Effectiveness and Safety of Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus

Yujin Yang, Junho Hyun, Junghoon Lee, Ju Hyeon Kim, Jeong Bok Lee, Do-Yoon Kang, Pil Hyung Lee, Jung-Min Ahn, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Jung Park, IRIS-DES Registry Investigators, Yujin Yang, Junho Hyun, Junghoon Lee, Ju Hyeon Kim, Jeong Bok Lee, Do-Yoon Kang, Pil Hyung Lee, Jung-Min Ahn, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Jung Park, IRIS-DES Registry Investigators

Abstract

Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a well-known risk factor for adverse cardiovascular events in patients receiving percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Limited data are available on the relative performance of different types of contemporary drug-eluting stents (DES) for diabetic patients.

Objectives: The authors investigated the effectiveness and safety profiles of several contemporary DES in patients with DM in a "real-world" clinical setting.

Methods: Among 24,516 patients enrolled in a multicenter, prospective registry, 7,823 patients with DM were treated with 4 contemporary DES: 2,877 with a cobalt chromium everolimus-eluting stent (EES), 789 with a biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent, 2,286 with a platinum chromium-EES, and 1,871 with a Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent. The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) (a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization).

Results: The median follow-up duration was 2.9 years. Observed 3-year rates of TVF were not significantly different according to different DES types. On multigroup propensity-score analysis, the adjusted HRs for TVF were similar in between-group comparisons: biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stent (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.76-1.16; P = 0.57), platinum chromium-EES (HR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.81-1.09; P = 0.41), and Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stent (HR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.86-1.18; P = 0.93) compared with the cobalt chromium-EES (reference). This trend was maintained in patients with non-insulin- and insulin-treated DM.

Conclusions: In this multicenter clinical-practice PCI registry, no significant between-group differences were found for a 3-year risk of TVF in patients with DM undergoing PCI with various types of contemporary DES. (Evaluation of the First, Second, and New Drug-Eluting Stents in Routine Clinical Practice [IRIS-DES]; NCT01186133).

Keywords: DES, drug-eluting stent(s); DM, diabetes mellitus; HbA1c, glycosylated hemoglobin; MACE, major adverse cardiovascular event(s); MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; PES, paclitaxel-eluting stent(s); SES, sirolimus-eluting stent(s); TVF, target vessel failure; TVR, target vessel revascularization; coronary artery disease; diabetes mellitus; drug-eluting stent; percutaneous coronary intervention.

Conflict of interest statement

This study was partly supported by the CardioVascular Research Foundation (Seoul, Republic of Korea). The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

© 2021 The Authors.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow Diagram BP-BES = biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents; CoCr-EES = cobalt chromium everolimus-eluting stents; DES = drug-eluting stents; DM = diabetes mellitus; IRIS-DES = Interventional Cardiology Research Incorporation Society-Drug-Eluting Stents registry; PtCr-EES = platinum chromium everolimus-eluting stents; Re-ZES = Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Unadjusted Curves for the TVF and its Components Crude cumulative-incidence curves for primary composite outcome of target vessel failure (TVF) (A) and its individual components: cardiac death (B), target vessel myocardial infarction (C), and target vessel revascularization (D). P values were calculated using the log-rank test. Target vessel failure was defined as death from cardiac causes, target vessel myocardial infarction (MI), or target vessel revascularization. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Adjusted Curves for the TVF and Its Components Adjusted cumulative-incidence curves for primary composite outcome of target vessel failure (A) and its individual components: cardiac death (B), target vessel myocardial infarction (C), and target vessel revascularization (D). P values were calculated using the adjusted log-rank test. Target vessel failure was defined as death from cardiac causes, target vessel myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.
Central Illustration
Central Illustration
Adjusted Risks for Device-Oriented and Patient-Oriented Clinical Events Comparing Contemporary Drug-Eluting Stents (A) Adjusted HR using multigroup propensity-score analyses are given for different types of stent compared with the CoCr-EES. (B) Unadjusted Kaplan-Meier curves for cumulative incidence of secondary outcomes of (a) major adverse cardiac events, (b) all-cause mortality, (c) any myocardial infarction, and (d) any revascularization. BP-BES = biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting stents; CoCr-EES = cobalt chromium everolimus-eluting stents; DM = diabetes mellitus; HR = hazard ratio; PtCr-EES = platinum chromium everolimus-eluting stents; Re-ZES = Resolute zotarolimus-eluting stents.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Adjusted HRs for TVF According to Insulin Use Adjusted HRs using multigroup propensity-score analyses are given for different types of stents compared with the CoCr-EES in in patients with non–insulin- or insulin-treated diabetes mellitus. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

References

    1. Bangalore S., Kumar S., Fusaro M., et al. Outcomes with various drug eluting or bare metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus: mixed treatment comparison analysis of 22,844 patient years of follow-up from randomised trials. BMJ. 2012;345
    1. Byrne R.A., Stone G.W., Ormiston J., Kastrati A. Coronary balloon angioplasty, stents, and scaffolds. Lancet. 2017;390:781–792.
    1. Stefanini G.G., Byrne R.A., Serruys P.W., et al. Biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stents reduce the risk of stent thrombosis at 4 years in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a pooled analysis of individual patient data from the ISAR-TEST 3, ISAR-TEST 4, and LEADERS randomized trials. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:1214–1222.
    1. Stone G.W., Kedhi E., Kereiakes D.J., et al. Differential clinical responses to everolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting coronary stents in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Circulation. 2011;124:893–900.
    1. Park D.W., Kim Y.H., Song H.G., et al. Outcomes after unrestricted use of everolimus-eluting and sirolimus-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: a multicenter, prospective cohort study. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2012;5:365–371.
    1. Kim Y.H., Park D.W., Ahn J.M., et al. Impact of ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stents in angina patients. EuroIntervention. 2013;9:110–117.
    1. Lee C.H., Kang D.Y., Han M., et al. Differential cutoff points and clinical impact of stent parameters of various drug-eluting stents for predicting major adverse clinical events: An individual patient data pooled analysis of seven stent-specific registries and 17,068 patients. Int J Cardiol. 2019;282:17–23.
    1. Kwon O., Kang S.H., Lee J.B., et al. Comparative effectiveness of different contemporary drug-eluting stents in routine clinical practice: a multigroup propensity score analysis using data from the stent-specific, multicenter, prospective registries. Coron Artery Dis. 2019;30:255–262.
    1. Lee P.H., Kwon O., Ahn J.M., et al. Safety and effectiveness of second-generation drug-eluting stents in patients with left main coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71:832–841.
    1. McCaffrey D.F., Griffin B.A., Almirall D., Slaughter M.E., Ramchand R., Burgette L.F. A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models. Stat Med. 2013;32:3388–3414.
    1. Bhatt D.L. CABG the clear choice for patients with diabetes and multivessel disease. Lancet. 2018;391:913–914.
    1. Lee P.H., Ahn J.M., Chang M., et al. Left main coronary artery disease: secular trends in patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68:1233–1246.
    1. Zelniker T.A., Wiviott S.D., Raz I., et al. SGLT2 inhibitors for primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular and renal outcomes in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cardiovascular outcome trials. Lancet. 2019;393:31–39.
    1. Kereiakes D.J., Cutlip D.E., Applegate R.J., et al. Outcomes in diabetic and nondiabetic patients treated with everolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents: results from the SPIRIT IV clinical trial (Clinical Evaluation of the XIENCE V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System) J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:2084–2089.
    1. Kedhi E., Gomes M.E., Lagerqvist B., et al. Clinical impact of second-generation everolimus-eluting stent compared with first-generation drug-eluting stents in diabetes mellitus patients: insights from a nationwide coronary intervention register. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2012;5:1141–1149.
    1. Kaul U., Bangalore S., Seth A., et al. Paclitaxel-eluting versus everolimus-eluting coronary stents in diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1709–1719.
    1. Partida R.A., Yeh R.W. Contemporary drug-eluting stent platforms: design, safety, and clinical efficacy. Cardiol Clin. 2017;35:281–296.
    1. de Waha A., Stefanini G.G., King L.A., et al. Long-term outcomes of biodegradable polymer versus durable polymer drug-eluting stents in patients with diabetes a pooled analysis of individual patient data from 3 randomized trials. Int J Cardiol. 2013;168:5162–5166.
    1. Paradies V., Vlachojannis G.J., Royaards K.J., Wassing J., van der Ent M., Smits P.C. Abluminal biodegradable polymer biolimus-eluting versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent in patients with diabetes mellitus: 5 years follow-up from the COMPARE II trial. Int J Cardiol. 2019;290:40–44.
    1. Pi S.H., Rhee T.M., Lee J.M., et al. Outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus according to insulin treatment after percutaneous coronary intervention in the second-generation drug-eluting stent era. Am J Cardiol. 2018;121:1505–1511.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner