A Pilot Study Testing a Life Skills Application to Address Interpersonal Relationships in College (MKit)
9. maj 2019 opdateret af: Michelle Munro-Kramer, University of Michigan
MKit: A Pilot Study Testing a Life Skills Application to Address Interpersonal Relationships in College
This study utilizes implementation science principles to culturally adapt a pre-existing web-based application (WebApp) for use with college students.
The ADAPT-ITT process will be utilized to adapt the WebApp to a diverse (race, ethnicity, gender/sexual identity) college population with a focus on life skills and holistic self-care as reinforcement to currently available primary prevention programming available to incoming students.
The study hypothesis is that the adapted WebApp will be usable, acceptable, and students will be willing to use it as a reinforcement to current university primary prevention programming.
The study team will also monitor retention of participants over the academic year.
Studieoversigt
Status
Afsluttet
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Undersøgelsestype
Interventionel
Tilmelding (Faktiske)
261
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.
Studiesteder
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, Forenede Stater, 48109
- University of Michigan
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Ja
Køn, der er berettiget til at studere
Alle
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Currently enrolled as a student at the participating university (University of Michigan)
- Age 18 or older
- Willing to participate in the study
- Able to speak and read English
- Participated in Relationship Remix at Alice Lloyd Hall or Mosher-Jordan Hall during the Fall of 2017. These residence halls were selected due to their similar sizes and demographic populations to allow for "approximate matching" between the control and intervention group.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Did not complete the Relationship Remix session
Studieplan
Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Forebyggelse
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Ingen (Åben etiket)
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentel: MKit WebApp Intervention
Interventionsarmen vil modtage den sædvanlige plejepakke til indkommende studerende ved University of Michigan, som omfatter: 1) Haven, et online modul om sunde forhold og seksuel vold afsluttet før de kom til campus; 2) Relationship Remix, et interaktivt peer-leveret program om sunde forhold og seksuel vold; og 3) Change it Up, en pædagogisk teaterforestilling med tilskuerintervention leveret af studerende skuespillere.
Derudover får de adgang til MKit WebApp, som giver dem adgang til indhold, målsætning og ressourcer til 14 emneområder.
|
MKit er en webbaseret applikation, der bruger en livsfærdighedstilgang til at håndtere sunde forhold og seksuel vold.
Det inkluderer 14 fliser, som inkorporerer information, målsætning og ressourcer.
|
|
Ingen indgriben: Standard for pleje
Kontrolarmen vil modtage den sædvanlige plejepakke for indkommende studerende ved University of Michigan, som omfatter: 1) Haven, et onlinemodul om sunde forhold og seksuel vold afsluttet før de kom til campus; 2) Relationship Remix, et interaktivt peer-leveret program om sunde forhold og seksuel vold; og 3) Change it Up, en pædagogisk teaterforestilling med tilskuerintervention leveret af studerende skuespillere.
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
3-Month Usability
Tidsramme: 3-months
|
The 10-item System Usability Scale will be used to evaluate the usability of WebApp in the intervention group only.
The System Usability Scale (Brook, 1996) includes 10 items that are rated from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).
To get a final score the: 1) First, one is subtracted from the score of the odd items; 2) Second, the responses are subtracted from 5 for the even-numbered items; 3) Then the responses are summed and multiplied by 2.5 to get a range of 0-100.
A score above 68 is considered above average.
|
3-months
|
|
5-Month Usability
Tidsramme: 5-months
|
The 10-item System Usability Scale will be used to evaluate the usability of WebApp in the intervention group only.
The System Usability Scale (Brook, 1996) includes 10 items that are rated from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).
To get a final score the: 1) First, one is subtracted from the score of the odd items; 2) Second, the responses are subtracted from 5 for the even-numbered items; 3) Then the responses are summed and multiplied by 2.5 to get a range of 0-100.
A score above 68 is considered above average.
|
5-months
|
|
3-Month Acceptability
Tidsramme: 3-months
|
The 5-item System Acceptability Scale (investigator created) will be used to evaluate the acceptability of the WebApp in the intervention group only.
An investigator-created acceptability scale with 5-items will be used to measure acceptability.
Four items are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree/Very Likely) to 5 (Strongly Disagree/Very Unlikely) and will be reverse coded.
One item assess the frequency of use of the WebApp from 1 (Never) to 5 (Multiple times a week).
All five items will be summed for a total score.
Scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
|
3-months
|
|
5-Month Acceptability
Tidsramme: 5-months
|
The 5-item System Acceptability Scale (investigator created) will be used to evaluate the acceptability of the WebApp in the intervention group only.
An investigator-created acceptability scale with 5-items will be used to measure acceptability.
Four items are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree/Very Likely) to 5 (Strongly Disagree/Very Unlikely) and will be reverse coded.
One item assess the frequency of use of the WebApp from 1 (Never) to 5 (Multiple times a week).
All five items will be summed for a total score.
Scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
|
5-months
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
3-Month Retention
Tidsramme: 3-months
|
The retention rate will be calculated based on how many participants in the intervention group have completed the follow-up surveys.
A total retention score (those retained/those enrolled) will be computed based on interaction with the WebApp.
|
3-months
|
|
5-Month Retention
Tidsramme: 5-months
|
The retention rate will be calculated based on how many participants in the intervention group have completed the follow-up surveys.
A total retention score (those retained/those enrolled) will be computed based on interaction with the WebApp.
|
5-months
|
Andre resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
3-Month Sexual Violence Victimization
Tidsramme: 3-months
|
The 10-item Sexual Experiences Survey will be used to measure participants' experiences of sexual violence victimization.
The revised Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Victimization (Koss et al., 2007) includes 10 items that are used to assess the frequency of seven victimization behaviors and then uses three questions to explore the sex of the perpetrator and if the participant believes they were raped.
We will be items 1-7 to assess the number of times an individual has experienced victimization over the last 3 months from 0 to 3+ times.
The results will be scored as a percentage of participants who have experienced each individual behavior and the percentage who report that they have experienced a rape.
|
3-months
|
|
5-Month Sexual Violence Victimization
Tidsramme: 5-months
|
The 10-item Sexual Experiences Survey will be used to measure participants' experiences of sexual violence victimization.
The revised Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Victimization (Koss et al., 2007) includes 10 items that are used to assess the frequency of seven victimization behaviors and then uses three questions to explore the sex of the perpetrator and if the participant believes they were raped.
We will be items 1-7 to assess the number of times an individual has experienced victimization over the last 5 months from 0 to 3+ times.
The results will be scored as a percentage of participants who have experienced each individual behavior and the percentage who report that they have experienced a rape.
|
5-months
|
|
3-Month Sexual Violence Perpetration
Tidsramme: 3-months
|
The 10-item Sexual Experiences Survey will be used to measure participants' experiences of sexual violence perpetration.
The revised Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Perpetration (Koss et al., 2007) includes seven items that are used to assess the frequency of perpetration of sexual violence behaviors and three questions that explore the sex of the victims and if the individual believes they have perpetrated a rape.
We will be using these to assess the number of times an individual has perpetrated sexual violence over the last 3 months from 0 to 3+ times.
The results will be scored as a percentage of participants who have perpetrated each individual behavior and the percentage who believe they have perpetrated a rape.
|
3-months
|
|
5-Month Sexual Violence Perpetration
Tidsramme: 5-months
|
The 10-item Sexual Experiences Survey will be used to measure participants' experiences of sexual violence perpetration.
The revised Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Perpetration (Koss et al., 2007) includes seven items that are used to assess the frequency of perpetration of sexual violence behaviors and three questions that explore the sex of the victims and if the individual believes they have perpetrated a rape.
We will be using these to assess the number of times an individual has perpetrated sexual violence over the last 5 months from 0 to 3+ times.
The results will be scored as a percentage of participants who have perpetrated each individual behavior and the percentage who believe they have perpetrated a rape.
|
5-months
|
|
3-Month Sexual Violence Knowledge
Tidsramme: 3-months
|
An 8-item (investigator created) scale will be used to measure participants' sexual violence knowledge at 3-months.
The investigator-created sexual violence knowledge questions are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 5 (Strongly Disagree) and the scores will be reverse-coded and summed for a total sexual violence knowledge score ranging from 8 - 40, with higher scores indicating more sexual violence knowledge.
|
3-months
|
|
5-Month Sexual Violence Knowledge
Tidsramme: 5-months
|
An 8-item (investigator created) scale will be used to measure participants' sexual violence knowledge at 5-months.
The investigator-created sexual violence knowledge questions are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 5 (Strongly Disagree) and the scores will be reverse-coded and summed for a total sexual violence knowledge score ranging from 8 - 40, with higher scores indicating more sexual violence knowledge.
|
5-months
|
|
3-Month Sexual Relationship Power
Tidsramme: 3-months
|
Fifteen items from the Relationship Control sub-scale of the Sexual Relationship Power Scale will be used to measure power dynamics within participants' sexual relationships at 3-months.
The Relationship Control Sub-scale Items (Pulerwitz, Gortmaker, & DeJong, 2000) are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 4 (Strongly Disagree).
Scores are summed with total scores ranging from 15-60.
Higher scores represent higher sexual relationship power.
|
3-months
|
|
5-Month Sexual Relationship Power
Tidsramme: 5-months
|
Fifteen items from the Relationship Control sub-scale of the Sexual Relationship Power Scale will be used to measure power dynamics within participants' sexual relationships at 5-months.
The Relationship Control Sub-scale Items (Pulerwitz, Gortmaker, & DeJong, 2000) are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 4 (Strongly Disagree).
Scores are summed with total scores ranging from 15-60.
Higher scores represent higher sexual relationship power.
|
5-months
|
|
3-Month Rape Myth Acceptance
Tidsramme: 3-months
|
The 22-item modified Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance scale will be used to measure attitudes endorsing rape myths at 3-months.
The modified Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale (McMahon & Farmer, 2011) is scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 5 (Strongly Disagree).
It includes four sub-scales (She asked for it, He didn't mean to, It wasn't really rape, and She lied).
The items in each sub-scale can be summed for a total score and the scores for the entire scale can be summed for a cumulative score.
Scores on the full scale range from 22-110.
Scores on the She Asked For It and He Didn't Mean To sub-scales range from 6-30.
Scores on the It Wasn't Really Rape and the She Lied sub-scales range from 5-25.
Higher scores indicate greater rejection of rape myths.
|
3-months
|
|
5-Month Rape Myth Acceptance
Tidsramme: 5-months
|
The 22-item modified Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance scale will be used to measure attitudes endorsing rape myths at 5-months.
The modified Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale (McMahon & Farmer, 2011) is scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 5 (Strongly Disagree).
It includes four sub-scales (She asked for it, He didn't mean to, It wasn't really rape, and She lied).
The items in each sub-scale can be summed for a total score and the scores for the entire scale can be summed for a cumulative score.
Scores on the full scale range from 22-110.
Scores on the She Asked For It and He Didn't Mean To sub-scales range from 6-30.
Scores on the It Wasn't Really Rape and the She Lied sub-scales range from 5-25.
Higher scores indicate greater rejection of rape myths.
|
5-months
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.
Sponsor
Efterforskere
- Ledende efterforsker: Michelle L Munro-Kramer, PhD,CNM,FNP, University of Michigan
Datoer for undersøgelser
Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
22. oktober 2017
Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)
28. april 2018
Studieafslutning (Faktiske)
28. april 2018
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
17. oktober 2017
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
17. oktober 2017
Først opslået (Faktiske)
23. oktober 2017
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
10. maj 2019
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
9. maj 2019
Sidst verificeret
1. maj 2019
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- HUM00133004
- KL2TR000434 (U.S. NIH-bevilling/kontrakt)
- KL2TR002241 (U.S. NIH-bevilling/kontrakt)
- CSA-16-17 (Anden identifikator: Michigan Department of State Police, Grants and Community Services Division)
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
INGEN
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Ingen
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Ingen
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .
Kliniske forsøg med Seksuel vold
-
Ivix LLXAfsluttetHypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD)Den Russiske Føderation
-
Ivix LLXAfsluttetHypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD)Den Russiske Føderation
-
University of British ColumbiaAfsluttetHypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD)Canada
-
Warner ChilcottAfsluttetHypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD)Forenede Stater, Australien, Canada
-
EndoCeutics Inc.AMAG Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Trukket tilbageHypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD)Forenede Stater
-
TriHealth Inc.TriHealth Medical Education Research FundAfsluttetHypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder (HSDD) | Lav libido | Kvindelig seksuel dysfunktion (FSD)Forenede Stater
Kliniske forsøg med MKit
-
University of MichiganNational Institutes of Health (NIH)AfsluttetSeksuel vold | Primær forebyggelseForenede Stater