Prediction of Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome in Patients Treated with Corifollitropin alfa or rFSH in a GnRH Antagonist Protocol

Georg Griesinger, Pierre J M Verweij, Davis Gates, Paul Devroey, Keith Gordon, Barbara J Stegmann, Basil C Tarlatzis, Georg Griesinger, Pierre J M Verweij, Davis Gates, Paul Devroey, Keith Gordon, Barbara J Stegmann, Basil C Tarlatzis

Abstract

Study question: What is the threshold for the prediction of moderate to severe or severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) based on the number of growing follicles ≥ 11 mm and/or estradiol (E2) levels?

Summary answer: The optimal threshold of follicles ≥11 mm on the day of hCG to identify those at risk was 19 for both moderate to severe OHSS and for severe OHSS. Estradiol (E2) levels were less prognostic of OHSS than the number of follicles ≥ 11 mm.

What is known already: In comparison to long gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocols, the risk of severe OHSS is reduced by approximately 50% in a GnRH antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation prior to in vitro fertilisation (IVF), while the two protocols provide equal chances of pregnancy per initiated cycle. Nevertheless, moderate to severe OHSS may still occur in GnRH antagonist protocols if human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) is administered to trigger final oocyte maturation, especially in high responder patients. Severe OHSS following hCG trigger may occur with an incidence of 1-2% in a relatively young (aged 18 to 36 years) IVF population treated in a GnRH-antagonist protocol.

Study design, size, duration: From the Engage, Ensure and Trust trials, in total, 2,433 women who received hCG for oocyte maturation and for whom the number of follicles ≥ 11 mm and the level of E2 on the day of hCG administration were known were included in the analyses.

Participants/materials, setting, methods: The threshold for OHSS prediction of moderate and severe OHSS was assessed in women treated with corifollitropin alfa or daily recombinant follicle stimulation hormone (rFSH) in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-antagonist protocol. Receiver operating characteristics curve analyses for moderate to severe OHSS and severe OHSS were performed on the combined dataset and the sensitivity and specificity for the optimal threshold of number of follicles ≥ 11 mm, E2 levels on the day of (hCG), and a combination of both, were determined.

Main results and the role of chance: The optimal threshold of follicles ≥ 11 mm on the day of hCG to identify those at risk of moderate to severe OHSS was 19 (sensitivity and specificity 62.3% and 75.6%, respectively) and for severe OHSS was also 19 (sensitivity and specificity 74.3% and 75.3%, respectively). The positive and negative predictive values were 6.9% and 98.6%, respectively, for moderate to severe OHSS, and 4.2% and 99.5% for severe OHSS.

Limitations, reasons for caution: This was a retrospective analysis of combined data from three trials following ovarian stimulation with two different gonadotropins.

Wider implications of the findings: For patients with 19 follicles or more ≥11 mm on the day of hCG, measures to prevent the development of OHSS should be considered. Secondary preventive measures include cycle cancellation or coasting, use of a GnRH agonist to trigger final oocyte maturation in place of hCG and a freeze all strategy.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00702845 NCT00696800 NCT00696878.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have the following interests: Financial support for this study was provided by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., the manufacturer of corifollitropin alfa and rFSH. Pierre J. M. Verweij is a former employee of MSD BV, Oss, The Netherlands. Davis Gates, Keith Gordon, and Barbara J. Stegmann are current employees of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ and may own stock or stock options in the company. Georg Griesinger has received consulting fees from MSD, Ferring, Glycotope, Serono, Finox, Vitrolife, IBSA, and ReprodWissen GmbH; board membership fee from MSD; and speakers’ bureau fees from MSD, Ferring, Serono, Vitrolife, and IBSA. Basil C. Tarlatzis declares unrestricted research and travel grants and honorarium from Merck Serono; unrestricted research and travel grants, honorarium, and speakers bureau fees from MSD; travel grants, honoraria, and advisory board fees from IBSA; and travel grants from Ferring. Paul Devroey has nothing to declare. This does not alter the authors' adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1. ROC curves for the prediction…
Fig 1. ROC curves for the prediction of moderate to severe OHSS (69 cases) based on the number of follicles ≥11 mm on the day of hCG, the E2 level on the day of hCG or both.
AUCs: 0.728 (follicles); 0.678 (E2); 0.739 (follicles and E2).
Fig 2. ROC curves for the prediction…
Fig 2. ROC curves for the prediction of severe OHSS (35 cases) based on the number of follicles ≥ 11 mm on the day of hCG, the E2 level on the day of hCG or both.
AUCs: 0.769 (follicles); 0.731 (E2); 0.782 (follicles and E2).
Fig 3. Probabilities of moderate to severe…
Fig 3. Probabilities of moderate to severe OHSS and severe OHSS associated with the number of follicles ≥11 mm on the day of hCG.
Fig 4. Probabilities of moderate to severe…
Fig 4. Probabilities of moderate to severe OHSS and severe OHSS associated with the E2 level on the day of hCG.

References

    1. Klemetti R, Sevon T, Gissler M, Hemminki E (2005) Complications of IVF and ovulation induction. Hum Reprod 20: 3293–3300.
    1. Alper MM, Smith LP, Sills ES (2009) Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: current views on pathophysiology, risk factors, prevention, and management. J Exp Clin Assist Reprod 6: 3
    1. Tarlatzis BC, Griesinger G, Leader A, Rombauts L, Ijzerman-Boon PC, Mannaerts BM (2012) Comparative incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa or recombinant FSH. Reprod Biomed Online 24: 410–419. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.01.005
    1. Delbaere A, Smits G, De Leener A, Costagliola S, Vassart G (2005) Understanding ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Endocrine 26: 285–290.
    1. Mathur RS, Akande AV, Keay SD, Hunt LP, Jenkins JM (2000) Distinction between early and late ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril 73: 901–907.
    1. Kolibianakis EM, Collins J, Tarlatzis BC, Devroey P, Diedrich K, Griesinger G (2006) Among patients treated for IVF with gonadotrophins and GnRH analogues, is the probability of live birth dependent on the type of analogue used? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update 12: 651–671.
    1. The corifollitropin alfa Ensure study group (2010) Corifollitropin alfa for ovarian stimulation in IVF: a randomized trial in lower-body-weight women. Reprod Biomed Online 21: 66–76. 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.03.019
    1. Devroey P, Boostanfar R, Koper NP, Mannaerts BM, Ijzerman-Boon PC, Fauser BC (2009) A double-blind, non-inferiority RCT comparing corifollitropin alfa and recombinant FSH during the first seven days of ovarian stimulation using a GnRH antagonist protocol. Hum Reprod 24: 3063–3072. 10.1093/humrep/dep291
    1. Norman RJ, Zegers-Hochschild F, Salle BS, Elbers J, Heijnen E, Marintcheva-Petrova M, Mannaerts B (2011) Repeated ovarian stimulation with corifollitropin alfa in patients in a GnRH antagonist protocol: no concern for immunogenicity. Hum Reprod 26: 2200–2208. 10.1093/humrep/der163
    1. Papanikolaou EG, Pozzobon C, Kolibianakis EM, Camus M, Tournaye H, Fatemi HM, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P (2006) Incidence and prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril 85: 112–120.
    1. Agents stimulating gonadal function in the human. Report of a WHO scientific group. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser 514: 1–30.
    1. Kwee J, Elting ME, Schats R, McDonnell J, Lambalk CB (2007) Ovarian volume and antral follicle count for the prediction of low and hyper responders with in vitro fertilization. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 5: 9
    1. Kahnberg A, Enskog A, Brannstrom M, Lundin K, Bergh C (2009) Prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 88: 1373–1381. 10.3109/00016340903287482
    1. Delvigne A, Rozenberg S (2002) Epidemiology and prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS): a review. Hum Reprod Update 8: 559–577.
    1. Griesinger G, Diedrich K, Tarlatzis BC, Kolibianakis EM (2006) GnRH-antagonists in ovarian stimulation for IVF in patients with poor response to gonadotrophins, polycystic ovary syndrome, and risk of ovarian hyperstimulation: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 13: 628–638.
    1. Kol S (2004) Luteolysis induced by a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist is the key to prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril 81: 1–5.
    1. Griesinger G, von Otte S, Schroer A, Ludwig AK, Diedrich K, Al Hasani S, Schultze-Mosgau A (2007) Elective cryopreservation of all pronuclear oocytes after GnRH agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in patients at risk of developing OHSS: a prospective, observational proof-of-concept study. Hum Reprod 22: 1348–1352.
    1. Griesinger G, Schultz L, Bauer T, Broessner A, Frambach T, Kissler S (2011) Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome prevention by gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist triggering of final oocyte maturation in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocol in combination with a "freeze-all" strategy: a prospective multicentric study. Fertil Steril 95: 2029–2033. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.01.163
    1. Manzanares MA, Gomez-Palomares JL, Ricciarelli E, Hernandez ER (2010) Triggering ovulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in in vitro fertilization patients with polycystic ovaries does not cause ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome despite very high estradiol levels. Fertil Steril 93: 1215–1219. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.12.019
    1. Leitao VM, Moroni RM, Seko LM, Nastri CO, Martins WP (2014) Cabergoline for the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertil Steril 101: 664–675. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.005
    1. Tang H, Hunter T, Hu Y, Zhai SD, Sheng X, Hart RJ (2012) Cabergoline for preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2: CD008605 10.1002/14651858.CD008605.pub2
    1. Tso LO, Costello MF, Albuquerque LE, Andriolo RB, Macedo CR (2014) Metformin treatment before and during IVF or ICSI in women with polycystic ovary syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 11: CD006105 10.1002/14651858.CD006105.pub3
    1. Fadini R, Dal Canto MB, Mignini RM, Brambillasca F, Comi R, Fumagalli D, Lain M, Merola M, Milani R, De Ponti E (2009) Effect of different gonadotrophin priming on IVM of oocytes from women with normal ovaries: a prospective randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online 19: 343–351.
    1. Gremeau AS, Andreadis N, Fatum M, Craig J, Turner K, McVeigh E, Child T (2012) In vitro maturation or in vitro fertilization for women with polycystic ovaries? A case-control study of 194 treatment cycles. Fertil Steril 98: 355–360. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.04.046
    1. Junk SM, Yeap D (2012) Improved implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates after single-embryo transfer with an optimized protocol for in vitro oocyte maturation in women with polycystic ovaries and polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 98: 888–892. 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.06.055
    1. Child TJ, Phillips SJ, Abdul-Jalil AK, Gulekli B, Tan SL (2002) A comparison of in vitro maturation and in vitro fertilization for women with polycystic ovaries. Obstet Gynecol 100: 665–670.
    1. Walls ML, Hunter T, Ryan JP, Keelan JA, Nathan E, Hart RJ (2015) In vitro maturation as an alternative to standard in vitro fertilization for patients diagnosed with polycystic ovaries: a comparative analysis of fresh, frozen and cumulative cycle outcomes. Hum Reprod 30: 88–96. 10.1093/humrep/deu248
    1. Devroey P, Polyzos NP, Blockeel C (2011) An OHSS-Free Clinic by segmentation of IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 26: 2593–2597. 10.1093/humrep/der251

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner