seven Norwegian cross-sectional studies. Addiction. 2011;106:162–167. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03122.x.
    1. Ramström L. Commentary on Lund et al.Consolidating the evidence on effectiveness of snus for smoking cessation - implications for public health. Addiction. 2011;106:168–169. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.03180.x.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation. Report on the scientific basis of tobacco product regulation: third report of a WHO study group. WHO Technical Report Series 955, Geneva, Switzerland; 2009.
    1. Asfar T, Ebbert JO, Klesges RC, Relyea GE. Do smoking reduction interventions promote cessation in smokers not ready to quit? Addict Behav. 2011;36:764–768. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.02.003.
    1. International conference on harmonisation of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. ICH-GCP Good Clinical Practice. Retrieved July 2011.
    1. Rutqvist LE, Curvall M, Hassler T, Ringberger T, Wahlberg I. Swedish snus and the GothiaTek® standard. Harm Reduction Journal. 2011;8:11. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-8-11.
    1. Lunell E, Lunell M. Steady-state nicotine plasma levels following use of four different types of Swedish snus compared with 2-mg Nicorette chewing gum: a crossover study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2005;7:397–403. doi: 10.1080/14622200500125468.
    1. Benowitz NL, Porchet H, Sheiner L, Jacob P III. Nicotine absorption and cardiovascular effects with smokeless tobacco use: comparison with cigarettes and nicotine gum. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1988;44:23–28. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1988.107.
    1. Heatherton TF, Kozlowski LT, Frecker RC, Fagerström KO. The Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence: a revision of the Fagerström Tolerance Questionnaire. Br J Addict. 1991;86:1119–1127. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01879.x.
    1. European Medicines Agency (EMA) Statistical principles for clinical trials. September 1998. Retrieved July 2011.
    1. Simmons MS, Connett JE, Nides MA, Lindgren PG, Kleerup EC, Murray RP, Bjornson WM, Tashkin DP. Smoking reduction and the rate of decline in FEV1: results from the Lung Health Study. Eur Respir J. 2005;25:1011–7. doi: 10.1183/09031936.05.00086804.
    1. Tönnesen P, Mikkelsen K, Bremann L. Nurse-conducted smoking cessation in patients with COPD using nicotine sublingual tablets and behavioral support. Nicotine Tob Res. 2005;7:139–48. doi: 10.1080/14622200412331328411.
    1. Gilljam H, Galanti MR. Role of snus (oral moist snuff) in smoking cessation and smoking reduction in Sweden. Addiction. 2003;98:1183–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2003.00379.x.
    1. Hajek P, Jackson P, Belcher M. Long-term Use of Nicotine Chewing Gum: Occurrence, Determinants, and Effect on Weight Gain. JAMA. 1988;260:1593–1596. doi: 10.1001/jama.260.11.1593.
    1. Jarvis MJ, Raw M, Russell MAH, Feyerabend C. Randomised controlled trial of nicotine chewing-gum. BMJ. 1982;285:537–540. doi: 10.1136/bmj.285.6341.537.
    1. Murray RP, Bailey WC, Daniels K, Bjornson WM, Kurnow K, Connett JE, Nides MA, Kiley JP. Safety of Nicotine Polacrilex Gum Used by 3,094 Participants in the Lung Health Study. Chest. 1996;109:438–445. doi: 10.1378/chest.109.2.438.
    1. Lund K-E, McNeill A, Scheffels J. The use of snus for quitting smoking compared with medicinal products. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12:817–822. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq105.
    1. Ramström LM, Foulds J. Role of snus in initiation and cessation of tobacco smoking in Sweden. Tobacco Control. 2006;15:210–214. doi: 10.1136/tc.2005.014969.
    1. Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) Health Effects of Smokeless Tobacco Products. European Commission, Brussels; 2008.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner