- ICH GCP
- Registro degli studi clinici negli Stati Uniti
- Sperimentazione clinica NCT04496713
Pilot Study of Video and Telephone Primary Care Visits
Pilot Study - Randomized Controlled Trial of Video and Telephone Primary Care Visits
Panoramica dello studio
Stato
Condizioni
Intervento / Trattamento
Tipo di studio
Iscrizione (Effettivo)
Fase
- Non applicabile
Contatti e Sedi
Luoghi di studio
-
-
Maryland
-
Baltimore, Maryland, Stati Uniti, 21287
- Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center
-
-
Criteri di partecipazione
Criteri di ammissibilità
Età idonea allo studio
Accetta volontari sani
Sessi ammissibili allo studio
Descrizione
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients scheduled for telephone-based visits who are doing so because of a lack of ability to conduct a video visit (i.e. no tablet/laptop; no access to internet) who live in Baltimore City
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with significant visual or hearing impairment
- Patients that have legal guardians or who are marked as lacking healthcare decision-making capacity
- Patients that have not selected English as their preferred language
Piano di studio
Come è strutturato lo studio?
Dettagli di progettazione
- Scopo principale: Ricerca sui servizi sanitari
- Assegnazione: Randomizzato
- Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
- Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)
Armi e interventi
Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm |
Intervento / Trattamento |
|---|---|
|
Nessun intervento: Telemedicine - Phone
Patients will continue with their telephone-based telemedicine visit as scheduled.
There will be no change to their care.
Patients will receive a survey by mail about the visit.
|
|
|
Sperimentale: Telemedicine - Audio/Video
Patients will be given an internet-connected tablet to have their upcoming visit with their physician by audio/video.
A survey can be completed on the tablet.
The devices will be sent back to the research time after their single use.
|
An internet-connected tablet provided to patient for upcoming visit with physician by audio/video which can also be used to complete a survey.
|
Cosa sta misurando lo studio?
Misure di risultato primarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Provider rating as assessed by the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems question on provider rating
Lasso di tempo: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Provider rating will be assessed with the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems question on provider rating of 0-10; 0 being worst provider possible and 10 being best provider possible.
|
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Misure di risultato secondarie
Misura del risultato |
Misura Descrizione |
Lasso di tempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for patient as assessed by a Likert scale
Lasso di tempo: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for patient will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to satisfaction. Satisfaction (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree).
Overall score 3 to 15 with higher scores signifying better satisfaction. |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for provider as assessed by a Likert scale
Lasso di tempo: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for provider will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to satisfaction. [1=Strongly Disagree. 5=Strongly Agree].
Overall score 2 to 10 with higher scores signifying better satisfaction. |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Efficacy of telemedicine visit for provider as assessed by a Likert scale
Lasso di tempo: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Efficacy of telemedicine visit for provider will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to efficacy. [1=Strongly Disagree. 5=Strongly Agree]. b. I was able to understand the patient's explanation of their medical problems well enough. c. In general, this telemedicine visit was effective in improving this patient's medical care d. An in-person visit would likely have provided additional clinically-relevant information e. An in-person visit would likely have led to a change in management |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Provider communication as assessed by yes/no question
Lasso di tempo: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
The ability of a provider to communicate will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire related to communication. Did this provider explain things in a way that was easy to understand? Yes/No |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Provider listening as assessed by yes/no question
Lasso di tempo: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Provider listening will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire related to listening. Did this provider listen carefully to you? Yes/No |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Provider respect as assessed by yes/no question
Lasso di tempo: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Provider respect will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire relating to respect. Did this provider show respect for what you had to say? Yes/No |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Provider time spent as assessed by yes/no question
Lasso di tempo: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Provider time spent will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire relating to time spent during the clinical encounter. Did this provider spend enough time with you? Yes/No |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
|
Patient health rating as assessed by a likert scale
Lasso di tempo: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Patient health will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to patient health. In general, how would you rate your overall health?
In general, how would you rate your overall mental or emotional health?
Overall score 2 to 10 with lower scores signifying better health. |
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
|
Collaboratori e investigatori
Sponsor
Investigatori
- Investigatore principale: Jeremy A Epstein, MD, Johns Hopkins University
- Investigatore principale: Casey Overby Taylor, PhD, Johns Hopkins University
Studiare le date dei record
Studia le date principali
Inizio studio (Effettivo)
Completamento primario (Effettivo)
Completamento dello studio (Effettivo)
Date di iscrizione allo studio
Primo inviato
Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità
Primo Inserito (Effettivo)
Aggiornamenti dei record di studio
Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)
Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC
Ultimo verificato
Maggiori informazioni
Termini relativi a questo studio
Parole chiave
Altri numeri di identificazione dello studio
- IRB00257994
Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)
Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?
Descrizione del piano IPD
Tipo di informazioni di supporto alla condivisione IPD
- STUDIO_PROTOCOLLO
- LINFA
Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio
Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti
Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .