A Pilot Study Testing a Life Skills Application to Address Interpersonal Relationships in College (MKit)
9 de maio de 2019 atualizado por: Michelle Munro-Kramer, University of Michigan
MKit: A Pilot Study Testing a Life Skills Application to Address Interpersonal Relationships in College
This study utilizes implementation science principles to culturally adapt a pre-existing web-based application (WebApp) for use with college students.
The ADAPT-ITT process will be utilized to adapt the WebApp to a diverse (race, ethnicity, gender/sexual identity) college population with a focus on life skills and holistic self-care as reinforcement to currently available primary prevention programming available to incoming students.
The study hypothesis is that the adapted WebApp will be usable, acceptable, and students will be willing to use it as a reinforcement to current university primary prevention programming.
The study team will also monitor retention of participants over the academic year.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Concluído
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Tipo de estudo
Intervencional
Inscrição (Real)
261
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.
Locais de estudo
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, Estados Unidos, 48109
- University of Michigan
-
-
Critérios de participação
Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
18 anos e mais velhos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Sim
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Tudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
- Currently enrolled as a student at the participating university (University of Michigan)
- Age 18 or older
- Willing to participate in the study
- Able to speak and read English
- Participated in Relationship Remix at Alice Lloyd Hall or Mosher-Jordan Hall during the Fall of 2017. These residence halls were selected due to their similar sizes and demographic populations to allow for "approximate matching" between the control and intervention group.
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Did not complete the Relationship Remix session
Plano de estudo
Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Prevenção
- Alocação: Randomizado
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervenção MKit WebApp
O braço de intervenção receberá o padrão usual de pacote de treinamento de atendimento para alunos que chegam à Universidade de Michigan, que inclui: 1) Haven, um módulo on-line sobre relacionamentos saudáveis e violência sexual concluído antes de vir para o campus; 2) Relationship Remix, um programa interativo entregue por pares sobre relacionamentos saudáveis e violência sexual; e 3) Change it Up, uma performance de teatro educacional com intervenção do espectador apresentada por atores estudantis.
Além disso, eles terão acesso ao MKit WebApp, que lhes dará acesso a conteúdo, definição de metas e recursos para 14 áreas temáticas.
|
O MKit é um aplicativo baseado na web que usa uma abordagem de habilidades para a vida para lidar com relacionamentos saudáveis e violência sexual.
Inclui 14 peças que incorporam informações, definição de metas e recursos.
|
|
Sem intervenção: Padrão de atendimento
O braço de controle receberá o padrão usual de pacote de treinamento de cuidados para os alunos que chegam à Universidade de Michigan, que inclui: 1) Haven, um módulo on-line sobre relacionamentos saudáveis e violência sexual concluído antes de vir para o campus; 2) Relationship Remix, um programa interativo entregue por pares sobre relacionamentos saudáveis e violência sexual; e 3) Change it Up, uma performance de teatro educacional com intervenção do espectador apresentada por atores estudantis.
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
3-Month Usability
Prazo: 3-months
|
The 10-item System Usability Scale will be used to evaluate the usability of WebApp in the intervention group only.
The System Usability Scale (Brook, 1996) includes 10 items that are rated from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).
To get a final score the: 1) First, one is subtracted from the score of the odd items; 2) Second, the responses are subtracted from 5 for the even-numbered items; 3) Then the responses are summed and multiplied by 2.5 to get a range of 0-100.
A score above 68 is considered above average.
|
3-months
|
|
5-Month Usability
Prazo: 5-months
|
The 10-item System Usability Scale will be used to evaluate the usability of WebApp in the intervention group only.
The System Usability Scale (Brook, 1996) includes 10 items that are rated from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 5 (Strongly Agree).
To get a final score the: 1) First, one is subtracted from the score of the odd items; 2) Second, the responses are subtracted from 5 for the even-numbered items; 3) Then the responses are summed and multiplied by 2.5 to get a range of 0-100.
A score above 68 is considered above average.
|
5-months
|
|
3-Month Acceptability
Prazo: 3-months
|
The 5-item System Acceptability Scale (investigator created) will be used to evaluate the acceptability of the WebApp in the intervention group only.
An investigator-created acceptability scale with 5-items will be used to measure acceptability.
Four items are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree/Very Likely) to 5 (Strongly Disagree/Very Unlikely) and will be reverse coded.
One item assess the frequency of use of the WebApp from 1 (Never) to 5 (Multiple times a week).
All five items will be summed for a total score.
Scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
|
3-months
|
|
5-Month Acceptability
Prazo: 5-months
|
The 5-item System Acceptability Scale (investigator created) will be used to evaluate the acceptability of the WebApp in the intervention group only.
An investigator-created acceptability scale with 5-items will be used to measure acceptability.
Four items are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree/Very Likely) to 5 (Strongly Disagree/Very Unlikely) and will be reverse coded.
One item assess the frequency of use of the WebApp from 1 (Never) to 5 (Multiple times a week).
All five items will be summed for a total score.
Scores range from 5-25, with higher scores indicating greater acceptability.
|
5-months
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
3-Month Retention
Prazo: 3-months
|
The retention rate will be calculated based on how many participants in the intervention group have completed the follow-up surveys.
A total retention score (those retained/those enrolled) will be computed based on interaction with the WebApp.
|
3-months
|
|
5-Month Retention
Prazo: 5-months
|
The retention rate will be calculated based on how many participants in the intervention group have completed the follow-up surveys.
A total retention score (those retained/those enrolled) will be computed based on interaction with the WebApp.
|
5-months
|
Outras medidas de resultado
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
3-Month Sexual Violence Victimization
Prazo: 3-months
|
The 10-item Sexual Experiences Survey will be used to measure participants' experiences of sexual violence victimization.
The revised Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Victimization (Koss et al., 2007) includes 10 items that are used to assess the frequency of seven victimization behaviors and then uses three questions to explore the sex of the perpetrator and if the participant believes they were raped.
We will be items 1-7 to assess the number of times an individual has experienced victimization over the last 3 months from 0 to 3+ times.
The results will be scored as a percentage of participants who have experienced each individual behavior and the percentage who report that they have experienced a rape.
|
3-months
|
|
5-Month Sexual Violence Victimization
Prazo: 5-months
|
The 10-item Sexual Experiences Survey will be used to measure participants' experiences of sexual violence victimization.
The revised Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Victimization (Koss et al., 2007) includes 10 items that are used to assess the frequency of seven victimization behaviors and then uses three questions to explore the sex of the perpetrator and if the participant believes they were raped.
We will be items 1-7 to assess the number of times an individual has experienced victimization over the last 5 months from 0 to 3+ times.
The results will be scored as a percentage of participants who have experienced each individual behavior and the percentage who report that they have experienced a rape.
|
5-months
|
|
3-Month Sexual Violence Perpetration
Prazo: 3-months
|
The 10-item Sexual Experiences Survey will be used to measure participants' experiences of sexual violence perpetration.
The revised Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Perpetration (Koss et al., 2007) includes seven items that are used to assess the frequency of perpetration of sexual violence behaviors and three questions that explore the sex of the victims and if the individual believes they have perpetrated a rape.
We will be using these to assess the number of times an individual has perpetrated sexual violence over the last 3 months from 0 to 3+ times.
The results will be scored as a percentage of participants who have perpetrated each individual behavior and the percentage who believe they have perpetrated a rape.
|
3-months
|
|
5-Month Sexual Violence Perpetration
Prazo: 5-months
|
The 10-item Sexual Experiences Survey will be used to measure participants' experiences of sexual violence perpetration.
The revised Sexual Experiences Survey - Short Form Perpetration (Koss et al., 2007) includes seven items that are used to assess the frequency of perpetration of sexual violence behaviors and three questions that explore the sex of the victims and if the individual believes they have perpetrated a rape.
We will be using these to assess the number of times an individual has perpetrated sexual violence over the last 5 months from 0 to 3+ times.
The results will be scored as a percentage of participants who have perpetrated each individual behavior and the percentage who believe they have perpetrated a rape.
|
5-months
|
|
3-Month Sexual Violence Knowledge
Prazo: 3-months
|
An 8-item (investigator created) scale will be used to measure participants' sexual violence knowledge at 3-months.
The investigator-created sexual violence knowledge questions are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 5 (Strongly Disagree) and the scores will be reverse-coded and summed for a total sexual violence knowledge score ranging from 8 - 40, with higher scores indicating more sexual violence knowledge.
|
3-months
|
|
5-Month Sexual Violence Knowledge
Prazo: 5-months
|
An 8-item (investigator created) scale will be used to measure participants' sexual violence knowledge at 5-months.
The investigator-created sexual violence knowledge questions are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 5 (Strongly Disagree) and the scores will be reverse-coded and summed for a total sexual violence knowledge score ranging from 8 - 40, with higher scores indicating more sexual violence knowledge.
|
5-months
|
|
3-Month Sexual Relationship Power
Prazo: 3-months
|
Fifteen items from the Relationship Control sub-scale of the Sexual Relationship Power Scale will be used to measure power dynamics within participants' sexual relationships at 3-months.
The Relationship Control Sub-scale Items (Pulerwitz, Gortmaker, & DeJong, 2000) are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 4 (Strongly Disagree).
Scores are summed with total scores ranging from 15-60.
Higher scores represent higher sexual relationship power.
|
3-months
|
|
5-Month Sexual Relationship Power
Prazo: 5-months
|
Fifteen items from the Relationship Control sub-scale of the Sexual Relationship Power Scale will be used to measure power dynamics within participants' sexual relationships at 5-months.
The Relationship Control Sub-scale Items (Pulerwitz, Gortmaker, & DeJong, 2000) are scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 4 (Strongly Disagree).
Scores are summed with total scores ranging from 15-60.
Higher scores represent higher sexual relationship power.
|
5-months
|
|
3-Month Rape Myth Acceptance
Prazo: 3-months
|
The 22-item modified Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance scale will be used to measure attitudes endorsing rape myths at 3-months.
The modified Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale (McMahon & Farmer, 2011) is scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 5 (Strongly Disagree).
It includes four sub-scales (She asked for it, He didn't mean to, It wasn't really rape, and She lied).
The items in each sub-scale can be summed for a total score and the scores for the entire scale can be summed for a cumulative score.
Scores on the full scale range from 22-110.
Scores on the She Asked For It and He Didn't Mean To sub-scales range from 6-30.
Scores on the It Wasn't Really Rape and the She Lied sub-scales range from 5-25.
Higher scores indicate greater rejection of rape myths.
|
3-months
|
|
5-Month Rape Myth Acceptance
Prazo: 5-months
|
The 22-item modified Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance scale will be used to measure attitudes endorsing rape myths at 5-months.
The modified Illinois Rape Myth Acceptance Scale (McMahon & Farmer, 2011) is scored from 1 (Strongly Agree) to 5 (Strongly Disagree).
It includes four sub-scales (She asked for it, He didn't mean to, It wasn't really rape, and She lied).
The items in each sub-scale can be summed for a total score and the scores for the entire scale can be summed for a cumulative score.
Scores on the full scale range from 22-110.
Scores on the She Asked For It and He Didn't Mean To sub-scales range from 6-30.
Scores on the It Wasn't Really Rape and the She Lied sub-scales range from 5-25.
Higher scores indicate greater rejection of rape myths.
|
5-months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Michelle L Munro-Kramer, PhD,CNM,FNP, University of Michigan
Datas de registro do estudo
Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
22 de outubro de 2017
Conclusão Primária (Real)
28 de abril de 2018
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
28 de abril de 2018
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
17 de outubro de 2017
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
17 de outubro de 2017
Primeira postagem (Real)
23 de outubro de 2017
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
10 de maio de 2019
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
9 de maio de 2019
Última verificação
1 de maio de 2019
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- HUM00133004
- KL2TR000434 (Concessão/Contrato do NIH dos EUA)
- KL2TR002241 (Concessão/Contrato do NIH dos EUA)
- CSA-16-17 (Outro identificador: Michigan Department of State Police, Grants and Community Services Division)
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
NÃO
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Não
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .