Predictors of response for elagolix with add-back therapy in women with heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids

Ayman Al-Hendy, Linda Bradley, Charlotte D Owens, Hui Wang, Kurt T Barnhart, Eve Feinberg, William D Schlaff, Elizabeth E Puscheck, Alice Wang, Veronica Gillispie, Sandra Hurtado, Ozgul Muneyyirci-Delale, David F Archer, Bruce R Carr, James A Simon, Elizabeth A Stewart, Ayman Al-Hendy, Linda Bradley, Charlotte D Owens, Hui Wang, Kurt T Barnhart, Eve Feinberg, William D Schlaff, Elizabeth E Puscheck, Alice Wang, Veronica Gillispie, Sandra Hurtado, Ozgul Muneyyirci-Delale, David F Archer, Bruce R Carr, James A Simon, Elizabeth A Stewart

Abstract

Background: Uterine fibroids are one of the most common neoplasms found among women globally, with a prevalence of approximately 11 million women in the United States alone. The morbidity of this common disease is significant because it is the leading cause of hysterectomy and causes significant functional impairment for women of reproductive age. Factors including age, body mass index, race, ethnicity, menstrual blood loss, fibroid location, and uterine and fibroid volume influence the incidence of fibroids and severity of symptoms. Elagolix is an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist that competitively inhibits pituitary gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor activity and suppresses the release of gonadotropins from the pituitary gland, resulting in dose-dependent suppression of ovarian sex hormones, follicular growth, and ovulation. In Elaris Uterine Fibroids 1 and Uterine Fibroids 2, 2 replicate multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, phase 3 studies, treatment of premenopausal women with elagolix with hormonal add-back therapy demonstrated reduction in heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids.

Objective: This analysis aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of elagolix (300 mg twice a day) with add-back therapy (1 mg estradiol/0.5 mg norethindrone acetate once a day) in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids in various subgroups of women over 6 months of treatment.

Study design: Data were pooled from Elaris Uterine Fibroid-1 and Uterine Fibroid-2 studies, which evaluated premenopausal women (18-51 years) with heavy menstrual bleeding (>80 mL menstrual blood loss per cycle, alkaline hematin methodology) and ultrasound-confirmed uterine fibroid diagnosis. Subgroups analyzed included age, body mass index, race, ethnicity, baseline menstrual blood loss, fibroid location, and uterine and primary fibroid volume (largest fibroid identified by ultrasound). The primary endpoint was the proportion of women with <80 mL menstrual blood loss during the final month and ≥50% menstrual blood loss reduction from baseline to final month. Secondary and other efficacy endpoints included mean change in menstrual blood loss from baseline to final month, amenorrhea, symptom severity, and health-related quality of life. Adverse events and other safety endpoints were monitored.

Results: The overall pooled Elaris Uterine Fibroid-1 and Uterine Fibroid-2 population was typical of women with fibroids, with a mean age of 42.4 (standard deviation, 5.4) years and a mean body mass index of 33.6 (standard deviation, 7.3) kg/m2 and 67.6% of participants being black or African American women. A wide range of baseline uterine and fibroid volumes and menstrual blood loss were also represented in the overall pooled study population. In all subgroups, the proportion of responders to the primary endpoint, mean change in menstrual blood loss, amenorrhea, reduction in symptom severity, and improvement in health-related quality of life were clinically meaningfully greater for women who received elagolix with add-back therapy than those who received placebo and consistent with the overall pooled study population for the primary endpoint (72.2% vs 9.3%), mean change in menstrual blood loss (-172.5 mL vs -0.8 mL), amenorrhea (50.4% vs 4.5%), symptom severity (-37.1 vs -9.2), and health-related quality of life score (39.9 vs 8.9). Adverse events by subgroup were consistent with the overall pooled study population.

Conclusion: Elagolix with hormonal add-back therapy was effective in reducing heavy menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids independent of age, body mass index, race, ethnicity, baseline menstrual blood loss, fibroid location, and uterine and primary fibroid volume.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02654054.

Keywords: BMI; age; elagolix; fibroid location; fibroid volume; heavy menstrual bleeding; leiomyoma; menstrual blood loss; race; subgroups; uterine fibroid; uterine volume.

Copyright © 2020 AbbVie Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

FIGURE 1. Odds ratios for primary endpoint…
FIGURE 1. Odds ratios for primary endpoint by factors contributing to disease severity
The odds ratios with 95% CIs are shown graphically and listed in the table to the right for each disease severity subgroup treated with elagolix with add-back. Odds ratios were determined by pooling the results from a logistic regression model including treatment and study as the main effects and baseline menstrual blood loss volume as a covariate in each data set from multiple imputation under each subgroup level. Median values for uterine and primary fibroid volumes were based on the overall median of the pooled Elaris Uterine Fibroids 1 and Uterine Fibroids 2 data set. CI, confidence interval; E2, estradiol; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; NETA, norethindrone acetate.
FIGURE 2. Mean changes in UFS-QOL scores…
FIGURE 2. Mean changes in UFS-QOL scores from baseline to month 6 for disease severity subgroups
A, The mean change in symptom severity score for each subgroup is depicted. B, The mean change in total HRQoL score for each subgroup is depicted. For symptom severity, a higher score indicates worse symptom severity. For HRQoL, a higher score indicates better quality of life. Data are presented as LS means, with error bars representing the standard error of mean. The change from baseline to month 6 in each parameter was analyzed using an analysis of covariance model with treatment as the main effect and baseline value as a covariate. Median values for uterine and primary fibroid volumes were based on the overall median of the pooled Elaris Uterine Fibroids 1 and Uterine Fibroids 2 data set. The asterisk symbol (***) indicates P<.001. FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; HRQoL, health-related quality of life; LS, least-squares; UFS-QOL, Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-Related Quality of Life.

References

    1. Bulun SE. Uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med 2013;369:1344–55.
    1. Fuldeore MJ, Soliman AM. Patient-reported prevalence and symptomatic burden of uterine fibroids among women in the United States: findings from a cross-sectional survey analysis. Int J Womens Health 2017;9:403–11.
    1. Marsh EE, Al-Hendy A, Kappus D, Galitsky A, Stewart EA, Kerolous M. Burden, prevalence, and treatment of uterine fibroids: a survey of U.S. women. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2018;27: 1359–67.
    1. Stewart EA, Laughlin-Tommaso SK, Catherino WH, Lalitkumar S, Gupta D, Vollenhoven B. Uterine fibroids. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2016;2:16043.
    1. Baird DD, Dunson DB, Hill MC, Cousins D, Schectman JM. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:100–7.
    1. Hapangama DK, Bulmer JN. Pathophysiology of heavy menstrual bleeding. Womens Health (Lond) 2016;12:3–13.
    1. Marshall LM, Spiegelman D, Barbieri RL, et al. Variation in the incidence of uterine leiomyoma among premenopausal women by age and race. Obstet Gynecol 1997;90:967–73.
    1. Dandolu V, Singh R, Lidicker J, Harmanli O. BMI and uterine size: is there any relationship? Int J Gynecol Pathol 2010;29:568–71.
    1. Laughlin SK, Schroeder JC, Baird DD. New directions in the epidemiology of uterine fibroids. Semin Reprod Med 2010;28:204–17.
    1. Wilcox LS, Koonin LM, Pokras R, Strauss LT, Xia Z, Peterson HB. Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988e1990. Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:549–55.
    1. Marshall LM, Spiegelman D, Goldman MB, et al. A prospective study of reproductive factors and oral contraceptive use in relation to the risk of uterine leiomyomata. Fertil Steril 1998;70: 432–9.
    1. Wise LA, Palmer JR, Harlow BL, et al. Reproductive factors, hormonal contraception, and risk of uterine leiomyomata in African-American women: a prospective study. Am J Epidemiol 2004;159:113–23.
    1. Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Fraser IS; FIGO Menstrual Disorders Working Group. The FIGO classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years. Fertil Steril 2011;95:2204–8. 2208.e1–3.
    1. Wegienka G, Baird DD, Hertz-Picciotto I, et al. Self-reported heavy bleeding associated with uterine leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 2003;101:431–7.
    1. Munro MG, Critchley HOD, Fraser IS; FIGO Menstrual Disorders Committee. The two FIGO systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2018;143:393–408.
    1. Buttram VC Jr, Reiter RC. Uterine leiomyomata: etiology, symptomatology, and management. Fertil Steril 1981;36:433–45.
    1. Clevenger-Hoeft M, Syrop CH, Stovall DW, Van Voorhis BJ. Sonohysterography in premenopausal women with and without abnormal bleeding. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:516–20.
    1. Stewart EA. Clinical practice. Uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med 2015;372:1646–55.
    1. Wise LA, Palmer JR, Spiegelman D, et al. Influence of body size and body fat distribution on risk of uterine leiomyomata in U.S. black women. Epidemiology 2005;16:346–54.
    1. Simon JA, Catherino W, Segars JH, et al. Ulipristal acetate for treatment of symptomatic uterine leiomyomas: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2018;131:431–9.
    1. Donnez J, Tatarchuk TF, Bouchard P, et al. Ulipristal acetate versus placebo for fibroid treatment before surgery. N Engl J Med 2012;366:409–20.
    1. Borah BJ, Nicholson WK, Bradley L, Stewart EA. The impact of uterine leiomyomas: a national survey of affected women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2013;209:319.e1–20.
    1. Schlaff WD, Ackerman RT, Al-Hendy A, et al. Elagolix for heavy menstrual bleeding in women with uterine fibroids. N Engl J Med 2020;382: 328–40.
    1. Diamond MP, Carr B, Dmowski WP, et al. Elagolix treatment for endometriosis-associated pain: results from a phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Reprod Sci 2014;21:363–71.
    1. Ng J, Chwalisz K, Carter DC, Klein CE. Dose-dependent suppression of gonadotropins and ovarian hormones by elagolix in healthy premenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2017;102:1683–91.
    1. Magnay JL, Nevatte TM, Dhingra V, O’Brien S. Menstrual blood loss measurement: validation of the alkaline hematin technique for feminine hygiene products containing super-absorbent polymers. Fertil Steril 2010;94: 2742–6.
    1. Coyne KS, Soliman AM, Margolis MK, Thompson CL, Chwalisz K. Validation of the 4 week recall version of the Uterine Fibroid Symptom and Health-related Quality of Life (UFS-QOL) Questionnaire. Curr Med Res Opin 2017;33:193–200.
    1. Spies JB, Coyne K, Guaou N, Boyle D, Skyrnarz-Murphy K, Gonzalves SM. The UFS-QOL, a new disease-specific symptom and health-related quality of life questionnaire for leiomyomata. Obstet Gynecol 2002;99: 290–300.
    1. Nicholson WK, Wegienka G, Zhang S, et al. Short-term health-related quality of life after hysterectomy compared with myomectomy for symptomatic leiomyomas. Obstet Gynecol 2019;134:261–9.
    1. Corona LE, Swenson CW, Sheetz KH, et al. Use of other treatments before hysterectomy for benign conditions in a statewide hospital collaborative. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015;212: 304.e1–7.
    1. Raine J. Esmya (ulipristal acetate) for symptoms of uterine fibroids: restrictions to use and requirement to check liver function before, during and after treatment Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. Available at: . Accessed August 18, 2020.
    1. Laughlin SK, Stewart EA. Uterine leiomyomas: individualizing the approach to a heterogeneous condition. Obstet Gynecol 2011;117: 396–403.
    1. Hartmann KE, Fonnesbeck C, Surawicz T, et al. Comparative Effectiveness Review No. 195: management of uterine fibroids Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Available at: . Accessed August 18, 2020.
    1. Stewart EA, Nowak RA. Leiomyoma-related bleeding: a classic hypothesis updated for the molecular era. Hum Reprod Update 1996;2: 295–306.
    1. Ciarmela P, Islam MS, Reis FM, et al. Growth factors and myometrium: biological effects in uterine fibroid and possible clinical implications. Hum Reprod Update 2011;17:772–90.
    1. Rackow BW, Taylor HS. Submucosal uterine leiomyomas have a global effect on molecular determinants of endometrial receptivity. Fertil Steril 2010;93:2027–34.

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner