- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT02954900
Know Your Risk: Assessment at Screening for Breast Cancer - Pilot Study (KYRAS)
Study of Web-based Decision Aids for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Increasing Breast Cancer Chemoprevention in the Primary Care Setting: Pilot
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Detaillierte Beschreibung
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women in the U.S. and the primary prevention of this disease is a major public health issue. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and other professional organizations recommend that clinicians discuss chemoprevention with high-risk women. Breast cancer chemoprevention with anti-estrogens, such as tamoxifen, raloxifene, exemestane, and anastrozole, is under-utilized, despite several randomized controlled trials demonstrating a 40-65% decrease in breast cancer incidence among high-risk women. Compounding this underutilization is the fact that a large proportion of women may be unaware of their high-risk status due to the investigators inability to adequately screen them in the primary care setting. Further research is needed to determine how knowledge about breast cancer, actual/perceived risk, and risks/benefits of chemoprevention are best communicated to women in order to promote breast cancer prevention strategies.
This study assesses risk communication and shared decision-making in patient-clinician dyads by administering validated measures at baseline, after interacting with the tools prior to the clinic visit, and after the clinical visit (quantitative analysis); and by using observer-based methods of audio-tape recordings of their clinical encounters (qualitative analysis).
The investigator hypothesizes that combining a patient-centered decision aid with a physician-centered decision support tool integrated into clinic workflow will improve accuracy of breast cancer risk perception, facilitate referrals for specialized risk counseling, and increase chemoprevention uptake.
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienorte
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, Vereinigte Staaten, 10032
- Columbia University Medical Center
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- 5-year breast risk of 1.67% or lifetime risk of 20% according to the Gail model
- The participant understands and is willing to provide informed consent in English or Spanish
- Has a primary care provider at Columbia University Medical Center (CUMC) / New York-Presbyterian Hospital
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior use of a selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) or aromatase inhibitor (AI) for chemoprevention
- Prior history of breast cancer
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Verhütung
- Zuteilung: N / A
- Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Sonstiges: Decision aid
50 women at high-risk for developing breast cancer will use a decision support tool, RealRisks, when discussing breast cancer risk with their providers who will have access to the BNAV provider clinical decision support tool.
|
RealRisks ist eine webbasierte Patientenentscheidungshilfe mit Modulen, die Informationen zur Risikobewertung und Chemoprävention darstellen.
Andere Namen:
Das Brustkrebsrisiko-Navigationstool (BNAV) ist ein webbasiertes Entscheidungsunterstützungstool mit Modulen, die Hausärzten relevante Informationen zur Risikobewertung von Brustkrebs und zu vorbeugenden Maßnahmen für ihre Patienten bieten.
Andere Namen:
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in the accuracy of risk perception (Likert Scale Score)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 2 weeks
|
To measure the patient's accuracy of perceived breast cancer risk before and after exposure to the RealRisks decision aid.
Perception will be assessed by comparing the difference between a patient's perceived risk and their actual risk based on the Gail breast cancer model.
Patients are asked to make a comparative risk assessment about themselves on a 3-point Likert scale.
|
Baseline, 2 weeks
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in a patient's breast cancer knowledge (Survey Score)
Zeitfenster: Baseline, 2 weeks
|
To assess patient's breast cancer knowledge before and after exposure to the RealRisks decision aid by comparing the difference between a patient's responses to a 13-item scale assessing knowledge with response options of true, false, or unsure.
|
Baseline, 2 weeks
|
|
Chemoprevention uptake rate among high-risk women
Zeitfenster: 6 months
|
To determine the uptake rate in the breast clinic after offering specialized risk counseling to a broader population of racially/ethnically diverse women screened in the primary care setting.
Electronic health records will be used to track chemoprevention uptake after exposure to the RealRisks decision aid.
|
6 months
|
|
Referral rates to the breast clinic
Zeitfenster: 12 months
|
To study appropriate referral rate by primary care providers of high-risk patients to the breast clinic.
|
12 months
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Mitarbeiter
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Katherine D Crew, M.D., M.S., Columbia University
Publikationen und hilfreiche Links
Allgemeine Veröffentlichungen
- Kukafka R, Yi H, Xiao T, Thomas P, Aguirre A, Smalletz C, David R, Crew K. Why Breast Cancer Risk by the Numbers Is Not Enough: Evaluation of a Decision Aid in Multi-Ethnic, Low-Numerate Women. J Med Internet Res. 2015 Jul 14;17(7):e165. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4028.
- Yi H, Xiao T, Thomas PS, Aguirre AN, Smalletz C, Dimond J, Finkelstein J, Infante K, Trivedi M, David R, Vargas J, Crew KD, Kukafka R. Barriers and Facilitators to Patient-Provider Communication When Discussing Breast Cancer Risk to Aid in the Development of Decision Support Tools. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2015 Nov 5;2015:1352-60. eCollection 2015.
- Kukafka R, Fang J, Vanegas A, Silverman T, Crew KD. Pilot study of decision support tools on breast cancer chemoprevention for high-risk women and healthcare providers in the primary care setting. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2018 Dec 17;18(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12911-018-0716-5.
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Schätzen)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- AAAP4151 I
- R01CA177995 (US NIH Stipendium/Vertrag)
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .