此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Diaphragm Electrical Activity of Preterm Infants on nCPAP With Binasal Prongs Versus RAM Cannula

2018年9月19日 更新者:Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

Effect of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) With RAM Cannula Versus Standard Binasal Prongs on Diaphragm Electrical Activity in Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW) Preterm Infants

Preterm babies have immature lungs and frequent pauses in their breathing which often necessitates breathing support. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) is one of the most commonly used tools, but the standard interfaces (prongs or mask) may cause nasal-septal injury and discomfort.

The RAM cannula is another interface that consists in soft and curved prongs to avoid this nasal injury, but as the seal is not 100%, suboptimal delivery of airway distending pressure could result if they are used to deliver CPAP, as compared to standard interfaces.

The investigators plan to study very low birth weight preterm babies who are generally well but require some support with their breathing. By inserting a special feeding tube with sensors into the stomach, the investigators can measure the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi), which is an important muscle for breathing. By analyzing EAdi in babies receiving nCPAP either with prongs or ram cannula, the investigators will be able to measure and compare how each method of support affects a baby's breathing. This important study will help us determine the most appropriate breathing support for preterm babies.

研究概览

详细说明

Continuous Positive Airway Pressure is one of the most researched and accepted methods of delivering NIV to term and preterm infants. Different interfaces have been used, most frequently binasal prongs or mask. The RAM cannula is a relatively new interface for delivering CPAP in preterm infants, specially to avoid nasal injury and discomfort. However, there are few studies in artificial models with different results in term of the percentage of pressure that is really delivered when we use the RAM cannula. The objective of this study is to to investigate in VLBW preterm infants who require respiratory support by nasal CPAP, whether or not using the RAM cannula as the interface will allow to provide the level of respiratory support equivalent to that with the traditional binasal prongs, measured by diaphragm electrical activity (Edi). The investigators hypothesize that in VLBW preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), the use of CPAP with RAM cannula as the interface may provide lower PEEP (positive end expiratory pressure) than set and increased resistance to gas flow, leading to increased respiratory effort for the patient as reflected by an increase in Edi.

This study will help Neonatologist determine if the amount of support provided with the RAM cannula as interface is equivalent to the support we achieve with the standard interfaces, to select the patients that could benefit from using this interface. The investigators will be able to utilize this information to decide on the most appropriate respiratory support modality for preterm patients.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (预期的)

20

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Ontario
      • Toronto、Ontario、加拿大、M4N3M5
        • 招聘中
        • Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
        • 接触:

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

5个月 至 7个月 (孩子)

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically stable preterm infants (defined as: cardiovascular stability with normal blood pressure and heart rate for GA and no recent increase in apneic episodes or spells and confirmed by the attending neonatologist) with birth weights less than 1500 gr and/or gestational age bellow 32 weeks, admitted to the NICU at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre on nasal continuous positive airway pressure of 5 to 8 cmH20 support, for at least 48 h and requiring less than 35% of oxygen.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants with congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal tract, phrenic nerve damage, diaphragmatic paralysis, esophageal perforation; infants with congenital or acquired neurological deficit (including significant intraventricular hemorrhage greater than Grade II), neonatal seizure; infants with significant congenital heart disease (including symptomatic PDA); infant with congenital anomalies of the diaphragm; infant with congenital anomalies of the respiratory tracts (e.g. Congenital Cystic Adenomatoid Malformation (CCAM)) infants requiring ongoing treatment for sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), antibiotics for lung infections, narcotic analgesics, or gastric motility agents will be excluded. Infants on nasal CPAP and requiring more than 35% oxygen will be excluded from the study. Infants with significant gastric residuals and vomiting, infants with facial anomalies, infants with pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum, and infants in the immediate postoperative period will be excluded. Infants with nasal excoriations will be excluded from the study as they may be electively placed on the RAM cannula to prevent further nasal trauma.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:交叉作业
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:CPAP with binasal prongs
Edi will be recorded while the infant is on nasal CPAP with the binasal prongs, with a PEEP of 5-8 cm H2O, for 2 hours. Then, the infant will be switched the interface to the RAM cannula, with a PEEP 2 cmH2O higher, during 2 hours.
change interface to RAM cannula
change interface to binasal prongs
有源比较器:CPAP with RAM cannula
Edi will be recorded while the infant is on nasal CPAP with the RAM cannula with a PEEP 2 cmH20 higher than the levels the infant was receiving before starting the study protocol, for 2 hours. Then, the infant will be switched the interface to the binasal prongs with a PEEP between 5-8 cmH2O, during 2 hours.
change interface to RAM cannula
change interface to binasal prongs

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Differences in Edi min between CPAP with binasal prongs versus with the RAM cannula
大体时间:4 hours
Measured by the electrical activity of the diaphragm between respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula)
4 hours

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Difference in neural respiratory rate
大体时间:4 hours
Measured by the electrical activity of the diaphragm between respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
4 hours
Difference in neural inspiratory time
大体时间:4 hours
Measured by the electrical activity of the diaphragm between respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
4 hours
Difference in Edi peak
大体时间:4 hours
Measured by the electrical activity of the diaphragm between respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
4 hours
Difference in transcutaneous pCO2
大体时间:4 hours
Measured difference in transcutaneous pCO2 between the 2 different respiratory support modes(nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
4 hours
Difference in number of apnea episodes
大体时间:4 hours
Difference in number of apnea episodes between the 2 different respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
4 hours
Needs of oxygen
大体时间:4 hours
Needs of O2 measured by FiO2 on the 2 different respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
4 hours

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Michael Dunn, MD、Staff Neonatologist - NICU

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2016年11月1日

初级完成 (预期的)

2019年12月31日

研究完成 (预期的)

2019年12月31日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2017年4月17日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2017年4月19日

首次发布 (实际的)

2017年4月20日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2018年9月20日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2018年9月19日

最后验证

2017年4月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

早产儿的临床试验

respiratory support- interface的临床试验

订阅