- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensayos clínicos de EE. UU.
- Ensayo clínico NCT05385445
Electronic Medical Records to Increase Adherence to the Choosing Wisely Recommendations
The Use of Electronic Medical Records to Change Clinician Behaviour and Increase Adherence to the Choosing Wisely Recommendations
Audit and Feedback (A&F), a strategy aimed at promoting modified practice through performance feedback, is a method to change provider behaviour and reduce unnecessary medical services. This study aims to assess the use of A&F to change:
- antibiotic prescribing for viral infections
- antipsychotic prescribing to patients with dementia
- routine measure of vitamin D in low risk adults
- annual screening blood tests (without direct indication by the risk profile of the patient)
Descripción general del estudio
Estado
Condiciones
Intervención / Tratamiento
Descripción detallada
The investigators conducted a clustered randomized trial of primary care providers in Manitoba, Canada participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network (MaPCReN) to assess the impact of A&F interventions to change prescribing and screening rates.
In January 2016, MaPCReN included 239 providers in 46 practices across Manitoba, representing ~20% of Manitoba primary care providers. MaPCReN recruits consenting primary care providers (family physicians, nurse practitioners and community pediatricians) that receive semi-annual feedback reports for practice reflection and quality improvement. Feedback reports provide practice-level details including disease prevalence and clinical characteristics of patients, reported in comparison to other providers at the same practice, health region and provincially
Investigators implemented an A&F cycle reporting on practice behaviours related to four Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) recommendations.
A) "Don't use antibiotics for upper respiratory infections that are likely viral in origin, such as influenza-like illness, or self-limiting, such as sinus infections of less than seven days of duration." • Bacterial infections of the respiratory tract are rare and usually only secondary complications from initial viral infections. Antibiotics are rarely indicated for upper respiratory illness and patients may suffer adverse effects from antibiotics.
B) Don't routinely measure Vitamin D in low risk adults.
• Routine supplementation of vitamin D is recommended for people living in Northern climates regardless of measured laboratory levels. There is no indication for ordering vitamin D unless a patient is suffering severe renal or metabolic disease.
C) Don't do annual screening blood tests unless directly indicated by the risk profile of the patient.
• There is minimal value in ordering routine blood tests in asymptomatic patients and in fact some "routine" screening tests such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is in fact recommended against due to the likelihood of producing false positive results. This may lead to additional and unnecessary testing.
D) Don't prescribe antipsychotics to treat behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia.
• There are some instances where patients with behavioural symptoms of dementia require antipsychotic medicines although these instances are rare. These medicines should be used judiciously given for this indication because they provide limited benefit and may cause serious side effects including premature death
MaPCReN personnel randomly assigned numbers to clinics for randomization. Number of physicians practicing at each clinic was controlled during randomization.
The intervention "Group 1" received the standard feedback report with a one-page summary of the CWC recommendations of interest. Group 1 did not receive any data specific to their prescribing. Intervention "Group 2" received the standard feedback report, CWC recommendation summary and practice-specific data related to their prescribing rates for the CWC recommendations of interest, compared to rates for other providers at their clinic, in their health region and in the province. The control group received the standard feedback report with no information related to CWC.
The A&F intervention took place between January 2016 and January 2017. Retrospective Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data from the MaPCReN repository was assessed between January 2014-December 2019 to assess changes in prescribing rates during and immediately following the A&F intervention (2016/17), as well as assess continued change in practice after the A&F (2018/19) compared to prescribing rates prior to the A&F (2014/15). There were seven clinics not included in the 2018/19 analysis due to a change in EMR vendor that may have compromised data quality.
Tipo de estudio
Inscripción (Actual)
Fase
- No aplica
Contactos y Ubicaciones
Ubicaciones de estudio
-
-
Manitoba
-
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canadá, R3W0A8
- University of Manitoba, Department of Family Medicine
-
-
Criterios de participación
Criterio de elegibilidad
Edades elegibles para estudiar
- Niño
- Adulto
- Adulto Mayor
Acepta Voluntarios Saludables
Géneros elegibles para el estudio
Descripción
Inclusion Criteria:
- All primary care providers participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network (MaPCReN), the Manitoba practice-based network of the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Primary care providers not participating in MaPCReN
Plan de estudios
¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?
Detalles de diseño
- Propósito principal: Investigación de servicios de salud
- Asignación: Aleatorizado
- Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
- Enmascaramiento: Doble
Armas e Intervenciones
Grupo de participantes/brazo |
Intervención / Tratamiento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Audit and Feedback Group 1
The intervention "Group 1" received the standard feedback report with a one-page summary of the CWC recommendations of interest.
Group 1 did not receive any data specific to their prescribing.
|
The investigators conducted a clustered randomized trial of primary care providers in Manitoba, Canada participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network (MaPCReN) to assess the impact of Audit & Feedback interventions to change prescribing and laboratory ordering.
|
|
Experimental: Audit and Feedback Group 2
Intervention "Group 2" received the standard feedback report, CWC recommendation summary and practice-specific data related to their prescribing rates for the CWC recommendations of interest, compared to rates for other providers at their clinic, in their health region and in the province.
|
The investigators conducted a clustered randomized trial of primary care providers in Manitoba, Canada participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network (MaPCReN) to assess the impact of Audit & Feedback interventions to change prescribing and laboratory ordering.
|
|
Sin intervención: Control
The control group received the standard feedback report with no information related to CWC.
|
¿Qué mide el estudio?
Medidas de resultado primarias
Medida de resultado |
Medida Descripción |
Periodo de tiempo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in antibiotic prescribing for upper respiratory infections that are likely viral in origins
Periodo de tiempo: 12 months
|
Investigators assessed baseline prescribing (before the intervention, 2014/2015), and compared this to during the intervention (2016/2017) and following the intervention (2018/2019)
|
12 months
|
|
Change in prescribing of antipsychotics to treat behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia.
Periodo de tiempo: 12 months
|
Investigators assessed baseline prescribing (before the intervention, 2014/2015), and compared this to during the intervention (2016/2017) and following the intervention (2018/2019)
|
12 months
|
|
Change in Vitamin D laboratory testing
Periodo de tiempo: 12 months
|
Investigators assessed baseline ordering (before the intervention, 2014/2015), and compared this to during the intervention (2016/2017) and following the intervention (2018/2019)
|
12 months
|
|
Change in PSA ordering (annual screening)
Periodo de tiempo: 12 months
|
Investigators assessed baseline ordering (before the intervention, 2014/2015), and compared this to during the intervention (2016/2017) and following the intervention (2018/2019)
|
12 months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Publicaciones y enlaces útiles
Fechas de registro del estudio
Fechas importantes del estudio
Inicio del estudio (Actual)
Finalización primaria (Actual)
Finalización del estudio (Actual)
Fechas de registro del estudio
Enviado por primera vez
Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Publicado por primera vez (Actual)
Actualizaciones de registros de estudio
Última actualización publicada (Actual)
Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad
Última verificación
Más información
Términos relacionados con este estudio
Palabras clave
Términos MeSH relevantes adicionales
Otros números de identificación del estudio
- HS19281(H2016:022)
Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio
Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.
Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .