Questa pagina è stata tradotta automaticamente e l'accuratezza della traduzione non è garantita. Si prega di fare riferimento al Versione inglese per un testo di partenza.

Erector Spinae Plane Block for Rib Fracture Analgesia in the Emergency Department

15 maggio 2021 aggiornato da: Dana Sajed, University of Southern California

Rib fractures, while in isolation are self-limited and benign, can be exquisitely painful. Poorly controlled rib fracture pain can compromise respiratory function leading to increased morbidity and mortality, especially in the elderly. Currently, opioid medications are the mainstay of analgesia but are associated with significant adverse effects, such as respiratory depression and delirium. In an effort to improve acute pain in the ED and concomitantly reduce opioid use, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has been implemented more frequently The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a relatively new ultrasound-guided procedure for thoracic analgesia.

Previously, the serratus anterior plane (SAP) block has been used for this indication. However, typical anatomical distribution limits the effectiveness of the SAP block to anterior rib fractures, while the majority of traumatic rib fractures are posterior, thus require a more central blockade such as the proposed ESPB. The ESPB can be done as a single injection into the superficial structures of the back under ultrasound guidance and as such, is a both a relatively safe and technically easy procedure to perform, especially in comparison to the more traditional alternatives of epidurals, paravertebral and intercostal injections.

There have been no prospective studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of the ESPB in the emergency department setting for acute rib fractures. The investigators hypothesize that the ESPB will provide improved acute pain scores in the emergency department compared to parental analgesia alone. Secondarily, investigators hypothesize that this will translate to less inpatient opioid requirements and improved incentive spirometry values.

Panoramica dello studio

Stato

Non ancora reclutamento

Descrizione dettagliata

Rib fractures, while in isolation are self-limited and benign, can be exquisitely painful. Poorly controlled rib fracture pain can compromise respiratory function leading to increased morbidity and mortality, especially in the elderly. Currently, opioid medications are the mainstay of analgesia but are associated with significant adverse effects, such as respiratory depression and delirium. Additionally, even short courses can predispose to life-long addiction perpetuating the opioid epidemic. In an effort to improve acute pain in the ED and concomitantly reduce opioid use, ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia has been implemented more frequently. As an example, ultrasound-guided peripheral nerve blocks for hip fractures have a promising track record for reducing opioid use and improving pain scores. The erector spinae plane block (ESPB) is a relatively new ultrasound-guided procedure for thoracic analgesia. It was first described in 2016 by Forero, et al., as an effective alternative to traditional neuraxial blockade for post-operative and chronic thoracic pain. A recent literature review by Kot et al., 2019 revealed six prospective studies in post-operative patients concluding that the ESPB was at least as effective as opioids in thoracic pain reduction, easy to use and with a low complication rate. One prospective study in post-operative breast surgery patients demonstrated a reduction in morphine by 65% compared to control. Most literature on the ESPB in the ED are case reports, which demonstrate its versatility in a myriad of clinical situations such as renal colic, acute herpes zoster, acute transverse process fractures, extensive burns, mechanical back pain, acute pancreatitis and acute rib fractures. This review found the ESPB to be effective at reducing pain scores for all reported indications with no complications. The ESPB is a particularly attractive multimodal form of analgesia in the ED where acute traumatic rib fractures are a common presentation. Usually the involuntary splinting from acute pain results in the typical pulmonary complications, but high doses of opioids and the subsequent respiratory depressive effects can lead to higher rates of atelectasis, pneumonia and respiratory failure. In order to combat this "between a rock and a hard place" scenario, regional analgesia has emerged as an effective means of improving both pain respiratory mechanics. Previously, the serratus anterior plane (SAP) block has been used for this indication. However, typical anatomical distribution limits the effectiveness of the SAP block to anterior rib fractures, while the majority of traumatic rib fractures are posterior, thus require a more central blockade such as the proposed ESPB. The ESPB can be done as a single injection into the superficial structures of the back under ultrasound guidance and as such, is a both a relatively safe and technically easy procedure to perform, especially in comparison to the more traditional alternatives of epidurals, paravertebral and intercostal injections. Another consideration of these technically more difficult procedures is that they are relatively contraindicated in the anticoagulated patient precluding a substantial number of elderly patients from their therapeutic benefits. The aforementioned reviews have supported the safety of the ESPB with no complications reported. Specifically, of the 10 case reports utilizing this block in the ED, none reported any complications. The 3 cases reported by Luftig et al, in 2018 specific to ED management of acute rib fractures were technically feasible, highly efficacious and safe. However, there have been no prospective studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of the ESPB in the emergency department setting for acute rib fractures. The investigators hypothesize that the ESPB will provide improved acute pain scores in the emergency department compared to parental analgesia alone. Secondarily, the investigators hypothesize that this will translate to less inpatient opioid requirements and improved incentive spirometry values.

Tipo di studio

Interventistico

Iscrizione (Anticipato)

40

Fase

  • Non applicabile

Contatti e Sedi

Questa sezione fornisce i recapiti di coloro che conducono lo studio e informazioni su dove viene condotto lo studio.

Contatto studio

  • Nome: Dana Sajed
  • Numero di telefono: 858 361 4685
  • Email: sajed@usc.edu

Criteri di partecipazione

I ricercatori cercano persone che corrispondano a una certa descrizione, chiamata criteri di ammissibilità. Alcuni esempi di questi criteri sono le condizioni generali di salute di una persona o trattamenti precedenti.

Criteri di ammissibilità

Età idonea allo studio

18 anni e precedenti (Adulto, Adulto più anziano)

Accetta volontari sani

No

Sessi ammissibili allo studio

Tutto

Descrizione

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age >=18
  • At least 1 acute rib fracture. Acute defined as within 7 days of presentation.
  • Numerical pain score on presentation at least 5 out of 10. This will identify patients that justify the invasive procedure.
  • Admitted to hospital for at least 24 hours of observation.
  • Be able to consent and participate in study by assuming necessary positioning for intervention

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hypotension/shock (shock index >1.0, SBP < 90)
  • Distracting injury not amenable to ESPB as determined by the enrolling physician. (i.e extremity fracture, burn, laceration, contusion, joint dislocation, etc.)
  • Examples of patients not able to consent/participate are intubated patients or patients in spinal precautions (i.e c-collar)
  • Known hypersensitivity to local anesthetic
  • Evidence of infection at the proposed site of injection

Piano di studio

Questa sezione fornisce i dettagli del piano di studio, compreso il modo in cui lo studio è progettato e ciò che lo studio sta misurando.

Come è strutturato lo studio?

Dettagli di progettazione

  • Scopo principale: Trattamento
  • Assegnazione: Randomizzato
  • Modello interventistico: Assegnazione parallela
  • Mascheramento: Nessuno (etichetta aperta)

Armi e interventi

Gruppo di partecipanti / Arm
Intervento / Trattamento
Sperimentale: ESPB Block
Patients with rib fracture randomized to block group
Nerve block with local anesthetic in the erector spinae plane
Altri nomi:
  • Blocco nervoso
  • Blocco erettore della spina dorsale
Comparatore attivo: Standard Care
Patients with rib fracture receiving IV analgesia/standard care
IV analgesia, typically Morphine/Opioid medications
Altri nomi:
  • Morfina
  • Oppiacei

Cosa sta misurando lo studio?

Misure di risultato primarie

Misura del risultato
Misura Descrizione
Lasso di tempo
To determine the effectiveness of the ESPB for pain management of acute rib fractures in the emergency department using a 10 point isual analog scale
Lasso di tempo: 0, 1, 2 and 24 hours assessment
Change in pain level from fractures as measured using a visual analog scale
0, 1, 2 and 24 hours assessment

Collaboratori e investigatori

Qui è dove troverai le persone e le organizzazioni coinvolte in questo studio.

Investigatori

  • Investigatore principale: Tom Mailhot, MD, LAC+USC Medical Center

Studiare le date dei record

Queste date tengono traccia dell'avanzamento della registrazione dello studio e dell'invio dei risultati di sintesi a ClinicalTrials.gov. I record degli studi e i risultati riportati vengono esaminati dalla National Library of Medicine (NLM) per assicurarsi che soddisfino specifici standard di controllo della qualità prima di essere pubblicati sul sito Web pubblico.

Studia le date principali

Inizio studio (Anticipato)

1 luglio 2021

Completamento primario (Anticipato)

30 giugno 2022

Completamento dello studio (Anticipato)

31 agosto 2022

Date di iscrizione allo studio

Primo inviato

12 maggio 2021

Primo inviato che soddisfa i criteri di controllo qualità

15 maggio 2021

Primo Inserito (Effettivo)

19 maggio 2021

Aggiornamenti dei record di studio

Ultimo aggiornamento pubblicato (Effettivo)

19 maggio 2021

Ultimo aggiornamento inviato che soddisfa i criteri QC

15 maggio 2021

Ultimo verificato

1 maggio 2021

Maggiori informazioni

Termini relativi a questo studio

Piano per i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)

Hai intenzione di condividere i dati dei singoli partecipanti (IPD)?

No

Informazioni su farmaci e dispositivi, documenti di studio

Studia un prodotto farmaceutico regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Studia un dispositivo regolamentato dalla FDA degli Stati Uniti

No

Queste informazioni sono state recuperate direttamente dal sito web clinicaltrials.gov senza alcuna modifica. In caso di richieste di modifica, rimozione o aggiornamento dei dettagli dello studio, contattare register@clinicaltrials.gov. Non appena verrà implementata una modifica su clinicaltrials.gov, questa verrà aggiornata automaticamente anche sul nostro sito web .

Prove cliniche su Erector Spinae Plane Block

3
Sottoscrivi