Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Erector Spinae Plane Block for Rib Fracture Analgesia in the Emergency Department

15 de mayo de 2021 actualizado por: Dana Sajed, University of Southern California

Rib fractures, while in isolation are self-limited and benign, can be exquisitely painful. Poorly controlled rib fracture pain can compromise respiratory function leading to increased morbidity and mortality, especially in the elderly. Currently, opioid medications are the mainstay of analgesia but are associated with significant adverse effects, such as respiratory depression and delirium. In an effort to improve acute pain in the ED and concomitantly reduce opioid use, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has been implemented more frequently The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a relatively new ultrasound-guided procedure for thoracic analgesia.

Previously, the serratus anterior plane (SAP) block has been used for this indication. However, typical anatomical distribution limits the effectiveness of the SAP block to anterior rib fractures, while the majority of traumatic rib fractures are posterior, thus require a more central blockade such as the proposed ESPB. The ESPB can be done as a single injection into the superficial structures of the back under ultrasound guidance and as such, is a both a relatively safe and technically easy procedure to perform, especially in comparison to the more traditional alternatives of epidurals, paravertebral and intercostal injections.

There have been no prospective studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of the ESPB in the emergency department setting for acute rib fractures. The investigators hypothesize that the ESPB will provide improved acute pain scores in the emergency department compared to parental analgesia alone. Secondarily, investigators hypothesize that this will translate to less inpatient opioid requirements and improved incentive spirometry values.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Aún no reclutando

Descripción detallada

Rib fractures, while in isolation are self-limited and benign, can be exquisitely painful. Poorly controlled rib fracture pain can compromise respiratory function leading to increased morbidity and mortality, especially in the elderly. Currently, opioid medications are the mainstay of analgesia but are associated with significant adverse effects, such as respiratory depression and delirium. Additionally, even short courses can predispose to life-long addiction perpetuating the opioid epidemic. In an effort to improve acute pain in the ED and concomitantly reduce opioid use, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has been implemented more frequently. As an example, ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures have a promising track record for reducing opioid use and improving pain scores. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a relatively new ultrasound-guided procedure for thoracic analgesia. It was first described in 2016 by Forero, et al., as an effective alternative to traditional neuraxial blockade for post-operative and chronic thoracic pain. A recent literature review by Kot et al., 2019 revealed six prospective studies in post-operative patients concluding that the ESPB was at least as effective as opioids in thoracic pain reduction, easy to use and with a low complication rate. One prospective study in post-operative breast surgery patients demonstrated a reduction in morphine by 65% compared to control. Most literature on the ESPB in the ED are case reports, which demonstrate its versatility in a myriad of clinical situations such as renal colic, acute herpes zoster, acute transverse process fractures, extensive burns, mechanical back pain, acute pancreatitis and acute rib fractures. This review found the ESPB to be effective at reducing pain scores for all reported indications with no complications. The ESPB is a particularly attractive multimodal form of analgesia in the ED where acute traumatic rib fractures are a common presentation. Usually the involuntary splinting from acute pain results in the typical pulmonary complications, but high doses of opioids and the subsequent respiratory depressive effects can lead to higher rates of atelectasis, pneumonia and respiratory failure. In order to combat this "between a rock and a hard place" scenario, regional analgesia has emerged as an effective means of improving both pain respiratory mechanics. Previously, the serratus anterior plane (SAP) block has been used for this indication. However, typical anatomical distribution limits the effectiveness of the SAP block to anterior rib fractures, while the majority of traumatic rib fractures are posterior, thus require a more central blockade such as the proposed ESPB. The ESPB can be done as a single injection into the superficial structures of the back under ultrasound guidance and as such, is a both a relatively safe and technically easy procedure to perform, especially in comparison to the more traditional alternatives of epidurals, paravertebral and intercostal injections. Another consideration of these technically more difficult procedures is that they are relatively contraindicated in the anticoagulated patient precluding a substantial number of elderly patients from their therapeutic benefits. The aforementioned reviews have supported the safety of the ESPB with no complications reported. Specifically, of the 10 case reports utilizing this block in the ED, none reported any complications. The 3 cases reported by Luftig et al, in 2018 specific to ED management of acute rib fractures were technically feasible, highly efficacious and safe. However, there have been no prospective studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of the ESPB in the emergency department setting for acute rib fractures. The investigators hypothesize that the ESPB will provide improved acute pain scores in the emergency department compared to parental analgesia alone. Secondarily, the investigators hypothesize that this will translate to less inpatient opioid requirements and improved incentive spirometry values.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Anticipado)

40

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Estudio Contacto

  • Nombre: Dana Sajed
  • Número de teléfono: 858 361 4685
  • Correo electrónico: sajed@usc.edu

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

18 años y mayores (Adulto, Adulto Mayor)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >=18
  • At least 1 acute rib fracture. Acute defined as within 7 days of presentation.
  • Numerical pain score on presentation at least 5 out of 10. This will identify patients that justify the invasive procedure.
  • Admitted to hospital for at least 24 hours of observation.
  • Be able to consent and participate in study by assuming necessary positioning for intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypotension/shock (shock index >1.0, SBP < 90)
  • Distracting injury not amenable to ESPB as determined by the enrolling physician. (i.e extremity fracture, burn, laceration, contusion, joint dislocation, etc.)
  • Examples of patients not able to consent/participate are intubated patients or patients in spinal precautions (i.e c-collar)
  • Known hypersensitivity to local anesthetic
  • Evidence of infection at the proposed site of injection

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: ESPB Block
Patients with rib fracture randomized to block group
Nerve block with local anesthetic in the erector spinae plane
Otros nombres:
  • Bloqueo nervioso
  • Bloque erector de la columna
Comparador activo: Standard Care
Patients with rib fracture receiving IV analgesia/standard care
IV analgesia, typically Morphine/Opioid medications
Otros nombres:
  • Morfina
  • Opioide

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
To determine the effectiveness of the ESPB for pain management of acute rib fractures in the emergency department using a 10 point isual analog scale
Periodo de tiempo: 0, 1, 2 and 24 hours assessment
Change in pain level from fractures as measured using a visual analog scale
0, 1, 2 and 24 hours assessment

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Tom Mailhot, MD, LAC+USC Medical Center

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Anticipado)

1 de julio de 2021

Finalización primaria (Anticipado)

30 de junio de 2022

Finalización del estudio (Anticipado)

31 de agosto de 2022

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

12 de mayo de 2021

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

15 de mayo de 2021

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

19 de mayo de 2021

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

19 de mayo de 2021

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

15 de mayo de 2021

Última verificación

1 de mayo de 2021

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

No

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir