- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT02830191
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplant Patients by Dried Blood Spot Assay. Interest and Feasibility. (CICLOSPOT)
Ciclosporin A (CsA) is an immunosuppressive drug used in organs and tissues transplantations (kidney, heart, liver, bone marrow ...) to prevent rejection, and in different autoimmune or inflammatory diseases. A therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is required during a CsA treatment. It is justified by a narrow therapeutic range between efficiency and nephrotoxicity, and by large intra- and interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. TDM of CsA is conventionally performed by determining residual concentration, and sometimes concentration at 2 hours after administration. TDM of CsA is currently performed by venous sampling on ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling could be a particularly interesting alternative to conventional blood sampling. With DBS, capillary blood is obtained from a finger prick by the patient himself, and the blood drop obtained is deposited on filter paper, which can be stored at room temperature and then be sent to the laboratory by mail.
This sampling method has several advantages : it requires small blood volumes, it is less invasive than conventional venous sampling, sampling can be performed by the patient himself at home few days before the consultation, and the results of the analysis can be available to the clinician on the day of consultation, allowing dose adjustment more quickly.
Several studies have been published in recent years using DBS sampling method, for various drugs such as antimalarials, antiepileptics, antiretrovirals, metformin, benzodiazepines, or immunosuppressants. Only one clinical validation study of TDM of CsA using DBS method was published by Wilhelm et al. (2013) in a population of 38 patients who received allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. The results showed excellent correlation between the concentrations determined by the two sampling methods.
The investigators propose an observational study at the University Hospital of Caen for clinical validation of DBS sampling for TDM of CsA in kidney transplantation, for which there are no data published. During a nephrology consultation, for each patient, venous and finger prick blood samples are simultaneously collected. CsA assays were performed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for the two sampling methods. A specific LC-MS/MS assay method applied for DBS samples was developed and validated for this study (DBS/LC-MS/MS). Correlation between the results obtained from the two sampling methods will be evaluated, on at least 100 samples. Patients have to answer a questionnaire to assess pain and comfort of DBS sampling, and feasibility of self-sampling at home by this method. The aim of this clinical validation study of DBS sampling is the establishment of the systematic TDM of CsA for renal transplant patients by DBS sampling at the University Hospital of Caen.
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Método de muestreo
Población de estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult Patient (18 years or older) treated with CsA and monitored for dose adjustment
- Kidney transplantation
- Not objecting to participate in study
Exclusion Criteria:
- Objecting to the additional sample by finger prick
- Anticoagulant treatment
- Hemostatic disorder (risk of hematoma)
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Modelos observacionales: Grupo
- Perspectivas temporales: Futuro
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|
|
Correlation between CsA concentrations determined from DBS sampling and conventional venous sampling for each patient (coefficient correlation, Bland-Altman difference plot)
Periodo de tiempo: 8 months
|
8 months
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|
|
Comparison of pain, comfort and practicality of the two sampling methods by a patient questionnaire.
Periodo de tiempo: 8 months
|
8 months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Estimar)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- 14-050
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
producto fabricado y exportado desde los EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .