Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

A Pilot Study Testing a Life Skills Application to Address Interpersonal Relationships in College (MKit)

9 de mayo de 2019 actualizado por: Michelle Munro-Kramer, University of Michigan

MKit: A Pilot Study Testing a Life Skills Application to Address Interpersonal Relationships in College

This study utilizes implementation science principles to culturally adapt a pre-existing web-based application (WebApp) for use with college students. The ADAPT-ITT process will be utilized to adapt the WebApp to a diverse (race, ethnicity, gender/sexual identity) college population with a focus on life skills and holistic self-care as reinforcement to currently available primary prevention programming available to incoming students. The study hypothesis is that the adapted WebApp will be usable, acceptable, and students will be willing to use it as a reinforcement to current university primary prevention programming. The study team will also monitor retention of participants over the academic year.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Intervención / Tratamiento

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

261

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Michigan
      • Ann Arbor, Michigan, Estados Unidos, 48109
        • University of Michigan

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Currently enrolled as a student at the participating university (University of Michigan)
  2. Age 18 or older
  3. Willing to participate in the study
  4. Able to speak and read English
  5. Participated in Relationship Remix at Alice Lloyd Hall or Mosher-Jordan Hall during the Fall of 2017. These residence halls were selected due to their similar sizes and demographic populations to allow for "approximate matching" between the control and intervention group.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Did not complete the Relationship Remix session

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Prevención
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Intervención MKit WebApp
El brazo de intervención recibirá el paquete de capacitación estándar de atención habitual para los estudiantes que ingresan a la Universidad de Michigan, que incluye: 1) Haven, un módulo en línea sobre relaciones saludables y violencia sexual completado antes de venir al campus; 2) Relationship Remix, un programa interactivo impartido por pares sobre relaciones saludables y violencia sexual; y 3) Change it Up, una actuación de teatro educativo de intervención de espectadores presentada por estudiantes actores. Además, recibirán acceso a la aplicación web MKit, que les dará acceso a contenido, establecimiento de objetivos y recursos para 14 áreas temáticas.
MKit es una aplicación basada en la web que utiliza un enfoque de habilidades para la vida para abordar las relaciones saludables y la violencia sexual. Incluye 14 mosaicos que incorporan información, establecimiento de objetivos y recursos.
Sin intervención: Estándar de cuidado
El brazo de control recibirá el paquete de capacitación estándar de atención habitual para los estudiantes que ingresan a la Universidad de Michigan, que incluye: 1) Haven, un módulo en línea sobre relaciones saludables y violencia sexual completado antes de ingresar al campus; 2) Relationship Remix, un programa interactivo impartido por pares sobre relaciones saludables y violencia sexual; y 3) Change it Up, una actuación de teatro educativo de intervención de espectadores presentada por estudiantes actores.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
3-Month Usability
Periodo de tiempo: 3-months
The 10-item System Usability Scale will be used to evaluate the usability of WebApp in the intervention group only. The System Usability Scale (Brook, 1996) includes 10 items that are rated from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). To get a final score the: 1) First, one is subtracted from the score of the odd items; 2) Second, the responses are subtracted from 5 for the even-numbered items; 3) Then the responses are summed and multiplied by 2.5 to get a range of 0-100. A score above 68 is considered above average.
3-months
5-Month Usability
Periodo de tiempo: 5-months
The 10-item System Usability Scale will be used to evaluate the usability of WebApp in the intervention group only. The System Usability Scale (Brook, 1996) includes 10 items that are rated from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree). To get a final score the: 1) First, one is subtracted from the score of the odd items; 2) Second, the responses are subtracted from 5 for the even-numbered items; 3) Then the responses are summed and multiplied by 2.5 to get a range of 0-100. A score above 68 is considered above average.
5-months
3-Month Acceptability
Periodo de tiempo: 3-months
The 5-item System Acceptability Scale (investigator created) will be used to evaluate the acceptability of the WebApp in the intervention group only. An investigator-created acceptability scale with 5-items will be used to measure acceptability. Four items are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree/Very Likely) to 5 (Strongly Disagree/Very Unlikely) and will be reverse coded. One item assess the frequency of use of the WebApp from 1 (Never) to 5 (Multiple times a week). All five items will be summed for a total score. Scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
3-months
5-Month Acceptability
Periodo de tiempo: 5-months
The 5-item System Acceptability Scale (investigator created) will be used to evaluate the acceptability of the WebApp in the intervention group only. An investigator-created acceptability scale with 5-items will be used to measure acceptability. Four items are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree/Very Likely) to 5 (Strongly Disagree/Very Unlikely) and will be reverse coded. One item assess the frequency of use of the WebApp from 1 (Never) to 5 (Multiple times a week). All five items will be summed for a total score. Scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
5-months

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
3-Month Retention
Periodo de tiempo: 3-months
The retention rate will be calculated based on how many participants in the intervention group have completed the follow-up surveys. A total retention score (those retained/those enrolled) will be computed based on interaction with the WebApp.
3-months
5-Month Retention
Periodo de tiempo: 5-months
The retention rate will be calculated based on how many participants in the intervention group have completed the follow-up surveys. A total retention score (those retained/those enrolled) will be computed based on interaction with the WebApp.
5-months

Otras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
3-Month Sexual Violence Victimization
Periodo de tiempo: 3-months
The 10-item Sexual Experiences Survey will be used to measure participants' experiences of sexual violence victimization. The revised Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Victimization (Koss et al., 2007) includes 10 items that are used to assess the frequency of seven victimization behaviors and then uses three questions to explore the sex of the perpetrator and if the participant believes they were raped. We will be items 1-7 to assess the number of times an individual has experienced victimization over the last 3 months from 0 to 3+ times. The results will be scored as a percentage of participants who have experienced each individual behavior and the percentage who report that they have experienced a rape.
3-months
5-Month Sexual Violence Victimization
Periodo de tiempo: 5-months
The 10-item Sexual Experiences Survey will be used to measure participants' experiences of sexual violence victimization. The revised Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Victimization (Koss et al., 2007) includes 10 items that are used to assess the frequency of seven victimization behaviors and then uses three questions to explore the sex of the perpetrator and if the participant believes they were raped. We will be items 1-7 to assess the number of times an individual has experienced victimization over the last 5 months from 0 to 3+ times. The results will be scored as a percentage of participants who have experienced each individual behavior and the percentage who report that they have experienced a rape.
5-months
3-Month Sexual Violence Perpetration
Periodo de tiempo: 3-months
The 10-item Sexual Experiences Survey will be used to measure participants' experiences of sexual violence perpetration. The revised Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Perpetration (Koss et al., 2007) includes seven items that are used to assess the frequency of perpetration of sexual violence behaviors and three questions that explore the sex of the victims and if the individual believes they have perpetrated a rape. We will be using these to assess the number of times an individual has perpetrated sexual violence over the last 3 months from 0 to 3+ times. The results will be scored as a percentage of participants who have perpetrated each individual behavior and the percentage who believe they have perpetrated a rape.
3-months
5-Month Sexual Violence Perpetration
Periodo de tiempo: 5-months
The 10-item Sexual Experiences Survey will be used to measure participants' experiences of sexual violence perpetration. The revised Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Perpetration (Koss et al., 2007) includes seven items that are used to assess the frequency of perpetration of sexual violence behaviors and three questions that explore the sex of the victims and if the individual believes they have perpetrated a rape. We will be using these to assess the number of times an individual has perpetrated sexual violence over the last 5 months from 0 to 3+ times. The results will be scored as a percentage of participants who have perpetrated each individual behavior and the percentage who believe they have perpetrated a rape.
5-months
3-Month Sexual Violence Knowledge
Periodo de tiempo: 3-months
An 8-item (investigator created) scale will be used to measure participants' sexual violence knowledge at 3-months. The investigator-created sexual violence knowledge questions are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 5 (Strongly Disagree) and the scores will be reverse-coded and summed for a total sexual violence knowledge score ranging from 8 - 40, with higher scores indicating more sexual violence knowledge.
3-months
5-Month Sexual Violence Knowledge
Periodo de tiempo: 5-months
An 8-item (investigator created) scale will be used to measure participants' sexual violence knowledge at 5-months. The investigator-created sexual violence knowledge questions are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 5 (Strongly Disagree) and the scores will be reverse-coded and summed for a total sexual violence knowledge score ranging from 8 - 40, with higher scores indicating more sexual violence knowledge.
5-months
3-Month Sexual Relationship Power
Periodo de tiempo: 3-months
Fifteen items from the Relationship Control sub-scale of the Sexual Relationship Power Scale will be used to measure power dynamics within participants' sexual relationships at 3-months. The Relationship Control Sub-scale Items (Pulerwitz, Gortmaker, & DeJong, 2000) are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 4 (Strongly Disagree). Scores are summed with total scores ranging from 15-60. Higher scores represent higher sexual relationship power.
3-months
5-Month Sexual Relationship Power
Periodo de tiempo: 5-months
Fifteen items from the Relationship Control sub-scale of the Sexual Relationship Power Scale will be used to measure power dynamics within participants' sexual relationships at 5-months. The Relationship Control Sub-scale Items (Pulerwitz, Gortmaker, & DeJong, 2000) are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 4 (Strongly Disagree). Scores are summed with total scores ranging from 15-60. Higher scores represent higher sexual relationship power.
5-months
3-Month Rape Myth Acceptance
Periodo de tiempo: 3-months
The 22-item modified Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance scale will be used to measure attitudes endorsing rape myths at 3-months. The modified Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale (McMahon & Farmer, 2011) is scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 5 (Strongly Disagree). It includes four sub-scales (She asked for it, He didn't mean to, It wasn't really rape, and She lied). The items in each sub-scale can be summed for a total score and the scores for the entire scale can be summed for a cumulative score. Scores on the full scale range from 22-110. Scores on the She Asked For It and He Didn't Mean To sub-scales range from 6-30. Scores on the It Wasn't Really Rape and the She Lied sub-scales range from 5-25. Higher scores indicate greater rejection of rape myths.
3-months
5-Month Rape Myth Acceptance
Periodo de tiempo: 5-months
The 22-item modified Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance scale will be used to measure attitudes endorsing rape myths at 5-months. The modified Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale (McMahon & Farmer, 2011) is scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 5 (Strongly Disagree). It includes four sub-scales (She asked for it, He didn't mean to, It wasn't really rape, and She lied). The items in each sub-scale can be summed for a total score and the scores for the entire scale can be summed for a cumulative score. Scores on the full scale range from 22-110. Scores on the She Asked For It and He Didn't Mean To sub-scales range from 6-30. Scores on the It Wasn't Really Rape and the She Lied sub-scales range from 5-25. Higher scores indicate greater rejection of rape myths.
5-months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Michelle L Munro-Kramer, PhD,CNM,FNP, University of Michigan

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

22 de octubre de 2017

Finalización primaria (Actual)

28 de abril de 2018

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

28 de abril de 2018

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

17 de octubre de 2017

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

17 de octubre de 2017

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

23 de octubre de 2017

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

10 de mayo de 2019

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

9 de mayo de 2019

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2019

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • HUM00133004
  • KL2TR000434 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)
  • KL2TR002241 (Subvención/contrato del NIH de EE. UU.)
  • CSA-16-17 (Otro identificador: Michigan Department of State Police, Grants and Community Services Division)

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

NO

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir