Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Impact Evaluation of GAIN Egg Campaign in Two Nigerian States

25 de junio de 2021 actualizado por: Edward Frongillo, Jr., University of South Carolina
Improved infant and young child feeding, including dietary quality and diversity, is important for child health and development. In the 2013 Nigeria Demographic and Health Survey, only 18% of children 6-23 months of age received at least 4 food groups in the previous 24 hours. In Kaduna, one of the poorest states, dietary diversity is low and consumption of eggs is infrequent, with households reporting consuming eggs only one day per week. Eggs are a nutrient-dense food, which can contribute enormously to a child's dietary quality. This study evaluates whether a 14-month behavior change intervention about eggs can increase the procurement and consumption of eggs in children 6-59 months of age living in Nigeria. The intervention includes delivery of messages about the health benefits of eggs through Above-the-line methods and Below-the-line methods. The intervention is evaluated using a longitudinal quasi-experimental design in two states in Nigeria with pre- and post-test questionnaires designed to assess changes in acquisition and consumption of eggs.

Descripción general del estudio

Estado

Terminado

Condiciones

Intervención / Tratamiento

Descripción detallada

The Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition (GAIN) seeks to improve dietary quality among children under-five years of age in Kaduna by increasing the demand for eggs through above-the-line and below-the-line behavior change interventions incorporating mass media, social media, and point-of-sale (POS) marketing. Above-the-line (ATL) interventions include television, radio, celebrity ambassadors and out-of-home (OOH) advertising (e.g., billboards). Below-the-line interventions (BTL) include interpersonal communication (IPC) activation, trade promotions, point-of-sale materials, food demonstrations and giveaways and door-to-door activation.

GAIN conducted a quasi-experimental longitudinal study of a demand creation campaign, using ATL and BTL interventions, among families of children 6-59 months of age to determine the impact on egg consumption among children and egg acquisition. Kaduna state was chosen as the intervention arm, and Kano state as the comparison arm. Within Kaduna state, the Kaduna North and Chikun local government areas (LGAs) were selected to receive ATL and BTL demand creation interventions. The comparison state, Kano, received no demand creation campaign.

The principal comparison for measuring the effect of demand creation interventions will be across states, comparing the combined effects of ATL and BTL interventions with the comparison areas which received no intervention.

Investigators also set out to determine the impact of this intervention on mediating outcomes in the hypothesized causal framework. Proximal mediators included caregivers' attitudes and beliefs toward eggs and willingness to pay for eggs.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

3453

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

      • Ibadan, Nigeria
        • University of Ibadan

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

6 meses a 4 años (Niño)

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

Sí

Géneros elegibles para el estudio

Todos

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Living in the project areas

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Vulnerable families (i.e., families headed by children, homeless families living on the street in the community, families with a severely mentally unstable head of household)

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Prevención
  • Asignación: No aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Único

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Egg demand creation campaign
Egg demand creation campaign using Above-the-line and Below-the-line methods for 14 months. Above-the-line interventions include television, radio, celebrity ambassadors and out-of-home advertising (e.g., billboards). Below-the-line interventions include interpersonal communication activation, trade promotions, point-of-sale materials, food demonstrations and giveaways and door-to-door activation.
Egg demand creation campaign including 14 months of above-the-line and below-the-line messaging.
Sin intervención: Comparison
Comparison arm with no campaign

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in the times eggs were consumed by children 6-59 months of age from baseline to endline
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline to 14 months
Change in the average number of times eggs were consumed in the past 7 days from baseline to endline in the two study arms
From baseline to 14 months
Change in the consumption of two or more eggs by children 6-59 months of age from baseline to endline
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline to 14 months
Change in the proportion of children consuming at least two eggs in the past 7 days from baseline to endline in the two study arms
From baseline to 14 months
Change in the availability of eggs by families of children 6-59 months of age from baseline to endline
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline to 14 months
Change in the proportion of households purchasing eggs and the change in the proportion of households acquiring eggs from baseline to endline in the two study arms
From baseline to 14 months

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Change in the consumption of any eggs by children 6-59 months from baseline to endline in the two study arms
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline to 14 months
Change in the consumption of one or more eggs by children 6-59 months of age from baseline to endline
From baseline to 14 months
Change in caregivers' (of children 6-59 months) attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge of eggs from baseline to endline
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline to 14 months
Change in the mean factor score created from Likert scales of attitudes (attitudes scale, higher score reflects better attitudes towards eggs), perceived benefits (benefits scale, higher score reflects better perceived benefits towards eggs), norms (norms scale, higher score reflects better norms towards eggs), self-efficacy (self-efficacy scale, higher score reflects better self-efficacy), and intention towards eggs (intent to feed eggs to child, higher score reflects more intent to feed eggs) from baseline to endline between the two study arms; change will be examined for a meta factor score combining all scales and each scale separately.
From baseline to 14 months
Change in caregivers' willingness to pay for eggs from baseline to endline
Periodo de tiempo: From baseline to 14 months
Change in willingness to pay for eggs, using for example the change in mean maximum price that caregivers would be willing to pay for eggs from baseline to endline between the two study arms.
From baseline to 14 months

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Edward A Frongillo, PhD, University of South Carolina

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

9 de septiembre de 2019

Finalización primaria (Actual)

8 de diciembre de 2020

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

8 de diciembre de 2020

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

15 de junio de 2021

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

15 de junio de 2021

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

23 de junio de 2021

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

30 de junio de 2021

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

25 de junio de 2021

Última verificación

1 de junio de 2021

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 101 (Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board)

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

SÍ

Descripción del plan IPD

Reports will be made available. We will provide information on how to make the request to have access to the partial or complete anonymized dataset.

Tipo de información de apoyo para compartir IPD

  • RSC

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir