Deze pagina is automatisch vertaald en de nauwkeurigheid van de vertaling kan niet worden gegarandeerd. Raadpleeg de Engelse versie voor een brontekst.

Pilot Study of Video and Telephone Primary Care Visits

8 februari 2022 bijgewerkt door: Johns Hopkins University

Pilot Study - Randomized Controlled Trial of Video and Telephone Primary Care Visits

The inability to access and use smartphones or camera-outfitted internet-connected devices during the COVID-19 pandemic relegates certain patients to receive audio-only telemedicine instead of audio/video-based telemedicine. The investigators are conducting a randomized controlled trial in order to characterize patient and provider attitudes towards these two modalities of care and to test the feasibility of a new model to make tablets for video-based care accessible to those who need that. The investigators hypothesize that patient and provider satisfaction will be higher with video-based telehealth when compared to phone-based telehealth.

Studie Overzicht

Toestand

Voltooid

Conditie

Interventie / Behandeling

Studietype

Ingrijpend

Inschrijving (Werkelijk)

15

Fase

  • Niet toepasbaar

Contacten en locaties

In dit gedeelte vindt u de contactgegevens van degenen die het onderzoek uitvoeren en informatie over waar dit onderzoek wordt uitgevoerd.

Studie Locaties

  • Verenigde Staten
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, Verenigde Staten, 21287
        • Johns Hopkins Outpatient Center

Deelname Criteria

Onderzoekers zoeken naar mensen die aan een bepaalde beschrijving voldoen, de zogenaamde geschiktheidscriteria. Enkele voorbeelden van deze criteria zijn iemands algemene gezondheidstoestand of eerdere behandelingen.

Geschiktheidscriteria

Leeftijden die in aanmerking komen voor studie

18 jaar en ouder (Volwassen, Oudere volwassene)

Accepteert gezonde vrijwilligers

Nee

Geslachten die in aanmerking komen voor studie

Allemaal

Beschrijving

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients scheduled for telephone-based visits who are doing so because of a lack of ability to conduct a video visit (i.e. no tablet/laptop; no access to internet) who live in Baltimore City

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with significant visual or hearing impairment
  • Patients that have legal guardians or who are marked as lacking healthcare decision-making capacity
  • Patients that have not selected English as their preferred language

Studie plan

Dit gedeelte bevat details van het studieplan, inclusief hoe de studie is opgezet en wat de studie meet.

Hoe is de studie opgezet?

Ontwerpdetails

  • Primair doel: Onderzoek naar gezondheidsdiensten
  • Toewijzing: Gerandomiseerd
  • Interventioneel model: Parallelle opdracht
  • Masker: Geen (open label)

Wapens en interventies

Deelnemersgroep / Arm
Interventie / Behandeling
Geen tussenkomst: Telemedicine - Phone
Patients will continue with their telephone-based telemedicine visit as scheduled. There will be no change to their care. Patients will receive a survey by mail about the visit.
Experimenteel: Telemedicine - Audio/Video
Patients will be given an internet-connected tablet to have their upcoming visit with their physician by audio/video. A survey can be completed on the tablet. The devices will be sent back to the research time after their single use.
Ander: Internet-connected computer tablet
An internet-connected tablet provided to patient for upcoming visit with physician by audio/video which can also be used to complete a survey.

Wat meet het onderzoek?

Primaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Provider rating as assessed by the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems question on provider rating
Tijdsspanne: Within 2 weeks of the study visit
Provider rating will be assessed with the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems question on provider rating of 0-10; 0 being worst provider possible and 10 being best provider possible.
Within 2 weeks of the study visit

Secundaire uitkomstmaten

Uitkomstmaat
Maatregel Beschrijving
Tijdsspanne
Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for patient as assessed by a Likert scale
Tijdsspanne: Within 2 weeks of the study visit

Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for patient will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to satisfaction.

Satisfaction (1=strongly disagree to 5=strongly agree).

  1. In general, I was satisfied with using a video or phone call for this visit
  2. I could explain my medical problems well enough
  3. Talking to the doctor was as satisfying as talking in person

Overall score 3 to 15 with higher scores signifying better satisfaction.
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for provider as assessed by a Likert scale
Tijdsspanne: Within 2 weeks of the study visit

Satisfaction with telemedicine visit for provider will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to satisfaction.

[1=Strongly Disagree. 5=Strongly Agree].

  1. In general, I was satisfied with using telemedicine for this visit
  2. Talking to the patient was as satisfying as talking in person.

Overall score 2 to 10 with higher scores signifying better satisfaction.
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
Efficacy of telemedicine visit for provider as assessed by a Likert scale
Tijdsspanne: Within 2 weeks of the study visit

Efficacy of telemedicine visit for provider will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to efficacy.

[1=Strongly Disagree. 5=Strongly Agree]. b. I was able to understand the patient's explanation of their medical problems well enough.

c. In general, this telemedicine visit was effective in improving this patient's medical care d. An in-person visit would likely have provided additional clinically-relevant information e. An in-person visit would likely have led to a change in management
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
Provider communication as assessed by yes/no question
Tijdsspanne: Within 2 weeks of the study visit

The ability of a provider to communicate will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire related to communication.

Did this provider explain things in a way that was easy to understand? Yes/No
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
Provider listening as assessed by yes/no question
Tijdsspanne: Within 2 weeks of the study visit

Provider listening will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire related to listening.

Did this provider listen carefully to you? Yes/No
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
Provider respect as assessed by yes/no question
Tijdsspanne: Within 2 weeks of the study visit

Provider respect will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire relating to respect.

Did this provider show respect for what you had to say? Yes/No
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
Provider time spent as assessed by yes/no question
Tijdsspanne: Within 2 weeks of the study visit

Provider time spent will be assessed by patients with the yes/no question of a modified version of the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems questionnaire relating to time spent during the clinical encounter.

Did this provider spend enough time with you? Yes/No
Within 2 weeks of the study visit
Patient health rating as assessed by a likert scale
Tijdsspanne: Within 2 weeks of the study visit

Patient health will be assessed with Likert-scale questions related to patient health.

In general, how would you rate your overall health?

  1. Excellent
  2. Very good
  3. Good
  4. Fair
  5. Poor

In general, how would you rate your overall mental or emotional health?

  1. Excellent
  2. Very good
  3. Good
  4. Fair
  5. Poor

Overall score 2 to 10 with lower scores signifying better health.
Within 2 weeks of the study visit

Medewerkers en onderzoekers

Hier vindt u mensen en organisaties die betrokken zijn bij dit onderzoek.

Sponsor

Johns Hopkins University

Onderzoekers

  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Jeremy A Epstein, MD, Johns Hopkins University
  • Hoofdonderzoeker: Casey Overby Taylor, PhD, Johns Hopkins University

Studie record data

Deze datums volgen de voortgang van het onderzoeksdossier en de samenvatting van de ingediende resultaten bij ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieverslagen en gerapporteerde resultaten worden beoordeeld door de National Library of Medicine (NLM) om er zeker van te zijn dat ze voldoen aan specifieke kwaliteitscontrolenormen voordat ze op de openbare website worden geplaatst.

Bestudeer belangrijke data

Studie start (Werkelijk)

24 januari 2021

Primaire voltooiing (Werkelijk)

24 november 2021

Studie voltooiing (Werkelijk)

30 december 2021

Studieregistratiedata

Eerst ingediend

29 juli 2020

Eerst ingediend dat voldeed aan de QC-criteria

29 juli 2020

Eerst geplaatst (Werkelijk)

3 augustus 2020

Updates van studierecords

Laatste update geplaatst (Werkelijk)

9 februari 2022

Laatste update ingediend die voldeed aan QC-criteria

8 februari 2022

Laatst geverifieerd

1 februari 2021

Meer informatie

Termen gerelateerd aan deze studie

Trefwoorden

Andere studie-ID-nummers

  • IRB00257994

Plan Individuele Deelnemersgegevens (IPD)

Bent u van plan om gegevens van individuele deelnemers (IPD) te delen?

JA

Beschrijving IPD-plan

Protocol and analysis plan, without any protected health information (PHI), can be shared on request via email.

IPD delen Ondersteunend informatietype

  • LEERPROTOCOOL
  • SAP

Informatie over medicijnen en apparaten, studiedocumenten

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd geneesmiddel

Nee

Bestudeert een door de Amerikaanse FDA gereguleerd apparaatproduct

Nee

Deze informatie is zonder wijzigingen rechtstreeks van de website clinicaltrials.gov gehaald. Als u verzoeken heeft om uw onderzoeksgegevens te wijzigen, te verwijderen of bij te werken, neem dan contact op met register@clinicaltrials.gov. Zodra er een wijziging wordt doorgevoerd op clinicaltrials.gov, wordt deze ook automatisch bijgewerkt op onze website .

Abonneren