- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT04297735
Telemedicine Enabling Patients in Self-care Behaviors
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
Study will utilize the Telemedicine group and the Standard Visit group (30 patients each group) to determine
Endpoints:
- Time of recognition, time of diagnosis and time of intervention for arrhythmia. These times will be noted for each patient in each group and look for any difference in these times based upon gaining information from telemedicine visits versus 6 month follow up visit.
- Three surveys of patient Self efficacy of medications, activity, and arrhythmia knowledge utilizing three surveys in each group. Surveys will be answered at the start of the study and end of the study by every patient within each group.
Surveys:
MUSE- Medication Understanding and Self Efficacy Tool Shortened FSES- Functioning self efficacy scale ASTA- Arrhythmia specific symptoms and health related quality of life in connection with heart rhythm disturbance
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, Estados Unidos, 48109
- University of Michigan
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- Read and speak English
- 18 years of age or older
- Have a cardiac arrhythmia diagnosis
- Are willing to participate in the study and answer a pre and post survey.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any difficulty in understanding the study
- Does not have internet or a cell phone data plan
- Any life threatening arrhythmias
- Objection to working with nurse practitioners and physician assistants
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Comparador activo: Standard of care group
Discuss new arrhythmias, review symptoms, discuss methods to help symptoms, questions and answers, monitor devices every 3 months
|
Visits every 6 months is standard of care.
Otros nombres:
|
|
Experimental: Telemedicine group
Discuss new arrhythmias, review symptoms, discuss methods to help symptoms, questions and answers, monitor devices every 3 months
|
Conduct monthly telemedicine 'skype' visit
Review details of medication indication and use, activity recommendations and changes, and knowledge of arrhythmia changes and activities which are helpful with arrhythmia changes.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Time of recognition of an arrhythmia
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 6 months
|
Patient recognition of a probable arrhythmia
|
Up to 6 months
|
|
Time of diagnosis of arrhythmia
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 6 months
|
Time of diagnosis of arrhythmia by medical staff- at what point is the diagnosis present.
|
Up to 6 months
|
|
Time to treatment initiation of arrhythmia
Periodo de tiempo: Up to 6 months
|
The time- what point in time is the treatment plan innitiated
|
Up to 6 months
|
Medidas de resultado secundarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in self efficacy in medication use score as measured by the Medication Self Efficacy Tool (MUSE) survey
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 months
|
MUSE is 7 items which are evaluated to identify if the patient has a good overall understanding and perception of their medicine.
|
Baseline, 6 months
|
|
Change in functioning self efficacy score as measured by the 13 Item Shortened Function Self-efficacy Scale (FSES)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 months
|
The FSES is 13 questions with responses scored from 1 to 5 with a maximum score of 65.
Higher scores indicates higher level of functioning.
|
Baseline, 6 months
|
|
Change in self-efficacy of arrhythmia management score as measured by the Arrhythmia-Specific questionnaire in Tachycardia and Arrhythmias (ASTA) survey
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline, 6 months
|
The ASTA questionnaire is divided into three separate parts.
|
Baseline, 6 months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Investigadores
- Investigador principal: Kathleen Fasing, University of Michigan
- Silla de estudio: Hakan Oral, MD, University of Michigan
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Publicaciones Generales
- Varma N, Epstein AE, Irimpen A, Schweikert R, Love C; TRUST Investigators. Efficacy and safety of automatic remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator follow-up: the Lumos-T Safely Reduces Routine Office Device Follow-up (TRUST) trial. Circulation. 2010 Jul 27;122(4):325-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.937409. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
- Harden M, Nystrom B, Kulich K, Carlsson J, Bengtson A, Edvardsson N. Validity and reliability of a new, short symptom rating scale in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 Jul 15;7:65. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-65.
- Anderson, T, Bansler, J., Kensing, F. & Moll, J., Aligning concerns in telecare: Three concepts to guide the design of patient centered e-health, Computer supported cooperative work, 3 (6), 1181-1214, 2018.
- Dalouk K, Gandhi N, Jessel P, MacMurdy K, Zarraga IG, Lasarev M, Raitt M. Outcomes of Telemedicine Video-Conferencing Clinic Versus In-Person Clinic Follow-Up for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Recipients. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Sep;10(9):e005217. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005217.
- Dixon DL, Dunn SP, Kelly MS, McLlarky TR, Brown RE. Effectiveness of Pharmacist-Led Amiodarone Monitoring Services on Improving Adherence to Amiodarone Monitoring Recommendations: A Systematic Review. Pharmacotherapy. 2016 Feb;36(2):230-6. doi: 10.1002/phar.1697. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
- Estrada JC, Darbar D. Clinical use of and future perspectives on antiarrhythmic drugs. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2008 Dec;64(12):1139-46. doi: 10.1007/s00228-008-0555-x. Epub 2008 Sep 2.
- Goldschlager N, Epstein AE, Naccarelli GV, Olshansky B, Singh B, Collard HR, Murphy E; Practice Guidelines Sub-committee, North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (HRS). A practical guide for clinicians who treat patients with amiodarone: 2007. Heart Rhythm. 2007 Sep;4(9):1250-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2007.07.020. Epub 2007 Jul 20. Erratum In: Heart Rhythm. 2007 Dec;4(12):1590.
- Honeyman, E., Ding, H., Varnfield, M., & Karunanithi, M. Mobile health applications in cardiac care. Interventional cardiology, 6.2, 227-241, 2014.
- Klein-Wiele O, Faghih M, Dreesen S, Urbien R, Abdelghafor M, Kara K, Schulte-Hermes M, Garmer M, Gronemeyer D, Hailer B. A novel cross-sector telemedical approach to detect arrhythmia in primary care patients with palpitations using a patient-activated event recorder. Cardiol J. 2016;23(4):422-8. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2016.0033. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
- Lamarche L, Tejpal A, Mangin D. Self-efficacy for medication management: a systematic review of instruments. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2018 Jul 20;12:1279-1287. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S165749. eCollection 2018.
- Lowres N, Redfern J, Freedman SB, Orchard J, Bennett AA, Briffa T, Bauman A, Neubeck L. Choice of Health Options In prevention of Cardiovascular Events for people with Atrial Fibrillation (CHOICE-AF): A pilot study. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016 Feb;15(1):39-46. doi: 10.1177/1474515114549687. Epub 2014 Sep 3.
- Lopez-Villegas A, Catalan-Matamoros D, Robles-Musso E, Peiro S. Effectiveness of pacemaker tele-monitoring on quality of life, functional capacity, event detection and workload: The PONIENTE trial. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016 Nov;16(11):1188-1195. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12612. Epub 2015 Dec 4.
- Ryan P. Integrated Theory of Health Behavior Change: background and intervention development. Clin Nurse Spec. 2009 May-Jun;23(3):161-70; quiz 171-2. doi: 10.1097/NUR.0b013e3181a42373.
- Ryan P, Papanek P, Csuka ME, Brown ME, Hopkins S, Lynch S, Scheer V, Schlidt A, Yan K, Simpson P, Hoffman R; Striving to be Strong Team. Background and method of the Striving to be Strong study a RCT testing the efficacy of a m-health self-management intervention. Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Aug;71:80-87. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.06.006. Epub 2018 Jun 9.
- Suter P, Suter WN, Johnston D. Theory-based telehealth and patient empowerment. Popul Health Manag. 2011 Apr;14(2):87-92. doi: 10.1089/pop.2010.0013. Epub 2011 Jan 17.
- Sutton, B. D'Oranzio, Gopinethannair, R. Developing a robust monitoring program in your practice: Clinical, economic, and workflow considerations. Electrophysiology Lab Digest, 13 (2), 2013.
- Tarakji, K. For arrhythmia patients, virtual visits hold plenty of virtues. Electrophysiology consult QD, 12 (2), 2016.
- Tovel H, Carmel S. Function Self-Efficacy Scale-FSES: Development, Evaluation, and Contribution to Well-Being. Res Aging. 2016 Aug;38(6):643-64. doi: 10.1177/0164027515596583. Epub 2015 Aug 2.
- Varma N, Ricci RP. Telemedicine and cardiac implants: what is the benefit? Eur Heart J. 2013 Jul;34(25):1885-95. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehs388. Epub 2012 Dec 4.
- Walfridsson, Ulla. ASTA, University Hospital, Linkoping, Sweeden, 2012.
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- HUM00156966
Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)
¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .