- ICH GCP
- US-Register für klinische Studien
- Klinische Studie NCT04496713
Pilot Study of Video and Telephone Primary Care Visits
Pilot Study - Randomized Controlled Trial of Video and Telephone Primary Care Visits
Studienübersicht
Status
Bedingungen
Intervention / Behandlung
Studientyp
Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)
Phase
- Unzutreffend
Kontakte und Standorte
Studienorte
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, Vereinigte Staaten, 21287
- Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center
-
-
Teilnahmekriterien
Zulassungskriterien
Studienberechtigtes Alter
Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige
Studienberechtigte Geschlechter
Beschreibung
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients scheduled for telephone-based visits who are doing so because of a lack of ability to conduct a video visit (i.e. no tablet/laptop; no access to internet) who live in Baltimore City
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with significant visual or hearing impairment
- Patients that have legal guardians or who are marked as lacking healthcare decision-making capacity
- Patients that have not selected English as their preferred language
Studienplan
Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?
Designdetails
- Hauptzweck: Versorgungsforschung
- Zuteilung: Zufällig
- Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
- Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)
Waffen und Interventionen
Teilnehmergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandlung |
|---|---|
|
Kein Eingriff: Telemedicine - Phone
Patients will continue with their telephone-based telemedicine visit as scheduled.
There will be no change to their care.
Patients will receive a survey by mail about the visit.
|
|
|
Experimental: Telemedicine - Audio/Video
Patients will be given an internet-connected tablet to have their upcoming visit with their physician by audio/video.
A survey can be completed on the tablet.
The devices will be sent back to the research time after their single use.
|
An internet-connected tablet provided to patient for upcoming visit with physician by audio/video which can also be used to complete a survey.
|
Was misst die Studie?
Primäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Provider rating as assessed by the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems question on provider rating
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Provider rating will be assessed with the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems question on provider rating of 0-10; 0 being worst provider possible and 10 being best provider possible.
|
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen
Ergebnis Maßnahme |
Maßnahmenbeschreibung |
Zeitfenster |
|---|---|---|
|
Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for patient as assessed by a Likert scale
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for patient will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to satisfaction. Satisfaction (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree).
Overall score 3 to 15 with higher scores signifying better satisfaction. |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for provider as assessed by a Likert scale
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for provider will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to satisfaction. [1=Strongly Disagree. 5=Strongly Agree].
Overall score 2 to 10 with higher scores signifying better satisfaction. |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Efficacy of telemedicine visit for provider as assessed by a Likert scale
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Efficacy of telemedicine visit for provider will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to efficacy. [1=Strongly Disagree. 5=Strongly Agree]. b. I was able to understand the patient's explanation of their medical problems well enough. c. In general, this telemedicine visit was effective in improving this patient's medical care d. An in-person visit would likely have provided additional clinically-relevant information e. An in-person visit would likely have led to a change in management |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Provider communication as assessed by yes/no question
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
The ability of a provider to communicate will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire related to communication. Did this provider explain things in a way that was easy to understand? Yes/No |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Provider listening as assessed by yes/no question
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Provider listening will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire related to listening. Did this provider listen carefully to you? Yes/No |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Provider respect as assessed by yes/no question
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Provider respect will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire relating to respect. Did this provider show respect for what you had to say? Yes/No |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Provider time spent as assessed by yes/no question
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Provider time spent will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire relating to time spent during the clinical encounter. Did this provider spend enough time with you? Yes/No |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Patient health rating as assessed by a likert scale
Zeitfenster: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Patient health will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to patient health. In general, how would you rate your overall health?
In general, how would you rate your overall mental or emotional health?
Overall score 2 to 10 with lower scores signifying better health. |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Mitarbeiter und Ermittler
Sponsor
Ermittler
- Hauptermittler: Jeremy A Epstein, MD, Johns Hopkins University
- Hauptermittler: Casey Overby Taylor, PhD, Johns Hopkins University
Studienaufzeichnungsdaten
Haupttermine studieren
Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)
Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)
Studienanmeldedaten
Zuerst eingereicht
Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat
Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen
Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)
Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt
Zuletzt verifiziert
Mehr Informationen
Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie
Schlüsselwörter
Andere Studien-ID-Nummern
- IRB00257994
Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)
Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?
Beschreibung des IPD-Plans
Art der unterstützenden IPD-Freigabeinformationen
- STUDIENPROTOKOLL
- SAFT
Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt
Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt
Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .