Safety and immunogenicity of Vi-DT conjugate vaccine among 6-23-month-old children: Phase II, randomized, dose-scheduling, observer-blind Study

Maria Rosario Capeding, Arijit Sil, Birkneh Tilahun Tadesse, Tarun Saluja, Samuel Teshome, Edison Alberto, Deok Ryun Kim, Eun Lyeong Park, Ju Yeon Park, Jae Seung Yang, Suchada Chinaworapong, Jiwook Park, Sue-Kyoung Jo, Yun Chon, Seon-Young Yang, Ji Hwa Ryu, Inho Cheong, Kyu-Young Shim, Yoonyeong Lee, Hun Kim, Julia A Lynch, Jerome H Kim, Jean-Louis Excler, T Anh Wartel, Sushant Sahastrabuddhe, Maria Rosario Capeding, Arijit Sil, Birkneh Tilahun Tadesse, Tarun Saluja, Samuel Teshome, Edison Alberto, Deok Ryun Kim, Eun Lyeong Park, Ju Yeon Park, Jae Seung Yang, Suchada Chinaworapong, Jiwook Park, Sue-Kyoung Jo, Yun Chon, Seon-Young Yang, Ji Hwa Ryu, Inho Cheong, Kyu-Young Shim, Yoonyeong Lee, Hun Kim, Julia A Lynch, Jerome H Kim, Jean-Louis Excler, T Anh Wartel, Sushant Sahastrabuddhe

Abstract

Background: Typhoid causes significant mortality among young children in resource-limited settings. Conjugate typhoid vaccines could significantly reduce typhoid-related child deaths, but only one WHO-prequalified typhoid conjugate vaccine exists for young children. To address this gap, we investigated the safety, immunogenicity and dose-scheduling of Vi-DT typhoid conjugate vaccine among children aged 6-23 months.

Methods: In this single center, observer blind, phase II trial, participants were randomly assigned (2:2:1) to receive one or two doses of Vi-DT or comparator vaccine. Anti-Vi IgG titer and geometric mean titers (GMT) were determined at 0, 4, 24 and 28 weeks. Data were analyzed using per-protocol and immunogenicity (a subset of intention-to-treat analysis) sets. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03527355).

Findings: Between April and July 2018, 285 children were randomized; 114 received one or two doses of Vi-DT while 57 received comparator. 277 completed the study follow-up per protocol; 112 and 110 from single- and two-dose Vi-DT schedules, respectively and 55 from the placebo group were included in the per protocol analysis. Safety profile is satisfactory. Thirteen serious adverse events were reported during the 28-week follow-up, none of which were related to Vi-DT. The seroconversion rate four weeks after the first dose was 100% (95% CI 98·3-100) in Vi-DT recipients and 7·0% (95% CI 2·8-16·7) in comparator recipients (p<0·0001). Similarly, the seroconversion rate 4 weeks after the second dose was 98·2% (95% CI 93· 6-99·5) and 21·8% (95% CI 13·0-34·4) among Vi-DT and comparator groups, respectively (p<0·0001). Anti-Vi IgG GMT was significantly higher in Vi-DT than in control group at all post-vaccination visits (p<0·0001).

Interpretation: Both single and two doses of Vi-DT vaccine are safe, well tolerated, and immunogenic for infants and toddlers in a moderately endemic setting.

Keywords: Infants and toddlers; Typhoid; Vi-DT; typhoid conjugate vaccine.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors, Dr. Capeding reports grants from International Vaccine Institute, during the conduct of the study., Seon-Young Yang, Ji Hwa Ryu, Inho Cheong, Kyu-Young Shim, Yoonyeong Lee, and Hun Kim are employees of SK BioScience. All other authors declare no conflict to interest.

© 2020 The Author(s).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of participant disposition (CONSORT flow diagram). * Screen failure – included participants that had abnormal laboratory values on screening, which included abnormal hematological profile, liver enzymes, renal function test and others; † One participant in each age strata 1 and 2 did not receive the 2nd dose of Test Vaccine; ‡ 5 participants (2 in Vi-DT Single dose Group, 2 in Vi-DT Two-dose Group, 1 in Comparator Group) who had delayed the 2nd vaccination. Four participants did not receive the second dose of Vi-DT – once participant due to violation of the selection criteria (i.e., moved out of study area) and three due to withdrawal of consent.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Seroconversion rate by vaccine group, age strata and follow-up time point – Immunogenicity Analysis Set. Seroconversion was defined as 4-fold rise in the anti-Vi IgG titer at week 4 as compared to baseline value. The bars represent the seroconversion rate by age group at different follow up time points; the error bars represent the 95% confidence interval for the point estimate of seroconversion.
Figure 3
Figure 3
GMT of anti-Vi IgG response by vaccine group, age strata and follow-up time point– Immunogenicity set. The line represents the GMT (IU/mL) values at each follow up time points and the error bars represent the 95% Confidence Interval.

References

    1. Lee JS, Mogasale VV, Mogasale V, Lee K. Geographical distribution of typhoid risk factors in low and middle income countries. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16(1):732.
    1. John J, Van Aart CJ, Grassly NC. The Burden of Typhoid and Paratyphoid in India: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(4)
    1. The global burden of typhoid and paratyphoid fevers: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(4):369–381.
    1. GOVPH. Department of Health. 2018Typhoid Morbidity Week 52. Available at: (Accessed in September 2019).
    1. Crump JA, Mintz ED. Global trends in typhoid and paratyphoid Fever. Clin Infect Dis. 2010;50(2):241–246.
    1. Crump JA, Luby SP, Mintz ED. The global burden of typhoid fever. Bull World Health Organ. 2004;82(5):346–353.
    1. Buckle GC, Walker CL, Black RE. Typhoid fever and paratyphoid fever: Systematic review to estimate global morbidity and mortality for 2010. Journal of global health. 2012;2(1)
    1. Bhutta ZA, Capeding MR, Bavdekar A. Immunogenicity and safety of the Vi-CRM197 conjugate vaccine against typhoid fever in adults, children, and infants in south and southeast Asia: results from two randomised, observer-blind, age de-escalation, phase 2 trials. Lancet Infect Dis. 2014;14(2):119–129.
    1. Kim JH, Mogasale V, Im J, Ramani E, Marks F. Updated estimates of typhoid fever burden in sub-Saharan Africa. Lancet Glob Health. 2017;5(10):e969.
    1. Mogasale V, Maskery B, Ochiai RL. Burden of typhoid fever in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic, literature-based update with risk-factor adjustment. Lancet Glob Health. 2014;2(10):e570–e580.
    1. Gaind R, Paglietti B, Murgia M. Molecular characterization of ciprofloxacin-resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi and Paratyphi A causing enteric fever in India. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2006;58(6):1139–1144.
    1. Arjyal A, Basnyat B, Nhan HT. Gatifloxacin versus ceftriaxone for uncomplicated enteric fever in Nepal: an open-label, two-centre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Infect Dis. 2016;16(5):535–545.
    1. Keddy KH, Smith AM, Sooka A, Ismail H, Oliver S. Fluoroquinolone-resistant typhoid. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(5):879–880.
    1. Lunguya O, Lejon V, Phoba MF. Salmonella typhi in the democratic republic of the congo: fluoroquinolone decreased susceptibility on the rise. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6(11):e1921.
    1. Crump JA, Sjolund-Karlsson M, Gordon MA, Parry CM. Epidemiology, Clinical Presentation, Laboratory Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Resistance, and Antimicrobial Management of Invasive Salmonella Infections. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2015;28(4):901–937.
    1. Wain J, Hendriksen RS, Mikoleit ML, Keddy KH, Ochiai RL. Typhoid fever. Lancet. 2015;385(9973):1136–1145.
    1. Yousafzai MT, Qamar FN, Shakoor S. Ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella Typhi Outbreak in Hyderabad City of Sindh, Pakistan: High Time for the Introduction of Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(Supplement_1):S16–s21.
    1. World Health O. Typhoid vaccines: WHO position paper, March 2018 - Recommendations. Vaccine. 2019;37(2):214–216.
    1. Antillon M, Bilcke J, Paltiel AD, Pitzer VE. Cost-effectiveness analysis of typhoid conjugate vaccines in five endemic low- and middle-income settings. Vaccine. 2017;35(27):3506–3514.
    1. Andrews JR, Baker S, Marks F. Typhoid conjugate vaccines: a new tool in the fight against antimicrobial resistance. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):e26–e30.
    1. Park SE, Pham DT, Boinett C. The phylogeography and incidence of multi-drug resistant typhoid fever in sub-Saharan Africa. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):5094.
    1. Britto CD, Dyson ZA, Duchene S. Laboratory and molecular surveillance of paediatric typhoidal Salmonella in Nepal: Antimicrobial resistance and implications for vaccine policy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(4)
    1. Britto CD, Wong VK, Dougan G, Pollard AJ. A systematic review of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, the etiological agent of typhoid. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2018;12(10)
    1. Britto CD, John J, Verghese VP, Pollard AJ. A systematic review of antimicrobial resistance of typhoidal Salmonella in India. Indian J Med Res. 2019;149(2):151–163.
    1. Sahastrabuddhe S, Saluja T. Overview of the Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine Pipeline: Current Status and Future Plans. Clin Infect Dis. 2019;68(Supplement_1):S22–Ss6.
    1. Fraser A, Goldberg E, Acosta CJ, Paul M, Leibovici L. Vaccines for preventing typhoid fever. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2007;(3)
    1. Levine MM, Ferreccio C, Black RE, Germanier R. Large-scale field trial of Ty21a live oral typhoid vaccine in enteric-coated capsule formulation. Lancet. 1987;1(8541):1049–1052.
    1. Levine MM, Ferreccio C, Abrego P, Martin OS, Ortiz E, Cryz S. Duration of efficacy of Ty21a, attenuated Salmonella typhi live oral vaccine. Vaccine. 1999;17(Suppl 2):S22–S27.
    1. Klugman KP, Koornhof HJ, Robbins JB, Le Cam NN. Immunogenicity, efficacy and serological correlate of protection of Salmonella typhi Vi capsular polysaccharide vaccine three years after immunization. Vaccine. 1996;14(5):435–438.
    1. Anwar E, Goldberg E, Fraser A, Acosta CJ, Paul M, Leibovici L. Vaccines for preventing typhoid fever. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews. 2014;(1)
    1. Cadoz M. Potential and limitations of polysaccharide vaccines in infancy. Vaccine. 1998;16(14-15):1391–1395.
    1. Jakobsen H, Jonsdottir I. Mucosal vaccination against encapsulated respiratory bacteria–new potentials for conjugate vaccines. Scand J Immunol. 2003;58(2):119–128.
    1. von Kalckreuth V, Konings F, Aaby P. The Typhoid Fever Surveillance in Africa Program (TSAP): Clinical, Diagnostic, and Epidemiological Methodologies. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62(Suppl 1):S9–s16.
    1. Capeding MR, Teshome S, Saluja T. Safety and immunogenicity of a Vi-DT typhoid conjugate vaccine: Phase I trial in Healthy Filipino adults and children. Vaccine. 2018;36(26):3794–3801.
    1. Medise BE, Soedjatmiko S, Rengganis I. Six-month follow up of a randomized clinical trial-phase I study in Indonesian adults and children: Safety and immunogenicity of Salmonella typhi polysaccharide-diphtheria toxoid (Vi-DT) conjugate vaccine. PLoS One. 2019;14(2)
    1. Capeding MR, Alberto E, Sil A. Immunogenicity, safety and reactogenicity of a Phase II trial of Vi-DT typhoid conjugate vaccine in healthy Filipino infants and toddlers: A preliminary report. Vaccine. 2020;38(28):4476–4483. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.09.074.
    1. Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities – MedDRA. (Accessed on September 20, 2019).
    1. Rijpkema S, Hockley J, Logan A. Establishment of the first International Standard for human anti-typhoid capsular Vi polysaccharide IgG. Biologicals. 2018;56:29–38.
    1. Szu SC. Development of Vi conjugate - a new generation of typhoid vaccine. Expert Rev Vaccines. 2013;12(11):1273–1286.
    1. Lin FY, Ho VA, Khiem HB. The efficacy of a Salmonella typhi Vi conjugate vaccine in two-to-five-year-old children. The New England journal of medicine. 2001;344(17):1263–1269.
    1. Kossaczka Z, Lin FY, Ho VA. Safety and immunogenicity of Vi conjugate vaccines for typhoid fever in adults, teenagers, and 2- to 4-year-old children in Vietnam. Infect Immun. 1999;67(11):5806–5810.
    1. Medise BE, Soedjatmiko S, Gunardi H. One-month follow up of a randomized clinical trial-phase II study in 6 to <24 months old Indonesian subjects: Safety and immunogenicity of Vi-DT Typhoid Conjugate Vaccine. Int J Infect Dis. 2020;93:102–107.
    1. Chinnasami B, Sadasivam K, Vivekanandhan A, Arunachalam P, Pasupathy S. A Study on Longevity of Immune Response after Vaccination with Salmonella Typhi Vi Conjugate Vaccine (Pedatyph) in Children. J Clin Diagn Res. 2015;9(5):Sc01–Sc03.
    1. Mohan VK, Varanasi V, Singh A. Safety and immunogenicity of a Vi polysaccharide-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine (Typbar-TCV) in healthy infants, children, and adults in typhoid endemic areas: a multicenter, 2-cohort, open-label, double-blind, randomized controlled phase 3 study. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61(3):393–402.
    1. WHO/SAGE . Meeting of the Strategic Advisory Group of Experts on immunization, October 2017 – conclusions and recommendations. 2020. Accessed at. Accessed on June 23.
    1. Background Paper on Typhoid Vaccines for SAGE Meeting. 2019. Available at. Accessed on September 25.
    1. Cawiding OR, Natividad GMR, Bato CV, Addawe RC. Forecasting typhoid fever incidence in the Cordillera administrative region in the Philippines using seasonal ARIMA models. AIP Conference Proceedings. 2017;1905(1)

Source: PubMed

3
Abonner