Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Diaphragm Electrical Activity of Preterm Infants on nCPAP With Binasal Prongs Versus RAM Cannula

19. September 2018 aktualisiert von: Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Effect of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) With RAM Cannula Versus Standard Binasal Prongs on Diaphragm Electrical Activity in Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW) Preterm Infants

Preterm babies have immature lungs and frequent pauses in their breathing which often necessitates breathing support. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) is one of the most commonly used tools, but the standard interfaces (prongs or mask) may cause nasal-septal injury and discomfort.

The RAM cannula is another interface that consists in soft and curved prongs to avoid this nasal injury, but as the seal is not 100%, suboptimal delivery of airway distending pressure could result if they are used to deliver CPAP, as compared to standard interfaces.

The investigators plan to study very low birth weight preterm babies who are generally well but require some support with their breathing. By inserting a special feeding tube with sensors into the stomach, the investigators can measure the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi), which is an important muscle for breathing. By analyzing EAdi in babies receiving nCPAP either with prongs or ram cannula, the investigators will be able to measure and compare how each method of support affects a baby's breathing. This important study will help us determine the most appropriate breathing support for preterm babies.

Studienübersicht

Status

Unbekannt

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure is one of the most researched and accepted methods of delivering NIV to term and preterm infants. Different interfaces have been used, most frequently binasal prongs or mask. The RAM cannula is a relatively new interface for delivering CPAP in preterm infants, specially to avoid nasal injury and discomfort. However, there are few studies in artificial models with different results in term of the percentage of pressure that is really delivered when we use the RAM cannula. The objective of this study is to to investigate in VLBW preterm infants who require respiratory support by nasal CPAP, whether or not using the RAM cannula as the interface will allow to provide the level of respiratory support equivalent to that with the traditional binasal prongs, measured by diaphragm electrical activity (Edi). The investigators hypothesize that in VLBW preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), the use of CPAP with RAM cannula as the interface may provide lower PEEP (positive end expiratory pressure) than set and increased resistance to gas flow, leading to increased respiratory effort for the patient as reflected by an increase in Edi.

This study will help Neonatologist determine if the amount of support provided with the RAM cannula as interface is equivalent to the support we achieve with the standard interfaces, to select the patients that could benefit from using this interface. The investigators will be able to utilize this information to decide on the most appropriate respiratory support modality for preterm patients.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Voraussichtlich)

20

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

  • Kanada
    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Kanada, M4N3M5
        • Rekrutierung
        • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
        • Kontakt:

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

5 Monate bis 7 Monate (Kind)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically stable preterm infants (defined as: cardiovascular stability with normal blood pressure and heart rate for GA and no recent increase in apneic episodes or spells and confirmed by the attending neonatologist) with birth weights less than 1500 gr and/or gestational age bellow 32 weeks, admitted to the NICU at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre on nasal continuous positive airway pressure of 5 to 8 cmH20 support, for at least 48 h and requiring less than 35% of oxygen.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants with congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal tract, phrenic nerve damage, diaphragmatic paralysis, esophageal perforation; infants with congenital or acquired neurological deficit (including significant intraventricular hemorrhage greater than Grade II), neonatal seizure; infants with significant congenital heart disease (including symptomatic PDA); infant with congenital anomalies of the diaphragm; infant with congenital anomalies of the respiratory tracts (e.g. Congenital Cystic Adenomatoid Malformation (CCAM)) infants requiring ongoing treatment for sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), antibiotics for lung infections, narcotic analgesics, or gastric motility agents will be excluded. Infants on nasal CPAP and requiring more than 35% oxygen will be excluded from the study. Infants with significant gastric residuals and vomiting, infants with facial anomalies, infants with pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum, and infants in the immediate postoperative period will be excluded. Infants with nasal excoriations will be excluded from the study as they may be electively placed on the RAM cannula to prevent further nasal trauma.

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Crossover-Aufgabe
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Aktiver Komparator: CPAP with binasal prongs
Edi will be recorded while the infant is on nasal CPAP with the binasal prongs, with a PEEP of 5-8 cm H2O, for 2 hours. Then, the infant will be switched the interface to the RAM cannula, with a PEEP 2 cmH2O higher, during 2 hours.
Sonstiges: respiratory support- interface
change interface to RAM cannula
Sonstiges: respiratory support- interface
change interface to binasal prongs
Aktiver Komparator: CPAP with RAM cannula
Edi will be recorded while the infant is on nasal CPAP with the RAM cannula with a PEEP 2 cmH20 higher than the levels the infant was receiving before starting the study protocol, for 2 hours. Then, the infant will be switched the interface to the binasal prongs with a PEEP between 5-8 cmH2O, during 2 hours.
Sonstiges: respiratory support- interface
change interface to RAM cannula
Sonstiges: respiratory support- interface
change interface to binasal prongs

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Differences in Edi min between CPAP with binasal prongs versus with the RAM cannula
Zeitfenster: 4 hours
Measured by the electrical activity of the diaphragm between respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula)
4 hours

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Difference in neural respiratory rate
Zeitfenster: 4 hours
Measured by the electrical activity of the diaphragm between respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
4 hours
Difference in neural inspiratory time
Zeitfenster: 4 hours
Measured by the electrical activity of the diaphragm between respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
4 hours
Difference in Edi peak
Zeitfenster: 4 hours
Measured by the electrical activity of the diaphragm between respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
4 hours
Difference in transcutaneous pCO2
Zeitfenster: 4 hours
Measured difference in transcutaneous pCO2 between the 2 different respiratory support modes(nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
4 hours
Difference in number of apnea episodes
Zeitfenster: 4 hours
Difference in number of apnea episodes between the 2 different respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
4 hours
Needs of oxygen
Zeitfenster: 4 hours
Needs of O2 measured by FiO2 on the 2 different respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
4 hours

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Michael Dunn, MD, Staff Neonatologist - NICU

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

1. November 2016

Primärer Abschluss (Voraussichtlich)

31. Dezember 2019

Studienabschluss (Voraussichtlich)

31. Dezember 2019

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

17. April 2017

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

19. April 2017

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

20. April 2017

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

20. September 2018

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

19. September 2018

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. April 2017

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • RAM cannula study

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Frühgeborene

Klinische Studien zur respiratory support- interface

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Norway

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

Abonnieren